This Assignment is due on Tuesday 04, 2014 at 12 pm. No later than that.

1. Please search the Internet and find 3 Videos about Quality.  One should describe Joseph Juran’s views or theories, one will describe Deming’s views and the last should explain some of Philip Crosby’s quality theory.   Write a short paper explaining the differences between the views and the common elements of these theories.  In your paper include the URL of the video and explain which you prefer and why. 800 words minimum.

2. Please explain the Process Capability Ratio. 1. Do you think that this would be a good measure to use. If “YES,” why. If “NO,” why not? 2. What type of process would be best suited for this type of measurement. Please include your references. 400 words minimum.

NOTE: I will check for ORIGINALITY VERICATION before I buy the answer.

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Discussion: Do we have our hands on the rail switch? What

does justice require of us?

This assignment asks you to consider if,  in your perspective, Peter Singer is correct that justice requires us as individual citizens to help reduce global poverty or if counter arguments are correct. Clearly reasonable people can differ and there is no expectation that you give a certain answer- only that you give it thoughtful reflection. As we talked about the first week our class is based on thinking not raw memorization. Current social and problems “require armies of independent-minded, collaborative, and passionate problem-solvers, not more Jeopardy champions” (p. xii).* The same can be said of the current job market. Portable skills are ideally suited to a rapidly changing job market. Justice requires moral reflection from among competing values and you will encounter the need for decisions in the presence of conflicting values throughout your life in ways large and small. 

To that end make sure you understand Singer’s arguments. Consider both arguments and evidence that could be made for his view and against it. Weigh the merits of the arguments and evidence. 

1) Do you agree or disagree with Peter Singer- that we all have our hands on the rail track switch when it comes to dealing with global poverty? Why? Why not?

Each 1st post should be at least three substantial paragraphs. 

The Readings:

Do we have our hands on the rail switch?

In this section Peter Singer explores the implications of this extension of the trolley problem to social justice. Is Singer correct or incorrect in whole or in part? Do we all (and not just our leaders) have our hands on the trolley switch? 

If our choices impact social justice and the environment, what can we find that isn’t related to politics?

Singer continues: “Bob’s conduct, most of us will immediately respond, was gravely wrong. Unger agrees. But then he reminds us that we, too, have opportunities to save the lives of children. We can give to organizations like Unicef or Oxfam America. How much would we have to give one of these organizations to have a high probability of saving the life of a child threatened by easily preventable diseases? (I do not believe that children are more worth saving than adults, but since no one can argue that children have brought their poverty on themselves, focusing on them simplifies the issues.) Unger called up some experts and used the information they provided to offer some plausible estimates that include the cost of raising money, administrative expenses and the cost of delivering aid where it is most needed. By his calculation, $200 in donations would help a sickly 2-year-old transform into a healthy 6-year-old — offering safe passage through childhood’s most dangerous years. To show how practical philosophical argument can be, Unger even tells his readers that they can easily donate funds by using their credit card and calling one of these toll-free numbers: (800) 367-5437 for Unicef; (800) 693-2687 for Oxfam America.

Now you, too, have the information you need to save a child’s life. How should you judge yourself if you don’t do it? Think again about Bob and his Bugatti.

If you still think that it was very wrong of Bob not to throw the switch that would have diverted the train and saved the child’s life, then it is hard to see how you could deny that it is also very wrong not to send money to one of the organizations listed above. Unless, that is, there is some morally important difference between the two situations that I have overlooked.”

“Bob’s Bughatti”

In a 1999 essay, the Australian philosopher Peter Singer proposed another thought experiment, a modern twist on the classic Trolley problem drawing on the work of New York University philosopher Peter Unger .

Singer writes, “Bob is close to retirement. He has invested most of his savings in a very rare and valuable old car, a Bugatti, which he has not been able to insure. The Bugatti is his pride and joy. In addition to the pleasure he gets from driving and caring for his car, Bob knows that its rising market value means that he will always be able to sell it and live comfortably after retirement. One day when Bob is out for a drive, he parks the Bugatti near the end of a railway siding and goes for a walk up the track. As he does so, he sees that a runaway train, with no one aboard, is running down the railway track. Looking farther down the track, he sees the small figure of a child very likely to be killed by the runaway train. He can’t stop the train and the child is too far away to warn of the danger, but he can throw a switch that will divert the train down the siding where his Bugatti is parked. Then nobody will be killed — but the train will destroy his Bugatti. Thinking of his joy in owning the car and the financial security it represents, Bob decides not to throw the switch. The child is killed. For many years to come, Bob enjoys owning his Bugatti and the financial security it represents.”

I need it within 4 hours.

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Using prompts from Rick Lavoie’s Understanding Learning Disabilities: How Difficult Can This Be? (Lavoie, 1989) video (provided in the Required Studies section) please discuss and share online. Rick Lavoie’s video provides activities for us to experience what it would be like to struggle with learning disabilities. Watch scenes 10 – 14 in order and participate in the activities. Then, share your experience with these challenges using the prompts below (C & D).
Scene Descriptions:

Scene 10 – Oral Expression
Scene 11 – Reading & Decoding
Scene 12 – Auditory & Visual Capabilities
Scene 13 – Fairness
Scene 14 – Commentary
C – After viewing the last 5 scenes listed above, share the most difficult activity for you. What information from Rick Lavoie will you take with you into your work with early childhood learners?
D – Teachers and children have ongoing discussions about fairness and what it means to be “fair.” Summarize what Rick said about “fairness.” Do you agree with Rick’s definition – please support your opinion. How do you plan to be “fair” and implement fairness when you work with young children who have special needs?
Support your statements with evidence from the required studies and your research.

Note: I choice scene 11-Reading and decoding
Here’s the link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJQAFPG25hY

Word count 250-350

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

You have just been hired as a new chief executive officer of a new full-service 200-bed for-profit health care organization. Twenty-four (24) hour emergency room services will be provided. The services offered will focus on adult care. The physicians under consideration for employment at the new facility are world renowned for their highly successful treatment rate for the most difficult cancers. About five miles away exists a non-for-profit teaching hospital that has also developed a great reputation in the community for providing great adult care services.

Prepare an eighteen to twenty (18-20) slide PowerPoint slide presentation in which you:

1. Provide a detailed organizational chart for your new facility.

2. Organize a mission, vision, and values statement for the new entity.

3. Compile procedures that govern the hospital-physician and physician-patient relationship including negligence and liability issues.

4. Describe referral services that will be offered.

5. Create a peer review system.

6. Provide a synopsis of how HMO insurance will be handled.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

• Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

• Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

• Differentiate among the ways that health care institutions can be organized and managed.

• Define negligence and liability as they relate to health care.

• Explain the concept of peer review and its relationship to medical staff privileges.

• Use technology and information resources to research issues in health care policy, law, and ethics.

• Write clearly and concisely about health care policy, law, and ethics using proper writing mechanics.

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"