HB II DB (1). Week vi

HB II DB (1). Week vi

Please read the assigned articles for this week’s unit. Identify a key “take away” from one of these readings. Based on this concept, search the Internet for a video, image, article, or some other strengths based representation of dis/ability as aligns with your take away. Please post your reflections on this assignment that includes the key takeaway (and which article you used) as well as why you selected your image/representation, concluding with why you think it aligns with your takeaway.

The post HB II DB (1). Week vi appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Analytical task

Analytical task

You really need to see the movie “99 homes” because this is the core this essay . Then, start this paper. I also send a paper written by someone others. You can have a look and see how to write that, but don’t copy that

BSL 212 – INTRODUCTION TO BUSINESS LAW

SPRING SEMESTER 2019

Analytical Paper: Ethics

After reading Chapter 2 of the textbook, watch the film 99 Homes, directed by Ramin Bahrani. There will

be a public screening of the film at 3:30PM on Monday, February 18 in Storer Auditorium, followed by

a panel discussion lead by Business School faculty. Plan ahead to ensure you have time to view the film

at least once before beginning your paper.

Essay Prompt:

There are numerous examples of ethically ambiguous practices featured in the film. These practices may

include actions, affirmative statements, omissions and/or schemes. Identify and explain a specific

ethically ambiguous practice, including a brief description of the parties involved and how the practice

worked. Then, utilizing the ethics material discussed in class and Chapter 2 of the textbook, analyze the

ethics of the specific practice you are focusing on. Your analysis should:

(1) Include two of the “Theories of Ethics” (excluding “Egoism”) and two of the “Ethics Traps”

presented in Chapter 2.

(2) Define and explain the theories and traps you are utilizing.

(3) Apply the theories and traps to analyze the ethics of the specific practice you are focusing on.

(4) Use specific conversations and evidence from the movie to assist in your analysis.

Your paper must be written in essay format; in other words, it should not be divided into individual

answers to the above questions. Your paper must include an introduction and a conclusion. There is no

need to consult sources beyond your textbook, your class notes, and the film itself (outside research is, in

fact, discouraged). Your paper must be a minimum of 1000 and a maximum of 1200 words, and must

be double-spaced, utilizing Times Roman 12-point font and 1 inch margins. In the upper left-hand

corner of the first page of your paper, list your name, your instructor’s name, the course (BSL 212),

the date, and the exact word count of your paper. Direct quotes from the film or the textbook should

be placed in quotation marks and the source should be noted in parentheses directly after the quote (99

Homes for the film, and Mann, Roberts, followed by the page number, for the textbook). Failure to

comply with these specific instructions will negatively impact your grade, as reflected in the Analytical

Paper Grading Rubric posted on Blackboard. You are to turn in a hard copy of your Analytical Paper, no

later than the start of class on March 6, 2019. Your Analytical Paper must also be submitted in Word

format on Blackboard under the designated “Assignments” tab by the same date and time as the hard

copy. Please note that the papers will be run through Safe Assignment, which will compare them against the

entire Internet and our internal database to help detect plagiarism. There is no makeup for this Analytical

Paper; it is not subject to the quiz make up policy articulated in the course syllabus.

The post Analytical task appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Analytical Assignment-Ethics

Analytical Assignment-Ethics

BSL 212 – INTRODUCTION TO BUSINESS LAW

SPRING SEMESTER 2019

Analytical Paper: Ethics

After reading Chapter 2 of the textbook, watch the film 99 Homes, directed by Ramin Bahrani. There will

be a public screening of the film at 3:30PM on Monday, February 18 in Storer Auditorium, followed by

a panel discussion lead by Business School faculty. Plan ahead to ensure you have time to view the film

at least once before beginning your paper.

Essay Prompt:

There are numerous examples of ethically ambiguous practices featured in the film. These practices may

include actions, affirmative statements, omissions and/or schemes. Identify and explain a specific

ethically ambiguous practice, including a brief description of the parties involved and how the practice

worked. Then, utilizing the ethics material discussed in class and Chapter 2 of the textbook, analyze the

ethics of the specific practice you are focusing on. Your analysis should:

(1) Include two of the “Theories of Ethics” (excluding “Egoism”) and two of the “Ethics Traps”

presented in Chapter 2.

(2) Define and explain the theories and traps you are utilizing.

(3) Apply the theories and traps to analyze the ethics of the specific practice you are focusing on.

(4) Use specific conversations and evidence from the movie to assist in your analysis.

Your paper must be written in essay format; in other words, it should not be divided into individual

answers to the above questions. Your paper must include an introduction and a conclusion. There is no

need to consult sources beyond your textbook, your class notes, and the film itself (outside research is, in

fact, discouraged). Your paper must be a minimum of 1000 and a maximum of 1200 words, and must

be double-spaced, utilizing Times Roman 12-point font and 1 inch margins. In the upper left-hand

corner of the first page of your paper, list your name, your instructor’s name, the course (BSL 212),

the date, and the exact word count of your paper. Direct quotes from the film or the textbook should

be placed in quotation marks and the source should be noted in parentheses directly after the quote (99

Homes for the film, and Mann, Roberts, followed by the page number, for the textbook). Failure to

comply with these specific instructions will negatively impact your grade, as reflected in the Analytical

Paper Grading Rubric posted on Blackboard. You are to turn in a hard copy of your Analytical Paper, no

later than the start of class on March 6, 2019. Your Analytical Paper must also be submitted in Word

format on Blackboard under the designated “Assignments” tab by the same date and time as the hard

copy. Please note that the papers will be run through Safe Assignment, which will compare them against the

entire Internet and our internal database to help detect plagiarism. There is no makeup for this Analytical

Paper; it is not subject to the quiz make up policy articulated in the course syllabus.

The post Analytical Assignment-Ethics appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Analyze how cultural differences contributed to the conflict in this case.

Analyze how cultural differences contributed to the conflict in this case.

Final Case Study

Important reminder: You must post a complete draft of your Final Case Study assignment in the Unit 10 discussion before midnight (CST) on Monday of Week 10. Be advised that you will only receive feedback on your Unit 10 assignment draft from your peers. Use the instructor feedback from your Unit 4 and Unit 6 assignments as well as your peer feedback from the Unit 10 discussion to create a stellar course project.

Introduction

Ethical dilemmas often have a cultural nuance that adds another layer to an already difficult situation. Multicultural issues can certainly affect ethical decision-making and reasoning and vice versa. For this final course assignment, you will combine what you learned about navigating multicultural issues with what you learned about ethical standards and how they apply to real professional conflicts.

You will revise the multicultural case study you created in Unit 4 based on instructor feedback and expand it to introduce an ethical dilemma stemming from the cultural conflict. Then, you will use research, industry best practices, and professional guidelines to resolve the ethical dilemma. You will also evaluate the utility of ethical decision-making models.

Please review the course project overview to ensure that you understand how all the course assignments interconnect.

Instructions

To complete this assignment:

Revise the multicultural case study you developed in Unit 4 to incorporate instructor feedback.

If you wish, you may instead create an entirely new case study that meets the criteria for this assignment. Again, while your case will be fictional, it must be credible and realistic based on your psychology specialization. To create an effective resolution, reflect on your responses to the course discussion questions and review the recommendations made on your posts by peers.

Create a case involving an ethical dilemma and cultural conflict or conflicts that could arise in your psychology specialization.

Use the Final Case Study Template linked in Resources to build a PowerPoint presentation that includes the following:

Title slide:

Enter a descriptive title of approximately 5–15 words that concisely communicates the heart of the case study. It should stir interest while maintaining professional decorum.

Enter your name, a job title, and an organization that would fit with your case study. Like the case study itself, these last two elements may be fictional.

Case Study Overview slides: Provide the briefest possible narrative description of the case. Additional supporting details and references may be added in the notes section below the slide. Include:

The professional setting of the case, based on your psychology specialization.

The relationship that exists between you and the other people, agency, business, or institution involved. Some possible examples may be:

Professor-Student.

Therapist-Patient.

Colleague-Colleague.

Consultant-Business.

Clinical supervisor-Student intern.

Administrative supervisor-Employee.

A very brief summation of an ethical dilemma involving cultural conflicts.

Cultural Differences slides: On the table provided, list side by side the main cultural identities from the Hays model, relevant to the case study conflict, of yourself and another person, agency, business, or institution in the case study.

If more than one person, agency, business, or institution is involved in the case, copy this slide for each one to compare yourself to all others involved.

In the notes section:

Identify common concerns with each cultural identity. Be careful to avoid using stereotypes.

Analyze how cultural differences contributed to the conflict in this case.

Relevant Biases: Identify two relevant biases you have or had and at least one strategy for improving your cultural competency around each of those biases. Note: This slide may be reused from the Unit 4 assignment, but if you received suggestions for improving it, be sure to do so.

Ethical Concerns slides: Bullet point the three or more ethical concerns in the case and apply one or more ethical standard to each concern. Additional supporting details and references may be added in the notes section below the slide. Be sure to link to elements of the code.

Comparison of Ethical Theories slides: In the first row of the table provided, enter the names of two ethical theories that you think would be the most appropriate for the situations in the case. In the following rows, enter comparisons of the relevant features of the two theories. In the notes section, evaluate which theory provides a more functional framework for your case and explain why. (Remember that ethical theories and ethical decision-making models are two different things. Please make sure that you are applying, comparing, and contrasting two ethical theories).

Ethical Decision-Making Model slides:

Identify each step in the model. Under each step of the model, apply it to your case.

Incorporate multicultural issues presented in the case study within the selected ethical decision-making model.

Copy this slide as needed, and combine steps on the slides as necessary or appropriate. In the notes section, write out supporting narrative details for your bullet points. (Bear in mind that ethical theories and ethical decision-making models are two different things. Please make sure that you are applying the steps of the ethical decision-making model to your case).

Best Practices for Working With [Cultural Identity] slides:

Identify best practices for working with at least two cultural identities related to this case.

Analyze, briefly, how each best practice could help you navigate this particular relationship and conflict.

Use the notes section to describe the best practice in more detail and elaborate as needed on your analysis of how the best practice could help you navigate the relationship and conflict.

Note: This slide may be reused from the Unit 4 assignment, but if you received suggestions for improving it, be sure to revise it.

Proposed Resolution slide: Use bullet points to summarize your proposed resolution to the ethical dilemmas in the case. In the notes section, write out supporting narrative details for your bullet points.

References slides: Use current APA style and formatting guidelines.

Additional Requirements

Written communication: Should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.

Format: Use the Final Case Study Template provided. Use current APA style and formatting guidelines as applicable to this assignment.

References: You must cite at least 10 scholarly research articles, which can include those used in previous assignments.

Length of PowerPoint: 12 slides minimum.

Citation requirements: You may cite reputable sources from websites, books, textbooks, and assigned resources but these will not count toward the 10 required scholarly research references.

Submit your Final Case Study PowerPoint file no later than 11:59 p.m. (CST) on Friday.

Resources

Final Case Study Scoring Guide.

Guidelines for Effective PowerPoint Presentations [PPTX].

Final Case Study Template [PPTX].

APA Style and Format.

Capella University Library.

Capella Writing Center.

Toggle Drawer[u10d1] Unit 10 Discussion 1Peer Review

To complete this discussion:

Attach a complete draft of your Final Case Study assignment to this discussion by midnight (CST) on Monday of Week 10.

Provide detailed feedback to one of your peers on his or assignment by midnight (CST) on Thursday of Week 10. It is important to respond to a discussion post that has not yet had a response. After you receive feedback from your peer, you should take it into account as you finalize your Unit 10 assignment, Final Case Study.

Response Guidelines

Your peer review should be at least 400 words and address the following:

Is the case study clearly described using current terminology from the field of ethics and multicultural issues? Summarize in one or two sentences how your peer did this, and identify the slides that covered this requirement.

What cultural issues did your peer identify? Evaluate the applicability of the facets identified to the issues. Are these issues pertinent to the approach that your peer offers later in the PowerPoint? What other cultural contexts might be applicable? How clearly are they presented?

What ethical or legal considerations are identified? Are there any pertinent ethical or legal considerations that your peer has not incorporated? Are there specific links to the codes?

How well did your peer use the notes section in the PowerPoint to support his or her argument?

How many research articles are included? (10 peer-reviewed journal articles in addition to any other resources are required.) How well did your peer support his or her writing with citations in the notes?

How would you summarize the recommendations your peer made for addressing the issue at hand? Are these recommendations supported with recent, peer-reviewed evidence? Suggest revisions or additions that would make your peer’s argument more effective. Alternatively, offer a recommendation to mitigate the issue addressed in the presentation.

Does your peer’s logic hold up across the presentation? Can you follow the argument? Are you convinced by the argument, based on the evidence and the way that your peer put the material together?

What is the most effective or convincing part of the presentation? What is the weakest part of the presentation? Be specific so that revisions can be completed effectively and efficiently.

Learning Components

This activity will help you achieve the following learning components:

Describe ethical dilemmas in psychology practice.

Identify types of cultural conflict.

Identify types of cultural differences.

Identify types of bias.

Investigate professional ethical standards.

Apply ethical theory to practice.

Employ ethical decision-making models to practice.

Identify research-based best practices related to culture.

Brainstorm potential solutions for ethical challenges.

The post Analyze how cultural differences contributed to the conflict in this case. appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Brainstorm potential solutions for ethical issues

Brainstorm potential solutions for ethical issues

Final Case Study

Important reminder: You must post a complete draft of your Final Case Study assignment in the Unit 10 discussion before midnight (CST) on Monday of Week 10. Be advised that you will only receive feedback on your Unit 10 assignment draft from your peers. Use the instructor feedback from your Unit 4 and Unit 6 assignments as well as your peer feedback from the Unit 10 discussion to create a stellar course project.

Introduction

Ethical dilemmas often have a cultural nuance that adds another layer to an already difficult situation. Multicultural issues can certainly affect ethical decision-making and reasoning and vice versa. For this final course assignment, you will combine what you learned about navigating multicultural issues with what you learned about ethical standards and how they apply to real professional conflicts.

You will revise the multicultural case study you created in Unit 4 based on instructor feedback and expand it to introduce an ethical dilemma stemming from the cultural conflict. Then, you will use research, industry best practices, and professional guidelines to resolve the ethical dilemma. You will also evaluate the utility of ethical decision-making models.

Please review the course project overview to ensure that you understand how all the course assignments interconnect.

Instructions

To complete this assignment:

Revise the multicultural case study you developed in Unit 4 to incorporate instructor feedback.

If you wish, you may instead create an entirely new case study that meets the criteria for this assignment. Again, while your case will be fictional, it must be credible and realistic based on your psychology specialization. To create an effective resolution, reflect on your responses to the course discussion questions and review the recommendations made on your posts by peers.

Create a case involving an ethical dilemma and cultural conflict or conflicts that could arise in your psychology specialization.

Use the Final Case Study Template linked in Resources to build a PowerPoint presentation that includes the following:

Title slide:

Enter a descriptive title of approximately 5–15 words that concisely communicates the heart of the case study. It should stir interest while maintaining professional decorum.

Enter your name, a job title, and an organization that would fit with your case study. Like the case study itself, these last two elements may be fictional.

Case Study Overview slides: Provide the briefest possible narrative description of the case. Additional supporting details and references may be added in the notes section below the slide. Include:

The professional setting of the case, based on your psychology specialization.

The relationship that exists between you and the other people, agency, business, or institution involved. Some possible examples may be:

Professor-Student.

Therapist-Patient.

Colleague-Colleague.

Consultant-Business.

Clinical supervisor-Student intern.

Administrative supervisor-Employee.

A very brief summation of an ethical dilemma involving cultural conflicts.

Cultural Differences slides: On the table provided, list side by side the main cultural identities from the Hays model, relevant to the case study conflict, of yourself and another person, agency, business, or institution in the case study.

If more than one person, agency, business, or institution is involved in the case, copy this slide for each one to compare yourself to all others involved.

In the notes section:

Identify common concerns with each cultural identity. Be careful to avoid using stereotypes.

Analyze how cultural differences contributed to the conflict in this case.

Relevant Biases: Identify two relevant biases you have or had and at least one strategy for improving your cultural competency around each of those biases. Note: This slide may be reused from the Unit 4 assignment, but if you received suggestions for improving it, be sure to do so.

Ethical Concerns slides: Bullet point the three or more ethical concerns in the case and apply one or more ethical standard to each concern. Additional supporting details and references may be added in the notes section below the slide. Be sure to link to elements of the code.

Comparison of Ethical Theories slides: In the first row of the table provided, enter the names of two ethical theories that you think would be the most appropriate for the situations in the case. In the following rows, enter comparisons of the relevant features of the two theories. In the notes section, evaluate which theory provides a more functional framework for your case and explain why. (Remember that ethical theories and ethical decision-making models are two different things. Please make sure that you are applying, comparing, and contrasting two ethical theories).

Ethical Decision-Making Model slides:

Identify each step in the model. Under each step of the model, apply it to your case.

Incorporate multicultural issues presented in the case study within the selected ethical decision-making model.

Copy this slide as needed, and combine steps on the slides as necessary or appropriate. In the notes section, write out supporting narrative details for your bullet points. (Bear in mind that ethical theories and ethical decision-making models are two different things. Please make sure that you are applying the steps of the ethical decision-making model to your case).

Best Practices for Working With [Cultural Identity] slides:

Identify best practices for working with at least two cultural identities related to this case.

Analyze, briefly, how each best practice could help you navigate this particular relationship and conflict.

Use the notes section to describe the best practice in more detail and elaborate as needed on your analysis of how the best practice could help you navigate the relationship and conflict.

Note: This slide may be reused from the Unit 4 assignment, but if you received suggestions for improving it, be sure to revise it.

Proposed Resolution slide: Use bullet points to summarize your proposed resolution to the ethical dilemmas in the case. In the notes section, write out supporting narrative details for your bullet points.

References slides: Use current APA style and formatting guidelines.

Additional Requirements

Written communication: Should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.

Format: Use the Final Case Study Template provided. Use current APA style and formatting guidelines as applicable to this assignment.

References: You must cite at least 10 scholarly research articles, which can include those used in previous assignments.

Length of PowerPoint: 12 slides minimum.

Citation requirements: You may cite reputable sources from websites, books, textbooks, and assigned resources but these will not count toward the 10 required scholarly research references.

Submit your Final Case Study PowerPoint file no later than 11:59 p.m. (CST) on Friday.

Resources

Final Case Study Scoring Guide.

Guidelines for Effective PowerPoint Presentations [PPTX].

Final Case Study Template [PPTX].

APA Style and Format.

Capella University Library.

Capella Writing Center.

Toggle Drawer[u10d1] Unit 10 Discussion 1Peer Review

To complete this discussion:

Attach a complete draft of your Final Case Study assignment to this discussion by midnight (CST) on Monday of Week 10.

Provide detailed feedback to one of your peers on his or assignment by midnight (CST) on Thursday of Week 10. It is important to respond to a discussion post that has not yet had a response. After you receive feedback from your peer, you should take it into account as you finalize your Unit 10 assignment, Final Case Study.

Response Guidelines

Your peer review should be at least 400 words and address the following:

Is the case study clearly described using current terminology from the field of ethics and multicultural issues? Summarize in one or two sentences how your peer did this, and identify the slides that covered this requirement.

What cultural issues did your peer identify? Evaluate the applicability of the facets identified to the issues. Are these issues pertinent to the approach that your peer offers later in the PowerPoint? What other cultural contexts might be applicable? How clearly are they presented?

What ethical or legal considerations are identified? Are there any pertinent ethical or legal considerations that your peer has not incorporated? Are there specific links to the codes?

How well did your peer use the notes section in the PowerPoint to support his or her argument?

How many research articles are included? (10 peer-reviewed journal articles in addition to any other resources are required.) How well did your peer support his or her writing with citations in the notes?

How would you summarize the recommendations your peer made for addressing the issue at hand? Are these recommendations supported with recent, peer-reviewed evidence? Suggest revisions or additions that would make your peer’s argument more effective. Alternatively, offer a recommendation to mitigate the issue addressed in the presentation.

Does your peer’s logic hold up across the presentation? Can you follow the argument? Are you convinced by the argument, based on the evidence and the way that your peer put the material together?

What is the most effective or convincing part of the presentation? What is the weakest part of the presentation? Be specific so that revisions can be completed effectively and efficiently.

Learning Components

This activity will help you achieve the following learning components:

Describe ethical dilemmas in psychology practice.

Identify types of cultural conflict.

Identify types of cultural differences.

Identify types of bias.

Investigate professional ethical standards.

Apply ethical theory to practice.

Employ ethical decision-making models to practice.

Identify research-based best practices related to culture.

The post Brainstorm potential solutions for ethical issues appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

PSY7543 module 10 task PowerPoint

PSY7543 module 10 task PowerPoint

Final Case Study

Important reminder: You must post a complete draft of your Final Case Study assignment in the Unit 10 discussion before midnight (CST) on Monday of Week 10. Be advised that you will only receive feedback on your Unit 10 assignment draft from your peers. Use the instructor feedback from your Unit 4 and Unit 6 assignments as well as your peer feedback from the Unit 10 discussion to create a stellar course project.

Introduction

Ethical dilemmas often have a cultural nuance that adds another layer to an already difficult situation. Multicultural issues can certainly affect ethical decision-making and reasoning and vice versa. For this final course assignment, you will combine what you learned about navigating multicultural issues with what you learned about ethical standards and how they apply to real professional conflicts.

You will revise the multicultural case study you created in Unit 4 based on instructor feedback and expand it to introduce an ethical dilemma stemming from the cultural conflict. Then, you will use research, industry best practices, and professional guidelines to resolve the ethical dilemma. You will also evaluate the utility of ethical decision-making models.

Please review the course project overview to ensure that you understand how all the course assignments interconnect.

Instructions

To complete this assignment:

Revise the multicultural case study you developed in Unit 4 to incorporate instructor feedback.

If you wish, you may instead create an entirely new case study that meets the criteria for this assignment. Again, while your case will be fictional, it must be credible and realistic based on your psychology specialization. To create an effective resolution, reflect on your responses to the course discussion questions and review the recommendations made on your posts by peers.

Create a case involving an ethical dilemma and cultural conflict or conflicts that could arise in your psychology specialization.

Use the Final Case Study Template linked in Resources to build a PowerPoint presentation that includes the following:

Title slide:

Enter a descriptive title of approximately 5–15 words that concisely communicates the heart of the case study. It should stir interest while maintaining professional decorum.

Enter your name, a job title, and an organization that would fit with your case study. Like the case study itself, these last two elements may be fictional.

Case Study Overview slides: Provide the briefest possible narrative description of the case. Additional supporting details and references may be added in the notes section below the slide. Include:

The professional setting of the case, based on your psychology specialization.

The relationship that exists between you and the other people, agency, business, or institution involved. Some possible examples may be:

Professor-Student.

Therapist-Patient.

Colleague-Colleague.

Consultant-Business.

Clinical supervisor-Student intern.

Administrative supervisor-Employee.

A very brief summation of an ethical dilemma involving cultural conflicts.

Cultural Differences slides: On the table provided, list side by side the main cultural identities from the Hays model, relevant to the case study conflict, of yourself and another person, agency, business, or institution in the case study.

If more than one person, agency, business, or institution is involved in the case, copy this slide for each one to compare yourself to all others involved.

In the notes section:

Identify common concerns with each cultural identity. Be careful to avoid using stereotypes.

Analyze how cultural differences contributed to the conflict in this case.

Relevant Biases: Identify two relevant biases you have or had and at least one strategy for improving your cultural competency around each of those biases. Note: This slide may be reused from the Unit 4 assignment, but if you received suggestions for improving it, be sure to do so.

Ethical Concerns slides: Bullet point the three or more ethical concerns in the case and apply one or more ethical standard to each concern. Additional supporting details and references may be added in the notes section below the slide. Be sure to link to elements of the code.

Comparison of Ethical Theories slides: In the first row of the table provided, enter the names of two ethical theories that you think would be the most appropriate for the situations in the case. In the following rows, enter comparisons of the relevant features of the two theories. In the notes section, evaluate which theory provides a more functional framework for your case and explain why. (Remember that ethical theories and ethical decision-making models are two different things. Please make sure that you are applying, comparing, and contrasting two ethical theories).

Ethical Decision-Making Model slides:

Identify each step in the model. Under each step of the model, apply it to your case.

Incorporate multicultural issues presented in the case study within the selected ethical decision-making model.

Copy this slide as needed, and combine steps on the slides as necessary or appropriate. In the notes section, write out supporting narrative details for your bullet points. (Bear in mind that ethical theories and ethical decision-making models are two different things. Please make sure that you are applying the steps of the ethical decision-making model to your case).

Best Practices for Working With [Cultural Identity] slides:

Identify best practices for working with at least two cultural identities related to this case.

Analyze, briefly, how each best practice could help you navigate this particular relationship and conflict.

Use the notes section to describe the best practice in more detail and elaborate as needed on your analysis of how the best practice could help you navigate the relationship and conflict.

Note: This slide may be reused from the Unit 4 assignment, but if you received suggestions for improving it, be sure to revise it.

Proposed Resolution slide: Use bullet points to summarize your proposed resolution to the ethical dilemmas in the case. In the notes section, write out supporting narrative details for your bullet points.

References slides: Use current APA style and formatting guidelines.

Additional Requirements

Written communication: Should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.

Format: Use the Final Case Study Template provided. Use current APA style and formatting guidelines as applicable to this assignment.

References: You must cite at least 10 scholarly research articles, which can include those used in previous assignments.

Length of PowerPoint: 12 slides minimum.

Citation requirements: You may cite reputable sources from websites, books, textbooks, and assigned resources but these will not count toward the 10 required scholarly research references.

Submit your Final Case Study PowerPoint file no later than 11:59 p.m. (CST) on Friday.

Resources

Final Case Study Scoring Guide.

Guidelines for Effective PowerPoint Presentations [PPTX].

Final Case Study Template [PPTX].

APA Style and Format.

Capella University Library.

Capella Writing Center.

Toggle Drawer[u10d1] Unit 10 Discussion 1Peer Review

To complete this discussion:

Attach a complete draft of your Final Case Study assignment to this discussion by midnight (CST) on Monday of Week 10.

Provide detailed feedback to one of your peers on his or assignment by midnight (CST) on Thursday of Week 10. It is important to respond to a discussion post that has not yet had a response. After you receive feedback from your peer, you should take it into account as you finalize your Unit 10 assignment, Final Case Study.

Response Guidelines

Your peer review should be at least 400 words and address the following:

Is the case study clearly described using current terminology from the field of ethics and multicultural issues? Summarize in one or two sentences how your peer did this, and identify the slides that covered this requirement.

What cultural issues did your peer identify? Evaluate the applicability of the facets identified to the issues. Are these issues pertinent to the approach that your peer offers later in the PowerPoint? What other cultural contexts might be applicable? How clearly are they presented?

What ethical or legal considerations are identified? Are there any pertinent ethical or legal considerations that your peer has not incorporated? Are there specific links to the codes?

How well did your peer use the notes section in the PowerPoint to support his or her argument?

How many research articles are included? (10 peer-reviewed journal articles in addition to any other resources are required.) How well did your peer support his or her writing with citations in the notes?

How would you summarize the recommendations your peer made for addressing the issue at hand? Are these recommendations supported with recent, peer-reviewed evidence? Suggest revisions or additions that would make your peer’s argument more effective. Alternatively, offer a recommendation to mitigate the issue addressed in the presentation.

Does your peer’s logic hold up across the presentation? Can you follow the argument? Are you convinced by the argument, based on the evidence and the way that your peer put the material together?

What is the most effective or convincing part of the presentation? What is the weakest part of the presentation? Be specific so that revisions can be completed effectively and efficiently.

Learning Components

This activity will help you achieve the following learning components:

Describe ethical dilemmas in psychology practice.

Identify types of cultural conflict.

Identify types of cultural differences.

Identify types of bias.

Investigate professional ethical standards.

Apply ethical theory to practice.

Employ ethical decision-making models to practice.

Identify research-based best practices related to culture.

Brainstorm potential solutions for ethical challenges.

The post PSY7543 module 10 task PowerPoint appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Standardized Procedure for Nurse Practitioners: General Policy

Standardized Procedure for Nurse Practitioners: General Policy

STANDARDIZED PROCEDURE PEDIATRICS 2

STANDARDIZED PROCEDURE PEDIATRICS 10

Standardized Procedure Pediatrics

Name

United States University

Primary Health of Acute Clients/Families Across the Lifespan

Course

Dr. Maria Luisa Ramira

July4, 2016

Running head: STANDARDIZED PROCEDURE PEDIATRICS 1

Standardized Procedure for Nurse Practitioners: General Policy

I Purpose

A. To establish a standardized procedure, in compliance with the California Board of Registered Nursing (BRN) and the 11 components of the BRN’s guidelines for Nurse Practitioners (NPs) to perform specified functions without the immediate supervision of a Physician.

II Development and Review

A. All standardized procedures are developed through the collaborative efforts of the members of the organization’s established interdisciplinary committee (IDC). The IDC will consist of physicians, nurse practitioners, registered nurses and administrative representatives of the organization.

B. All standardized procedures will be approved through the IDC made readily available and contain signed and dated approval sheets of all professionals covered by the procedures.

C. All standardized procedures will be reviewed every 3 years or more often as necessary by the IDC.

D. All NPs and their supervising physicians will signify agreement to the standardized procedures upon hire, annually and with changes as needed as evidenced by a signed and dated approval sheet.

E. Signature on the statement of approval and agreement implies the following: Approval of all procedures in the document, intent to abide by the procedures and willingness to maintain a collegial and collaborative relationship with all parties. The signed statement of approval and agreement form will serve as the record of those NPs who have been authorized to perform the procedures. The signature page will be kept on file and readily available together with Standardized Procedures.

III Scope and Setting

A NPs may manage those functions outlined in the standardized procedures, within their trained area of specialty and consistent with their experience and credentialing. Such functions include assessment, management and treatment of acute and chronic illness, contraception, health promotion and overall evaluation of health status. Additional functions include the ordering of diagnostic procedures, physical, occupational, speech therapies, diet and referral to specialty care as needed.

B NPs are authorized to practice standardized procedures in the organization’s Outpatient Clinics.

IV Education and Training/Qualifications

A NPs must have the following

1 Current California registered nurse (RN) license

2 Certification by the State of California, BRN as an NP

3 Board certification from the American Nurses Credentialing Center

4 NP furnishing number

5 DEA registration number

6 Current Health Care Provider Card from the American Heart Association

7 Credentialed by the organization’s medical staff

B In addition to the required education and training all NPs will be required to complete competency validation upon hire and annually. The supervising physician is charged with observing the NP and documenting competency validation. The competency validation checklist is managed, maintained and made available by the Office of Medical Staff as a component of the privilege process. Checklist will be reviewed and updated annually by the IDC.

V Supervision and Evaluation

A NP is authorized to implement the approved standardized procedures without the direct or immediate observation or supervision of a physician unless otherwise specified within a particular procedure.

B Supervising physicians will conduct a weekly case review of a minimum of 10% of each NPs cases for the week. The review will be documented within the electronic medical record and must be completed within 30 days of the visit selected for review. Cases will be selected randomly unless a request for review is received by a medical professional.

C No single physician will supervise more than 4 NPs at any one time.

VI Consultations

A Physician consultation is to be obtained as specified in individual procedures or when deemed appropriate.

VII Patient Records

A NPs will be responsible for the documentation of a complete electronic medical record for each patient contact/encounter in accordance with existing clinic and medical staff policies.

Protocol:

Croup initial visit in the outpatient clinic setting

I Rationale

To assist Nurse Practitioners in the outpatient clinic setting in the differentiation between

croup and other upper airway conditions and to establish guidelines for the management of croup in this setting.

II Definition

Swelling and erythema of the upper airway resulting in narrowing of these airways, usually as a result of viral infection and in some instances bacterial. Most cases are usually mild and self-limiting however, children can be seriously ill or at risk for rapid progression of disease leading to further narrowing of the airways and respiratory compromise.

III Epidemiology

A Typically occurs in children between the ages of 6 months to 6 years, with a peak

incidence between 6 and 36 months.

B Most often occurs in the fall and is usually but not limited to parainfluenza type 1 viral infection.

C Cases occurring in winter are usually but not limited to influenza A and B viruses

D Risk factors include familiar history, parental smoking and male gender.

IV History

A Symptoms of upper respiratory infection for several days.

B Rhinorrhea

C Cough

D Low grade fever

E Symptoms occurring most often at night

F Sore throat

G Stridor

H Intermittent barking, seal like cough

V Physical Exam

A Barking seal like cough, stridor

B Tachypnea

C Use of accessory muscles for respiration

D Tachycardia

E Wheezing

F Low grade fever however, can be elevated to 104F

G Visualization of mouth and epiglottis normal

VI Diagnostic tests

A Diagnosis typically made based on clinical presentation

B Plain imaging of soft tissue of the neck may display classic pattern of subglottic narrowing (steeple sign) on posteroanterior view.

C Pulse oximetry

D Laboratory tests are not necessary for the diagnosis of croup however, may be used to assist with differential diagnosis.

1 CBC

2 Viral Serology

3 Tissue culture

VII Differential Diagnosis

A Epiglottitis

B Foreign body aspiration

C Retropharyngeal or peritonsillar abscess

D Compression due to tumors, trauma or congenital malformations

E Angioedema

F Asthma exacerbation

G Bacterial traceitis

VIII Management – According to severity of disease by means of the Westley Croup Score based on the presence or absence of stridor at rest, degree of chest wall retractions, air entry, the presence or absence of pallor or cyanosis and the mental status.

A Mild croup (Westley croup score of ≤2)

No stridor at rest (although stridor may be present when upset or crying), a barking cough, hoarse cry, and either no, or only mild, chest wall/subcostal retractions.

B Moderate croup (Westley croup score of 3 to 7)

Stridor at rest, has at least mild retractions, and may have other symptoms or signs of respiratory distress, but little or no agitation.

C Severe croup (Westley croup score of ≥8)

Significant stridor at rest, although the loudness of the stridor may decrease with worsening upper airway obstruction and decreased air entry. Retractions are severe (including indrawing of the sternum) and the child may appear anxious, agitated, or pale and fatigued.

D Impending respiratory failure (Westley croup score of ≥12)

Fatigue and listlessness

Marked retractions (although retractions may decrease with increased obstruction and decreased air entry)

Decreased or absent breath sounds

Depressed level of consciousness

Tachycardia out of proportion to fever

Cyanosis or pallor

E Treatment

Mild Croup:

1 Single dose of dexamethasone 0.15 to 0.6 mg/kgorally or parentally to a max dose of 10mg.

2 Disposition home with the following instructions:

a Fever management with acetaminophen 15mg/kg po every 4-6hrs as needed not to exceed 75mg/kg/day.

b Anticipatory guidance of potential worsening and instructions on when to seek care.

c Use of humidified air, cool mist or hot stream

d Return for follow-up next day.

Moderate Croup

1 Follow mild croup guidelines

2 Observe patient for up to 4 hours

If improved

3 Disposition home following instructions for mild croup

If no improvement

a Consult with supervising physician and prepare to administer

b Inhaled racemic epinephrine0.05 ml/kg per dose (maximum of 0.5 ml) of a 2.25% solutiondiluted with normal saline for a 3ml total volume via nebulizer.

c If pulse oximetry is <92% provide supplemental oxygen at a rate to maintain 02 Sat < 92%

d Refer or disposition child via emergency transport to emergency department

Severe croup and impending respiratory failure

a Activate 911 and provide the following until emergency transport arrives:

b Ensure open airway

c Administer supplemental 02 to maintain 0s sat 92%

d Single dose of dexamethasone 0.15 to 0.6 mg/kgparentally.

e Inhaled racemic epinephrine0.05 ml/kg per dose (maximum of 0.5 ml) of a 2.25% solutiondiluted with normal saline for a 3ml total volume via nebulizer.

f Notify supervising physician of need for emergency transport

IX Development and Approval of the Standardized Procedure

This standardized procedure was developed and approved through the organization’s Interdisciplinary Committee and will be reviewed and approved every 3 years or more often as needed.

Revision Date_____________ Review Date______________

X Standardized procedure was approved by the following members of the Interdisciplinary Committee.

___________________ Date_______________________

Pediatric Department Chair

___________________ Date_______________________

Supervising Physician

___________________ Date_______________________

Director of Nursing Practice

___________________ Date_______________________

Administration

XI Practitioners authorized to function under this standardized procedure:

This list of Nurse Practitioners will be maintained on file in the department in which Nurse Practitioners practice and hospital administration.

References

An explanation of standardized procedure requirements for nurse practitioner practice. (1998). Retrieved from http://www.rn.ca.gov/pdfs/regulations/npr-b-20.pdf

Bjornson, C., & Johnson, D. (2015). Croup. Retrieved from https://online.epocrates.com/diseases/68111/Croup/Key-Highlights

Burns, C. E., Dunn, A. M., Brady, M. A., Starr, N. B., &Blosser, C. G. (2013). Pediatric Primary Care (5th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier.

Ferri, F. F. (2016). Ferri’s Clinical Advisor. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier.

Woods, C. R. (2015). Croup. Retrieved from https://www.uptodate.com/contents/croup-approach-to-management?source=see_link&sectionName=Respiratory+care&anchor=H91700#H1

Zoorob, R., Sidani, M., & Murray, J. (2011). Croup: An overview. Retrieved from http://www.aafp.org/afp/2011/0501/p1067.html

The post Standardized Procedure for Nurse Practitioners: General Policy appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Analyze the created Gantt chart and network diagram.

Analyze the created Gantt chart and network diagram.

Use Company: Target (Goal is attached)

The stage is set for your strategic goal to become a reality. Before that can happen, you’ll need to think through and map out the tasks within the project. This assignment will focus on planning out the individual aspects of the project using the project management tools that you’ve previously learned. You will be able to use Word or Excel for this assignment. (Choose whichever you’re more familiar with.) It’s important to think through the goal you’re trying to accomplish and how you’ll reach it. The more detailed you can be with your tasks, the smoother the project management cycle will go. Your submission this week should accomplish the following:

Create a basic chart that lists out at least 8 tasks required to complete your chosen strategic management goal and estimates on how long each will take to complete.

Create a Gantt chart using the tasks listed in the previous chart.

Create a network diagram using the tasks listed out in the previous chart.

Analyze your created Gantt chart and network diagram. Identify two potential issues that may be a cause for concern when the project gets underway.

The post Analyze the created Gantt chart and network diagram. appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Week2

Week2

Choose an Acute Health Problem for Pediatrics and write a complete SP. Follow guidelines per CA BRN examples

STANDARDIZED PROCEDURE PEDIATRICS 2

STANDARDIZED PROCEDURE PEDIATRICS 10

Standardized Procedure Pediatrics

Name

United States University

Primary Health of Acute Clients/Families Across the Lifespan

Course

Dr. Maria Luisa Ramira

July4, 2016

Running head: STANDARDIZED PROCEDURE PEDIATRICS 1

Standardized Procedure for Nurse Practitioners: General Policy

I Purpose

A. To establish a standardized procedure, in compliance with the California Board of Registered Nursing (BRN) and the 11 components of the BRN’s guidelines for Nurse Practitioners (NPs) to perform specified functions without the immediate supervision of a Physician.

II Development and Review

A. All standardized procedures are developed through the collaborative efforts of the members of the organization’s established interdisciplinary committee (IDC). The IDC will consist of physicians, nurse practitioners, registered nurses and administrative representatives of the organization.

B. All standardized procedures will be approved through the IDC made readily available and contain signed and dated approval sheets of all professionals covered by the procedures.

C. All standardized procedures will be reviewed every 3 years or more often as necessary by the IDC.

D. All NPs and their supervising physicians will signify agreement to the standardized procedures upon hire, annually and with changes as needed as evidenced by a signed and dated approval sheet.

E. Signature on the statement of approval and agreement implies the following: Approval of all procedures in the document, intent to abide by the procedures and willingness to maintain a collegial and collaborative relationship with all parties. The signed statement of approval and agreement form will serve as the record of those NPs who have been authorized to perform the procedures. The signature page will be kept on file and readily available together with Standardized Procedures.

III Scope and Setting

A NPs may manage those functions outlined in the standardized procedures, within their trained area of specialty and consistent with their experience and credentialing. Such functions include assessment, management and treatment of acute and chronic illness, contraception, health promotion and overall evaluation of health status. Additional functions include the ordering of diagnostic procedures, physical, occupational, speech therapies, diet and referral to specialty care as needed.

B NPs are authorized to practice standardized procedures in the organization’s Outpatient Clinics.

IV Education and Training/Qualifications

A NPs must have the following

1 Current California registered nurse (RN) license

2 Certification by the State of California, BRN as an NP

3 Board certification from the American Nurses Credentialing Center

4 NP furnishing number

5 DEA registration number

6 Current Health Care Provider Card from the American Heart Association

7 Credentialed by the organization’s medical staff

B In addition to the required education and training all NPs will be required to complete competency validation upon hire and annually. The supervising physician is charged with observing the NP and documenting competency validation. The competency validation checklist is managed, maintained and made available by the Office of Medical Staff as a component of the privilege process. Checklist will be reviewed and updated annually by the IDC.

V Supervision and Evaluation

A NP is authorized to implement the approved standardized procedures without the direct or immediate observation or supervision of a physician unless otherwise specified within a particular procedure.

B Supervising physicians will conduct a weekly case review of a minimum of 10% of each NPs cases for the week. The review will be documented within the electronic medical record and must be completed within 30 days of the visit selected for review. Cases will be selected randomly unless a request for review is received by a medical professional.

C No single physician will supervise more than 4 NPs at any one time.

VI Consultations

A Physician consultation is to be obtained as specified in individual procedures or when deemed appropriate.

VII Patient Records

A NPs will be responsible for the documentation of a complete electronic medical record for each patient contact/encounter in accordance with existing clinic and medical staff policies.

Protocol:

Croup initial visit in the outpatient clinic setting

I Rationale

To assist Nurse Practitioners in the outpatient clinic setting in the differentiation between

croup and other upper airway conditions and to establish guidelines for the management of croup in this setting.

II Definition

Swelling and erythema of the upper airway resulting in narrowing of these airways, usually as a result of viral infection and in some instances bacterial. Most cases are usually mild and self-limiting however, children can be seriously ill or at risk for rapid progression of disease leading to further narrowing of the airways and respiratory compromise.

III Epidemiology

A Typically occurs in children between the ages of 6 months to 6 years, with a peak

incidence between 6 and 36 months.

B Most often occurs in the fall and is usually but not limited to parainfluenza type 1 viral infection.

C Cases occurring in winter are usually but not limited to influenza A and B viruses

D Risk factors include familiar history, parental smoking and male gender.

IV History

A Symptoms of upper respiratory infection for several days.

B Rhinorrhea

C Cough

D Low grade fever

E Symptoms occurring most often at night

F Sore throat

G Stridor

H Intermittent barking, seal like cough

V Physical Exam

A Barking seal like cough, stridor

B Tachypnea

C Use of accessory muscles for respiration

D Tachycardia

E Wheezing

F Low grade fever however, can be elevated to 104F

G Visualization of mouth and epiglottis normal

VI Diagnostic tests

A Diagnosis typically made based on clinical presentation

B Plain imaging of soft tissue of the neck may display classic pattern of subglottic narrowing (steeple sign) on posteroanterior view.

C Pulse oximetry

D Laboratory tests are not necessary for the diagnosis of croup however, may be used to assist with differential diagnosis.

1 CBC

2 Viral Serology

3 Tissue culture

VII Differential Diagnosis

A Epiglottitis

B Foreign body aspiration

C Retropharyngeal or peritonsillar abscess

D Compression due to tumors, trauma or congenital malformations

E Angioedema

F Asthma exacerbation

G Bacterial traceitis

VIII Management – According to severity of disease by means of the Westley Croup Score based on the presence or absence of stridor at rest, degree of chest wall retractions, air entry, the presence or absence of pallor or cyanosis and the mental status.

A Mild croup (Westley croup score of ≤2)

No stridor at rest (although stridor may be present when upset or crying), a barking cough, hoarse cry, and either no, or only mild, chest wall/subcostal retractions.

B Moderate croup (Westley croup score of 3 to 7)

Stridor at rest, has at least mild retractions, and may have other symptoms or signs of respiratory distress, but little or no agitation.

C Severe croup (Westley croup score of ≥8)

Significant stridor at rest, although the loudness of the stridor may decrease with worsening upper airway obstruction and decreased air entry. Retractions are severe (including indrawing of the sternum) and the child may appear anxious, agitated, or pale and fatigued.

D Impending respiratory failure (Westley croup score of ≥12)

Fatigue and listlessness

Marked retractions (although retractions may decrease with increased obstruction and decreased air entry)

Decreased or absent breath sounds

Depressed level of consciousness

Tachycardia out of proportion to fever

Cyanosis or pallor

E Treatment

Mild Croup:

1 Single dose of dexamethasone 0.15 to 0.6 mg/kgorally or parentally to a max dose of 10mg.

2 Disposition home with the following instructions:

a Fever management with acetaminophen 15mg/kg po every 4-6hrs as needed not to exceed 75mg/kg/day.

b Anticipatory guidance of potential worsening and instructions on when to seek care.

c Use of humidified air, cool mist or hot stream

d Return for follow-up next day.

Moderate Croup

1 Follow mild croup guidelines

2 Observe patient for up to 4 hours

If improved

3 Disposition home following instructions for mild croup

If no improvement

a Consult with supervising physician and prepare to administer

b Inhaled racemic epinephrine0.05 ml/kg per dose (maximum of 0.5 ml) of a 2.25% solutiondiluted with normal saline for a 3ml total volume via nebulizer.

c If pulse oximetry is <92% provide supplemental oxygen at a rate to maintain 02 Sat < 92%

d Refer or disposition child via emergency transport to emergency department

Severe croup and impending respiratory failure

a Activate 911 and provide the following until emergency transport arrives:

b Ensure open airway

c Administer supplemental 02 to maintain 0s sat 92%

d Single dose of dexamethasone 0.15 to 0.6 mg/kgparentally.

e Inhaled racemic epinephrine0.05 ml/kg per dose (maximum of 0.5 ml) of a 2.25% solutiondiluted with normal saline for a 3ml total volume via nebulizer.

f Notify supervising physician of need for emergency transport

IX Development and Approval of the Standardized Procedure

This standardized procedure was developed and approved through the organization’s Interdisciplinary Committee and will be reviewed and approved every 3 years or more often as needed.

Revision Date_____________ Review Date______________

X Standardized procedure was approved by the following members of the Interdisciplinary Committee.

___________________ Date_______________________

Pediatric Department Chair

___________________ Date_______________________

Supervising Physician

___________________ Date_______________________

Director of Nursing Practice

___________________ Date_______________________

Administration

XI Practitioners authorized to function under this standardized procedure:

This list of Nurse Practitioners will be maintained on file in the department in which Nurse Practitioners practice and hospital administration.

References

An explanation of standardized procedure requirements for nurse practitioner practice. (1998). Retrieved from http://www.rn.ca.gov/pdfs/regulations/npr-b-20.pdf

Bjornson, C., & Johnson, D. (2015). Croup. Retrieved from https://online.epocrates.com/diseases/68111/Croup/Key-Highlights

Burns, C. E., Dunn, A. M., Brady, M. A., Starr, N. B., &Blosser, C. G. (2013). Pediatric Primary Care (5th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier.

Ferri, F. F. (2016). Ferri’s Clinical Advisor. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier.

Woods, C. R. (2015). Croup. Retrieved from https://www.uptodate.com/contents/croup-approach-to-management?source=see_link&sectionName=Respiratory+care&anchor=H91700#H1

Zoorob, R., Sidani, M., & Murray, J. (2011). Croup: An overview. Retrieved from http://www.aafp.org/afp/2011/0501/p1067.html

The post Week2 appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"