What is the difference between Physical Causal Explanations and Behavioral Casual Explanations, and how do they tie into critical thinking?

3PGS EACH WEEK

Critical Thinking

Start by reading and following these instructions:

1. Quickly skim the questions or assignment below and the assignment rubric to help you focus.
2. Read the required chapter(s) of the textbook and any additional recommended resources. Some answers may require you to do additional research on the Internet or in other reference sources. Choose your sources carefully.
3. Consider the discussion and the any insights you gained from it.
4. Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, check your spelling.

Week 3

Assignment:

1. What are the two arenas that are used to assess credibility? How do they tie into the degrees of credibility and incredibility?
2. How does the content of the claim relate to fallacies from the previous chapter? How does an observation relate to fallacies?
3. Why is background information essential to assessing a claim? Give an example from last month’s news to support your answer.
4. Name five ways that one can prove his/her expertise. Explain how they are not always foolproof using examples from current events.

WEEK 4

Assignment:

1. Watch a cable news program for one full hour where guests are asked to provide their opinions. List the rhetorical devices or logical fallacies or both, found during the dialogue by name of show, time of day, host name, guest name, and organization to which the guest belongs. Evaluate the motivation for this person in using rhetorical devices or logical fallacies.
2. Define the 13 rhetorical devices in common use and give examples, stating how each tie into critical thinking.
3. What are the emotional fallacies and their premises and conclusions? Use current events from the last month as examples.
4. What are the non-emotional fallacies and their premises and conclusions?
5. Name 5 emotions and the fallacies that are associated with them. Give examples of each as they relate to something important to you.

WEEK 5

Assignment:

1. Name 5 of the 11 ad hominem fallacies and explain how they confuse the qualities of a person making a claim with the qualities of the claim.
2. Are fallacies used in politics? Give an example from the most recent election.
3. Listen a talk radio program, a television program, or have a conversation with another person. Provide examples of the following that you’ve overheard:

• Hasty generalization (describe which type and why it was incorrect)
• Generalizing from exceptional cases (describe which type and why it was incorrect)
• Fallacious appeal to Popularity (common belief) (describe which type and why it was incorrect)

1. What is “begging the question”? Give a real life scenario in which this has happened to you.

WEEK 6

Assignment:

1. Name the four types of categorical claims and draw Venn diagrams for each.
2. Draw the Venn diagram for the three categorical operations and a Venn diagram for a current event in the past month.
3. Generate the square of opposition. Explain all parts of it in detail and how each would relate to a current event.
4. Select a recent news event and create four Categorical Syllogisms

WEEK 7

Assignment:

1. Describe the 18 Elementary Valid Argument Pattern rules.
2. How does Principle of Total Evidence work in inductive reasoning? Use an example from current events.
3. What are the differences between statistical syllogisms, inductive generalizing from samples, arguments from analogy and reasoning from the general to the general? Explain in your own words when each is appropriate.

WEEK 8

Assignment:

1. What is the difference between Physical Causal Explanations and Behavioral Casual Explanations, and how do they tie into critical thinking?
2. Name the types of explanations and how they are evaluated. Use examples from your life to support your answer.
3. What is an Inference to the Best Explanation and how does it relate to forming a hypothesis?
4. What are the definitions of aesthetic value and judgment? Use examples from your life to support your definition.

The post What is the difference between Physical Causal Explanations and Behavioral Casual Explanations, and how do they tie into critical thinking? appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Critical Thinking Weeks 3-8

3PGS EACH WEEK

Critical Thinking

Start by reading and following these instructions:

1. Quickly skim the questions or assignment below and the assignment rubric to help you focus.
2. Read the required chapter(s) of the textbook and any additional recommended resources. Some answers may require you to do additional research on the Internet or in other reference sources. Choose your sources carefully.
3. Consider the discussion and the any insights you gained from it.
4. Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, check your spelling.

Week 3

Assignment:

1. What are the two arenas that are used to assess credibility? How do they tie into the degrees of credibility and incredibility?
2. How does the content of the claim relate to fallacies from the previous chapter? How does an observation relate to fallacies?
3. Why is background information essential to assessing a claim? Give an example from last month’s news to support your answer.
4. Name five ways that one can prove his/her expertise. Explain how they are not always foolproof using examples from current events.

WEEK 4

Assignment:

1. Watch a cable news program for one full hour where guests are asked to provide their opinions. List the rhetorical devices or logical fallacies or both, found during the dialogue by name of show, time of day, host name, guest name, and organization to which the guest belongs. Evaluate the motivation for this person in using rhetorical devices or logical fallacies.
2. Define the 13 rhetorical devices in common use and give examples, stating how each tie into critical thinking.
3. What are the emotional fallacies and their premises and conclusions? Use current events from the last month as examples.
4. What are the non-emotional fallacies and their premises and conclusions?
5. Name 5 emotions and the fallacies that are associated with them. Give examples of each as they relate to something important to you.

WEEK 5

Assignment:

1. Name 5 of the 11 ad hominem fallacies and explain how they confuse the qualities of a person making a claim with the qualities of the claim.
2. Are fallacies used in politics? Give an example from the most recent election.
3. Listen a talk radio program, a television program, or have a conversation with another person. Provide examples of the following that you’ve overheard:

• Hasty generalization (describe which type and why it was incorrect)
• Generalizing from exceptional cases (describe which type and why it was incorrect)
• Fallacious appeal to Popularity (common belief) (describe which type and why it was incorrect)

1. What is “begging the question”? Give a real life scenario in which this has happened to you.

WEEK 6

Assignment:

1. Name the four types of categorical claims and draw Venn diagrams for each.
2. Draw the Venn diagram for the three categorical operations and a Venn diagram for a current event in the past month.
3. Generate the square of opposition. Explain all parts of it in detail and how each would relate to a current event.
4. Select a recent news event and create four Categorical Syllogisms

WEEK 7

Assignment:

1. Describe the 18 Elementary Valid Argument Pattern rules.
2. How does Principle of Total Evidence work in inductive reasoning? Use an example from current events.
3. What are the differences between statistical syllogisms, inductive generalizing from samples, arguments from analogy and reasoning from the general to the general? Explain in your own words when each is appropriate.

WEEK 8

Assignment:

1. What is the difference between Physical Causal Explanations and Behavioral Casual Explanations, and how do they tie into critical thinking?
2. Name the types of explanations and how they are evaluated. Use examples from your life to support your answer.
3. What is an Inference to the Best Explanation and how does it relate to forming a hypothesis?
4. What are the definitions of aesthetic value and judgment? Use examples from your life to support your definition.

The post Critical Thinking Weeks 3-8 appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Describe the scene you selected and explain how it illustrates the theme of colonialism or postcolonialism.

Report Issue
After watching Part 1 of Things Fall Apart video from this week’s Resources, select one event in the story so far that fits the theme of colonialism as you have been studying it throughout this course. Describe the scene you selected and explain how it illustrates the theme of colonialism or postcolonialism. Be sure to cite the example you selected from the story.

Link to video: https://youtu.be/TQIXTFg589s

The post Describe the scene you selected and explain how it illustrates the theme of colonialism or postcolonialism. appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Evaluate each alternative using the facts and issues you identified earlier, given the conditions and information available.

How to Analyze a Case Study

Included in these cases are questions to help you understand and analyze the case. You may, however, be assigned other case studies that do not have questions. This Hands-on Guide presents a structured framework to help you analyze such cases as well as the case studies in this text. Knowing how to analyze a case will help you attack virtually any business problem.

A case study helps students learn by immersing them in a real-world business scenario where they can act as problem-solvers and decision-makers. The case presents facts about a particular organization. Students are asked to analyze the case by focusing on the most important facts and using this information to determine the opportunities and problems facing that organization. Students are then asked to identify alternative courses of action to deal with the problems they identify.

A case study analysis must not merely summarize the case. It should identify key issues and problems, outline and assess alternative courses of action, and draw appropriate conclusions. The case study analysis can be broken down into the following steps:

1. Identify the most important facts surrounding the case.
2. Identify the key issue or issues.
3. Specify alternative courses of action.
4. Evaluate each course of action.
5. Recommend the best course of action.

Let’s look at what each step involves.

1. Identify the most important facts surrounding the case. Read the case several times to become familiar with the information it contains. Pay attention to the information in any accompanying exhibits, tables, or figures. Many case scenarios, as in real life, present a great deal of detailed information. Some of these facts are more relevant than others for problem identification. One can assume the facts and figures in the case are true, but statements, judgments, or decisions made by individuals should be questioned. Underline and then list the most important facts and figures that would help you define the central problem or issue. If key facts and numbers are not available, you can make assumptions, but these assumptions should be reasonable given the situation. The “correctness” of your conclusions may depend on the assumptions you make.
2. Identify the key issue or issues. Use the facts provided by the case to identify the key issue or issues facing the company you are studying. Many cases present multiple issues or problems. Identify the most important and separate them from more trivial issues. State the major problem or challenge facing the company. You should be able to describe the problem or challenge in one or two sentences. You should be able to explain how this problem affects the strategy or performance of the organization.

You will need to explain why the problem occurred. Does the problem or challenge facing the company comes from a changing environment, new opportunities, a declining market share, or inefficient internal or external business processes? In the case of information systems-related problems, you need to pay special attention to the role of technology as well as the behavior of the organization and its management.

Information system problems in the business world typically present a combination of management, technology, and organizational issues. When identifying the key issue or problem, ask what kind of problem it is: Is it a management problem, a technology problem, an organizational problem, or a combination of these? What management, organizational, and technology factors contributed to the problem?

· To determine if a problem stems from management factors, consider whether managers are exerting appropriate leadership over the organization and monitoring organizational performance. Consider also the nature of management decision-making: Do managers have sufficient information for performing this role, or do they fail to take advantage of the information that is available?

· To determine if a problem stems from technology factors, examine any issues arising from the organization’s information technology infrastructure: its hardware, software, networks and telecommunications infrastructure, and the management of data in databases or traditional files. Consider also whether the appropriate management and organizational assets are in place to use this technology effectively.

· To determine the role of organizational factors, examine any issues arising from the organization’s structure, culture, business processes, work groups, divisions among interest groups, relationships with other organizations, as well as the impact of changes in the organization’s external environment-changes in government regulations, economic conditions, or the actions of competitors, customers, and suppliers.

You will have to decide which of these factors—or combination of factors—is most important in explaining why the problem occurred.

1. Specify alternative courses of action. List the courses of action the company can take to solve its problem or meet the challenge it faces. For information system-related problems, do these alternatives require a new information system or the modification of an existing system? Are new technologies, business processes, organizational structures, or management behavior required? What changes to organizational processes would be required by each alternative? What management policy would be required to implement each alternative?

Remember, there is a difference between what an organization “should do” and what that organization actually “can do”. Some solutions are too expensive or operationally difficult to implement, and you should avoid solutions that are beyond the organization’s resources. Identify the constraints that will limit the solutions available. Is each alternative executable given these constraints?

1. Evaluate each course of action. Evaluate each alternative using the facts and issues you identified earlier, given the conditions and information available. Identify the costs and benefits of each alternative. Ask yourself “what would be the likely outcome of this course of action? State the risks as well as the rewards associated with each course of action. Is your recommendation feasible from a technical, operational, and financial standpoint? Be sure to state any assumptions on which you have based your decision.
2. Recommend the best course of action. State your choice for the best course of action and provide a detailed explanation of why you made this selection. You may also want to provide an explanation of why other alternatives were not selected. Your final recommendation should flow logically from the rest of your case analysis and should clearly specify what assumptions were used to shape your conclusion. There is often no single “right” answer, and each option is likely to have risks as well as rewards.

The post Evaluate each alternative using the facts and issues you identified earlier, given the conditions and information available. appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"