notable Nobel Prize in Physics awardees physics homework help

Who are the most notable awardees of Nobel Prize in Physics in the past decade. Pick three and explain extensively how and why they were picked for the distinction.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Research and select 3 current epidemiological studies regarding risk factors that are associated with Diabetes

Research and select 3 current epidemiological studies regarding risk factors that are associated with Diabetes. Use the following website to search for studies: http://www.pubmedcentral.gov In a Word document: Article 1: Part one: Describe the criteria you used to select these papers (e.g., only English language, peer reviewed articles, only a specific age group, only US studies, etc). Part two: Identify the articles according to type of risk factors studied (e.g., environmental, socio-economic, behavioral). Part Three: Read each study using the Template for Assessment of Causation for Reviewing Epidemiological Studies. Template for Assessment of Causality for Reviewing Epidemiological Studies Causality Criteria Criteria to Evaluate Studies Description Exposure, Intervention Outcome Study design Study Population Main Result A. Description of the evidence What was the exposure or intervention? Was the outcome? What was the study design? What was the study population? What was the main result? Internal Validity Observation bias Recall bias Confounding Chance B. Internal Validity (non-causal factors) Are the results likely to be affected by observation bias? Are results likely to be affected by recall bias? Are the results likely be affected by confounding (list which ones)? Are the results likely to be affected by chance? Generalizability Eligible population Source population Other population C. External validity – Generalization of results Can the study results be applied to the eligible population? Can the study results e applied to the source population? Can the study results be applied to other relevant populations? Part Four: Identify proximate and/or underlying determinants for each study. Part Five: Answer the questions posed in the Template for Assessment of Causation for Reviewing Epidemiological Studies, for each study. Number each study, and list the title, and state each question in the format it appears on the template.
 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Clarke s Cosmological Argument assignment help

I need a 1200 – 1500 word MLA Format Paper on Clarke’s Cosmological Argument for God’s existence.  I have to discuss and analyze Clarke’s argument in the paper.

The paper must include the following items below:

–  Defend a thesis and should proceed according to the following format: Thesis, Argument, Objection(s), Response(s), Conclusion

– Sources must be properly cited using MLA format.

–  Use a standard 10-12 pt. font and be double spaced.

-Introductory paragraph: overview of what you are going to do in your paper. Must include thesis for the paper. Your thesis is going to be whether you agree or disagree with the argument you look at.  For instance, if you are going to talk about Anselm’s argument and agree with it, you might say, “My thesis will be that Anselm’s argument is a good one.”  Also, it’s OK in philosophy if you actually tell your reader straight out “My thesis in this paper will be. . . .”  In philosophy, you always want to as direct and clear as possible.

-next you might want to write one or two paragraphs with a little biographical information on your philosopher.  For instance, if you are writing on Anselm, write one or two paragraphs telling your reader about who Anselm was as a person and what he did with his life.  To do this, you will have to do some research on the Internet from a reliable source.  Some good sites are these:

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: http://plato.stanford.edu/

Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy: http://www.iep.utm.edu/

Note that you don’t want to do too much of this biographical information in your paper.  One or two paragraphs is enough.  More than that would be too much.

After this, then you will want to spend some time explaining to your reader the argument you will be analyzing in your paper.  For instance, if you are going to be analyzing Anselm’s Ontological Argument in your paper, then explain Anselm’s argument to your reader.  Here you want to explain the argument you are analyzing as clearly as you can.  Also, you want to explain the line of reasoning as clearly as you can in your own words.  Don’t just give your reader a long list of quotes.  That doesn’t show you really understand the argument for yourself.  It’s OK to use some quotes in your explanation of the argument, but, again, just do not do too much of this.  Overall, your goal is to explain the line of reasoning as clearly as you can in your own words.  Here you can use the readings for the course, including the reviews that I send out each week, to help you (obviously, though, you cannot just copy any explanations in these materials; again, your goal is to explain things in your own words).  Explaining the argument you are analyzing to your reader thoroughly and clearly and carefully and in your own words will take a few paragraphs.

After you explain the argument you are analyzing to your reader, restate the thesis of your essay.  For instance, if you are looking at Anselm’s essay, you might say, “Now that I have explained Anselm’s argument, now I will defend the thesis that it is a good one.” 

Then, after you restate your thesis, go on to explain to your reader your reasons for adopting that thesis.  Here you are explaining why you accept the thesis you have stated.  This is important, and it will require you to think.  You don’t want to simply say “I agree with Anselm’s argument” or “I disagree with Anselm’s argument” and just leave it at that.  You want to go on to explain why you think that this argument you are analyzing is good or bad.  To do that, really think about the assumptions and premises that undergird the argument you are looking at.  If you think the argument is bad because a certain assumption or premise that undergirds that argument is bad, then explain which assumption or premise you think is bad and why you think that assumption or premise is bad.  If you think the argument is good because the assumptions and premises that undergird the argument are good, then explain why you find the individual assumptions and premises that undergird the argument persuasive.  Again, you don’t want to simply say “I agree with Anselm’s argument” or “I disagree with Anselm’s argument.”  You want to explain why you think that this argument you are analyzing is good or bad.

After this, you want to think of some objections to your thesis and write them out and explain why someone might have these objections.  The objections you explain here will depend on your thesis.  If you are defending the argument you are considering, then think of two or three possible objections someone might have to the argument you are defending.  For instance, if you are defending Anselm’s argument, then think of two or three possible objections that someone might have to it.  By contrast, if you are attacking the argument you are considering, then think of two or three possible objections that someone might have regarding why the argument at hand is a good one.  Doing this will require you to think hard, and it will require you to consider alternative points of view to the thesis you are considering. 

Next you want to think of responses to the very objections that you just raised and then write them out and explain them.  The responses you explain here will depend again on your thesis and the point of view you are taking.  If you are defending the argument you are considering, and then just raised two or three possible objections to it, then go on and answer each of those two or three objections.  By contrast, if you are attacking the argument you are considering, and then just considered two or three objections regarding why someone might think that the argument at hand is a good one, then go on to answer those two or three objections and explain why you think they don’t show the argument at hand is good.

After this, wrap up your paper with a concluding paragraph providing an overview of what you argued in your essay.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

How did the Patriots [Sons of Liberty] use the so-called Boston “massacre” to their advantage? Why was this important?…

How did the Patriots [Sons of Liberty] use the so-called Boston “massacre” to their advantage? Why was this important? (not the event, but how it was used)
 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

BIO LABS / natural science guru

Here is the file.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

STATSOLVER: USING BP CHART/DATA CHART/EXCEL/ DOTS

Part 2: Take a weekly / monthly (even quarterly) important number from your everyday work that makes you (and your department or bosses) “sweat”… …and do a run and control chart analysis. If it’s monthly, try to have at least 2 years’ worth (24 data points). • If it’s weekly, try to have at least 6 months’ worth (~25 data points), but a year (~50 weeks) is fine, too. • If you try to use a quarterly figure, you’ll need 5 years of data (~20 data points) to get a decent chart (as in the Bacteraemia example in the tutorial). After describing your analysis, also answer these two questions: • Has this analysis made you think differently about the situation? • Given this knowledge, is there an alternative action to what’s normally done in the weekly / monthly “How’re we doin’ ?” meetings? • Go ahead and share this specific personal example at appropriate moments in this week’s DQ dialogue and Lessons Learned. I’m not looking for profundity here — just evidence that your thinking is beginning to change. So, this is more of your personal “AHA!” rather than deep analysis. I’m more concerned with innovative application and not necessarily the ‘right’ answer. Please submit your assignment in a Word document with appropriate control charts pasted in. — Be aware, I have Office 2003: Please make sure that you save your file accordingly – as a “.doc” — so that it can be read (and make sure that the graphs don’t get obliterated in the process). There seems to be some problems using “Load” in Excel 2007/2010 for some of you. I have e-mailed my friend who wrote BPChart and should hear from him soon. Meanwhile, all you have to do is OPEN (in regular Excel) the data file, highlight and “COPY” the data, then open up BPChart and “PASTE” your copied data into the database worksheet that appears when you open up BPChart. You can then close out the original data file and should now be able to get your charts. I hope this helped. Your feedback with BPChart issues has been very helpful — keep it coming! Remember: the very left column is for your TIME factor. Make sure the first piece of actual data is pasted into cell C14. Monday, June 04, 2012
 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

What are the benefits of coconut water

I really love vitacocopure

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Predict what might happen to multicellular plants if a micro-organism that digested pectin was accidentally released from a laborator

Predict what might happen to multicellular plants if a micro-organism that digested pectin was accidentally released from a laborator
 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Find the errors business and finance assignment help

  1. Download and save (use your last name as part of the file name) the attached proofreading assignment .pdf document
  2. Highlight the errors (if error is a missing comma, period, semi-colon, etc, highlight word prior to where the comma, semi-colon, etc should be placed) in the letter using the highlighting function in Adobe Reader.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"