Write a two-page essay that critiques the following statement.

 

  • Write a two-page essay that critiques the following statement. The essay should contain an introduction, thesis, body, and conclusion. It may include a standard form of the argument. It may identify and address a fallacy, and it may critique a theory. All methods are open for utilization in the critique.

The reason that Hurricane Katrina devastated New Orland was because God was punishing the city for its wickedness in holding a Mardi Gras parade.

 

“PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH graduate paper help TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT”

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Is there a significant opportunity for philosophers or others to play this kind of constructive role in our own society?

Do you agree that (to use a famous phrase from the eighteenth century Prussian philosopher Immanuel Kant), awakening an individual–or an entire society–from “dogmatic slumbers” is a constructive and useful role of raising probing philosophical questions? Is there a significant opportunity for philosophers or others to play this kind of constructive role in our own society?

The role of a philosopher is to guide an individual in her quest to know the truth andto experience the reality in a real way. An individual and a society must be awakened fromthe slumber of…

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Please describe the ways in which some of today’s music reflects each of the three philosophies: ethical egoism, nihilism, and postmodernism.

 

  • To what extent do you believe our opportunity for creating meaningful, ethical action in the world lies more with the modernist perspective, such as Descartes and Kant (i.e. divine command theory, deontology, etc.), or the postmodern philosophies of Michel Foucault, Mike Ventimiglia and bell hooks? Please offer a specific example of how your chosen approach can serve to create a more ethically ideal world.
  • Please describe the ways in which some of today’s music reflects each of the three philosophies: ethical egoism, nihilism, and postmodernism. Please share links to music videos to illustrate your point. Be sure to reference specific lyrics in your posts.

Your initial post should be at least 250 words and must substantively integrate the assigned readings from the module with proper APA (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. style formatting. You may use additional sources and materials as long as they are relevant to the discussion and cited properly.

 

“PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH ASSIGNMENT HELP TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT”

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

In 1000-1500 words, Socrates and the Pursuit of Wisdom Essay Prompt: Philosophy is a pursuit of wisdom, exemplified in the figure of Socrates.

I need someone to help me fix and add more to my essay. Here is the prompt: “In 1000-1500 words, Socrates and the Pursuit of Wisdom Essay Prompt: Philosophy is a pursuit of wisdom, exemplified in the figure of Socrates. In a paper united by a thesis and organizational statements that appear early (i.e. in the first paragraph), explain what Socrates meant by wisdom. Briefly describe Socrates’ method for pursuing wisdom and, summarizing some of the main points you have gathered from the readings, explain how Socrates’ pursuit relates to a meaningful life. “I need someone to help me fix and add more to my essay. Here is the prompt: “In 1000-1500 words, Socrates and the Pursuit of Wisdom Essay Prompt: Philosophy is a pursuit of wisdom, exemplified in the figure of Socrates. In a paper united by a thesis and organizational statements that appear early (i.e. in the first paragraph), explain what Socrates meant by wisdom. Briefly describe Socrates’ method for pursuing wisdom and, summarizing some of the main points you have gathered from the readings, explain how Socrates’ pursuit relates to a meaningful life. ”

Antonia Meizinger

01/23/2019

Meaning of Wisdom according to Socrates

Socrates was an established philosopher of the ancient Greece who is viewed as one of the organizers of present day logic. In spite of the fact that there are no writings straightforwardly composed by Socrates, we are aware of his thoughts from the works of his understudies Plato and Xenophon. As per Socrates, wisdom is identified with one’s close insight about someone’s degree of learning. Sometimes you may think you are insightful and stretch out that discernment to a misrepresentation of being astute about a wide scope of subjects, at that point you are not so much wise. The sign of a genuinely wise individual is that the person acknowledges his or her own absence of learning decisively.

The wisdom is being defined by the Socratic traits in Plato’s “Apology”. Socrates depicts how his devotee Chaerephon ventured to the oracles and Delphi and put to it the topic of who was the smartest. The oracle addressed that none was wiser than Socrates. Socrates illustrates this reaction I Apology with a contention known as “Socratic obliviousness”. Socrates guarantees that he was at first confounded by the oracle’s case since he did not think about himself insightful. He accepted it as a sacred obligation to speak to those who were said to be insightful in Athens to study the oracle’s case. What he found is that many individuals who were viewed as wise were not, on the grounds that they just knew models and wonders as opposed to forces and structures (Rayner). In the end Socrates understood that the general population who seemed to be insightful was in fact not so, but rather they were bamboozled seeing that they were uninformed of their own numbness. Since Socrates knew his own obliviousness, he was wiser than all others in just that single thing, acknowledging the limit of his wisdom (Lodhi).

Socrates’ method for pursuing wisdom

Socrates was on a very basic level concerned about the commonsense issue of helping individuals build up the thinking capacities imperative to living a balanced life. Socratic Method is an approach to look for certainties by your own lights. A Socratic exchange uncovers how unique our viewpoints can be on ideas we utilize each day. It uncovers how extraordinary our methods of insight are, and regularly how viable or indefensible, as the case scope rationalities can be.

The Socratic Method extends through so many stages. Dialogue normally doesn’t proceed in a straight way through these stages on the grounds that new knowledge picked up amid the procedure regularly requires the adventurers to reapply the procedure, starting at a prior stage with a more noteworthy clearness and comprehension. The stages are: Ponder—the procedure starts when interest and our drive for scholarly investigation drives normally to making inquiries. From ponder a theory emerges (Boghossian). The second stage is theory which is the theoretical reaction to the inquiry emerging from our wonder forms the speculation (Boghossian).

The third stage is elenchus. This is the focal strategy of the technique. Elenchus is a type of agreeable factious discourse between people, in view of asking and noting inquiries to invigorate basic reasoning and to draw out thoughts and hidden assumptions. It is a “contention of negation; questioning, testing, investigation particularly for reasons for refutation.” As initially polished by Socrates, it has the accompanying steps:

Socrates’ questioner affirms a proposition, for instance “Strength is perseverance of the spirit”, which Socrates thinks about false and focuses for negation. Also, Socrates anchors his conversationalist consent to additionally premises, for instance “Mettle is a fine thing” and “Insensible continuance is certifiably not a fine thing”. Regularly counterexamples are utilized to test the speculation and exhibit why it isn’t right.

Socrates at that point contends, and the questioner concurs that these further premises suggest the opposite of the first proposal; for this situation, it prompts: “bravery isn’t continuance of the spirit”. Socrates at that point guarantees that he has demonstrated that his conversationalist postulation is false and that its invalidation is valid.

Tolerating or Revising the Hypothesis—if the speculation has withstood examination in the elenchus stage, at that point the theory stands and the following stage can start. Something else, a reconsidered speculation is proposed to fuse what was found out above, and the elenchus starts with this new theory. Acting in like manner—the members presently apply what has been realized. This may involve overhauling a recently held conviction, pondering the session, pondering about something recently, consenting to meet once more, or evolving conduct. The key assignments requiring the most aptitude and practical insight are: picking the conversationalist, picking the principal question, picking the following inquiry, and choosing when to stop.

Application of Socratic Method

Learning: Individual may wish to watch, partake, or lead session utilizing the Socratic Method as an approach to become familiar with the technique to get familiar with the point being analyzed, or to appreciate all the more captivating communications with other individuals (Whipple).

Challenging beliefs: since the Socratic Method challenges presumptions, convictions and vague reasoning apparent from the underlying speculation, it ends to be utilized to test unwarranted convictions and may prompt new bits of knowledge or may make somebody change their long held, yet ineffectively analyzed beliefs. The Socratic Method can be valuable system in numerous types of psychotherapy where it is utilized to enable an individual to change and beat issues in wanted ways (Labendz).

Education: Socrates believed that the Socratic Method was the main substantial way to learning. We saw in Meno how the Method evoked inert information from the slave. The Method has incredible potential as an educating instrument. The Socratic Method is a useful asset to rouse understudies to take a profound enthusiasm for their very own excitedly adamant training and flourishing in life (Whipple).

Works Cited

Boghossian, Peter. A manual creating atheists. Pitchstone Publishing, 2013.

Labendz, Jenny R. Socratic Torah: Non-Jews in Rabbinic Intellectual Cultur. OUP, USA, 2013.

Lodhi, Anam. Socrates on Wisdom. 2018. 22 January 2019.

Rayner, Tim. What is Wisdom? Socrates and the known Unknowns. 21 Nov 2015. 22 January 2019.

Whipple, Robert D. Socratic Method and Writing Instruction. University Press of America, 1997.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

What does it take to be a good Hindu? A good Christian? A good Muslim or Buddhist or Jew?

 

Part 1: What does it take to be a good Hindu? A good Christian? A good Muslim or Buddhist or Jew?

Each great religious tradition offers guidance for living a joyful and fulfilling life.

Compile a matrix (using the blank matrix available in the Shared Documents section) that compares the basic origin, beliefs, understanding, components, and precepts (commandments) of the five major religions. Include moral duties and prohibitions, ceremonial obligations, and general principles of ethical behavior toward other people.

There may be a degree of overlap among some religions. An obvious example would be prohibitions against murder in both Judaism and Christianity.

Information in the table should be in your own words rather than copied form an outside source. Please list any your references you used to construct your table following the essay in the appropriate APA format. Please use at least three references.

Part 2: After you have compiled your matrix, write an essay of 350 to 500 words in length that synthesizes the information in your matrix into some general conclusions. You should point out what the different religions (Dharmic and Abrahamic) have in common and draw conclusions about the commonalities.

How do these differences or commonalities affect the way you interact with fellow employees now and in the future?

Similarly, you should point out where these differ and offer an analysis of those differences.

 

“PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH graduate paper help TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT”

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Describe ethical subjectivism, and explain whether or not it is an adequate theory for a moral action.

Describe ethical subjectivism, and explain whether or not it is an adequate theory for a moral action.  Why and how is it an adequate moral theory or not? Be specific about your reasons, facts, and use examples.

 

“PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH ASSIGNMENT HELP TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT”

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Do you identify more with the position of Aminata or Ezra?

 

Scenario: Aminataand Ezra are discussing the effects of globalization as a form of modernization or Westernization of the world. Aminatapoints out all of globalization’sclass and commercialized aspects—including the ubiquitous McDonald’s and Levis—that have negative effects on local cultures. For example, Western nations often purchase rainforests and valuable land overseas to graze cattle for cheap beef in fast food restaurants. Still, 8,000 children conti hunger and malnutrition, around the globe, even while these Western franchises expand. They also sometimes employ child or slave labor to make many of their garments, in deplorable conditions, to import back to Western nations. She invokes the following African proverbs to lament the excessive materialism and lack of humanity reflected in globalization:

It is the human being that counts: I call upon gold, it answers not; I call upon cloth, it answers not; it is the human being that counts. ~AkanProverb

and

An abundance of food at your neighbour’s will not satisfy your hunger. ~Bayaka Proverb

Ezra understands Aminata’s concerns but contends that globalization also produces many benefits including an increase in cross-cultural understanding, the transference of concerns for human rights and democracy, and the possibility for economic development. In fact, benefiting from one of these cross-cultural exchanges himself, Ezra quotes his American Zen teacher who often shares the famous koan: What do you call the world?

Ezra explains that while there is much suffering in the world, and we certainly should seize the opportunity for discussions and finding solutions, this koan is meant to get our minds to ask the important questions before reacting. What is the true nature of suffering? What is the real cause here? Can I effectively help a world that I see as separate from myself? Might it be more beneficial for me to deeply understand how the world is not something outside of myself that needs saving? Could daily mindfulness in my own small actions make more of an impact? (Kuruvilla, 2015).

This activity aligns with module outcomes 2 and 3.

Discussion Question

Prepare for your discussion by completing your readings and viewings. Then respond to the following:

  • Do you identify more with the position of Aminata or Ezra? What is your personal observation of these globalization issues, in light of what you learned from global ethical perspectives? Do the positives outweigh the negatives, or vice versa?
  • If some cultures are endangered by globalization, do we have a moral obligation to resist exporting our products or ideas? Explain your response, drawing upon both the Eastern and African ethical models we explored in this module. End with a proverb or koan that best reflects your own global philosophy.

Evaluation Criteria

Your initial post is due by Thursday at 11:59 PM EST. Your responses to other posts are due by Sunday at 11:59 PM EST.

Initial Discussion Post

Your initial post should be at least 250 words and must substantively integrate the assigned readings from the module with proper APA style formatting. You may use additional sources and materials as long as they are relevant to the discussion and cited properly.

 

“PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH ASSIGNMENT HELP TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT”

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

explanation of the Cartesian Method and identify some of the potential problems with, and appeal of, this approach.

I need a 1–2-page explanation of the Cartesian Method and identify some of the potential problems with, and appeal of, this approach. Try to illustrate key aspects of this method with your own examples. Please use Roots of Wisdom 7th edition 2015. I’ve attached photos of the notes and passage.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

How might you comfortably analyze a popular video, equipped with the ethical knowledge you have learned in the last eight weeks?

 

Introduction

Now that we have covered a wide range of theories and philosophers, you have a final opportunity to put your knowledge into practice in this class and discuss your values with your classmates. How do you connect what you learned in this course with concrete actions you can take in the world? How might you comfortably analyze a popular video, equipped with the ethical knowledge you have learned in the last eight weeks? This activity aligns with module outcomes 1 and 2.

Discussion Question

Prepare for this discussion by completing your readings and viewings. Then respond to the following:

  • Visit the site, change.org. You can look at the latest petitions or click “browse” to see a list of featured, popular, or recent petitions. Choose an ethical issue for which you would either sign a petition or create one. Share the issue with the class, and in a sentence or two, explain why it is important to you.
  • Find a YouTube video that contains a contemporary and recent ethical issue. Analyze your chosen YouTube video from the perspective of one or several ethical theories we have covered in this course. In what way could the video compel the viewer to take action?

Evaluation Criteria

Your initial post is due by Thursday at 11:59 PM EST. Your responses to other posts are due by Sunday at 11:59 PM EST.

Initial Discussion Post

Your initial post should be at least 250 words and must substantively integrate the assigned readings from the module with proper APA style formatting. You may use additional sources and materials as long as they are relevant to the discussion and cited properly.

 

“PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH ASSIGNMENT HELP TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT”

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"