SWOT Analysis
Marcia J. Simmering
Encyclopedia of Management. Ed. Marilyn M. Helms. 5th ed. Detroit, MI: Gale, 2006. p771-773.
Copyright: COPYRIGHT 2006 Gale, COPYRIGHT 2007 Gale, Cengage Learning
Listen
Page 771
SWOT ANALYSIS
Organizational strategies are the means through which companies accomplish their missions and goals. Successful strategies address four elements of the setting within which the company operates: (1) the company’s strengths, (2) its weaknesses, (3) the opportunities in its competitive environment, and (4) the threats in its competitive environment. This set of four elements—strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats—when used by a firm to gain competitive advantage, is often referred to as a . SWOT was developed by Ken Andrews in the early 1970s. An assessment of strengths and weaknesses occurs as a part of organizational analysis; that is, it is an audit of the company’s internal workings, which are relatively easier to control than outside factors. Conversely, examining opportunities and threats is a part of environmental analysis—the company must look outside of the organization to determine opportunities and threats, over which it has lesser control.
Andrews’s original conception of the strategy model that preceded the SWOT asked four basic questions about a company and its environment: (1) What can we do? (2) What do we want to do? (3) What might we do? and (4) What do others expect us to do?
The answers to these questions provide the input for an effective strategic process. While Andrews’ original conception of this analysis has been developed and changed to the more streamlined SWOT analysis that we know today, his work is the foundation of this activity.
STRENGTHS, WEAKNESSES,
Strengths, in the SWOT analysis, are a company’s capabilities and resources that allow it to engage in activities to generate economic value and perhaps competitive advantage. A company’s strengths may be in its ability to create unique products, to provide high-level customer service, or to have a presence in multiple retail markets. Strengths may also be things such as the company’s culture, its staffing and training, or the quality of its managers. Whatever capability a company has can be regarded as strength.
A company’s weaknesses are a lack of resources or capabilities that can prevent it from generating economic value or gaining a competitive advantage if used to enact the company’s strategy. There are many examples of organizational weaknesses. For example, a firm may have a large, bureaucratic structure that limits its ability to compete with smaller, more dynamic companies. Another weakness may occur if a company has higher labor costs than a competitor who can have similar productivity from a lower labor cost. The characteristics of an organization that can be strength, as listed above, can also be a weakness if the company does not do them well.
Opportunities provide the organization with a chance to improve its performance and its competitive advantage. Some opportunities may be anticipated, others arise unexpectedly. Opportunities may arise when there are niches for new products or services, or when these products and services can be offered at different times and in different locations. For instance, the increased use of the Internet has provided numerous opportunities for companies to expand their product sales.
Page 772 |
Threats can be an individual, group, or organization outside the company that aims to reduce the level of the company’s performance. Every company faces threats in its environment. Often the more successful companies have stronger threats, because there is a desire on the part of other companies to take some of that success for their own. Threats may come from new products or services from other companies that aim to take away a company’s competitive advantage. Threats may also come from government regulation or even consumer groups.
A strong company strategy that shows how to gain competitive advantage should address all four elements of the SWOT analysis. It should help the organization determine how to use its strengths to take advantage of opportunities and neutralize threats. Finally, a strong strategy should help an organization avoid or fix its weaknesses. If a company can develop a strategy that makes use of the information from SWOT analysis, it is more likely to have high levels of performance.
Nearly every company can benefit from SWOT analysis. Larger organizations may have strategic-planning procedures in place that incorporate SWOT analysis, but smaller firms, particularly entrepreneurial firms may have to start the analysis from scratch. Additionally, depending on the size or the degree of diversification of the company, it may be necessary to conduct more than one SWOT analysis. If the company has a wide variety of products and services, particularly if it operates in different markets, one SWOT analysis will not capture all of the relevant strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats that exist across the span of the company’s operations.
LIMITATIONS OF SWOT ANALYSIS
One major problem with the SWOT analysis is that while it emphasizes the importance of the four elements associated with the organizational and environmental analysis, it does not address how the company can identify the elements for their own company. Many organizational executives may not be able to determine what these elements are, and the SWOT framework provides no guidance. For example, what if a strength identified by the company is not truly a strength? While a company might believe its customer service is strong, they may be unaware of problems with employees or the capabilities of other companies to provide a higher level of customer service. Weaknesses are often easier to determine, but typically after it is too late to create a new strategy to offset them. A company may also have difficulty identifying opportunities. Depending on the organization, what may seem like an
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
The Krewe Club of Ny maintains a supply of swizzle sticks for events the on Demand for them is low, records from last year show they used any so at the dirt believes that they should be a of the ha so they stems seek to manage this inventory using a E Pictograms they perm to defer it a an Kreme policy swizzle sticks are not exits, My cost a nickel fierce la due to Kub and slogan Panted on ease one This also serves to increase the oust they ant be obtained food a restaurant supply house Instead they must be ordered will an eye torrents the b day tad tire costs tis t pace an or r most of this cost is a result of explaining the meaning of a sees lessons temps cooler why it should noted on the edge of each swizzle stick costs are 20% of purchase price. A) what should the order quantity for swizzle sticks be? B) What is the average inventory if they order at their Eocene amount'. C) What is their total inventory policy cost if they order at their Cotree amount? D) How many orders will they place in a year if they order optimally (in accordance with the Eocene Policy)? E) After calculating the Eocene and their supplier of their order amount, they are that the supplier is to break a case, that is there of must be ordered in multiples of that amount. Not wanting to the krewe decides to round up to the next Hight multiple of 10,000 what is their total increasing policy cost cost of goods) if they order at this amount? 
Methodology.pdf
Questionnaire….docx
We are a leading academic writing company, which has been providing exclusive writing services for years.