Assignment 1: Project Proposal: Initiating & Planning

Due Week 6 and worth 150 points

Note: This is the first of three assignments which, as a whole, will cover all aspects of the project life cycle relevant to your selected project.

You have been selected to be the Project Manager (for a project of your choice). The project that you decide to use should meet the key criteria of a project, such as (a) having a beginning and an end; (b) results in something being delivered to someone; (c) requires a series of activities that must be done to complete the project; and (d) requires resources (e.g., people, materials) to complete the work. The project must be one of a professional nature and must last for at least twelve months. NOTE: You are prohibited from using projects that can be found on the Internet, including projects found in places like CourseHero. All project submissions are submitted to Safe Assign for review.

Write a two to three page paper, in which you define the scope of your chosen project. In your paper you must:

Provide a brief summary of your chosen project.

Describe at least three (3) project goals and three (3) project objectives.

Identify the key customer(s) and at least two (2) stakeholders for your project. Remember, you are delivering the project to your customer(s); however, there are others (stakeholders) who have a vested interest in your project.

Describe at least three (3) key milestones and /or deliverables for your project.

Describe a high-level timeline that includes key tasks and deadlines.

Estimate the project’s overall cost and any key staffing and non-staffing resources needed.

Use at least three (3) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar websites do not qualify as quality resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

Typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides.

Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

Evaluate corporate strategy and the project life cycle phases to define the project and initiate a project plan.

The post Assignment 1: Project Proposal: Initiating & Planning appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

· What did the Court state about the justiciability of this case?

Assignment Details In this unit, we are studying the power that may be exercised by the executive branch. Select only 1 of the following cases, and respond to the questions in a 4–5-page paper (choose only 1 case): Case 1: Read the case Trump v. Hawaii, 585 U.S. _ (2018), and answer the following questions:

· Summarize the facts of the case in your own words.

· Summarize the law that was passed to exclude certain foreign nationals.

· What did the Court state about the justiciability of this case?

· What did the Court state about the plaintiffs’ standing to file the lawsuit?

· What did the Court state regarding the president’s authority to pass this law?

· Finally, discuss whether you agree with the majority or with the dissenting justices. Explain your answer.

OR

Case 2:

Read the case of Zivotofsky v. Kerry, 576 U.S. _(2015), and answer the following questions:

· Summarize the facts of the case in your own words.

· Summarize the law that was passed to exclude certain foreign nationals.

· What did the Court state about the justiciability of this case?

· What did the Court state about the plaintiffs’ standing to file the lawsuit?

· What did the Court state about the conflict between Congress’s authority to pass the statute and the president’s authority to recognize a foreign sovereign?

· Finally, discuss whether you agree with the majority or with the dissenting justices. Explain your answer.

References

Oyez. (n.d.). Trump v. Hawaii. Retrieved from https://www.oyez.org/cases/2017/17-965

Oyez. (n.d.). Zivotofsky v. Kerry. Retrieved from https://www.oyez.org/cases/2014/13-628

The post · What did the Court state about the justiciability of this case? appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Unit 2 Assignment

Assignment Details In this unit, we are studying the power that may be exercised by the executive branch. Select only 1 of the following cases, and respond to the questions in a 4–5-page paper (choose only 1 case): Case 1: Read the case Trump v. Hawaii, 585 U.S. _ (2018), and answer the following questions:

· Summarize the facts of the case in your own words.

· Summarize the law that was passed to exclude certain foreign nationals.

· What did the Court state about the justiciability of this case?

· What did the Court state about the plaintiffs’ standing to file the lawsuit?

· What did the Court state regarding the president’s authority to pass this law?

· Finally, discuss whether you agree with the majority or with the dissenting justices. Explain your answer.

OR

Case 2:

Read the case of Zivotofsky v. Kerry, 576 U.S. _(2015), and answer the following questions:

· Summarize the facts of the case in your own words.

· Summarize the law that was passed to exclude certain foreign nationals.

· What did the Court state about the justiciability of this case?

· What did the Court state about the plaintiffs’ standing to file the lawsuit?

· What did the Court state about the conflict between Congress’s authority to pass the statute and the president’s authority to recognize a foreign sovereign?

· Finally, discuss whether you agree with the majority or with the dissenting justices. Explain your answer.

References

Oyez. (n.d.). Trump v. Hawaii. Retrieved from https://www.oyez.org/cases/2017/17-965

Oyez. (n.d.). Zivotofsky v. Kerry. Retrieved from https://www.oyez.org/cases/2014/13-628

The post Unit 2 Assignment appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Discuss how each party determines the value of what they are negotiating for and what they are willing to give up.

Report Issue

Find a situation (a real-world situation or a fictional situation) with two or more parties of jurisdiction or interest over a specific project or policy (public/private partnership, intergovernmental). At least one of the parties needs to be a governing board or elected officials.

In 750-1,000 words, do the following:

Explain the participants in the situation. (power involved, interest, requirement)

Explain the difference between influence and negotiation among the parties.

Recommend strategies to build the relationship between the parties in preparation for negotiation (at least one of the parties needs to be elected officials or a governing board)

Recommend different techniques of negotiation the parties can utilize to get their interest or requirements met.

Discuss how each party determines the value of what they are negotiating for and what they are willing to give up.

Discuss what would make each party agree to a decision within a negotiation or leave the table (how much leverage does each party have).

Use two to three scholarly resources to support your explanations.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies: 2.4: Recommend strategies for negotiating various agreements; 3.4: Recommend strategies to build relationships and advocate with elected or governing board officials.

Rubric

Attempt Start Date: 02-May-2019 at 12:00:00 AM

Due Date: 08-May-2019 at 11:59:59 PM

Maximum Points: 100.0

0Files BROWSE FROM MY COMPUTER More options for File Upload

                       © 2019 BNED LoudCloud LLC  

Terms & Conditions |

Privacy Policy |

Tech Support

[ Ver: 5.4.1-865 ]

In the lecture the professor gave us these notes.

For section three:

1) section three should lead into section four.

2) Section four must mention BATNA: Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement

3) Pick 2-3 negotiation tactics and how they relate to the scenario.

4) Don’t do section 5 and 6 as is. Discuss more about how much each party has and how much leverage they have.

attachment
Rubric_Print_Format7.xlsx

The post Discuss how each party determines the value of what they are negotiating for and what they are willing to give up. appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"