Assignment 4: Persuasive Paper Part 2: Solution and Advantages
|
Criteria
|
Â
Unacceptable
Below 60% F
|
Meets Minimum Expectations
60-69% D
|
Â
Fair
70-79% C
|
Â
Proficient
80-89% B
|
Â
Exemplary
90-100% A
|
1. Revise, using feedback from the professor and classmates, your Persuasive Paper Part 1: A Problem Exists.
Weight: 5%
|
Did not submit or incompletely revised, using feedback from the professor and classmates, your Persuasive Paper Part 1: A Problem Exists.
|
Insufficiently revised, using feedback from the professor and classmates, your Persuasive Paper Part 1: A Problem Exists.
|
Partially revised, using feedback from the professor and classmates, your Persuasive Paper Part 1: A Problem Exists.
|
Satisfactorily revised, using feedback from the professor and classmates, your Persuasive Paper Part 1: A Problem Exists.
|
Thoroughly revised, using feedback from the professor and classmates, your Persuasive Paper Part 1: A Problem Exists.
|
2. Include a defensible, relevant thesis statement clearly in the first paragraph.
Weight: 5%
|
Did not submit or incompletely included a defensible, relevant thesis statement clearly in the first paragraph.
|
Insufficiently included a defensible, relevant thesis statement clearly in the first paragraph.
|
Partially included a defensible, relevant thesis statement clearly in the first paragraph.
|
Satisfactorily included a defensible, relevant thesis statement clearly in the first paragraph.
|
Thoroughly included a defensible, relevant thesis statement clearly in the first paragraph.
|
3. Explain a detailed, viable solution that supports your thesis. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs.
Weight: 5%
|
Did not submit or incompletely explained, in one or two (1-2) paragraphs, a detailed, viable solution that supports your thesis.
|
Insufficiently explained, in one or two (1-2) paragraphs, a detailed, viable solution that supports your thesis.
|
Partially explained, in one or two (1-2) paragraphs, a detailed, viable solution that supports your thesis.
|
Satisfactorily explained, in one or two (1-2) paragraphs, a detailed, viable solution that supports your thesis.
|
Thoroughly explained, in one or two (1-2) paragraphs, a detailed, viable solution that supports your thesis.
|
4. State, explain, and support the first advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs.
Weight: 10%
|
Did not submit or incompletely stated, explained, and supported the first advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution in one or two (1-2) paragraphs.
|
Insufficiently stated, explained, and supported the first advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution in one or two (1-2) paragraphs.
|
Partially stated, explained, and supported the first advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution in one or two (1-2) paragraphs.
|
Satisfactorily stated, explained, and supported the first advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution in one or two (1-2) paragraphs.
|
Thoroughly stated, explained, and supported the first advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution in one or two (1-2) paragraphs.
|
5. State, explain, and support the second advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs.
Weight: 10%
|
Did not submit or incompletely
stated, explained, and supported the second advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution in one or two (1-2) paragraphs.
|
Insufficiently stated, explained, and supported the second advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution in one or two (1-2) paragraphs.
|
Partially stated, explained, and supported the second advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution in one or two (1-2) paragraphs.
|
Satisfactorily stated, explained, and supported the second advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution in one or two (1-2) paragraphs.
|
Thoroughly stated, explained, and supported the second advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution in one or two (1-2) paragraphs.
|
6. State, explain, and support the third (and fourth if desired) advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs.
Weight: 10%
|
Did not submit or incompletely stated, explained, and supported the third advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution in one or two (1-2) paragraphs.
|
Insufficiently stated, explained, and supported the third advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution in one or two (1-2) paragraphs.
|
Partially stated, explained, and supported the third advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution in one or two (1-2) paragraphs.
|
Satisfactorily stated, explained, and supported the third advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution in one or two (1-2) paragraphs.
|
Thoroughly stated, explained, and supported the third advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution in one or two (1-2) paragraphs.
|
7. Provide a concluding paragraph / transitional paragraph that summarizes the proposed solution and its advantages.
Weight:10%
|
Did not submit or incompletely provided a concluding paragraph / transitional paragraph that summarizes the proposed solution and its advantages.
|
Insufficiently provided a concluding paragraph / transitional paragraph that summarizes the proposed solution and its advantages.
|
Partially provided a concluding paragraph / transitional paragraph that summarizes the proposed solution and its advantages.
|
Satisfactorily provided a concluding paragraph / transitional paragraph that summarizes the proposed solution and its advantages.
|
Thoroughly provided a concluding paragraph / transitional paragraph that summarizes the proposed solution and its advantages.
|
8. Develop a coherently structured paper with effective transitional words, phrases, sentences and  an introduction, body, and conclusion.
Weight: 10%
|
Did not submit or incompletely developed a coherently structured paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion.
|
Insufficiently developed a coherently structured paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion.
|
Partially developed a coherently structured paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion.
|
Satisfactorily developed a coherently structured paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion.
|
Thoroughly developed a coherently structured paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion.
|
9. Support advantage claims with at least three (3) additional quality relevant references (at least six (6) total for Parts 1 and 2).
Weight: 10%
|
No references provided
|
Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.
|
Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.
|
Meets number of required references; most references high quality choices.
|
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.
|
10. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements
Weight: 25%
|
More than 8 errors present
|
7-8 errors present
|
5-6 errors present
|
3-4 errors present
|
0-2 errors present
|