Cathy Song “Lost Sister”
Writing a literary analysis involves clearly communicating to your reader what you consider to be the most interesting and important aspect of a given work a particular topic. Develop your interpretation out of details selected from the work itself to support your thesis. Each reader may notice different elements; he may focus on different incidents, characters, images or motifs. Therefore, there are many different possibilities for interesting essay, different because seen from different perspectives, but in some ways, the same because they deal with the same work. The author of a literary work, then, directs the reader to consider certain judgments about human lifesuggesting how we ought to live, defining problems relating to the human psyche, social systems or human historyor sometimes showing the consequences of human choice and behavior (some universal truths). Major literary works will inspire some consensus in terms of interpretation; therefore, a work cannot mean anything a reader wants it to mean. Nor does it always mean what the author intended it to mean. By remaining close to the text, explaining particular elements there, writers are more likely to develop an interesting, convincing essay, which makes sense to other readers of a particular time and place and which probably relates, in some degree, to similar works of a particular genre. An analysis must do more than simply retell the story. Plot summary is useful to support a point, but paragraphs starting with pot summary often confuse the reader.Each paragraph, then, should be centered on a particular point; it should develop a topic sentence at the start of the paragraph. Make the point, describe the particular textual elements that relate to the point, support the point with quotation, paraphrase the quote in your own words, summarize the point or reference it to some other important element in the text.Analyze the significance of the textual details and their interrelationships. What inferences should the reader draw in the sentence? What does this paragraph really mean? How does a chapter relate to what happens next? To the end of the story? To the beginning?In summation, Im looking for: A thoughtful analysis of particular textual details demonstrated by an
interesting and focused thesis, well-supported throughout the essay by
clear topic sentences, thesis reminders, and fully developed paragraphs. A well-organized essay that presents a logical sequence of points. A sound introduction which attracts the readers interest and end with
a thesis appropriate to the size of the essay; a sound conclusion that
rather centers on your most crucial, most interesting, last major point.
Somehow, again, refer to the thesis, but do not necessarily repeat it
mechanically following word by word your introduction. Page references cited parenthetically in the text. Full documentation of all sources on a works cited or bibliography
page.A good reference book on writing analytical papers is John Trimbles, Writing with Style. Study chapters on Openers, Closers, and Writing a Literary Analysis. Also, refer to the MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers by Joseph Gilbaldi and Walter S. Achtert for quoting, citations, works cited, bibliographies, mechanics, etc. Both of these books are also recommended for this for this course. Additionally, the essays should be written in MLA format for parenthetical documentation and formatting. This means essays should be double spaced, not single-spaced paragraphs then double-spaced between them. Here are some suggested topics:1. Compare how an author or two who, in your view, shares, to some degree, a common point of view about life in America. State how far they agree or disagree and analyze the individual techniques that each uses to convey that point of view.2. Analyze a story/poem or two as a literary work. This essay can focus on style, plot and structure, characterization, development of theme, tone, setting, use or misuse of myth, identity, etc. Determine what the artistic purpose of the work is and how well the author uses the literary elements to enhance or achieve that purpose.3. Discuss the portrayal of women in at least TWO authors.4. Write an analysis of a certain theme in the work of TWO authors. Compare and contrast them to make some kind of evaluation and to come to some conclusion the author(s) argue.5. Choose one or two authors that develop the persona/personality of its narrator. In an essay, describe the persona/personality of the narrator and discuss how the author conveys that persona/personality to the reader. Support and illustrate.
6. A sense of home/place is a prominent theme in several short stories. Explore and examine how the places we grow up shape us as people. How is identity created by where we live? How does this sense of place shape a definition of home? Explore values and beliefs.7. One can argue that many authors are on a journey in search of something. Identify and describe a journey with all of its ups and downs. In the end, come to some conclusion about the journey and the search: What is gained? What is lost? Is it worth it?9. Reexamine one of the stories and write an essay indicating what actions and objects seem symbolic in their suggestions. How do these actions point toward any central theme in the story? 10. Compare and contrast various topics in two or more poems/short stories. Ascertain such topics as the American Dream, immigration, assimilation/acculturation, family, individualism, stereotypes, etc.11. Discuss the parent/child relationship or the sense/definition of family in two or more poems/short stories. Come to some conclusion the authors make about it, and show how they characterize it. Also, how do the writers depict the family? A supportive structure or an oppressive cage? Nurtures or smothers the individual? Do you agree with their views? Why or why not? Discuss how they convey their points of views.12. A topic of your own made in consultation with me. In this case, a title or brief statement of the topic should be submitted.Note: Students do not need to complete a comparison of two poems or two short stories.

Last Completed Projects
# topic title discipline academic level pages delivered
6

Writer’s choice

Business

University

2

1 hour 32 min
7

Wise Approach to

Philosophy

College

2

2 hours 19 min
8

1980’s and 1990

History

College

3

2 hours 20 min
9

pick the best topic

Finance

School

2

2 hours 27 min
10

finance for leisure

Finance

University

12

2 hours 36 min
FORMAT AND FEATURES:

At least 275 words per page
Free inquiry
Free title page
Free outline
Free bibliography
Free plagiarism report
Free unlimited revisions
Instant email delivery
Flexible prices and discounts

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Q.1) Descartes Meditations finds Descartes meditating on first philosophy, which is to say, first principles, or that, which is most fundamental. And, as both the first two propositions in Meditation I and the extended title of the text indicate, these first principles are God, souls (res cogitons), and bodies (res extensa). Taking such lofty concerns into consideration, does Descartes succeed in rationally proving that the human soul is a completely distinct and separate existence from the human body? One would do well to consider the following: his inventory of the basic kinds of being; his image of the tree as indicative of the role of metaphysical investigation as foundational to grasping reality; the faculties of the mind as suggestive of the existence of material bodies.
Q.2) Perhaps the defining characteristic of Descartes Meditations is the method by which he undertakes his meditating; accordingly, it behooves one to take special note of his method. What is the method by which Descartes conducts his investigation? One would do well to consider the following: the four rules of method; clear and distinct ideas, both what they are and what they most certainly are not; the two basic procedures of intuition and deduction; the virtues of such a method, such as the way in which the method allows Descartes to avoid certain pitfallsand be sure to identify said pitfallsto which many of his predecessors had succumbed; why Descartes understood his method to be, in a sense, full-proof.
Q.3) A total of six meditations comprise Descartes Meditations, each a masterpiece in its own right; you are to select one among these six meditations and exhibit a detailed and nuanced understanding of it. One would do well to include the following: a meticulously- wrought exegesis of the particular idea(s) Descartes explores in ones selected meditation, using ones own words and original examples to clarify what Descartes reflects on; an examination of any notions that he introduces, rules outincluding his reason(s) for ruling them outand settles on, either ultimately or for the time being; appropriate consideration of the context within which ones selected meditation appears in the overall work.
Q.4) Scholars generally consider Descartess Meditations on First Philosophy in Which the Existence of God and the Distinction of the Soul from the Body Are Demonstrated to be a seminal, pivotal, and deeply influential text in the history of western philosophy; please take the work as a whole into consideration by tracing the logical trajectory of Descartess argument as it develops over the course of the work. One would do well to consider the following: any key themes that emerge repeatedly; any particularly difficult challenges that give Descartes reason to pause; anyif there are, in fact, anyinstances when Descartes appears to change his opinion on something. Ultimately, one should strive to provide a clear grasp of the narrative thread that ties together the meditations into a single, cohesive work of profound insight

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Philosophy 240 EthicsThird Paper: Organ Conscription and Ethical TheoryDue on Canvas: Tuesday, Dec 11 at 12:00 p.m. (noon) IntroductionTransplantation of vital organs began very experimentally in the 1950s and 1960s, but today it is well beyond the stage of medical experiment. Today transplantation of the kidney, liver, heart, lung, pancreas, and intestine (along with some other organs) is routine. From the start the procedures raised some ethical problems, some related to the fact that the demand for vital organs outpaces the supply. The majority of transplanted organs come from deceased donors. The problems are that only about 3 in 1,000 people die in a way that allows for organ donation, and only 48 percent of adults in the U.S. are signed up to be donors. Thus many organs that could be used are either buried or burned (cremation) because the deceased wasnt a donor or the family of the deceased refused donation. The result is that 22 people a day die waiting for a transplant, which is over 8,000 people a year. Organ ConscriptionThere are a number of proposals for solving this problem and creating a bigger supply of available organs, and therefore saving many lives. One of the more controversial is called organ conscription, which would require that every person who dies under the circumstances enabling organ transplantation would have their organs removed. That is, each person would become a donor whether or not while living they consented to be a donor, and whether or not their family consents. Like a military draft, this would be a draft of organs from deceased people. Hence the name: conscription. If implemented this policy would immediately raise the number of available organs and save many lives (for the purposes of your paper, lets assume that the number of people who die waiting for an organ will be cut from 8,000 a year to zero). And under conscription there would be no need for expensive ongoing public education programs, no need to train requesters, and no need to maintain donor registries. All of these facts mean that money and resources would be freed up for use in other areas of health care. Some morally relevant factors to help get your thinking started:Common sense morality and moral tradition in most cultures holds that the living not only have strong claims over their bodies while living, but also over what happens to their bodies after they die.
Supporters of conscription claim that the dead do not have interests, do not have rights, cannot be harmed, and therefore have no valid claims over their body after they die. They add that the policy is fair, since it would apply to all and everyone would be treated in the same way.
Instructions: write a paper of 900 to 1,300 words on the ethics of organ conscription that answers the following questions: Explain your own stance regarding this policy. Do you support it and believe it is morally permissible, or are you opposed to it and believe it to be morally wrong? Briefly your reasons for your view.
Very briefly explain Kants moral theory. Then do the following three things:
Using the second formulation of the categorical imperative (and the idea of autonomy) construct the best Kantian argument in support of organ conscription
Using the second formulation of the categorical imperative (and the idea of autonomy) construct the best Kantian argument against organ conscription
Explain which of these positions is most true to Kantian moral theory and why
Very briefly explain utilitarianism. How does utilitarianism apply? What would it say about the morality of organ conscription? Since were talking about a policy issue, it will be easier to work with rule utilitarianism instead of using act utilitarianism.
Which theory best answers the question Is a policy of organ conscription morally right to enact as law? and why?

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Assessment Brief (1500 words in total)Working with the level 6 criteria you are to respond to the two questions below. Each question has a word limit of 750 words. Imagine the target audience to be an interview panel and therefore the answers should reflect the need to be concise, informed and accessible to a mixed/professional audience.
1. What is your understanding of a Maths Mastery approach and what do you believe are the implications for the Primary classroom? (750 words)
2. How would you aim to meet the needs of all children in a maths lesson? (750 words)When answering the questions, also:
– critically discuss current issues in mathematics education and their impact on effective mathematics teaching and learning;- develop a personal philosophy that encompasses key issues that can influence childrens mathematical learning;- critically evaluate progression in the mathematics curriculum from Foundation Stage to Key Stage 1 and 2, and implications for transitional stages;- identify effective mathematics teaching strategies and critically analyse how these can be planned for and incorporated in the dedicated daily mathematics lesson.
Remember at level 6 this needs to be a critical, analytical reflection, simple description is not enough. The level 6 criteria are outlined below for you to refer to for this written element.Further guidanceReflection on personal practice means use of 1st person is expected where appropriate.
Reflect critically and analytically on views and philosophy in an articulate manner.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"