How could you, in the role of a community health nurse, address these concerns?

/in /by

Visit the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s MyEnvironment site at http://www.epa.gov/myenvironment (Links to an external site.), and enter your city and state, ZIP code, or location into the location box.

Choose one of the topic areas.

· My Health

· My Climate

· My Air

· My Water

Then, click on the boxes under the Map Contents menu to add data into the map on specific topics. Explore the site to learn more about your environment and things that might be impacting the health of its citizens.

· Identify something new you learned about your environment and how it could be affecting health by completing this statement, “I didn’t know _____.”

· How could you, in the role of a community health nurse, address these concerns?

Optional: For more environmental health information, you can also visit the following resources.

· Environmental health tracking: https://ephtracking.cdc.gov/InfoByLocation/ (Links to an external site.)

· Air quality: http://www.airnow.gov (Links to an external site.)

· Toxic release inventory: https://www.epa.gov/toxics-release-inventory-tri-program

 

“PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH ASSIGNMENT HELP TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT”

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

How is Cihahl or Ebsco Host different from ProQuest and Allied Health data bases? Which would you say is better and why?

/in /by

 

#1) The Institute of Medicine has stated a goal that 90% of practice be evidence-based by 2020. According to HealthyPeople.gov, the United States is currently at approximately 15%. Discuss two barriers that might hold nursing practice from achieving this goal, and suggest ways in which identified barriers may be addressed.

#2) Many nurses go to Sigma Theta Tau International to obtain and submit evidence-based research. Explain what this organization is and why it is so important to nursing scholarship, leadership and service. This post should be at least 150-200 words.

#3) How is Cihahl or Ebsco Host different from ProQuest and Allied Health data bases? Which would you say is better and why?

Please include in-text citations, and cite all factual information. References must be within the last 5 – 7 years.

 

“PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH graduate paper help TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT”

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

 Post an explanation of how you could apply key interventions supported by the scholarly research evidence to potentially help resolve the issue in measurable ways.

/in /by

 Post an explanation of how you could apply key interventions supported by the scholarly research evidence to potentially help resolve the issue in measurable ways. Continue to collaborate with the selected individuals in your practice environment as needed in the development of the Practice Experience Project, and share this information with your group.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Superior Essay Writers | The Business Logic of Sustainability

/in /by

Focus on the positive potential of profit and business: how about some good news for a change?

Three TED talks will start us off:

The Business Logic of Sustainability (Links to an external site.)
The Route to a Sustainable Future (Links to an external site.)
Let the Environment Guide our Development (Links to an external site.)
(This was from last week, make sure to watch it if you skipped it)

After all of the bad news this term, are you seeing any convergence of ideas here? Next, choose one of the following 4 TED talks to watch:
Let’s go all in on selling Sustainability (Links to an external site.)
Global Priorities (Links to an external site.)
How big brands can help save biodiversity (Links to an external site.)
Cradle to cradle Design (Links to an external site.)

(you can obviously watch more than one if you’re interested
After hearing about some potential solutions, how do you feel about the prospect of business and industry leading the shift toward sustainability?
Out of the 4+ talks you watched, is there one idea you feel more compelled to believe in or support?
After all of the bad news, is there hope? And can business and entrepreneurship play a role in a sustainable future?
The discussion board grading scheme:
Exceptional Participation
Average Participation

Sample Solution

The Rights of Transgender Americans: An Examination of the Conflict among Religion and the State Research question: How and to what degree do religiously traditionalist on-screen characters impact state approaches that oppress the privileges of transgender individuals in the United States today? In the United States, most trans individuals face separation in the work environment, courts, schools, military, and other open spaces. While mainstream society and religious gatherings alike are captivated in this open discussion, the victimization the privileges of trans individuals that exists today is determinedly because of the connection of two pivotal components: the principal factor is an absence of satisfactory strategies which explicitly ensure the common and human privileges of trans individuals on nearby and government levels; the subsequent factor is considerate society’s harmful enemy of trans talk in open talk, which frequently emphatically impacts the primary factor. What the two variables share practically speaking is an inseparable association with common and religious conservatism. Today, traditionalist religious entertainers, overwhelmingly Christians, can viably campaign conservative political authorities and agents to dispute against the privileges of trans individuals on nearby and government levels. Between the religiously moderate convictions of the two lobbyists and government authorities themselves, the state is rendered one-sided when shaping laws that influence the privileges of trans individuals. In this manner, the idea of partition of chapel and state isn’t constant as a general rule and, without secularization of the express, the counter trans talk of religious moderates proceeds to strongly oppress the privileges of trans individuals in policymaking. Furthermore, a huge segment of common society freely scatters a one-dimensional talk against trans individuals when examining how trans individuals ought to be treated in state strategy and society. This enemy of trans talk in common society bears a critical connection with the qualities that religious and mainstream preservationists straightforwardly express, and frequently has for all intents and purposes no premise in the truth of the lived encounters and mistreatment of trans individuals. The result of this association between preservationist religion, traditionalist common society, and a non-mainstream, conservative state is that most of laws in the United States victimize the privileges of trans individuals. In the interim, in this progressing open discussion, trans individuals are encountering genuine, significant mental disturbance because of exploitation and endure: today, trans individuals face an exceptional battle to obtain all out approval of their character and equivalent rights as natives of the state and individuals from common society, in both religious and mainstream spaces over the United States. As the perceivability, acknowledgment, and consideration of trans individuals ascends in religious and mainstream spaces crosswise over common society, trans individuals and their partners campaign the state to be incorporated into and secured by approaches at nearby and government levels, since most of enactment rejects and disappoints trans individuals. On a government level, trans individuals don’t have legitimate assurances from separation in light of the fact that the Equal Protection Clause of the constitution fails to expressly and reliably incorporate trans individuals in its denial of uncalled for and biased treatment dependent on sex and sexual orientation (Oakes 298). In like manner, no government law assigning trans individuals as an ensured class or explicitly requiring equivalent treatment for them exists, and all states with the exception of one preclude lawful acknowledgment from securing non-twofold and sexual orientation non-acclimating individuals (O’Hara, The Daily Dot). In open talk, the presence of trans individuals will in general conflict with the customary, traditional convictions of religious moderates, especially Christians, who base their cisnormative origination of sex and sex in a fundamentalist translation of the creation story inside sacred texts. By practicing the privilege of religious opportunity, numerous moderate Christians vocalize their enemy of trans talk so as to influence the state to shape strategies that maintain their religious convictions. For example, as later as August 2017, unmistakable individuals from the Trump-Pence Administration’s Evangelical Advisory Board took an interest in the national gathering of the Southern Baptist Convention’s Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission that discharged “The Nashville Statement”: “We certify that self-origination as a male or female ought to be characterized by God’s blessed purposes in creation and reclamation as uncovered in Scripture. We deny that receiving a gay or transgender self-origination is predictable with God’s sacred purposes in creation and recovery… We deny any commitment to talk in such ways that shame God’s plan of his picture bearers as male and female” (www.cbmw.org). While the partnership between moderate Christian consultants and the official part of government disregards division of chapel and express, the prominent scattering of this unequivocally religious proclamation prevents the sheer presence from securing trans individuals by referencing the scriptural sections as proof of a male-female sex and sexual orientation parallel. Additionally, most of the state enactment that as of now manages open spaces supports and mirrors this enemy of trans talk from Christian preservationists in this national talk, causing trans individuals to be additionally deceived because of underestimation and disappointment in common society. Inseparably connected, religious and mainstream moderates alike illuminate the manner in which common society sees sex as a non-navigable double, which thus worsens oppression trans individuals in state approaches. In the United States, overwhelming Christian convictions have empowered courts to decide that “God made a man that neither the law nor the therapeutic network could transform into a lady” and the other way around (Greenberg 66). Various wards and states have passed alleged washroom bills to limit the utilization of transgender individuals’ entrance to open bathrooms, compelling them to utilize ones that match their sex relegated during childbirth (Gerstenfeld 65). For instance, North Carolina’s restroom bills denies the privilege to sue under a state antidiscrimination law and Mississippi enables organizations to refuse any assistance to trans individuals based on religious convictions (Green, The Atlantic). In the open discussion on this questionable issue of restroom charges, Republican presidential applicant Mike Huckabee, who self-recognizes as Christian, declared, “Presently I wish that somebody revealed to me that when I was in secondary school that I could have felt like a lady when it came time to clean up in P.E. I’m almost certain that I would have discovered my ladylike side and stated, ‘Mentor, I think I’d preferably shower with the young ladies today’” (Bradner, CNN). In spite of the fact that there is no proof that trans-comprehensive and unbiased open spaces represent any dangers to cisgender individuals, trans individuals are physically and mentally damaged and defrauded by washroom bills. This enactment uncovers how hostile to trans talk from religious preservationists and mainstream entertainers quite often revolves around the unfair over-sexualization of trans individuals, and this extremism renders the presence of trans individuals as naturally unseemly and unreasonable due to their flighty and non-accommodating sexuality and sex personality. By taking advantage of common society’s uninformed nerves that trans individuals bring forth sex bedlam and ungrounded fears that defenseless kids and ladies are in danger of rape, religious traditionalists can successfully shape state arrangements that deny trans individuals access to an assortment of open spaces. A long way from an issue of protection or a security chance, these restroom charges deliberately eradicate trans individuals’ characters from open spaces, which avoids trans individuals from getting the help, assets, and administrations they have to completely exist and flourish as equivalent individuals from common society and natives of the state. As a foundationally persecuted minority, trans individuals are decreased to helpless residents of the United States, yet their minimization empowers religious preservationists to openly prevent the rights from securing trans individuals for the sake of ensuring their religion. In open talk, American minister Neil Cazares-Thomas comprehends “the establishments of outreaching Christianity in the United States as a purposeful vital endeavor to guarantee that Christians were at each degree of government. With that in mind, they have been very effective. Yet in addition thus, the congregation has turned into a portrayal of the way of life and not a portrayal of Jesus… Isn’t there detachment of chapel and state here? What’s more, in the event that it was valid, for what reason would you have a Christian clergyman or any pastor open a state occasion? There is this hazy line between the partition of chapel and state and the significance of God and religion in municipal life” (Dart, The Guardian). As preservationist Christians hold the most impact on the present organization, their convictions are fundamentally pertinent in the development of strategies that victimize trans individuals. Rather than this position in open discussion, the Texas Pastor Council asserted, “It’s truly is an ethical issue… It’s an open tolerability issues, it’s an open security issue… It’s not plainly religious by any stretch of the imagination. Tragically, it appears as though the main critical voice left that has any structure of contradicting such a law has originated from the congregation” (Caballero, Christian Daily). In light of this enemy of trans talk, there have been cases in which a trans parent’s tyke guardianship and appearance rights are now and again surrendered in light of the fact that their sex character is ventured to be innately unfit for a tyke’s prosperity according to preservationist Christianity (Cooper 9). Hushed by a mainstream society that weights them to endure trans individuals, traditionalist Christians look to campaign policymakers with an enemy of trans talk that interests to national,>

GET ANSWER

find the cost of your paper
 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Define global health and discuss the relation with community/public health nursing.

/in /by

Nursing and Global Health

1.  Define global health and discuss the relation with community/public health nursing.

2.  How a new nurse can take to get involved in international health care.

3.  Discuss how the disease affects the people globally and what nurses can do in global public health to address and its impact.

As stated in the syllabus present your assignment in an APA format word document, Arial 12 font attached to the forum in the discussion tab of the blackboard titled “Week 15 discussion questions” for grading ( 9 points) and in the tab titled “Week 14 assignment” in Turnitin to verify originality (1 point value).  If the originality exceeds the percentage of plagiarism allow by the University points will be deducted.  In our last faculty meeting with our nursing director, assistant director, and lead professor it was discussed that if the references used in the assignment are not quoted in the assignment it is considered plagiarism.   A minimum of 3 evidence-based references besides the class textbook are required.   You must post two replies to any of your peers sustained with the proper references and make sure that the references that you use in your assignment are properly quoted in it.   A minimum of 800 words is required.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Assignment 7.2 – Final Paper Task: Who Inspires You?

/in /by

 

Assignment 7.2 – Final Paper Task: Who Inspires You?
For your final paper, select a historical or contemporary figure that you believe is an effective leader and analyze that person through all four frames as identified throughout the course. This week you must identify the person you want to analyze. You are required to read a biography of the person. This must be a book, this assignment cannot be completed with internet research only.

This short paragraph should include the following:

  • The name of the person you wish to analyze
  • The title of the biography/auto-biography you will read as the foundation to complete the assignment (in APA reference format)
    • Your selection must have been reviewed by a credible source. Examples of credible book review sources are: Choice, Kirkus, Booklist, Library Journal, Publisher’s Weekly, and the New York Times Book Review.
    • If you look your book up on amazon.com, you can generally find the book review right above the product information.
  • A brief explanation of why you chose the person and what you hope to learn.

Your paper should be sufficient in length to fully address the question(s) presented, written at the college level, adhere to APA guidelines, and include a reference list. Any sources used must be cited properly, including the online assessment, using in-text citations and a references page.

 

“PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH graduate paper help TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT”

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

analyze should be related to specific disease, condition, or public health issue of personal or professional interest to you.

/in /by

 

Overview

Deliver a 5 page analysis of an existing quality improvement initiative at your workplace. The QI initiative you choose to analyze should be related to specific disease, condition, or public health issue of personal or professional interest to you.

Too often, discussions about quality health care, care costs, and outcome measures take place in isolation—each group talking among themselves about results and enhancements. Because nurses are critical to the delivery of high-quality, efficient health care, it is essential that they develop the proficiency to review, evaluate performance reports, and be able to effectively communicate outcome measures related to quality initiatives. The nursing staff’s perspective and the need to collaborate on quality care initiatives are fundamental to patient safety and positive institutional health care outcomes.

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

· Competency 2: Plan quality improvement initiatives in response to routine data surveillance.

· Recommend additional indicators and protocols to improve and expand quality outcomes of a quality initiative.

· Competency 3: Evaluate quality improvement initiatives using sensitive and sound outcome measures.

· Analyze a current quality improvement initiative in a health care setting.

· Evaluate the success of a current quality improvement initiative through recognized benchmarks and outcome measures.

· Competency 4: Integrate interprofessional perspectives to lead quality improvements in patient safety, cost effectiveness, and work-life quality

· Incorporate interprofessional perspectives related to initiative functionality and outcomes.

· Competency 5: Apply effective communication strategies to promote quality improvement of interprofessional care.

· Communicate evaluation and analysis in a professional and effective manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.

· Integrate relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style.

Assessment Instructions

Preparation

You have been asked to prepare and deliver an analysis of an existing quality improvement initiative at your workplace. The QI initiative you choose to analyze should be related to a specific disease, condition, or public health issue of personal or professional interest to you. The purpose of the report is to assess whether specific quality indicators point to improved patient safety, quality of care, cost and efficiency goals, and other desired metrics.

Your target audience consists of nurses and other health professionals with specializations or interest in your selected condition, disease, or issue. In your report, you will define the disease, analyze how the condition is managed, identify the core performance measurements used to treat or manage the condition, and evaluate the impact of the quality indicators on the health care facility:

Note: Remember, you can submit all, or a portion of, your draft to Smarthinking for feedback, before you submit the final version of your analysis for this assessment. However, be mindful of the turnaround time for receiving feedback, if you plan on using this free service.

The numbered points below correspond to grading criteria in the scoring guide. The bullets below each grading criterion further delineate tasks to fulfill the assessment requirements. Be sure that your Quality Improvement Initiative Evaluation addresses all of the content below. You may also want to read the scoring guide to better understand the performance levels that relate to each grading criterion.

1. Analyze a current quality improvement initiative in a health care setting.

· Evaluate a QI initiative and explain what prompted the implementation. Detail problems that were not addressed and any issues that arose from the initiative.

2. Evaluate the success of a current quality improvement initiative through recognized benchmarks and outcome measures.

· Analyze the benchmarks that were used to evaluate success. Detail what was the most successful, as well as what outcome measures are missing or could be added.

3. Incorporate interprofessional perspectives related to initiative functionality and outcomes.

· Integrate the perspectives of interprofessional team members involved in the initiative. Detail who you talked to, their professions, and the impact of their perspectives on your analysis.

4. Recommend additional indicators and protocols to improve and expand quality outcomes of a quality initiative.

· Recommend specific process or protocol changes as well as added technologies that would improve quality outcomes.

5. Communicate evaluation and analysis in a professional and effective manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.

6. Integrate relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style.

Submission Requirements

. Length of submission: A minimum of five but no more than seven double-spaced, typed pages.

. Number of references: Cite a minimum of four sources (no older than seven years, unless seminal work) of scholarly peer reviewed or professional evidence that support your interpretation and analysis.

. APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting.

 

“PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH ASSIGNMENT HELP TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT”

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Superior Essay Writers | Supply chain

/in /by

According to Heizer, Render & Munson there six reasons domestic business operations decide to change to some form of international operation are:

a.Improve the supply chain
Ans.- Fonterra acquired local dairy units across 50 countries and managed to form collaboration and increase sells, availability of products to the consumer.
b.Reduce costs and exchange rate risk
Ans.
c.Improve operations
Ans. Managed to collab with multinational company like Nestle, which manufactures dairy consumer product in various countries.
d.Understand markets
Ans. The aimed of Fonterra’s food service business to developing “out of home eating” market and at the present time the worth revenue is 1 billion. This worldwide business operates in fifty countries with cream, butter, yoghurt, pastries, and beverages. there are many customers include large restaurant chain in the global and also include cafe, airlines, hotel, entertainment venues, workplace and institutions.
e.Improve products
Ans. In the world, Fonterra has provided world largest dairy research facility and registered world’s largest pilot plants. Fonterra has 400 employs which including engineers, scientists and technologist. It has more than 600 patents.
f.Attract and retain global talent
Ans.
Identify an example of each reason (a-f) at Fonterra. Provide justification for each reason
(2 marks each).

Presentation A typical issue in the social science field is endeavoring to figure out who needs benefits, figuring out where best to spend assets, and as a rule attempting to decide a model of forecast to decide adolescent misconduct so as to apply counteractive action procedures. It is the objective of this proposition to demonstrate that the General Theory of Crimes idea of restraint and the impact it has on deciding adolescent wrongdoing is the preferable technique over other increasingly normal models. Research has demonstrated that discretion directs a few (if not all) of the connections different speculations have with wrongdoing. One of the later speculations, the general hypothesis of wrongdoing (Gottfredson, Hirschi. 1990), recommends that the idea of discretion is the absolute best forecaster of wrongdoing. Discretion alludes to an individual’s capacity to think about the long haul outcomes of standoffish conduct, (Hirschi, 2004). Generous consideration regarding this hypothesis has brought about momentous observational help for its immediate impacts on wrongdoing, yet different outside components (for example companions) still seem to have critical extra impacts too, (Pratt, Cullen, 2000). As opposed to depending upon a specific perspective, for instance those utilized in the general hypothesis of wrongdoing; others recommend utilizing various speculations in the meantime, (Messner, Krohn, Liska, 1989). Analysts have been examining the degree to which restraint directs the relationship between an assortment of outside elements and criminal practices; anyway it is as of late that scientists have begun to take a gander at how much poise impacts criminal conduct. A few investigations have discovered that outside elements, for example, the region they live in, will have an increasingly noteworthy impact for those with a more prominent degree of discretion, (Wikström, Loeber, 2000). At the end of the day, some have recommended that outside impacts are just inconsequential for those with low poise, (Gottfredson, Hirschi, 1990). Accordingly, those with some degree of restraint will have an impact by outside components. Actually, others have discovered that social impacts (for example reprobate companions) have clear impacts for those most in danger. For instance, Wright and associates (2001) recommend that those with minimal poise have a more prominent propensity towards freak conduct and along these lines unsafe social impacts serve just to decline that inclination. Conversely, those with high discretion can challenge the enticement of these negative social impacts. In any case, it has been recommended that specific individual attributes could direct the impacts of components, for example, those found in social learning hypothesis, (Agnew, 2006). Social learning hypothesis has accomplished a fairly huge measure of observational help. Current hypotheses may need to take a gander at their ideas, and arrangements went for culprits who don’t have restraint may need to refocus their endeavors on social issues that may not be as significant for those offenders that give indications of prevalent degrees of poise. As referenced above, it stays questionable how solid the associations are, and how their belongings present, anyway it is accepted that the General Theory of Crime introduces a progressively faultless perspective to be the best indicator of adolescent misconduct, since it incorporates discretion. Also, the reason for this proposition is to endeavor to give a more noteworthy knowledge into which of these hypotheses best anticipate adolescent wrongdoing, so as to give better treatment/counteractive action for this populace (for example better administration with motivations). Writing Review The conduct science field has for quite a while looked to locate the most ideal approach to clarify the expansive scopes of criminal conduct. Various speculations have created because of this frequently with unmistakable and as a general rule contradictory suppositions to clarify criminal conduct. These clarifications differ from sociological components and individual qualities, to the later association between the two impacts. Before depicting these potential intelligent connections, a couple of hypotheses will be talked about to demonstrate the significant commitment every ha made without anyone else. Social Learning Theory: Akers introduced extraordinary compared to other known social learning hypotheses, and throughout the years has been given generous help. Akers reconsidered the hypothesis of differential affiliation set forth by Sutherland, trying to clarify criminal conduct that took a gander at the possibility of differential fortifications, impersonation, definitions, and differential affiliations. The accommodating or nonconforming of these components will be controlled by whether the conduct is adjusted, (Akers, 1998). Differential affiliations are maybe one of the most significant pieces of the social learning hypothesis. The idea of differential affiliation alludes to the communication with various gatherings, and how standoffish individuals partner more with one another than they do with those that would be viewed as expert social, (Akers, 1985). Differential affiliations happen first and give the setting to the conceptualization of definitions, prologue to fortifications, and models to duplicate, (Akers et al., 1979). The prizes and disciplines of perceived affiliations will impact the ability to make new affiliations and maintain the old ones, (Akers, 1998). The normal gatherings with whom one differentially partners incorporate, family, peers, church, neighbors, schools, and educators, anyway they are not restricted to simply these, (Akers, 1985). The need, term, recurrence, and power of every relationship set up its quality, (Akers, 1998). In particular, those connections that happen frequently, start prior, last the longest, and include those with whom one is nearest will have the best influence on the conduct. The quantity of reprobate companions that one partners with is the best forecaster of criminal conduct, (Akers et al., 1979). At last, it is this equalization of these fortifications (either as remunerations or disciplines) that give to increment or reduction reprobate conduct. The General Theory of Crime: The General Theory of Crime not at all like the past speculations tries to clarify reprobate conduct as the aftereffect of a solitary individual characteristic, (Gottfredson, Hirschi, 1990). This single attribute, for example poise, alludes to an individual’s capacity to consider the long haul, negative results of withdrawn conduct, and the majority of the potential outcomes of a person’s activities, (Hirschi, 2004). With the understanding that torment is experienced differentially and that joy is similarly delighted in by everybody, an individual’s degree of discretion will affect how much an individual works out outcomes. Along these lines, the less an individual contemplates forthcoming outcomes, the more prominent the possibility they will submit reprobate acts when the chances to do as such emerges, (Gottfredson, Hirschi, 1990). Hirschi and Gottfredson (1994) felt that their hypothesis clarifies reprobate acts, yet additionally various practices concerning moment delight at the danger of long haul torment. Besides, on the off chance that one needs poise they are regularly depicted as hasty, irascible, having unsafe practices, obtuse, and narrow minded, (Gottfredson, Hirschi, 1990). Reprobate acts are submitted so as to fulfill ones personal circumstance, and their prompt fulfillment. For those lacking poise, these reprobate demonstrations will in general fulfill their hasty wants, and are frequently destructive to other people, (Gottfredson, Hirschi, 1990). Also, in light of the fact that those low in poise are increasingly disposed to search for acts that offer moment fulfillment at the danger of long haul torment, one can expect that they will participate in reprobate practices (for example drinking and medication use. Besides, those carrying out one kind of reprobate conduct are bound to perpetrate another sort of reprobate conduct, which means ones past reprobate conduct is the best forecaster of future wrongdoing, (Hirschi, 2004). Over assortment, reprobate practices will be submitted all the more regularly by those lacking poise, (Gottfredson, Hirschi, 1990). As indicated by Hirschi and Gottfredson, everybody is inclined to veer off in the first place; anyway it is through great child rearing that restraint is obtained, and will remain fairly stable all through an individual’s life (Hirschi, Gottfredson, 1994). However, Gottfredson and Hirschi (1990) felt that open door was fundamental alongside poise they admitted that there were various chances to submit reprobate acts, and accordingly decreased the part they play. Outline Research has demonstrated that significant ideas coming about because of social learning hypothesis (for example affiliations, definitions, and fortifications), and the general hypothesis of wrongdoing (for example restraint) are connected to reserved conduct. Ideas from every one of these hypotheses have appeared to affect reprobate conduct; anyway there is likewise proof that demonstrates that there are intuitive impacts too, however they have neglected to concede to the precise way this collaboration happens. The speculations talked about before endeavor to demonstrate why individuals submits degenerate acts through immediate and free measures, and can be considered as either a social causation or social choice model. Social causation proposes reprobate acts are the aftereffect of degenerate social connections, which social learning would fall under since it recommendations factors outside the individual lead to standoffish conduct. >

GET ANSWER

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

demonstrate understanding of quantitative and qualitative research, the purpose and importance of designs, and how research is critical for creating a credible evidence-based nursing practice. 

/in /by

A baccalaureate nurse understands, relates, and values the fundamental elements of research, process, and designs as a foundation for an evidence-based practice (AACN, 2008; QSEN, 2018).

Purpose:  

This assignment provides a learning activity for students to demonstrate understanding of quantitative and qualitative research, the purpose and importance of designs, and how research is critical for creating a credible evidence-based nursing practice.

Course Outcomes:

This assignment enables the student to meet the following Course Outcomes.

CO 1:  Examine the sources of evidence that contribute to professional nursing practice. (PO 7)

CO 2:  Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (PO 4 & 8)

CO 5:  Recognize the role of research findings in evidence-based practice. (PO 7 & 8)

Due Date

Submit the completed Research Designs Assignment by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 5.

Points

This assignment is worth 225 points.

Directions for Preparing the Scholarly Paper:

1. Read each of these instructions.

2. Read the assignment grading rubric criteria.

3. This assignment is completed as an APA paper. APA resources can be found in your Resources Tab. You are required to complete the paper using the productivity tools required by Chamberlain University, which is Microsoft Office Word 2013 (or later version), or Windows and Office 2011 (or later version) for MAC. You must save the file in the “.docx” format. Do NOT save as Word Pad. A later version of the productivity tool includes Office 365, which is available to Chamberlain students for FREE by downloading from the student portal at http://my.chamberlain.edu (Links to an external site.) . Click on the envelope at the top of the page.

4. You are required to use the grading rubric criteria to ensure you are meeting all grading requirements of the paper.

5. The guideline below is a recommended outline only and does not substitute for your assignment grading rubric; your paper will be graded using the assignment grading rubric criteria.

6. For the introduction paragraph section, summarize your learning using mostly your own words (see the grading rubric for details):

· The need for nursing research.

· The importance for nurses to understand the basic principles of research.

· The purpose of your paper.

1. For the quantitative research section, summarize your learning using mostly your own words (see the grading rubric for details):

· The importance of quantitative research.

· One type of quantitative design; explain one important feature of this type of design.

· How quantitative research can help improve nursing practice.

1. For the qualitative research section, your learning using mostly your own words (see the grading rubric for details):

· The importance of qualitative research.

· One type of qualitative design; explain one important feature of this type of design.

· How qualitative research can help improve nursing practice.

1. For the research sampling section, your learning using mostly your own words (see the grading rubric for details):

· What is sampling and why is sampling important.

· One sampling strategy used in quantitative research.

· One other sampling strategy that you learned.

1. For the credible nursing practice section, your learning using mostly your own words (see the grading rubric for details):

· How research can help to make nursing practice safer.

· Why research is critical for creating an evidence-based nursing practice.

1. For the conclusion section, summarize your learning using mostly your own words (see the grading rubric for details):

· Short, concise, thorough summary of the main points of the paper.

1. Double check your work with the grading rubric to ensure you have met all grading criteria for this assignment.

2. Two or more supporting scholarly references are required.  Textbooks are not allowed and should not be used as a scholarly source.  Use the Chamberlain Library to locate relevant, scholarly sources.

3. No more than two direct quotes are allowed.  You should be using mostly your own words to demonstrate your understanding of the topics/criteria for this assignment.  Citations and references must be included.

4. This is a short, scholarly paper. The assignment should be 3-4 pages in length not including the title page and references page.

5. Submit the completed assignment on the Week 5: Assignment page.

**Academic Integrity Reminder**

Chamberlain College of Nursing values honesty and integrity. All students should be aware of the Academic Integrity policy and follow it in all discussions and assignments.

By submitting this assignment, I pledge on my honor that all content contained is my own original work except as quoted and cited appropriately. I have not received any unauthorized assistance on this assignment.

Note: Please use your browser’s File menu to save or print this page.

References

American Association of Colleges of Nurses (AACN). (2008). Executive summary: The essentials of baccalaureate education for professional nursing practice (2008). Retrieved from http://www.aacnnursing.org/Education-Resources/AACN-Essentials

Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN). (2018). QSEN knowledge, skills, and attitude competencies. Retrieved from http://qsen.org/competencies/pre-licensure-ksas/

Rubric

NR439 Research Designs Assignment Rubric

NR439 Research Designs Assignment Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction

Write a paragraph introduction incorporating your learning and using mostly your own words to summarize: a) The need for nursing research. b) The importance for nurses to understand the basic principles of research. c) The purpose of your paper.
32.0 pts

Thoroughly summarizes criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.

 28.0 pts

Mostly summarizes criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details or is missing.

 25.0 pts

Minimally summarizes criteria from first the column or two criteria lack details or is missing.

 11.0 pts

Poorly summarizes criteria from the first column or all criteria lack details.

 0.0 pts

All criteria from the first column are missing.
32.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuantitative Research

Write a paragraph incorporating your learning and using mostly your own words to summarize: a) The importance of quantitative research. b) One type of quantitative design; explain one important feature of this type of design. c) How quantitative research can help improve nursing practice.
34.0 pts

Thoroughly summarizes criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.

 30.0 pts

Mostly summarizes criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details or is missing.

 27.0 pts

Minimally summarizes criteria from first the column or two criteria lack details or is missing.

 13.0 pts

Poorly summarizes criteria from the first column or all criteria lack details.

 0.0 pts

All criteria from the first column are missing.
34.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQualitative Research

Write a paragraph incorporating your learning and using mostly your own words to summarize: a) The importance of qualitative research. b) One type of qualitative design; explain one important feature of this type of design. c) How qualitative research can help improve nursing practice.
34.0 pts

Thoroughly summarizes criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.

 30.0 pts

Mostly summarizes criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details or is missing.

 27.0 pts

Minimally summarizes criteria from first the column or two criteria lack details or is missing.

 13.0 pts

Poorly summarizes criteria from the first column or all criteria lack details.

 0.0 pts

All criteria from the first column are missing.
34.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch Sampling

Write a paragraph incorporating your learning and using mostly your own words to summarize: a) What is sampling and why is sampling important. b) One sampling strategy used in quantitative research. c) One other sampling strategy that you learned.
34.0 pts

Thoroughly summarizes all criteria in the first column. Thorough details are provided.

 30.0 pts

Mostly summarizes criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details or is missing.

 27.0 pts

Minimally summarizes criteria from the first column or two criteria lack details or is missing.

 13.0 pts

Vaguely summarizes all criteria from the first column or all criteria lack details.

 0.0 pts

All criteria from the first column are missing.
34.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCredible Nursing Practice

Write a paragraph incorporating your learning and using mostly your own words to summarize: a) How research can help to make nursing practice safer. b) Why research is critical for creating an evidence-based nursing practice.
34.0 pts

Thoroughly summarizes criteria in the first column. Thorough details are provided.

 30.0 pts

Mostly summarizes criteria in the first column. Good details.

 27.0 pts

Minimally summarizes criteria in the first column or one criteria lack details or is missing.

 13.0 pts

Poorly summarizes criteria from the first column or both criteria lack details.

 0.0 pts

Both criteria from the first column are missing.
34.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion

Write a short, concise, thorough summary of the main points of the paper.
32.0 pts

Summarizes a short, concise, thorough summary of the main points of the paper.

 28.0 pts

Mostly summarizes the main points of the paper. Good details.

 25.0 pts

Writes a vague summary of the paper. Fair details.

 11.0 pts

Writes a poor summary of the paper. Poor details.

 0.0 pts

Did not sufficiently provide any of the conclusion criteria or conclusion not discussed.
32.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Writing, Mechanics, Organization, Spelling, Sentence Structure, Grammar.
8.0 pts

Excellent scholarly writing, mechanics, organization, spelling, sentence structure, grammar. No errors noted.

 6.0 pts

Good writing, mechanics, organization, spelling, sentence structure, grammar. A few errors.

 3.0 pts

Fair writing, mechanics, organization, Spelling, sentence structure, grammar. Some errors noted.

 2.0 pts

Poor writing, mechanics, organization, spelling sentence structure, grammar. Many errors noted.

 0.0 pts

Very poor writing, mechanics, and organization. Errors throughout are noted. Writing is difficult to understand or follow.
8.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Formatting
8.0 pts

Excellent APA formatting with no errors. Uses mostly own words. No more than 2 direct quotes used.

 6.0 pts

Good APA formatting with a few errors noted. Three direct quotes used.

 3.0 pts

Fair APA formatting with some errors noted. Four direct quotes used.

 2.0 pts

Poor APA formatting with many errors noted. Five or more direct quotes used.

 0.0 pts

Very poor APA with errors noted throughout.
8.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupporting Evidence

Uses 2 or more relevant scholarly sources to support writing. Textbooks should not be used.
9.0 pts

Uses 2 or more relevant scholarly sources to support writing. Textbooks are not used.

 5.0 pts

Uses at least 1 relevant scholarly source to support writing.

 0.0 pts

No relevant scholarly sources provided.
9.0 pts

 

“PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH ASSIGNMENT HELP TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT”

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"