Impressions Of Museum Or Gallery Exhibit

/in /by

you are asked to attend a “cultural event” and report on your experience. This assignment requires the following:

  • Submit your cultural event choice to the instructor for approval before the end of Week 5.
  • Visit a museum or gallery exhibition of modern art before the end of Week 9.
  • Write a report of the visit.
  • Summarize the report in a PowerPoint presentation.

Write a three to four (3-4) page paper (750-1,000 words) in which you:

  1. Identify the date visited, location, name, and background of the museum or specific exhibition. (If virtual, identify the Website along with the other information.)
  2. Describe three (3) works, noting the artist, title, subject, and the time period of each work.
  3. Compare the style, influences, and meaning or intent of each piece, highlighting any changes (if any) from the first to last piece.
  4. Explain your reasons for selecting the pieces in a discussion of the reasons for the artist’s popularity and / or impact on the art world.

The post Impressions Of Museum Or Gallery Exhibit appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Using Information Systems And Information Technologies / Management Information Systems

/in /by

Write a four to five (4-5) page paper in which you:

  1. Present an overview of the origin and history of the concept that you have chosen.
  2. Describe one (1) current use of the concept that you have chosen. Include at least two (2) examples of such use in individuals, organizations, and / or governments to support your response.
  3. Discuss common attitudes toward the concept. Next, discuss your own attitudes toward the concept in question. Justify your response.
  4. Explain the fundamental strengths and weaknesses–or the advantages and disadvantages–of the concept that you have chosen. Justify your response.
  5. Describe the prevailing view that experts hold about the likely future of the concept in question. Include the views of at least three (3) experts to support your response.
  6. Use at least six (6) quality references. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.

The post Using Information Systems And Information Technologies / Management Information Systems appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Paper On Health Issue

/in /by

For this assignment, you are to select a target population with a specific health issue (DEPRESSION IS THE HEALTH ISSUE TO CHOOSE) and research how social, cultural, and behavior factors of the target population contribute to health outcomes associated with the health issue. The 1,200-1,500 word Research Paper must including the following:

Introduction: Provide a concise synopsis of the purpose of the paper and a general introduction to the target population and the health issue.

Target Population: Provide a description about the target population that you have selected; provide demographic information about the population; and discuss relevant social, cultural, and behavior factors that affect this population.

Health Issue: Provide information discussing the health issue that you have selected; include a history of knowledge and public health understanding regarding the health issue; how it has evolved; biological and epidemiological information related to the disease; and major social, cultural, and behavior factors that affect or relate to the health issue.

Relationship Between Health Issue and Target Population: Analyze how social, cultural, and behavior factors in the target population contribute to the health issue; and identify what factors/characteristics are positive or negative and which behaviors/practices/beliefs serve as risk factors or protective factors.

Current Strategies/Interventions: Discuss existing programming to prevent or reduce the health issue within the target population and challenges to interventions and programming.

The post Paper On Health Issue appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Investigating cryptographic libraries

/in /by

1. Identify and name one open-source cryptographic library for each of the following

programming languages. Provide a web link to the library doc page. a. C b. C++ c. JAVA d. Python

2. For each of the libraries you have identified in 1) above, list and explain all requirements that are necessary for using the libraries functions in a piece of code. For example, for a JAVA library what classes need to imported etc.

3. For each library identified in 1) above, name a function that belongs each of the following categories

a. Key Generation b. Hash Functions c. Block Ciphers d. Stream Ciphers

If the library you choose does not have any support for functions in a category please state so.

4. Finally provide short documentation for each of the functions listed in 3 above. At minimum, describe the purpose of the function and list all of its input variables and expected output.

The post Investigating cryptographic libraries appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Paper-PROMPT 1: DQ2

/in /by

Paper-PROMPT 1: DQ2

PROMPT 1: DQ2

DUE DATE: March 7th tonight (23:00 EST)!!

PROMPT: Research how operations management changed over the past 100 years, current technology and future trends. Apply this information to determine how fast it will take African countries, China and India to catch up and surpass the United States and other developed countries.

REQUIREMENTS:

An appropriate-length response to the Forum questions should be between 400 and 500 words and should include a minimum of three scholarly or professional sources per question in order to receive full points. Students are encouraged to review the articles, etc. used by fellow students. Students are cautioned to follow APA guidelines to receive full points.

Assignment should meet professional standards in content, punctuation/writing style and APA guidelines for citation of sources and should run approximately 400-500 words.

Several criteria must be met in order to receive full credit:

  • They relate directly to the assigned topic and contribute new information to build our understanding of the concepts.
  • They develop the point with examples and appropriately documented research, exhibit sound research skills employing various tools and library resources such as surveys, Internet, databases,. Wikipedia is not a valid source.
  • They contain original thought- synthesizing information. Do not simply copy material from another source.
  • They are written clearly and correctly and follow proper APA citation rules with a minimum of 3 professional business or peer-reviewed sources other than the text.

The post Paper-PROMPT 1: DQ2 appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

I want A Study Plan For Project Management

/in /by

I want A Study Plan For Project Management

study plan for these classes:

managing project execution,

project leadership and communication,

issues and cases in global project management

project management capstone

The post I want A Study Plan For Project Management appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Differentiation of Rewards and Segmentation of Current or Potential workers

/in /by

Differentiation of Rewards and Segmentation of Current or Potential workers

HRMN 495 (Contemporary Issues in Human Resource Management Practice)

This assignment allows you to demonstrate mastery in outcome # 5: Analyze and evaluate one’s own work practices for individual improvement and development.

Final Knowledge Gained and Further Development Activity

In this final paper, students will draw upon knowledge gained in both this capstone class, but also other classes they have taken in their degree program. Students will select two of the following concepts that represent key concepts related to the key knowledge areas in HR for the selected concepts, students will describe, the concepts selected, knowledge about it with scholarly support for the statements. Provide at least two scholarly sources for your information. Include a title page and a reference page for the paper. Use topic heading to identify the segments of the paper.

  1. Title Page
  2. Introduction and Purpose of Paper
  3. Concept Selected
    A. Academic definitions of the key terms

    B. The value that is added to the organization through the concept

    C. Examples of the concept in practice

    D. Risks of not utilizing the concept

    E. Your personal evaluation of your own competencies in the concept area

    F. How you will continue to develop your competencies in the area and how you will apply the concept in your own organization

  4. Concluding Comments on Knowledge of the HR function
  5. Reference Page
    Choose from the following: pick 2
  6. HR Competencies for the 21st Century
  7. The Strategic Role of Human Resources
  8. HR Metrics that Matter
  9. The HR So That Statement
  10. Differentiation of Rewards and Segmentation of Current or Potential Employees
  11. Employment Brand
  12. Employee Engagement

Due Date March 10th Sunday @ 8 PM. Eastern time

PLEASE Proof-Read paper ……

Rubric Name: Assignment 4: Knowledge Gained and Personal Assessment (16%)

This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Criteria

Level 5 Exceeds Expectations

4 points

Level 4 Meets Expectations

3.6 points

Level 3 Meets Some Expectations

3.2 points

Level 2 Does Not Meet Expectations

2.5 points

Level 1 Did Not Submit or Did Not Meet Minimum Expectations

0 points

Criterion 1 Academic definitions of the key terms; The value that is added to the organization through the concept

Definitions are complete, relevant, current and supported with outstanding academic citation (s). The value to the organization was explained well and was convincing in both an academic and professional manner. The topic two topics selected exceeded the expectations.

Definitions are complete, relevant, current and supported with academic citation (s). The value to the organization was explained and was convincing in both an academic and professional manner. Each of the two topic areas met the expectations for the assignment.

For the two concept areas, some but not all meet the expectations. Definitions were not complete, relevant, current and/or supported with academic citation (s). The value to the organization was explained in some but not all and was not all were convincing in both an academic and professional manner.

Combined, the twp concept areas did not meet the expectations. Definitions were not complete, relevant, current and/or supported with academic citation (s). The value to the organization was explained in some but not all and was not all were convincing in both an academic and professional manner. Overall, the segment did not meet the expectations for the capstone class.

Did Not Submit or Did Not Meet Minimum Expectations

/ 4

Criterion 2 Examples of the concept in practice; Risks of not utilizing the concept

Examples were excellent, relevant and insightful. Risks were identified in an also insightful manner and were justified robustly. Scholarly support was given for the assertions made. The segment exceeded that of most submissions.

Examples were good, relevant and insightful. Risks were identified in an also insightful manner and were justified adequately. Scholarly support was given for the assertions made in a manner that met the expectations for an upper level course. .

The examples and risks identified met some of the expectations of being appropriate, relevant and insightful. Risks were identified but could have been justified more robustly. Scholarly support was given for the assertions made but not in a fully convincing manner.

The examples and risks identified did not met the expectations of being appropriate, relevant and insightful. Risks were wither not identified or but could have been justified more robustly. Scholarly support was either not given for the assertions made or were not in a fully convincing manner. This segment did not meet the expectations of a upper level course.

Did Not Submit or Did Not Meet Minimum Expectations

/ 4

Criterion 3 Your personal evaluation of your own competencies in the concept; How you will continue to develop your competencies in the concept and how you will apply the concept in your own organization

For the area selected, the personal evaluation is credible and candid with convincing information shared. The evaluation is very well written and explained. Explanation is thorough, convincing and relevant to the organization. It exceeds the expectations for the personal evaluation and relevance to the organization.

For the two areas selected, the personal evaluation is credible and candid with convincing information shared. It was written in a good manner. The explanation is thorough, convincing and relevant to the organization. The segment meets the general expectations for a capstone level course.

For most of the concpets selected, the personal evaluation is credible and candid with convincing information. Explanation for most is thorough, convincing and relevant to the organization. Some but not all the expectations for the entire two were met.

The personal evaluation is not credible and/or candid with convincing information shared for the two concept areas. Explanations for each is not as thorough, convincing and/or relevant to the organization as was expected.

Did Not Submit or Did Not Meet Minimum Expectations

/ 4

Criterion 4 Academic Writing Style Including Introduction, Purpose Statement, Citations and References

Writes in an error free manner, includes all the required elements, writing is clear, logical, flows well and is convincing. Citations and references are provided in accurate APA format

Generally writes in an error free manner, includes all the required elements, writing is mostly clear, logical, flows well and is convincing. Citations and references are provided and are in accurate APA format.

In a portion but not all the final paper, the writing style was in an error free manner, includes all the required elements, writing is mostly clear, logical, flows well and is convincing. Citations and references are not all provided and/or are not all in accurate APA format for some but not all the sources.

Generally does not write in an error free manner, does not include all the required elements, does not writing is a mostly clear, logical manner and is not always convincing. Citations and references are not provided and/or are not in accurate APA format.

Did Not Submit or Did Not Meet Minimum Expectations

The post Differentiation of Rewards and Segmentation of Current or Potential workers appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Analyze and evaluate one’s own work practices for individual improvement and development.

/in /by

Analyze and evaluate one’s own work practices for individual improvement and development.

This assignment allows you to demonstrate mastery in outcome # 5: Analyze and evaluate one’s own work practices for individual improvement and development.

Final Knowledge Gained and Further Development Activity

In this final paper, students will draw upon knowledge gained in both this capstone class, but also other classes they have taken in their degree program. Students will select two of the following concepts that represent key concepts related to the key knowledge areas in HR for the selected concepts, students will describe, the concepts selected, knowledge about it with scholarly support for the statements. Provide at least two scholarly sources for your information. Include a title page and a reference page for the paper. Use topic heading to identify the segments of the paper.

  1. Title Page
  2. Introduction and Purpose of Paper
  3. Concept Selected
    A. Academic definitions of the key terms

    B. The value that is added to the organization through the concept

    C. Examples of the concept in practice

    D. Risks of not utilizing the concept

    E. Your personal evaluation of your own competencies in the concept area

    F. How you will continue to develop your competencies in the area and how you will apply the concept in your own organization

  4. Concluding Comments on Knowledge of the HR function
  5. Reference Page
    Choose from the following: pick 2
  6. HR Competencies for the 21st Century
  7. The Strategic Role of Human Resources
  8. HR Metrics that Matter
  9. The HR So That Statement
  10. Differentiation of Rewards and Segmentation of Current or Potential Employees
  11. Employment Brand
  12. Employee Engagement

Due Date March 10th Sunday @ 8 PM. Eastern time

PLEASE Proof-Read paper ……

Rubric Name: Assignment 4: Knowledge Gained and Personal Assessment (16%)

This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Criteria

Level 5 Exceeds Expectations

4 points

Level 4 Meets Expectations

3.6 points

Level 3 Meets Some Expectations

3.2 points

Level 2 Does Not Meet Expectations

2.5 points

Level 1 Did Not Submit or Did Not Meet Minimum Expectations

0 points

Criterion 1 Academic definitions of the key terms; The value that is added to the organization through the concept

Definitions are complete, relevant, current and supported with outstanding academic citation (s). The value to the organization was explained well and was convincing in both an academic and professional manner. The topic two topics selected exceeded the expectations.

Definitions are complete, relevant, current and supported with academic citation (s). The value to the organization was explained and was convincing in both an academic and professional manner. Each of the two topic areas met the expectations for the assignment.

For the two concept areas, some but not all meet the expectations. Definitions were not complete, relevant, current and/or supported with academic citation (s). The value to the organization was explained in some but not all and was not all were convincing in both an academic and professional manner.

Combined, the twp concept areas did not meet the expectations. Definitions were not complete, relevant, current and/or supported with academic citation (s). The value to the organization was explained in some but not all and was not all were convincing in both an academic and professional manner. Overall, the segment did not meet the expectations for the capstone class.

Did Not Submit or Did Not Meet Minimum Expectations

/ 4

Criterion 2 Examples of the concept in practice; Risks of not utilizing the concept

Examples were excellent, relevant and insightful. Risks were identified in an also insightful manner and were justified robustly. Scholarly support was given for the assertions made. The segment exceeded that of most submissions.

Examples were good, relevant and insightful. Risks were identified in an also insightful manner and were justified adequately. Scholarly support was given for the assertions made in a manner that met the expectations for an upper level course. .

The examples and risks identified met some of the expectations of being appropriate, relevant and insightful. Risks were identified but could have been justified more robustly. Scholarly support was given for the assertions made but not in a fully convincing manner.

The examples and risks identified did not met the expectations of being appropriate, relevant and insightful. Risks were wither not identified or but could have been justified more robustly. Scholarly support was either not given for the assertions made or were not in a fully convincing manner. This segment did not meet the expectations of a upper level course.

Did Not Submit or Did Not Meet Minimum Expectations

/ 4

Criterion 3 Your personal evaluation of your own competencies in the concept; How you will continue to develop your competencies in the concept and how you will apply the concept in your own organization

For the area selected, the personal evaluation is credible and candid with convincing information shared. The evaluation is very well written and explained. Explanation is thorough, convincing and relevant to the organization. It exceeds the expectations for the personal evaluation and relevance to the organization.

For the two areas selected, the personal evaluation is credible and candid with convincing information shared. It was written in a good manner. The explanation is thorough, convincing and relevant to the organization. The segment meets the general expectations for a capstone level course.

For most of the concpets selected, the personal evaluation is credible and candid with convincing information. Explanation for most is thorough, convincing and relevant to the organization. Some but not all the expectations for the entire two were met.

The personal evaluation is not credible and/or candid with convincing information shared for the two concept areas. Explanations for each is not as thorough, convincing and/or relevant to the organization as was expected.

Did Not Submit or Did Not Meet Minimum Expectations

/ 4

Criterion 4 Academic Writing Style Including Introduction, Purpose Statement, Citations and References

Writes in an error free manner, includes all the required elements, writing is clear, logical, flows well and is convincing. Citations and references are provided in accurate APA format

Generally writes in an error free manner, includes all the required elements, writing is mostly clear, logical, flows well and is convincing. Citations and references are provided and are in accurate APA format.

In a portion but not all the final paper, the writing style was in an error free manner, includes all the required elements, writing is mostly clear, logical, flows well and is convincing. Citations and references are not all provided and/or are not all in accurate APA format for some but not all the sources.

Generally does not write in an error free manner, does not include all the required elements, does not writing is a mostly clear, logical manner and is not always convincing. Citations and references are not provided and/or are not in accurate APA format.

Did Not Submit or Did Not Meet Minimum Expectations

The post Analyze and evaluate one’s own work practices for individual improvement and development. appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Contemporary challenges in Human Resource Management Practice

/in /by

Contemporary challenges in Human Resource Management Practice

This assignment allows you to demonstrate mastery in outcome # 5: Analyze and evaluate one’s own work practices for individual improvement and development.

Final Knowledge Gained and Further Development Activity

In this final paper, students will draw upon knowledge gained in both this capstone class, but also other classes they have taken in their degree program. Students will select two of the following concepts that represent key concepts related to the key knowledge areas in HR for the selected concepts, students will describe, the concepts selected, knowledge about it with scholarly support for the statements. Provide at least two scholarly sources for your information. Include a title page and a reference page for the paper. Use topic heading to identify the segments of the paper.

  1. Title Page
  2. Introduction and Purpose of Paper
  3. Concept Selected
    A. Academic definitions of the key terms

    B. The value that is added to the organization through the concept

    C. Examples of the concept in practice

    D. Risks of not utilizing the concept

    E. Your personal evaluation of your own competencies in the concept area

    F. How you will continue to develop your competencies in the area and how you will apply the concept in your own organization

  4. Concluding Comments on Knowledge of the HR function
  5. Reference Page
    Choose from the following: pick 2
  6. HR Competencies for the 21st Century
  7. The Strategic Role of Human Resources
  8. HR Metrics that Matter
  9. The HR So That Statement
  10. Differentiation of Rewards and Segmentation of Current or Potential Employees
  11. Employment Brand
  12. Employee Engagement

Due Date March 10th Sunday @ 8 PM. Eastern time

PLEASE Proof-Read paper ……

Rubric Name: Assignment 4: Knowledge Gained and Personal Assessment (16%)

This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Criteria

Level 5 Exceeds Expectations

4 points

Level 4 Meets Expectations

3.6 points

Level 3 Meets Some Expectations

3.2 points

Level 2 Does Not Meet Expectations

2.5 points

Level 1 Did Not Submit or Did Not Meet Minimum Expectations

0 points

Criterion 1 Academic definitions of the key terms; The value that is added to the organization through the concept

Definitions are complete, relevant, current and supported with outstanding academic citation (s). The value to the organization was explained well and was convincing in both an academic and professional manner. The topic two topics selected exceeded the expectations.

Definitions are complete, relevant, current and supported with academic citation (s). The value to the organization was explained and was convincing in both an academic and professional manner. Each of the two topic areas met the expectations for the assignment.

For the two concept areas, some but not all meet the expectations. Definitions were not complete, relevant, current and/or supported with academic citation (s). The value to the organization was explained in some but not all and was not all were convincing in both an academic and professional manner.

Combined, the twp concept areas did not meet the expectations. Definitions were not complete, relevant, current and/or supported with academic citation (s). The value to the organization was explained in some but not all and was not all were convincing in both an academic and professional manner. Overall, the segment did not meet the expectations for the capstone class.

Did Not Submit or Did Not Meet Minimum Expectations

/ 4

Criterion 2 Examples of the concept in practice; Risks of not utilizing the concept

Examples were excellent, relevant and insightful. Risks were identified in an also insightful manner and were justified robustly. Scholarly support was given for the assertions made. The segment exceeded that of most submissions.

Examples were good, relevant and insightful. Risks were identified in an also insightful manner and were justified adequately. Scholarly support was given for the assertions made in a manner that met the expectations for an upper level course. .

The examples and risks identified met some of the expectations of being appropriate, relevant and insightful. Risks were identified but could have been justified more robustly. Scholarly support was given for the assertions made but not in a fully convincing manner.

The examples and risks identified did not met the expectations of being appropriate, relevant and insightful. Risks were wither not identified or but could have been justified more robustly. Scholarly support was either not given for the assertions made or were not in a fully convincing manner. This segment did not meet the expectations of a upper level course.

Did Not Submit or Did Not Meet Minimum Expectations

/ 4

Criterion 3 Your personal evaluation of your own competencies in the concept; How you will continue to develop your competencies in the concept and how you will apply the concept in your own organization

For the area selected, the personal evaluation is credible and candid with convincing information shared. The evaluation is very well written and explained. Explanation is thorough, convincing and relevant to the organization. It exceeds the expectations for the personal evaluation and relevance to the organization.

For the two areas selected, the personal evaluation is credible and candid with convincing information shared. It was written in a good manner. The explanation is thorough, convincing and relevant to the organization. The segment meets the general expectations for a capstone level course.

For most of the concpets selected, the personal evaluation is credible and candid with convincing information. Explanation for most is thorough, convincing and relevant to the organization. Some but not all the expectations for the entire two were met.

The personal evaluation is not credible and/or candid with convincing information shared for the two concept areas. Explanations for each is not as thorough, convincing and/or relevant to the organization as was expected.

Did Not Submit or Did Not Meet Minimum Expectations

/ 4

Criterion 4 Academic Writing Style Including Introduction, Purpose Statement, Citations and References

Writes in an error free manner, includes all the required elements, writing is clear, logical, flows well and is convincing. Citations and references are provided in accurate APA format

Generally writes in an error free manner, includes all the required elements, writing is mostly clear, logical, flows well and is convincing. Citations and references are provided and are in accurate APA format.

In a portion but not all the final paper, the writing style was in an error free manner, includes all the required elements, writing is mostly clear, logical, flows well and is convincing. Citations and references are not all provided and/or are not all in accurate APA format for some but not all the sources.

Generally does not write in an error free manner, does not include all the required elements, does not writing is a mostly clear, logical manner and is not always convincing. Citations and references are not provided and/or are not in accurate APA format.

Did Not Submit or Did Not Meet Minimum Expectations

The post Contemporary challenges in Human Resource Management Practice appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"