Note: This assignment is for academic research pro only Thank you. Due by 16 Jul @ 6pm

 

I’m looking for a tutor who understanding informatics nursing and healthcare

 

 

Note: Write 1-1.5  page discussion post citing  (APA Format) the references  to include  reference page  (APA format)..please only use references that are provided or w/in the last  5 years relevant to topic. Note: ALL assignments  will be submitted via Turnitin for plagiarism 

 

Note: Please ensure to flush all words to the right not toward the left.

 

From moment to moment, a nurse leader’s day involves communication—with patients, families, colleagues, supervisors, and so on.

Think of a particular day you spent working in a health care environment, and consider three or four distinct points in time. For each point of time, consider the following: With whom did you interact? Which forms of communication did you use? What issues were communicated about—did they seem to be light-hearted or sensitive? straightforward or complicated? How would you describe the pace of the interactions and your work?

As you consider these questions, it becomes clear that communication can be quite complex, with many layers of meaning that shape the experience for everyone involved. How could this awareness help you to understand instances of ineffective communication when they arise?

To prepare:

·         Review the information in Figure 19.1 of the course text, as well as the assigned articles.

·         Reflect on an incident involving ineffective communication within your organization or another health care setting. Consider this incident through the lens of the communication process outlined in Figure 19.1 of the course text 

·         What barriers contributed to this incident? What other challenges may have influenced this situation?

·         Using the information presented in the other Learning Resources, consider what could have been done to prevent or address the ineffective communication. Why do you think the use of these strategies would have resulted in better outcome(s)?

 

References

 

Marquis, B. L., & Huston, C. J. (2012). Leadership roles and management functions in nursing: Theory and application (Laureate Education, Inc., custom ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins. (Figure 19.1 is scanned doc for this reference

 

Robinson, F. P., Gorman, G., Slimmer, L. W., Yudkowsky, R. (2010). Perceptions of effective and ineffective nurse-physician communication in hospitals. Nursing Forum, 45(3), 206– 216.

 

Thomas, C. M., Bertram, E., & Johnson, D. (2009). The SBAR communication technique: Teac
hing nursing students professional communication skills. Nurse Educator, 34(4), 176–180

 

 

• Operations Management homework help

 

Week 5 Assignment : Project -Final Project Summary

 

Week 1: Identify a problem

Week 2: Interview decision makers

Week 3: Problem Analysis and budget impact

Week4: Solutions to the problem

 

In this course, you have been asked to provide an analysis of a current nursing or patient care problem which has an impact on the hospital’s budget.  Specifically, you have described the problem, demonstrated a proposed analysis of the problem, identified the potential impact of the problem on the current budget and recommended potential solutions to the problem.  This week, you will create a power point presentation, including notes pages to explain each of the concepts in depth.  As you create this project, reflect on the various aspects of the budgeting process you have learned throughout this course and the feedback you have received from the facilitator on the individual parts of this assignment throughout the course.   Be sure to reflect this information in your presentation.

 

Grading Criteria	Maximum Points
Clearly identified a nursing problem with a budgetary impact.	30
Provided a detailed analysis of the problem.	50
Provided a potential solution to the identified problem.	30
Utilized sound budgetary principles in the development of the solution for the problem.	30
Demonstrated an integration of information technology in the solution to the problem, including but no limited to advanced computer systems, electronic health records and nursing information systems.	30
Provided a comprehensive list of references, including peer-reviewed publications.	10
Slides and notes are well developed and easy to read.	10
Utilizes APA style (which includes grammar, spelling, punctuation and formatting).	10
Total:

OVERVIEW

 

Write a 5–7-page assessment in which you examine the controversy related to research and ethics in the field of social psychology.

It is essential to be able to critically analyze the research methods used in studies, in order to weigh the validity of the conclusions or recommendations.

SHOW LESS

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

•   Competency 1: Apply information literacy and research skills to locate scholarly information in the field of social psychology.

•                     Use valid, scholarly research resources relevant to the field of social psychology.

•   Competency 4: Examine the research methods frequently used in the study of social psychology.

•                     Describe the impact of controversial research studies on the human participants.

•   Competency 5: Examine controversial research studies in social psychology from an ethical standpoint.

•                     Explain how controversial research studies contributed to the development of ethical standards in the field of psychology.

•                     Develop evidence-based arguments for and against controversial research studies in the field of social psychology.

•                     Describe what controversial research studies revealed about conformity and obedience to authority.

•   Competency 6: Apply critical thinking skills to resolve conflicts and issues in the field of social psychology.

•                     D
etermine whether knowledge gained justifies controversial research studies in the field of social psychology.

•   Competency 7: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for professionals in the field of psychology.

•                     Write coherently to support a central idea with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics as expected of a psychology professional.

Use APA format and style.

 

CONTEXT

Is conformity good or bad? Are people willing to hurt one another just because an authority told them to? Some of the most fascinating research results about human behavior were intending to answer these very questions. The results on the topics of social conformity and obedience to authority revealed some disturbing revelations about human behavior and about potential harm to participants in research. The studies and their results had tremendous implications for the field on how we conduct research—and on how we understand the influence of social pressure and leadership. Because of the significant implications in both research and application, these studies have been some of the most controversial and hotly debated topics in psychology.

 

QUESTIONS TO CONSIDER

 

To deepen your understanding, you are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of the business community.

•   Is deception always necessary when conducting research in social psychology with human participants?

Do the insights gained from research justify deceiving people?

 

RESOURCES

Suggested Resources

The following optional resources are provided to support you in completing the assessment or to provide a helpful context. For additional resources, refer to the Research Resources and Supplemental Resources in the left navigation menu of your courseroom.

Library Resources

The following e-books or articles from the Capella University Library are linked directly in this course. Note: Some of the articles listed are fairly old and are included here because they are considered seminal works in the field.

•   Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. (1961). Transmission of aggression through imitation of aggressive models. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63(3), 575–582.

•   Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. (1963). Imitation of film-mediated aggressive models. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66(1), 3–11.

•   Becker-Blease, K. A., & Freyd, J. J. (2006). Research participants telling the tr
uth about their lives: The ethics of asking and not asking about abuse. American Psychologist, 61(3), 218–226.

•   Benham, B. (2008). The ubiquity of deception and the ethics of deceptive research. Bioethics, 22(3), 147–156.

•   Boynton, M. H., Portnoy, D. B., & Johnson, B. T. (2013). Exploring the ethics and psychological impact of deception in psychological research. IRB: Ethics & Human Research, 35(2), 7–13.Crano, W. D. (2000). Milestones in the psychological analysis of social influence. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4(1), 68–80.

•   Buckle, J. L., Dwyer, S. C., & Jackson, M. (2010). Qualitative bereavement research: Incongruity between the perspectives of participants and research ethics boards. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13(2), 111–125.

•   Guadagno, R. E., Muscanell, N. L., Rice, L. M., & Roberts, N. (2013). Social influence online: The impact of social validation and likability on compliance. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 2(1), 51–60.

•   Haney, C., & Zimbardo, P. (1998). The past and future of U.S. prison policy: Twenty-five years after the Stanford Prison Experiment. American Psychologist, 53(7), 709–727.

•   Heerdink, M. W., van Kleef, G. A., Homan, A. C., & Fischer, A. H. (2013). On the social influence of emotions in groups: Interpersonal effects of anger and happiness on conformity versus deviance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(2), 262–284.

•   Horcajo, J., Petty, R. E., & Briñol, P. (2010). The effects of majority versus minority source status on persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(3), 498–512.

•   Juritzen, T. I., Grimen, H., & Heggen, K. (2011). Protecting vulnerable research participants: A Foucault-inspired analysis of ethics committees. Nursing Ethics, 18(5), 640–650.

•   McDonald, K. E., Kidney, C. A., & Patka, M. (2013). “You need to let your voice be heard”: Research participants’ views on research. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 57(3), 216–225.

•   Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371–378.

•   Milgram, S. (1964). Group pressure and action against a person. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69(2), 137–143.

•   Milgram, S. (1965). Liberating effects of group pressure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1(2), 127–134.

•   Pascual-Leone, A., Singh, T., & Scoboria, A. (2010). Using deception ethically: Practical research guidelines for researchers and reviewers. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 51(4), 241–248.

•   Zimbardo, P. G. (1974). On ‘obedience to authority‘. American Psychologist, 29(7), 566–567.

•   Voisin, D., & Fointiat, V. (2013). Reduction in cognitive dissonance according to normative standards in the induced compliance paradigm. Social Psychology, 44(3), 191–195.

•   Wilson, C. M., & Christensen, B. K. (2012). Ethical issues relevant to the assessment of suicide risk in nonclinical research settings. Crisis, 33(1), 54–59.