response about diversity

After you read the article(on the following), write a 2 page (double-spaced) opinion piece or response on how statements in the article undermine the leadership of that particular group in organizations.

The article link: 

http://www.diversityinc.com/things-not-to-say/7-things-never-to-say-to-asian-american-executives/

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

You are the police chief of a city with about a million inhabitants on the east coast of Florida.

You are the police chief of a city with about a million inhabitants on the east coast of Florida. The changing climate and the resulting rise of the sea level, as well as recent weather events, have caused the local leaders and governmental officials to consider building dikes and sea walls along particular sections of the beach to prevent beach erosion and destruction of oceanfront property. Along with the sea wall and dikes, officials have considered plans to dredge an inlet presently used for recreational boating and fishing to build a major sea port for cruise ships and ocean going freighters. Private investment will be sought to build hotels and other commercial properties within the new seaport. Sand from the dredging would be used to replenish the eroding beaches. The rising sea levels and building the sea wall, dikes, and commercial port would eliminate many current roads, and would require building new roads to accommodate structural changes. To obtain property for the projects, the city will have to use the process of eminent domain. According to the plan, around 1,000 low income homes will have to be razed to allow the building of the sea port. The residents of those homes will have to be relocated. To finance the major changes, property and sales taxes for city residents also would have to be raised.

       In addition to eroding beaches and oceanfront property, rising sea levels also will contaminate local water tables. Hence, the supply of water for household and commercial use may be reduced. Water use for farms that surround the city may also become scarce. Also, the changing climate will cause the winter dry season to be longer and more severe. The rainy season is predicted to be shorte, but it will have a higher number of severe rainstorms with high winds causing damage and possibly more severe local flooding. The land contiguous to the city is owned by the local Seminole tribe, and is part of their reservation. The tribe stated that they would build a casino if the city followed through with its plans to build an ocean port. But the tribe would only do this if the city promised to build a four-lane highway from the downtown area to the casino.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  Questions: Make a list and identify issues in the scenario that will affect the criminal justice system and police directly and indirectly. Exhaust all possibilities. Here was my list……….. Did I get everything politically, ecologically, culturally, demographically, etc.?

  • Building a seaport for cruise ships and ocean going frieghters may bring tourism/goods therefore, bring in economic advances.
  • Building a major seaport may bring in tourism and/or immigrants and crime/drug trade thus, causing higher crime rates.
  • Areas that attract tourist have distinctive social control problems.
  • If police agency doesn’t build a wall, winter dry season being more severe may create traffic hazards.
  • Preventing beach erosion and destruction of ocean front property will enhance public safety.
  • Casino may cause unemployment rates for others in the city. Loss of revenue
  • Raising of taxes may cause even more poverty.
  • Hotels will bring revenue.
  • Severe rainstorms with high winds and flooding risks public safety, as well as farming crops, and may cause damage to houses hurting the city economically.
  • 1,000 low income homes must be razed, and residences must be relocated may cause lueding and rioting causing crime.
  • A sudden influx of exodus of people (low income residents) creates a new set of demographic characteristics within the community which can alter crime patterns
  • Bringing in  a larger population, may create a problematic population for the police department.
  • Larceny and other property crimes may rise, due to the larger population and material wealth.
  • Migration patterns may bring in new citizens who may have values different from those of the longtime residents creating a heterogenous environment.
  • Depending on the demographics of the city, the Seminole tribe and the city may have racial rioting.
  • Due to population, crime and interpersonal conflict may arise. Population will increase, traffic will change (new highway for casino), and people of different ethical backgrounds will settle.
  • If the Sleepy Hollow city begins to change demographically, economically, culturally, the environment will become complex.
  • Police agency may have to expand.
  • If a casino is built there must be a new area of expertise for the police agency. This may be in regards to I think federal regulations of a tribe. I am unsure if the tribe would have its own tribal laws. There may have to be an expansion of a tribal agency.
  • May acquire environment uncertainty.
  • There could possibly be political conditions  that take hold. Pressures from tribal members, public concern of the expansion  of jails and public safety.                                    Is there anything I missed? Politically, economically, culturally, demographically, ecologically, geographically, etc?

These were the only two questions I was confused on. 

What are the major threats and opportunities for the police department that will result from the changing climate and planned changes?

Given the effect the changes will have on the criminal justice system, what steps must your police department take to deal with the changes? 

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Week 4 Project

To prepare for this Project:

  • Review the Topic Exploration and Analysis you developed in Week 2.
  • Review the Literature Review you developed in Week 3.
  • Consider insights gained about the effectiveness of publicity campaigns from this week’s Learning Resources and Discussion.
  • With the potential solutions and steps you identified in the Literature Review in mind, as well as other relevant information you gained through your research, consider how you might most effectively reach out to the public for support on this issue.
  • What message or messages would you craft? To whom would they be addressed?
  • How would you deliver your message(s) to most effectively reach the intended audience(s)? Consider the pros and cons of all forms of information dissemination. These include the Internet (websites, blogs, social media sites), print ads, TV and radio ads, PowerPoint presentations, community posters and pamphlets, billboards, speaker presentations, community gatherings, and phone campaigns. 

By Day 7

In a 2- to 3-page paper, describe your proposed overall approach and process for publicizing your social issue. Address the following, making sure to support your statements with references to this week’s required readings:

  • Briefly describe the social issue and what you would like to achieve through this publicity campaign.
  • To whom would you reach out? Why? (Note: Think creatively about the support you would most like to have and most need.)
  • How would you reach out? What methods would you use to inform and inspire? Why? 
  • Are there any groups or individuals with whom you would most like to connect? Why?
  • What messages would you incorporate into your campaign? Why do you think this messaging would resonate with potential interested individuals or groups? (Note: Messaging can be different for different intended audiences.)
  • In launching this campaign, what would be the first step you would take and why?
  • In a conclusion to this essay, explain why you believe that this approach will be successful. Be sure to align your rationale to the social issue.
  • Be sure to include an introductionbodyconclusion, and reference page, using APA format to cite each of your sources in the body of your paper.

**** Will provide my week 2 & 3 papers once a person has been assigned to assist**

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

BEHS103 Quiz 1 2016 (10/10)

QuestionQuiz 1Question 1 Which of the following is not considered a social science?sociologybiochemistryphysical anthropologygerontologyQuestion 2 Which of the following is considered the newest social science?gerontologyhistorypolitical sciencesociologyQuestion 3 Which of the following social scientists is most likely to study evolution?AnthropologistSocial PsychologistSociologistGerontologistQuestion 4 Which of the following social scientists would be most interested in legislation regarding Social Security, Medicare, retirement, and chronic disease?AnthropologistSocial PsychologistSociologistGerontologistQuestion 5 Which of the following social scientists are most likely to study attraction and intimacy?Social psychologistSociologistCultural anthropologistGerontologistQuestion 6 Which famous social scientist advocated for revolution as a way to counteract the oppression caused by industrialization and capitalism?DurkheimWeberMarxSimmelQuestion 7 The generation that creates a “bulge” in the current population pyramid is the:Baby Boom generationGen X generationTraditionalist generationMillennial generationQuestion 8 The generation that has never known life without computers is the:Traditionalist generationBaby Boomer generationGen X generationMillennial generationQuestion 9The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires, among other things, the provision of equal access to telecommunications.TrueFalseQuestion 10The first type of distance learning was:telecoursescorrespondence coursesonline coursesMOOC’s

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

I have chosen the 2nd Amendment, the right to bear arms. How does the Supreme Court views this right? Can you predict the future of this right?

I have chosen the 2nd Amendment, the right to bear arms. How does the Supreme Court views this right? Can you predict the future of this right? Will the Supreme Court restrict or expand this right in the future, and why?

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Answer the music question……1 music question……due tomorrow

DUE TOMORROW BY 8pm my time in California

NO COVER PAGE OR REFERENCE PAGE NEEDED

The Beatles’ early gigs in Hamburg proved to be extremely beneficial to their development. Why? Can you hear that development in their music? Any bands or artists who have a Beatles influenced sound since their breakup?

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

ll of the following are reasons that U. leaders created drug regulations EXCEPT:

dependence 

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

dr wilmington is a social psychologist who studies the topic of love. He goes to a variety of places where couples are found and watches how they…

dr wilmington is a social psychologist who studies the topic of love. He goes to a variety of places where couples are found and watches how they interact with each other. Which research method is he using for his study

a case tudy

b survey

c correlational

d experiment

e naturalistic observation

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

KIM WOODS

Be sure to reply to your classmates and instructor. Try to attempt to take the conversation further by examining their claims or arguments in more depth or responding to the posts that they make to you.  Keep the discussion on target and try to analyze things in as much detail as you can.

o    Gina Lasiter

After watching Michael Walzer’s video on Just War Theory, explain his idea of the “moral equality of soldiers on the battlefield,” and discuss the ways in which this equality might complicate the utilitarian goal of promoting the greatest good for the greatest number. After watching Michael Walzer’s video on Just War Theory his idea of “moral equality of soldiers on the battlefield” Soldiers on both sides just or unjust have equal rights to shoot their guns so long as they shoot each other and not at an innocent civilian. War itself is a required independence and grant soldiers on both sides equal rights. It is also mentioned that soldiers on the battlefield are moral equals. Self defense is a justification of a just war. So basically he is saying as long as soldiers are shooting other soldiers in self defense and no civilians get hurt it is a just war and is showing moral  equal quality on both sides. He uses the example of a bank robbery in comparison of moral equality between the bank robber and the guard. He says the guard has more rights then the bank robber because it is just cause to protect the innocent and protect his rights to keep the bank safe. Here he is telling us their is no moral equality present. The bank robber is morally wrong and is putting innocent people is danger which makes it an unjust situation. When discussing equality and how it might complicate the utilitarian goal of promoting the greatest good for the greatest number. He is stating that soldiers are taught to fight for their country for the greatest good by winning the war even though it isn’t the choice of the greatest number of people. Soldiers on both sides feel the same uncertainty and strangeness when risking the lives of near by civilians. As long as they are fighting in a way of self-defense it is justified as for the greater of the good. Utilitarian may see this as not generating the net good for the greatest number because people’s lives are being lost. Gina WestmontTV. (2013, March 7). What is just war theory, Michael Walzer, Feb. 21, 2013 (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. [Video file]. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/9f4XuOkMCSA

      • Go To Parent

After watching Michael Walzer’s video on Just War Theory, explain his idea of the “moral equality of soldiers on the battlefield,” and discuss the ways in which this equality might complicate the utilitarian goal of promoting the greatest good for the greatest number.

After watching Michael Walzer’s video on Just War Theory his idea of “moral equality of soldiers on the battlefield” Soldiers on both sides just or unjust have equal rights to shoot their guns so long as they shoot each other and not at an innocent civilian. War itself is a required independence and grant soldiers on both sides equal rights. It is also mentioned that soldiers on the battlefield are moral equals. Self defense is a justification of a just war. So basically he is saying as long as soldiers are shooting other soldiers in self defense and no civilians get hurt it is a just war and is showing moral  equal quality on both sides. He uses the example of a bank robbery in comparison of moral equality between the bank robber and the guard. He says the guard has more rights then the bank robber because it is just cause to protect the innocent and protect his rights to keep the bank safe. Here he is telling us their is no moral equality present. The bank robber is morally wrong and is putting innocent people is danger which makes it an unjust situation. When discussing equality and how it might complicate the utilitarian goal of promoting the greatest good for the greatest number. He is stating that soldiers are taught to fight for their country for the greatest good by winning the war even though it isn’t the choice of the greatest number of people. Soldiers on both sides feel the same uncertainty and strangeness when risking the lives of near by civilians. As long as they are fighting in a way of self-defense it is justified as for the greater of the good. Utilitarian may see this as not generating the net good for the greatest number because people’s lives are being lost.

Gina

WestmontTV. (2013, March 7). What is just war theory, Michael Walzer, Feb. 21, 2013 (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. [Video file]. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/9f4XuOkMCSA

100-125WORD COUNT

Jamante Galvin

      • Go To Parent

Is it ever morally permissible to lie to someone? Describe a circumstance in which it seems that lying might make more people happy than telling the truth.  Would lying be the right thing to do in that circumstance, or is it our moral duty to tell the truth, even then?  Consider what Immanuel Kant would say, and explain that with reference to this week’s readings.  Then, offer your own perspective.  If you agree with Kant, consider and respond to an objection to his view.  If you disagree with Kant, explain why.  Discuss the positive and negative aspects of deontological theory as it relates to another of the theories you have encountered in this course.

Sometimes we may lie to protect someone else feelings even though we may not mean to lie intentionally. For example, telling someone that they prepared a delicious home cooked meal after they have slaved over a hot stove knowing that deep down inside the food tastes awful to you. Lying in this case would be morally wrong because I believe that we can handle situations such as these delicately. Furthermore, Kant’s stance on lying is stern. He does not believe in misleading someone even if the lie is a small lie is morally wrong, “and since we presumably do not want to be lied to, we should not lie to others” (Mosser 2013). Also, Kant thoughts are that humans have the dignity to be ethical in their own decisions and lying affects others of their freedom to choose rationally. I agree that we can never be afraid to tell the truth to someone even if their feelings are going to be hurt. You may lose some friendships along the way or maintain healthy friendships. Honestly, I believe that if you are upfront with someone, they will actually respect you more because you are being real with them instead of being fake.

Positive aspects of deontology ethics is the obligation of one to carry out moral acts without the actions of consequences. In contrast, consequentialism theory is the consequences of one’s conduct are the basis for their judgment about right or wrong. Deontologist believe consequences should not play a role in someone’s morals. The negative aspect of deontology ethics, is the refusal to acknowledge the acts of consequences whether it is good, bad or neutral.

                                                                References

Mosser, K. (2013). Understanding philosophy. San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint Education, Inc.

100-125 WORD COUNT 

·         Jasmine Longino

    • Go To Topic

Week 3 Discussion

3.      Is it ever morally permissible to lie to someone? Describe a circumstance in which it seems that lying might make more people happy than telling the truth.  Would lying be the right thing to do in that circumstance, or is it our moral duty to tell the truth, even then?  Consider what Immanuel Kant would say, and explain that with reference to this week’s readings.  Then, offer your own perspective.  If you agree with Kant, consider and respond to an objection to his view.  If you disagree with Kant, explain why.  Discuss the positive and negative aspects of deontological theory as it relates to another of the theories you have encountered in this course.

I believe that it’s never morally permissible to lie to anyone. I always would like people to tell me the truth, so I feel obligated to do the same. I do understand that there are instances when people may be lying to me and I do not know. Being honest helps me sleep better at night knowing that I am doing the right thing and if someone else decides that they want to do otherwise, that is on their conscience. A circumstance that lying may have benefits the parties would be when I had to tell children that Santa was not real. They had believed this for years and they had never asked me before. After I broke the news to them some of them started to cry while others just sat there with a blank stare. Lying may have been right in regards to the children’s sadness but it is more important to have correct knowledge over emotional fabricated stories. I do believe that it was my moral duty to tell the children because if they still decided to believe in Santa then, at least they would know the truth. According to Kant, “high faculties are and always should be preferred over the lower ones” (Kant, I.,2008). The high faculty in that situation was the knowledge and truth and Kant would agree that I made to right decision. An objection to this view would be that the children would have been happier by having something positive to believe in. Deontology tells us that we are obligated to do what is moral. I made a moral decision to tell the children the truth even if it hurt their feelings, it was my duty. A positive aspect on deontology is that it follows the rues of duty and puts aside emotions and consequences. A negative aspect is that in utilitarianism the greatest good for the majority takes precedent, and in deontology that is not the case. An example would be if someone stole food. I would be obligated to jail that person versus just letting him take the food so that he does not starve.

References

Kant, I. (2008). Groundwork for the metaphysic of morals. In J. Bennett (Ed. & Trans.), Early Modern Philosophy. Retrieved from http://www.earlymoderntexts.com/pdfs/kant1785.pdf (Original work published in 1785)

100-125 WORD COUNT

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"