discuss the role of a juvenile probation officer

/in /by

discuss the role of a juvenile probation officer

What is restorative justice and how does it meet the goals of the juvenile justice network? Many juvenile probation officers are involved in restorative justice programs. Using the internet, search for information on restorative youth justice and review its concepts. Then discuss the role of a juvenile probation officer and whether restorative justice is a proper focus for juvenile probation. Use reference Cox, M., S., Allen, M., J., Hanser, D., R. (2014). Juvenile Justice: A Guide to Theory, Policy, and Practice. [Purdue University Global Bookshelf]. Retrieved from https://purdueuniversityglobal.vitalsource.com/#/books/9781483321950/.

The post discuss the role of a juvenile probation officer appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Write a 500-word essay about the impact of reading upon your life

/in /by

Write a 500-word essay about the impact of reading upon your life. A literacy essay explores one’s growth as a reader. Don’t confuse literacy with literature. The goal is to come up with a thesis that states how one specific text, or perhaps a series of them, or just the written word in general contributed to your personal development.

This may seem a bit strange, but I want you to write about yourself in the third person and then use yourself as a source for the works-cited list at the end. In other words, write about yourself as if you’re writing about someone else. For example, if I were doing this assignment, I would NOT write, “I always had lots of books as a kid.” Instead, I’d write, “Dr. Robertson always had lots of books as a kid. Then I’d cite myself as a “personal interview” in the works cited at the end. All your major assignments should be in third person. The third person’s name is Haiyi Hu.

Use MLA style throughout in Times New Roman 12.

Include a heading and headers.

Double-space everything.

Quote and cite from each source at least once within your text. Sources include the literature we’ve read (each item is a separate entry) and any outside sources you might decide to use.

List each source in the works-cited section at the end (no works cited = automatic D!).

Include at least three paragraphs (intro., body, and conclusion). You can have as many body paragraphs as you like; just make sure they’re not too short.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Evaluation Paper Packet

/in /by

Nick Pincumbe

EN 1101 Evaluation Paper Packet

Your assignment, if you choose to accept it (and you’d better, it’s worth 10% of your grade!) is to choose one literary short story reading from this course (the full list of options will be discussed in class) and write a fully fleshed out Evaluation paper (4G) on one of the following topics:

  1. What is the dominant theme of this piece? How do you know this theme exists? What does the literary piece say about that theme and how is it expressed in the piece?
  2. What was one major symbol used in your chosen piece? What was the significance of this symbol in understanding the overall meaning of the piece? How was this expressed in the piece?
  3. What was the major conflict in your chosen piece? Was it external (character vs. the world) or internal (character vs. themselves)? How did encountering this conflict change the protagonist over the length of the piece?


Construct a clear argument answering these questions for one of the topics and use specific textual evidence from the story to support and develop your stance. Your essay should contain a thesis statement that gives me an idea of how you will back this point up and how your support will be organized throughout. It should also fulfill the other requirements of your rubric.

This paper should include significant textual evidence (properly documented quotes or paraphrases from your chosen reading) to support your thesis. In addition, since we are part of a larger conversation about literary analysis, the use of credible, properly documented, academic literary criticism is welcomed and encouraged.

1200 words (two pages double spaced 12 point font). Please include your name, a title, the date, and your class hour at the top, as well as page numbers throughout.

Nick Pincumbe

EN 1101 Evaluation Paper

Assignment 4A: Pre-Writing

Your first assignment in the creation of your Evaluation Paper (4G) is to do a Pre-Writing exercise (4A). For this exercise you can choose one type of Pre-Writing, such as:

Asking questions

Listing

Brainstorming

Freewriting

Clustering

Bubbling

Informal Outlining

At the top of the first page of your assignment, list the type of Pre-Writing you chose to use from this list.

Choose an appropriate topic for the Evaluation paper (sample topics listed on the first page of this prompt) and write out one of the above Pre-Writing activities on that topic.

Your Pre-Writing activity should be at least one full page in length.

At the bottom of the last page of your assignment, write down a one sentence description of your narrowed topic for this paper.

If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to ask!

Nick Pincumbe

EN 1101 Evaluation Paper

Assignment 4B: Annotated Bibliography

Your second assignment in the creation of your Evaluation Paper (4G) is to create your Annotated Bibliography (4B).

An annotated bibliography formalizes your research process. It forces us to spend a bit more time thinking about the sources we’re using, whether we can trust them, and how we are using them in our writing.

For this assignment, we are considering outside literary criticism as a means to complement our own analysis of texts. As such, you should take your questions and assumptions from the pre-writing exercise and challenge them by locating one or more sources of academic quality that provide insightful literary criticism on your chosen literary piece (noSparknotes, Cliffnotes, etc. will be accepted).

You will need to use credible library and/or Internet resources. Your annotated bibliography should include four distinct parts:

  1. A full citation of each source in MLA Style as it would appear on your Works Cited page (alphabetical order, hanging indentations, etc.).
  2. A short one paragraph summary below each source of the important information it contains.
  3. A thoughtful one paragraph explanation below each source of why you found this source to be credible.
  4. A short one paragraph explanation below each source of how you could use this source to develop your topic and support your thesis.

Other than the citation, each part of your Annotated Bibliography should consist of complete sentences. Make sure to visually distinguish each part of the assignment.

Your initial copy can be typed and printed or hand written and should be completed in class during our library day. In fact, it should be shared with me for my review before you will be dismissed on the day in question. A final version should be submitted electronically along with your other assignments when your final draft is due.

Sources can be electronic or print, but should be of academic quality (no .com, no wiki, no dictionaries or encyclopedias).

If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to ask!

Nick Pincumbe

EN 1101 Evaluation Paper

Assignment 4C: Thesis Statement

Your third assignment in the creation of your Evaluation Paper (4G) is to create your thesis statement (4C). For this exercise you should use this sheet as your guide and create a printed one page assignment that identifies your TOPIC, your STANCE on that topic, and three SUPPORT POINTS that you will use to back up that stance in your paper. Please include your name, date, etc., as you would on any other assignment and bring one hard copy to your Conference (see Course Schedule announcement for dates).

Thesis Statement Breakdown

  1. Topic:
  2. Stance:
  3. First support:
  4. Second support:
  5. Third support:

Sample Layout

Due to/Because of

1) (First Support Point)____________________________________________________,

2) (Second Support Point)__________________________________________________, 

and

3) (Third Support Point)___________________________________________________,

4) (Topic and Stance)______________________________________________________.


If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to ask!

Nick Pincumbe

EN 1101 Evaluation Paper

Assignment 4D: Outline

Your fourth assignment in the creation of your Evaluation Paper (4G) is to take your thesis statement (4C) and expand it into an outline (4D). For this exercise you should use this handout as your guide and create a printed one-to-two page assignment that outlines a five paragraph structure for your essay based on an introduction, three support paragraphs, and a conclusion. Per our discussion in class, the three support points from your thesis should be the basis for your three support paragraphs.

Since you’ll be including source material for this paper, you can record key quotes or paraphrases (and their in-text citations) as examples where appropriate. Make sure to include your explanation or analysis of the source material you choose to use.

Please include your name, date, etc., as you would on any other assignment and bring one hard copy to your Conference (see Course Schedule announcement for dates).

See the next two pages for a helpful breakdown of how to assemble a complete outline. If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to ask!

Outline Breakdown

Introduction

Hook___________________________________________________________________

Background______________________________________________________________

Point 1) _________________________________________________________________

Point 2) _________________________________________________________________

Point 3) _________________________________________________________________

Thesis __________________________________________________________________

Support One

Topic Sentence ___________________________________________________________

Example or Citation 1a)____________________________________________________

Analysis/Explanation 1b)__________________________________________________

Example or Citation 2a)____________________________________________________

Analysis/Explanation 2b)__________________________________________________

Example or Citation 3a)____________________________________________________

Analysis/Explanation 3b)__________________________________________________

Explanation (relates back to thesis)____________________________________________

Transition _______________________________________________________________

Support Two

Topic Sentence ___________________________________________________________

Example or Citation 1a)____________________________________________________

Analysis/Explanation 1b)__________________________________________________

Example or Citation 2a)____________________________________________________

Analysis/Explanation 2b)__________________________________________________

Example or Citation 3a)____________________________________________________

Analysis/Explanation 3b)__________________________________________________

Explanation (relates back to thesis) ___________________________________________

Transition _______________________________________________________________

Support Three

Topic Sentence ___________________________________________________________

Example or Citation 1a)____________________________________________________

Analysis/Explanation 1b)__________________________________________________

Example or Citation 2a)____________________________________________________

Analysis/Explanation 2b)__________________________________________________

Example or Citation 3a)____________________________________________________

Analysis/Explanation 3b)__________________________________________________

Explanation (relates back to thesis) __________________________________________

Conclusion

Restated Thesis __________________________________________________________

Recap Point 1) ___________________________________________________________

Recap Point 2) ___________________________________________________________

Recap Point 3) ___________________________________________________________

Take Home _____________________________________________________________

Nick Pincumbe

EN 1101 Evaluation Paper

Assignment 4E: First Draft

Your fifth assignment in the creation of your Evaluation Paper (4G) is to take your outline (4D) and expand it into a full draft of your paper (4E). For this exercise you should use this handout as your guide and create a printed one-to-two page assignment that follows the five paragraph structure of your outline, but is fleshed out into complete sentences, and includes a clear introduction, support paragraphs, concrete examples, and a complete conclusion. Per our discussion in class, the three support points from your thesis should be the basis for your three support paragraphs. Please include your name, date, etc., as you would on any other assignment and bring three hard copies to workshop (see Course Schedule announcement for dates).

Remember, this paper should include significant textual evidence (properly documented quotes or paraphrases from your chosen reading) to support your thesis, as well as sufficient analysis and concrete examples. In addition, since we are part of a larger conversation about literary analysis, the use of (properly documented) outside literary criticism is welcomed and encouraged.

If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to ask!

EN 1101 Evaluation Paper

Assignment 4F: Revision Exercise Assignment 4G: Final Draft

Your sixth and seventh assignments in the creation of your Evaluation Paper (4G) are to take your first draft (4E), to do a revision exercise on it (4F), and then to fully revise and edit your first draft to create a final draft (4G) for submission in class.

4F: Revision and Editing Exercise

For this exercise you should review (look again) at your first draft and type full sentence answers to the following prompts:

  1. What part of your paper, if any, can use expansion and what specific information can you add there to make it stronger?
  2. What part of your paper, if any, gets off topic, and what can you remove to help?
  3. Is your organization strong? If so, what makes it strong? If not, or if it could use improvement still, what can you move or substitute to help? Consider creating a reverse outline to help.
  4. How credible are the sources you used? How do you know?
  5. Examine your paper’s tone. Is it too informal or conversational? If so, what can change?
  6. Do you have any word choice errors that spellcheck wouldn’t find?
  7. Do you have any coma-splice errors, run ons, or sentence fragments?
  8. Do you have any fluffy word choices?
  9. Are all of your sources properly documented in MLA style?
  10. What is one specific step you can take to improve your paper before submitting it?

Only one copy of Assignment 4F is needed. It should be submitted along with 4A, 4B, 4C, 4D, and 4E when you turn in 4G.

4G: Final Draft

Complete your final draft of your Evaluation Paper by revising and editing your first draft (4D). Your final draft should present a compelling argument clearly stated in a complete thesis statement, include a complete introduction, at least three support paragraphs, and a complete conclusion, should be well-organized and supported, should include plenty of thoughtful analysis and concrete support details and should follow all of the expectations of the course rubric.

The final draft should be a two page assignment (Times New Roman 12 point font) and should include your name, date, etc., as you would on any other assignment.

Assignments 4A, 4B, 4C, 4D, 4E, and 4F should be submitted by the listed due date (see Course Schedule announcement). Make sure everything is clearly labelled and organized to put yourself in the best position for success!

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Discuss teacher-directed, collaborative, and student-directed Learning.

/in /by
  1. Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, check your spelling.

Assignment:

Write a 1750-2000 word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer the questions for each bullet point. There should be separate sections, one for each bullet below. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at least three (3) citations in your essay. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the essay. The cover page and reference page do not count towards the minimum word amount.

Essay Questions:

  1. Think of the best teacher you have ever had. What authority base and influence model did this teacher use the majority of the time? Think of the worst teacher you ever had. What authority base and influence model did this teacher use the majority of the time?
  2. Discuss teacher-directed, collaborative, and student-directed Learning. Give a solid example for each in an early childhood education setting. Discuss your own personal philosophy on these teaching methods and explain how you would use them in the examples you chose.
  3. Select a concept from any subject with which you are familiar. Write a question for the concept at each of the following levels: analysis, evaluation, knowledge, synthesis, comprehension, and application. Would there be any difference in the use of wait time in asking the six questions you wrote? Why? In classroom management, why is a hierarchical ordering of questions important?
  4. Prepare a lesson for early childhood education using an individual lesson structure and rewrite it as a cooperative learning lesson with all three important elements of cooperative learning. List and discuss the positive interdependences your students might practice in this lesson.
 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

EXAMINATION OF A SOCIAL NORM

/in /by

As I mentioned in class today, you will have a choice of two essay possibilities for this next week. Please choose one of the following two:


****FIRST POSSIBILITY: EXAMINATION OF A SOCIAL NORM****
This writing assignment asks you to identify some kind of social norm and then examine that norm based on the criteria we talked about during lecture. Here are those criteria:

1. To what extent is the norm known and recognized?
2. What is the mode of transmission? How do we learn about the norm?
3. How much and how often do we conform to the norm?
4. Does the norm apply equally to all groups?
5. Is the norm severely or lightly enforced?
6. What is the mode and consistency of enforcement?

Please be clear about what specific norm you have identified and then examine that norm along each of those criteria. Your write up should be between 700-900 words. Submit your finished documents to Canvas before 9am, Friday, April 19th.


****SECOND POSSIBILITY: BREACHING EXPERIMENT****
This writing assignment requires you to conduct a breaching experiment and write up your findings.

The written document you submit must have two parts:

For the first part, I want you to describe your breach in as much hard-boiled detail as you can. This is the “who, what, where, when” part of your assignment. Who did what? What happened? Where did it happen? When did it happen? How did it happen? In other words, how did you create some trouble in a familiar scene of life? That’s what you should describe for Part I.

For the second part, I want you to discuss how other people responded to your breach of the norm. How did others sanction you — or not? What kinds of tactics did others use to let you know your behavior was “out of line” and/or not customary for what is expected in that social environment? Why do you think they used those tactics and not others?

The first and second parts of this assignment must each be between 350-450 words. That means the total length of this assignment = 700-900 words. Submit your finished documents to Canvas before 9am, Friday, April 19th.

Here is a link to an article that provides a tidy summary about the methods and goals of breaching experiments: http://wiredcosmos.com/2012/06/07/sociology-in-action-the-breaching-experiment (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

For the breaching experiment, you can work with a partner. One of you can be the person who conducts the breach, and the other person can record people’s reactions to the breach. If you are working with a partner who is also enrolled in this class, make sure you indicate that fact in your written response. You can work with only one other partner, and both of you must individually submit the essay.

**Remember, if you decide to conduct a breaching experiment, do not do anything illegal. That is critically important, because a good breach does not hurt anybody or do damage to property, etc, etc. Breaches are done in the spirit of “serious play.”**

**I also encourage you to review the assigned reading by Harold Garfinkel, “Studies of the Routine Grounds for Everyday Activities.” It is available on the course website**

Rubric

Essay Rubric

CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking(analysis/argumentation)40.0 ptsADemonstrates excellent critical thinking with excellent observation and original thought.32.0 ptsBDemonstrates good critical thinking with good observations but lacks supporting details or balance.24.0 ptsCDemonstrates some critical thinking with weak observations.16.0 ptsDDemonstrates weak critical thinking with few to no observations0.0 ptsFDid not demonstrate any critical thinking.40.0pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSociological Development(incorporate at least one source from lecture, articles, or discussion)40.0 ptsADraws solid conclusions from observations and demonstrates strong understanding of material.32.0 ptsBDraws decent conclusions from observations and demonstrates a good understanding of source material.24.0 ptsCDraws an incomprehensive conclusion and demonstrates some understanding of source material.16.0 ptsDSeverely lacks development in conclusion and demonstrates weak understanding of source material.0.0 ptsFDoes not draw any conclusions and/or does not incorporate source material.40.0pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization & Clarity20.0 ptsAVery well organized with no errors in grammar/spelling and consistently conveys arguments clearly.15.0 ptsBWell organized with few errors in grammar/spelling and usually conveys arguments clearly.10.0 ptsCSomewhat organized with errors sometimes detracting from readability and arguments.5.0 ptsDSeverely lacks organization. Numerous errors in grammar/spelling frequently detract from readability.0.0 ptsFDoes not have organization and is not readable.20.0pts
Total Points: 100.0
 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

English 1100 In-class Final Exam

/in /by

Question Description

English 1100 In-class Final Exam

For the final exam, you will be given a list of possible questions one week in advance of your exam date, and then you will have one week to prepare an argumentative essay, to be written out by hand in class during the exam. You are welcome to write on whichever question most interests you; please select one (1) question only and answer that question to the best of your ability. My recommended method of preparation would be to complete a full outline of your essay during the week leading up to the exam. Please be certain to carefully read the following instructions and to ask questions if you have any.

On the date of the final exam, you will have 2h 50m to complete the exam. Unlike the midterm, the final exam will be closed book. Therefore, you are not permitted to bring your notes or to consult the texts (online or otherwise), though a physical, paper dictionary is allowed.

-You are welcome to use material from lecture without citing it; however, any other material that is referenced must credit its source.

-Additional research (anything beyond reading back over the essays and course notes) is absolutely, 100% not necessary to fully succeed in the exam.

-Please remember that the final exam is an individual assignment that must represent each student’s unique work and opinion.

Essay structure: Your essay should have a clear and arguable thesis that structures the ensuing body paragraphs. While the midterm was 4-5 paragraphs long, the final exam should use a 5-6 paragraph essay structure: a short introduction that quickly introduces your argument; three or four body paragraphs that each elaborate (clearly and fully) on one main idea; and a short conclusion. Students can earn full marks with either three or four body paragraphs, and the best essays will provide a clear and arguable thesis statement and will have a cohesive and logical essay structure.

Option: A comparison/contrast structure is an option for this essay. We have spoken in class about different methods for structuring a comparison / contrast essay, including “point-by-point” and “block” methods of paragraph development. We have also considered different ways of arriving at a thesis that uses a comparison / contrast methodology. Whichever method(s) you choose to create your comparison / contrast, remember that the thesis should go beyond providing a listing of similarities and/or differences.

Evaluation: The essay will be evaluated according to the following criteria: insight and originality of the central argument/thesis; logic and execution of essay organization and structure; coherence and cohesion of body paragraphs; and clarity of writing, writing style (*which includes the grammar concepts that we have worked on over the course of the term*).

Question

Violence: The essays by Binyavanga Wainaina, Margaret Laurence, Daniel Heath Justice, Richard Wagamese, Taiaiake Alfred, and Ngugi Wa Thiong’o all attempt to write, explain, or respond to violence. In these texts, violence takes on a variety of forms, whether psychological, emotional, or physical. Make an argument about how violence is depicted in two-three of these essays.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Outline the major points of the essay, especially those points you want to emphasize in your response.

/in /by

This is a writing essay, need 700 words count.

Need to read this article: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2008/…

And 2 full pages writing reflection.

Steps in the process:

  • Outline the major points of the essay, especially those points you want to emphasize in your response. Then brainstorm and outline your response, clearly identifying your main thesis.
  • Write a summary and response essay.

The summary section of your essay (200-300 words) should clearly and objectively present the main ideas, as well as the important sub-points, of the essay you have chosen to write about. The summary should be written almost entirely in your words; only use particularly important quotations when they are necessary for your summary.

The response section of your essay (300-400 words) should include an original idea as its main thesis. While the summary is objective, the response is subjective and presents your ideas on the subject. The response can take one of the following forms:

(1) an explanation of your agreement or disagreement with the author’s claim(s) (If you choose to agree, you must go beyond simply saying you feel similarly by presenting new information or reasons that you feel the author’s position should be supported.)

(2) an evaluation of the author’s presentation of his or her argument. Your response should present evidence from your own knowledge and experience to support your argument. You do not need to use additional sources in this essay.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

The Academic Support Center (S020) can help you with any stage of the writing process

/in /by

Readings:

Any one short story in Unit 3:

Cheever, “The Swimmer”

Boyle, “Filthy with Things”

Baldwin, “Sonny’s Blues”

Walker, “Everyday Use”

Sanders, “The Men We Carry in Our Minds”

Morrison, “Recitatif”

Alexie, “What You Pawn I Will Redeem”

One or two scholarly journal articles that you’ll find through research

The second paper assignment asked you to think about how one text shapes your reading of another text. This assignment asks you to continue to develop that skill, but to deepen it by bringing in outside research of your own. For your third essay I’d like you to locate one or two scholarly journal articles that will serve as the “lens” through which you analyze your chosen work of literature. Explain how the articles shape your interpretation of the work of literature. For example, do they help you to understand the issues that the literature raises? Or, do they show that these issues are more complex than the literature would lead us to believe? Or, do they challenge the argument made in the piece of literature? Or, do they support that argument?

Your essay must meet these requirements:

Do non-literary research: Please don’t look up literary criticism–for example, don’t use criticism that analyzes symbols or characters in the work that you choose to analyze.

Use scholarly sources that you find through research: Your paper’s grade will be reduced if you don’t use at least one scholarly If you’re not sure if your source is OK to use, please ask me.

Make connections between texts: Your paper must connect your research to the piece of literature that you’re analyzing. Don’t just describe what your research sources say.

Use quotes from the piece of literature and from each scholarly source that you use.

Have a Works Cited page: Your final draft must include a Works Cited page in MLA style. The Works Cited page does not count toward the 5 full-page length requirement.

Sources of assistance for this assignment:

Speak with a librarian at the RVCC library. See the library home page for information on how to do a live chat with a librarian, submit a question via the library web site, or schedule a one-on-one meeting with a librarian to discuss your research project.

The Academic Support Center (S020) can help you with any stage of the writing process. This is a free, drop-in service—no appointment is necessary.

Essay Requirements:

A minimum of five double-spaced pages

Criteria for a successful essay include:

A title that captures the essence of your essay

Well-developed introduction

Clear thesis statement in the introduction

Well-developed support for your argument (weave in quotes and analyze them)

Logical organization with topic sentences and transitions

Conclusion that adds a final thought

Few sentence-level errors (grammar, spelling)

MLA citation

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Customer Behavior Analysis

/in /by

From the case answer each of the following sets of questions to guide your analysis, problem identification, and recommendation for this case: Segmentation Analysis: The UK shower market can generally be described as consisting of three end-consumer segments (the premium segment, the standard segment, and the value/DIY segment) and the developer segment. Describe each of these three segments along the following four factors:

  1. the key criteria they used to evaluate a shower purchase (e.g., performance, service, convenience, style, etc.),
  2. their usual motivation for purchasing a shower (e.g., replace a broken shower, install a new shower, etc.),
  3. the price point or price range that they would consider purchasing at, and
  4. the channel(s) through which they most preferred to shop for a shower.
  5. As you describe the value for plumbers, be sure to include:
  1. Channel Analysis: There are three main channels of distribution in the UK shower market (DIY Sheds, Showrooms, Trade Shops). Describe each channel based upon the following factors:
    1. The type or level of service it offered its customers and
    2. The relative influence plumbers had on consumer purchase decisions in each channel.
  2. Customer Behavior Analysis: The case states, “very few units had sold in the first four months on the market” (p. 9). Using information presented in the case:
    1. Describe factors that influences end-consumers’ adoption of the Quartz product (provide a brief explanation of the factors, not merely a list).
    2. Identify which factor(s) is(are) the main reason(s) for the slow adoption rate.
  3. Problem identification: Build upon the analyses you presented in answers 1-4 and explain the causes of the Aqualisa Quartz Shower’s poor performance at the time of the case.
  4. Recommendation: How do you think the Quartz should be marketed? Your recommendation should include these 3 elements.

Element 1: The key Marketing Strategy Decisions, specifically:

  1. The primary target market the company should pursue (premium segment, the standard segment, the value/DIY segment, or the developer segment)
  2. The relative price-point or price range, and
  3. The primary distribution channel.

Element 2: Specific reasons for each of your strategy recommendations (a, b, and c). In particular,

Element 3: Your answer should clearly identify current problems or obstacles your decisions help address.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"