What were your communication challenges at the start of class?

These are the requirements for my reflection essay for my speech class

Instructions

Please answer the following questions. Please read all the questions before writing; consider all the areas covered in the course, going back to the beginning. Remember to cite specific examples to illustrate your statements. 

What were your communication challenges at the start of class?

In what ways do you think you have progressed in your interpersonal communication abilities? What do you want to keep working on?

In what ways do you think you have progressed in your small group (i.e. meetings) communication abilities? What do you want to keep working on?

In what ways has your understanding of nonverbal communication improved? How aware are you of the messages you send? In what ways are you better able to decode other people’s nonverbal messages?

How do you feel like your understanding of the ways that diversity affects communication (gender, ethnicity, etc.) has improved? Include specifics.

What did you learn from the course material about interviewing? What did you learn from doing your interview, and what would you like to improve for future interviews?

What were the organization patterns for your speeches? How could the organization have been improved?

How successful were your introductions, bodies, and conclusions? Again, be specific with examples.

How did your language, voice, and body language enhance or harm your presentations? Be as precise as you can and comment on all areas of your delivery. 

In your estimation, what were the most effective aspects of your presentations?

Reflection paper feedback

_____ Pre-existing communication challenges

_____ Interpersonal progression and goals

_____ Small group progression and goals

_____ Nonverbal understanding

_____ Diversity understanding

_____ Discussion of your interview effectiveness

_____ Discussion of your organization

_____ Discussion of your introductions, bodies, and conclusions w/examples

_____ Discussion of your use of language, voice, and body

_____ Discussion of the most effective aspects of your messages

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

What questions still linger for you about the subject matter or about the writing?

You must write on an essay that you have not explored in a formal writing assignment yet this semester.

The essays you can choose

  1. Pizza, Pakora and Pancit by Sravani Banerjee.
  2. OMG: Tweeting, Trending, Texting by Manda Mohsenzadegan
  3. “Drugs” by Gore Vidal
  4. Lera’s Story by Dan Archer and Olga Trusova

please follow the requirement

Format Requirements:

  1. Minimum 2 full pages (to the bottom of two pages)
  2. Typed
  3. 12 pt. Times New Roman Font
  4. MLA format

Assignment: Please write a 3-4 paragraph mini-essay in which you summarize your chosen essay, analyze two meaningful quotes from the essay, connect those quotes to the message of the essay and devise discussion questions based on your essay’s subject matter.

Please structure your paper as follows:

Paragraph One: Summarize/paraphrase your chosen essay. Do not utilize quotes in this paragraph. Instead, put the essay into your own words. Make sure you clearly convey the main message of the essay in this paragraph.

Paragraph Two: Choose two meaningful quotes from the essay to analyze and “pull apart” like you did in your rhetorical analysis essay. Make sure you connect the quotes to the main message of the paragraph. If this paragraph seems too long, feel free to break it up into two separate paragraphs—each paragraph focusing on one quote at a time.

Paragraph Three: (If you broke up the previous paragraph into two paragraphs, for you this will be Paragraph Four.) I would like for you to come up with discussion questions you could pose to your fellow classmates if you were to lead a group discussion on your chosen essay. Another way of going about this would be to approach it as you would a double or triple entry journal in which you list the questions that you still have about the reading. What questions still linger for you about the subject matter or about the writing? How could you “go deeper” on the subject? How could you play “devil’s advocate”?

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Americans’ Attitudes About Privacy, Security and Surveillance

Over the last few weeks we have looked at a number of perspectives on the topic of privacy

ranging from essays (Solnit, Menand), a report (Madden & Rainie), a television show (“Nosedive” dir. Wright), a

TED Talk (Greenwald), and a short story (Eggers). Now it’s your turn to enter the conversation by providing a

synthesis of some of these ideas before providing your own subjective position on the topic.

The essential questions you are responding to are 1) what do these writers have to say about privacy in the digital

age and 2) what is your position on the topic?

In order to write an effective analysis, I advise that you follow these steps:

● Introduce the topic, maybe including an anecdote from your own life, an example from a culturally

relevant reference, or a quote that relates to what you are discussing. Give your reader a sense of what you

will be discussing in your essay and why.

● Next, tell us what others are saying, providing a summary and analysis of the ideas put forth by at least

three voices found in our class texts. Be sure to show how these ideas are related and how they differ. You

will want to provide relevant quotes to show what they are saying, making sure to frame each quote.

● Once you have shown what others have said it is your turn to respond. Show whether you agree, disagree

or agree and disagree simultaneously. This is your chance to include reference to your self-selected text

that may support you positions, or at least help to why what you are discussing is important. As you’re

doing this, be sure to distinguish what you are saying from what others have said. It would help to identify

whose views you agree with the most and explain your reasoning with examples from your knowledge and

experiences.

● After presenting your position, enhance your credibility by planting a naysayer, anticipating objections,

qualifying and/or making concessions to this position. Represent these objections fairly and be sure to

answer them.

● End with a conclusion that summarizes your position and says why it matters.

Class Texts

Eggers, Dave. “We Like You So Much and Want to Know You Better.” The New York Times

Magazine. Sept. 22 2013.

Greenwald, Glenn. “Why Privacy Matters” Speech. Ted.com. Web.

Madden, Mary and Lee Rainie. “Americans’ Attitudes About Privacy, Security and Surveillance.”

Pewinternet.org. 20 May 2015. Web

Menand, Louis. “Why Do We Care So Much About Privacy?” The New Yorker, 22 June 2018.

“Nosedive.” Black Mirror, season 3 episode 1, written by Michael Schur and Rashida Jones, directed by Joe

Wright, Netflix, 2016.

Solnit, Rebecca.. “Driven To Distraction.” Harpers Magazine. May 2018.

Self-selected “privacy” text (See RR#7 prompt)

Requirements:

● Your essay must be a minimum of 4-6 pages long, double-spaced, 12-point Times New Roman font, and formatted

according to MLA guidelines, including a works cited page.

● Your essay must include references (direct quote and paraphrase) to at least three of the class texts listed above in

addition to a self-selected text from a credible source.

● Your essay must have a strong thesis that is well supported through well-developed, unified and coherent body

paragraphs that contain effective topic sentences.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Examine the author’s purpose

Purpose: Students should write an analysis of a single text (print, visual, cultural). The final draft should be 3-4 pages long. Go to course documents and there will be a folder with links to articles that you may use if you wish.

Assignment: You are to examinea short text of your choosing in great detail and depth. You will need to analyze the text’s argument and consider how and why the argument is made. Do notsummarize the content of the text and do not respond to the text’s argument. Your job is to analyzethe rhetorical strategies of the text.

Step 1:Locate a text with a rhetorical argument. You may use an essay, a speech, an advertisement, or any other text.

Step 2:Examine theauthor’s purpose. As with all texts we discuss in class, your job is to consider the author’s purpose, make a claim (using evidence) about why he or she wrote the text, and who the text’s intended audience might be. Look for a thesis statement and/or end-of- paragraph arguments and for the use of evidence to support the argument. Think about what kinds of changes the author is hoping to create in the reader’s mind or actions as you evaluate the author’s purpose. What obstacles is the author up against? Does the author cope with all those obstacles successfully? What means of appeal (such as pathos, logos and ethos) does the author employ? Make sure to quote sentences that demonstrate the author’s main ideas in order to judge their effectiveness, and integrate those ideas into your argument.

Also, consideraudience. Closely examine the title, the introduction, conclusion, examples, language and word choices that the author uses. What kind(s) of people do you think these would appeal to, and why? Are these people included in this target audience? How do their experiences suggest whether the author succeeded or not? Make sure to use quotes from the text that shows us for who the author intends to write.

Step 3:Write a rough draft analysis of your text. Explain the author’s rhetorical strategies. Explain how the author makes his or her argument. What kind of evidence does she provide to support her claim? Does this text speak to the intended audience? Why?

Page length: 3-4 pages

Format: MLA. 12 pt. Double-spaced. Times New Roman (this font). 1-inch margins. Pages numbered, no number on first page. No title page—put name, date, class and instructor on first page at the top, flush left (double-spaced).

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

ajesty’s Principal Secretary of State of North-America

Section 2: Short Essay (30 points). For section 2 of your Final Exam, please write a 3-4 page(s) short essay. The short essay must be written in MLA style. It must consist of an introduction with a thesis, multiple fully developed body paragraphs, and a conclusion. When quoting, please provide the source from where you attained the quote. Also, please attach a works cited page to your short essay at the end, even for the textbook we are using. If students have not purchased “Rules of Thumb”, they can visit “Owl Purdue MLA” to see how to use MLA writing style. Also, outside or secondary sources are not required, but they can be used to write the Final Exam short essay. If students need help with writing and organizing their essay, they can read Harvard College Writing Center’s “A Brief Guide to Writing A College Paper” which is online: writingcenter.fas.harvard.edu/files/hwp/files/bg_writing_english.pdf. It can be accessed by going to this url address. The topic for the Final Exam essay should not be the same topic as the Midterm Exam Essay or the Final Term Paper.

Topic(s) for the short essay: For section 2 of the Final Exam, students have free range to write about any of the readings that we have covered in this class this semester. Students are to examine and analyze the similarities as well as the differences between two or more texts that they choose to write about. Students will be able to show what they have learned from the class this semester. Some of the issues that have been covered in the readings this semester includes slavery, segregation, Jim Crow Laws, racial discrimination, voting rights, poverty, sexism, access to equal education, mass incarceration, lack of access to equal health care, unethical medical practices in prison, White mob violence of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, Civil Rights, and Human Rights, etc. Some suggestions for brainstorming ideas are as follows: Students can compare, and contrast different poems, like for instance, Maya Angelou’s “Still I Rise”, and Paul Lawrence Dunbar’s “We Wear the Mask” to examine and analyze the differences, or similarities between the two poems. Students can look at similar readings they feel mirror each other to discuss how they speak to the same realities African Americans had to endure and overcome in their’ plight for freedom, justice, and equality. For example, some authors detested slavery and racial injustice in their writings like in Benjamin Banneker’s Letter to Thomas Jefferson, and Richard Allen’s “An Address to Those Who Keep Slaves and Approve the Practice”. As another idea, students could compare and analyze the aesthetics in Phillis Wheatley’s poems “On Being Brought from Africa to America”, “To the Right Honourable William, Earl of Dartmouth, His Majesty’s Principal Secretary of State of North-America, & c.”, and Frances E.W. Harper’s poems, “The Slave Auction”, “The Slave Mother”, and “Bury Me in a Free Land”. In general, students can also look at how the various readings we have covered helped them to better understand history, society, politics, or any other aspects of life. There are no parameters, boundaries or restrictions in terms of creative freedom when writing the short essay for the second section of the Final Exam.

Some questions for students to consider when they are writing out essays:

How are the authors using language in the texts? How do the authors use language to communicate certain ideas to the reader? What words jump out at you from the texts? Why? What type of atmosphere do the authors create in these texts? What stands out to you in these pieces of writing? Who is the intended audience in both texts? Where is the setting in these stories or writings? Describe something that stands out to you in the settings between the two stories or writings? Where do you think these events are taking place? What are some of the points that the authors raise in their stories or pieces of writing? Why are these writings important to understanding the Black experience? What do we learn about history and society from reading these texts? Do we learn anything new or important about African American people and their’ culture from these texts? What do you think was the authors’ purpose for writing these stories? What do the authors want us to learn or take away from their stories? What are the authors’ purpose in writing these texts? What specifically are the authors trying to communicate to the audience through their writings? What do the authors want their’ audiences to take away from their stories or pieces of writing? How do these stories or pieces of writing help us to address deeper societal issues like racial discrimination, sexism, homophobia, Islamophobia, gentrification, income inequality, mass incarceration, unethical medical practices in prison, poverty, voting rights, access to equal education, lack of equal access to health care, Civil Rights, Human Rights, Black on Black violence, and the police shootings of countless African Americans in the present day? Do the authors provide any solutions to these deeper societal issues in their writings? If you feel the authors failed this objective, do you have any solutions to these deeper societal issues? In final, how do these writings help us to learn more about the human 

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Which economic concepts can be used to better understand sweatshops and manufacturing in the developing world?

The assignment is to write a reaction essay after reading the following two academic articles:

Skarbek, et. al. on working conditions in sweatshops:

Powell and Skarbek on wages in sweatshops:

Questions to focus on:

1. Which economic concepts can be used to better understand sweatshops and manufacturing in the developing world?

2. How could domestic policy improve outcomes for workers in sweatshops?

3. How could domestic policy harm workers in sweatshops?

4. Do international protests help or harm sweatshop workers?

Your response should not exceed 2000 words, and should be at least 1250 words.

Extra resources:

Krugman on sweatshops: http://www.slate.com/articles/business/the_dismal_science/1997/03/in_praise_of_cheap_labor.html

Kristof on sweatshops: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/15/opinion/15kristof.html

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Describe global patterns of atmospheric heating and circulation.

1.  Describe global patterns of atmospheric heating and circulation.  What mechanisms produce high precipitation in the tropics? What mechanisms produce high precipitation at temperate latitudes?  What mechanisms produce low precipitation in the tropics? (60 points)

2.  Use what you know about atmospheric circulation and seasonal changes in the sun’s orientation to earth to explain the highly seasonal rainfall in the tropical dry forest and tropical savanna biomes. (Hint: Why does the rainy season in these biomes come during the warmer months?) (40 points)Must be single spaced, double spaced between paragraphs with 1 inch margins around and headings in bold. Times New Roman 12 Pt Font. APA Format.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

The specific topic concerning literature is up to you, and the approach you use in your analysis will also be up to you

You may write your Course Paper ONLY on (any one or more of) the following texts:

  1. Federico García Lorca (Avant-garde/ Spain): Lament for Ignacio Sanchez Mejías
  2. Jonathan Swift (Enlightenment/ Ireland) : A Modest Proposal
  3. James Joyce (Modern/ Ireland): The Dead
  4. Mo Yan (Modern/China): The Old Gun
  5. Rabindranath Tagore; (Modern/ India): Kabuliwala
  6. Hanan Al-Shaykh (Modern/ Lebanon): The Women’s Swimming Pool
  7. Naguib Mahfouz (Modern/ Egypt): Zaabalawi
  8. Doris Lessing (Colonial/ Rhodesia): The Old Chief of Mshlanga
  9. Nawal El Saadawi (Feminist/Egypt): In Camera
  10. Leslie Marmon Silko (Post [-] colonial/ United States): Yellow Woman
  11. Toni Morrison: Recitatif
  12. Alice Munro (Contemporary/ Canada): Walker Brothers Cowboy
  13. Pablo Neruda (Modern Romantic/ Chile): Tonight I Can Write; Ode to the Tomato
  14. Clarice Lispector (Modern/ Brazil): The Daydreams of a Drunken Woman
  15. Jorge Luis Borges (Modern/ Argentina): The Garden of the Forking Paths
  16. Katherine Mansfield (Modernist/ New Zealand): The Garden Party
  17. Witi Ihimaera (Postcolonial/ New Zealand): This Life is Weary

The purpose of this essay will be to demonstrate to me that you can argue effectively about literature. You should have a clear thesis statement that you then support with specific evidence throughout the rest of your essay. Your evidence will come from the text itself and from secondary sources as well. This essay is not a plot summary, response paper, book report, or explication. Instead, it is a persuasive analysis in which you enlighten the work of literature you are writing about.

You should assume that your reader is familiar with the literature you are discussing and address that reader accordingly.

The specific topic concerning literature is up to you, and the approach you use in your analysis will also be up to you. You are welcome to employ whatever analytical tools seem appropriate to your topic and to your interests. Your essay must deal with literature we are studying in this course. Look at the list I have given under “Course Paper texts”. You may discuss one or two works of literature but no more than two works. For example, you can write a comparative analysis of the female characters in “The Woman’s Swimming Pool” and “In Camera,” OR you can do an in-depth analysis on the role of desire in Mo Yan’s “The Old Gun”(it is up to you!).

You must have at least FOUR secondary sources. NO BLOCK QUOTATIONS (any quote that extends beyond 4 typed lines). These sources must be scholarly. Remember, you are in college and your writing must reflect scholarly thinking and presentation. This is not your weekly discussion board responses.

Papers should be double spaced, with 1” margin on the left and 1.5” margin on the right. Please use 12-point Times New Roman. Cite your sources according to MLA. You should have a minimum of FOUR outside sources. Do not use Internet sources unless the exact same source exists in a printed form and merely happens to be on-line in a full text version. Papers will be graded on the originality of argument, use and integration of textual evidence, development of detail, and mechanics of writing.

When I grade the paper, I will look for well thought-out thesis and support, idea development, organization and “flow” (logical transitions, topic sentences), clarity of expression (grammar and punctuation), and adherence to MLA formatting (Font, Spacing, Titles, Headings, In-text Citations, Documentation).

Word Limit: MINIMUM of 8-9 double-spaced pages (9th page will be Works Cited)

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

What other issues may the DHS need to address in the future?

1. Identify the three major factors that will arise as the DHS progresses in asserting itself as an effective federal department focused on protecting the United States from all hazards. What other issues may the DHS need to address in the future?

2.How does the federal government address incidents of cybercrime and cyberterrorism within an overarching cybersecurity and critical infrastructure plan?

3.Identify and describe the various programs, organizations, and volunteer groups in which private citizens may participate regarding homeland security.

4.Create two qualitative systems for floods—one that measures consequence and another that measures likelihood.

5.How is the media an effective risk communicator? In what ways are they poor at communicating disaster information?

Keep the following in mind when completing this essay examination:

  • When developing your answers remember you must include (cited) facts to support the major points in your response. Your responses should not include continuous citations without your thoughts and analysis, as well. Rather, your responses must reflect a balance between facts and your perspective on the points you make.
  • Your responses to each of the quiz questions should be a minimum of one page (250 words) and a maximum of two pages in length, double-spaced and written in 11-point Arial font or 12-point Times New Roman.
  • Include the question you are responding to immediately before each answer.
  • Include a title/cover page.
  • Include cited references and format them in the American Psychological Association (APA) writing style (6th edition).
 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"