Compare and contrast two alternatives for the county’s solid waste disposal (for example landfill versus incineration).

EOH 502 Case#4
Order Details/Description

Please, this essay it has to be an anti-plagiarism, my professor has very good software that detects plagiarism. This assignment is for a Master’s program degree in Public Health. It has to be original made form scratch and unique essay. They have to have references in the end of each paragraph and at the end of essay, minimum 5-7 references. Time’s new roman and font size is 12. Please, make sure that you do spelling check for each essay. This assignment it has to be free of plagiarism, because this university uses plagiarism detection software. I want this essay to be built from scratch, original and unique as requested.
Make sure that you put references citation for each paragraph of the assignment cases and SLP’s. Put citation and references that pertains to the assignment given. If you don’t’ cited, do not put references. They are checking the references for validation on each paragraph.
Also, if you have any problems getting into the websites, use the browser hotspot shield USA ip address. www.hotspotshield.com

Module 4 – Case
Physical Hazards
Assignment Overview
You are employed by a local municipality as environmental health officer and are placed in charge of solid waste disposal and management.

Case Assignment
Currently the county disposes of their municipal solid wastes in a landfill. The landfill’s capacity will end in a few years and a new option is being considered to manage solid waste management in the county for the next 50 years. Write a paper in which you:

Compare and contrast two alternatives for the county’s solid waste disposal (for example landfill versus incineration). Examples of factors to consider in your analysis may include environmental impacts, human health impacts, resource conservation or recovery, occupational hazards for operators and sustainability.
Select the best method for solid waste disposal in this scenario setting and explain your rationale.
Assignment Expectations
Use information from your module readings/articles as well as appropriate research to support your paper.

Length: The CA assignment should be 3-5 pages long (double-spaced).

References: At least three references must be included from academic sources (e.g., peer-reviewed journal articles). Required Reading is included. Quoted materials should not exceed 10% of the total paper (since the focus of these assignments is critical thinking). Use your own words and build on the ideas of others. Materials copied verbatim from external sources must be enclosed in quotation marks. In-text citations are required as well as a list of references at the end of the assignment. (APA format is recommended.)

Organization: Subheadings should be used to organize your paper according to the questions.

Format: APA format is recommended for this assignment.

Grammar and Spelling: While no points are deducted for minor errors, assignments are expected to adhere to standard guidelines of grammar, spelling, punctuation, and sentence syntax. Points may be deducted if grammar and spelling impact clarity.

The following items will be assessed in particular:

Achievement of learning objectives for SLP assignment.
Relevance – All content is connected to the question.
Precision – Specific question is addressed. Statements, facts, and statistics are specific and accurate.
Depth of discussion – Points that lead to deeper issues are presented and integrated.
Breadth – Multiple perspectives and references, and multiple issues/factors are considered.
Evidence – Points are well supported with facts, statistics, and references.
Logic – Discussion makes sense; conclusions are logically supported by premises, statements, or factual information.
Clarity – Writing is concise and understandable, and contains sufficient detail or examples.
Objectivity – Avoids the use of first person and subjective bias.
Module 4 – Background
Physical Hazards
Required Reading
Center for Disease Control and Prevention (2013). Workplace Safety & Health Topics: Noise and Hearing Loss. Retrieved on 1/6/14 at http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/noise/
Ekmekçioğlu M., Kaya T., & Kahraman C. (2010). Fuzzy Multicriteria Disposal Method and Site Selection for Municipal Solid Waste. Waste Management, 30(8): 1729–1736.
Marshall R.E., & Farahbakhsh K. (2013). Systems Approaches to Integrated Solid Waste Management in Developing Countries. Waste Management, 33(4): 988-1003.
Occupational Safety and Health (n.d.). What Constitutes an Effective Hearing Conservation Program?. Retrieved on 1/6/14 at https://www.osha.gov/dts/osta/otm/noise/hcp/index.html
S. Environmental Protection Agency (2012). Radiation Protection. Retrieved on 1/6/14 at http://www.epa.gov/radiation/understand/health_effects.html
Wada Y., Okumoto T., & Wada N. (2008). Evaluating Waste Disposal Systems.The Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 10(2): 173-187.
Recommended Reading
Sliwinska-Kowalska M., & Davis A. (2012). Noise-Induced Hearing Loss.Noise & Health, 14(61), 274-80.
Suter A.H. (2012). Engineering Controls for Occupational Noise Exposure: The Best Way to Save Hearing. Sound and Vibration, 46(1): 24-32.
S. Environmental Protection Agency (2012). Noise Pollution. Retrieved on 1/6/14 at http://www.epa.gov/air/noise.html
S. Environmental Protection Agency (2013). Wastes. Retrieved on 1/6/14 at http://www.epa.gov/osw/
Vallee, L., Ruddy, M., & Bota, K. (2010). Can You Hear Me Now? Professional Safety, 55(11), 26-32.

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"