Obstacles to Good Nutrition

Children in the United States face significant obstacles to good nutrition. This is due in part to the increased consumption of fast food.

Review Chapter 6 in your text, particularly the section titled “Reality Check: How Is America Eating: Do We Fulfill Our Nutritional Needs?” as well as the articles and Web sites listed in this week’s Learning Resources. Drawing on these resources, what you have learned in the course so far, and your own observations of current lifestyle trends, consider the following:

Current obstacles to good nutrition for young children

Knowledge and approaches adults committed to the well-being of children can take to overcome these obstacles

With these thoughts in mind:

By Day 3:

Post a response to the following:

Identify at least two obstacles to good nutrition for young children and social, economic, and/or historical forces that have brought about or contributed to these obstacles.

Describe how early childhood advocates and professionals might offset/overcome these obstacles

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

The Literature Review

This week, we will be expanding on the work we started in week two of this course. Rather than just analyzing resources, this week we will be blending our resources into a larger frame, drawing connections between each of the resources and to our project thesis. 

A literature review has two specific goals:

• To demonstrate that you, the researcher, has done his or her due dillgence in exploring the work other researchers have done in the area; and
• To ground the theory in the current research available.

You should think of your literature review as a way to tell a story about your research using sources as guideposts along the way. Think about your role in this as a moderator in a discussion between your sources, and your job is to keep them focused on your thesis (this is usually the first section of a research article, so you should use the literature reviews of your sources as a model for what we are doing here).

You will need a minimum of five (5) sources in your literature review (you will need a total of ten in your Final Project). Consider the following to help you gather these sources:

• Do a library search using Grantham’s EBSCOhost library database or from Google Scholar
• Use key words to search (try different variations)
• Only use scholarly books or peer-reviewed journal articles
• Choose sources from within the past 5 years (you can set your EBSCO search to only show articles within this range)
• Read titles to see what looks relevant (don’t waste your time reading things that don’t look like they will work for your project)
• Read the abstracts and only choose the most pertinent articles (once again, don’t waste your time—if the abstract doesn’t seem promising, move on to the nerxt article).

Please note: information from the Internet may not be used for this project unless the source is from an e-journal (a peer-reviewed journal that is published on the web). The organization’s website is an exception to this rule, but it can only count as one of your ten sources.
Assignment

Create a literature review, incorporating each of your references (minimum of five), tying them to each other and to the thesis of your project in a single narrative. You should cite each source in the body of your literature review and in a references page at the end of your paper.

Your literature review should be arranged in the following way:

• Introduction: A concise definition of the topic and organization with which you are working. A clearly stated thesis of your project. A brief description about how this project might be interesting and/or important to your readers/adudience.
• Main Body: A discussion of each of your sources, including what they are claiming, how they relate to other sources you are using, and how they support your thesis (make sure you identify and cite each source as you use them). Each work should be summarized and evaluated for its premise, scope, and conclusion. In addition, address any inconsistencies, omissions, or errors, as well as accuracy, depth, and relevance you find compelling or think maight be useful to your readers/audience. Use logical connections and transitions to connect sources.
• Conclusion: The conclusion summarizes the key findings of the review in general terms. You may want to revisit commonalities and differences between your sources, whether favorable or not. Make sure you tie your work throughout this review back to your thesis.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Compare and contrast the future between individuals without disabilities and the future of individuals with PHI. Explain your response. What evidence do you have to support your response?

Minimum of 150 words with in-text citation(s) and reference(s).

Why is the definition of multiple disabilities significant to education? How does it relate to the classroom?

Minimum of 150 words with in-text ciation(s) and reference(s).

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Short paragraph of 200 words with two reference in APA format , due Wednesday June 22, 2016 4am 

our own communities and discuss emerging diseases.  

– [ ] Look into health data for “South Carolina “. You can look at statistics from your local health department or websites such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.  Find a disease that is emerging in your community and discuss.  Give the rates and the duration of the increase of this disease.  What population does this disease affect most?  Discuss what you think can be done to prevent further increase in this disease.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"