You must select and develop the two strategic recommendation for the physical store that

will respond to your client’s needs. The first of the recommendations must come directly

from your recommendations within Assessment Task 1. The second recommendation must

come from within the TOWS strategies. You are not permitted to have the same

recommendations as your team member from assessment task 1; and you are not permitted

to have a promotional recommendation.

You must and complete a strategic recommendation report, containing both visual and

written components. The visuals will be used to illustrate and support how some retailing

aspects should be altered to accommodate the recommendations. You are welcome to

consider the use of any visual aid – for example, developing an infographic, a short video

(not more than 6 minutes for each strategic recommendation), a presentation, a brochure,

etc. The challenge is to avoid developing a full written report. The written component is to

explain or support your visual aspects.

To develop the strategies, you may be required to undertake further analysis in areas of your

strategic focus.

The assessment will require you to demonstrate your ability to problem-solve using

innovative thinking and approaches that will carefully balance the realistic commercial needs

of the retailer and the theoretical content covered during the semester.

Attachments:

MKTG1087-2010….pdf

Retailing-Ass….pdf

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

1. Why does offering HMO plans affect incentives?
2. How could improving access reduce costs?
3. How could improving care coordination reduce costs?
4. Why is the evidence about effects on cost so varied?
5. Why is the evidence about effects on quality so varied?
6. Why is the evidence about effects on the patient experience so varied?:
7. How would a successful PCMH program affect patients? Hospitals? Participating practices?

CASE 6.1 Can Patient-Centered Medical Homes Help Realize the Triple Aim? A PCMH emphasizes a team approach to care, typically including physicians, advanced practice nurses, physician assistants, mnurses, pharmacists, nutritionists, social workers, educators, and care coordinators. This team cooperates to improve access (e.g., after-hours care and same-day visits), patient engagement (e.g., teaching patients how to manage their care and contribute to decision making), care coordination (e.g, tracking care plans among providers and improving transitions from hospitals to home), quality (e.g improving patient satisfaction and tracking compliance with practice protocols), and safety (e.g, decision support for prescribing and tracking abnormal test results). Despite broad similarities, PCMHs vary in their emphases and implementation strategies. Not surprisingly, reviews find weak, variable evidence that PCMHs save money, although the evidence is stronger and less variable for high-risk patients (Sinaiko et al. 2017). Similarly, some studies find improvements in patients' experiences in PCMH practices, whereas others do not (Sarinopoulos et al. 2017). How much PCMHs improve quality and safety also remains unclear (Green et al. 2018) nce that they ucosts (aeng et al 2015). of ways s offers some strong An analysis of MOS for Medicare Madicaid and the ACA marketplace, Geisinger's PCMH approach differs from most others in a numbernintegrated health system that offers PPOS and Geisinger used a standardized model. Geis Geisinger had a long history of experimenting with PCMH models Geisinger focused on high-risk patients. Geisinger used a mix of volume-based and quality-based payments. had clear incentives to reduce cost and improve quality because it offered an HMO. The Geisinger study found that implementation of a PCMH significantly reduced costs (primarily by reducing hospitalization), and the size of the reduction grew with experience as a PCMH practice. An earlier Geisinger study found that patients perceived that some aspects of care had improved and some had not (Maeng et al. 2013). Only modest evidence about quality and safety has been analyzed. For this highly integrated system, PCMHs appear to contribute Can becoming a PCMH help other practices realize the Triple Aim? Green and colleagues (2018) suggest that the evidence is clearer than it seems. Their analysis focused on conditions that were targeted by Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan and measured how many PCMH components each practice had implemented (which had seldom been done before). Their analysis found that emergency department costs and hospitalization costs fell for all conditions but fell by much more for targeted conditions and for practices with more complete PCMH implementation. An earlier study that analyzed data for only two years of PCMH implementation (Paustian associated with higher quality and significant cost reductions for adults. Partial PCMH implementation was associated with higher quality but not with cost reductions. A separate study found that the patient experience was rated more highly in PCMH practices (Sarinopoulos et al. 2017). realizing the Triple Aim tal. 2014) found that full implementation was Discussion Questions Why does offering HMO plans affect incentives? How could improving access reduce costs? How could improving care coordination reduce costs? Why is the evidence about effects on cost so varied? Why is the evidence about effects on quality so varied? . Why is the evidence about effects on the patient experience so varied? How would a successful PCMH program affect patients? Hospitals? Participating practices?

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

The aim of this project is to provide the practical experience of working through the complete life cycle of an imaginary project on Pandemic Control and Management Support (PCMS). This project will also give students an opportunity to research and exercise various project management methods.

Background

The Pandemic Control and Management Support (PCMS) is a two-year project in which to design, research and produce a support system for (1) government to get comprehensive information on the disease, e.g., its origin, its biological family, the demographic distribution of the people who contracted the disease, etc, for making decisions on pandemic control and management; (2) citizens to get warnings, advices, and necessary care arrangement if necessary. The PCMS system would be used by the government to integrate some existing applications/systems in collecting data, data analytics and prediction.

This project is complex as it involves putting an innovative use of relatively new technologies especially big data analytics into the exiting systems with a need to integrate with various applications cross the departments and agencies.

Attachments:

5442041-1-ass….docx

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Not Solved, and times gone

• Posted: 4 years ago
• Budget: $5

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"