To what extent does our privacy change as a function of immersive relations to technology? Explain your answer by using concepts from both Tavini and Verbeek.1

Analytical Writing Summary: Immersive Relations Learning objectives: The purpose of this writing assignment is to synthesize and apply information in a compact, precise form. Submission: S1) This assignment is due online, see listed due date in weekly content. S2) This assignment should be 4-5 pages double-spaced max. Our focus is structure and precision. With a longer assignment, we can expand conditions. But this is not our purpose for these analytical summaries.

Assignment:
To what extent does our privacy change as a function of immersive relations to technology? Explain your answer by using concepts from both Tavini and Verbeek. (Note that Verbeek is in week 3)

Your conditions:
A1) Have you captured the proper concepts from each author?
A2) Have you used relevant original examples to illustrate either your exposition OR your counter argument?
A3) Have you prepared the reader to understand both parts of your discussion on the assumption that the reader has not mastered technical concepts?
A4) Have you created a thorough argument that unifies all of your smaller claims? Have you presented a cohesive total discussion?
A5) Does each paragraph have a descriptive function in your overall argument? And, is this function evident from the structure that you have set up?
A6) Is your summary sufficiently different from other summaries? As expected, all of the summaries will converge on certain intrinsic properties. But remember, we are concerned with process. I want to see how you get there.
A7) Always cite your work (APA, MLA, Chicago are all fine, as long as the citation style is consistent).

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Process Scheduling

The requirements and demands are the same as my previous order. Writer must able to fulfull both of my pending orders. Part I – Part IV Assignment Expectations 1. There are no page limits. Write what you need to write, neither more nor less. Make each sentence count! (Having said that; it’s unlikely that one page would be enough, and very likely that eight pages would be too much.) 2. Ensure that your answer reflects your detailed understanding of the theory and techniques taught in this module. 3. References and citations are required. This requirement can be satisfied by citing the assignment’s “Home” page and/or the DOD CPI Guidebook.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Understanding how Lung cancer is caused using the Biopsychosocial Model

Assignment 1 – 1500 words (15% total mark)
Understanding how Lung cancer is caused using the Biopsychosocial Model

Use headings for each Task – Each task is distinct and does not require linking between tasks – content within tasks requires cohesion.

Task 1: The significance of lung cancer in New Zealand. (20pts, Maximum of 300 words) (327)
Lung cancer, as a high-volume cancer with large inequities and a relatively poor survival rate, continues to have the greatest impact on overall cancer morbidity and mortality rates in New Zealand and globally. Cancer is defined as a malignant disease, characterised by an uncontrolled and rapid growth of abnormal cells (REF). Lung cancer as per the New Zealand Ministry of Health is a specific disease caused by abnormal smooth muscle within the lining of the lungs that can invade neighbouring tissues, organs, blood and lymph (1). There are two major groups of lung cancer, each differentiated by which cells are affected. Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) affects alveolar lung tissue whilst non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) affects bronchial lung tissue (REF). Both cancers are attributable by biological (genetics, age, tissue health, poor sleep), psychological (motivation, stress, anxiety, sense of stability) and social (income, employment, social networks, education) risk factors, with those more socioeconomically deprived (income < NZD46,500) having the greatest incidence rates (6 + REF).

As the world’s leading cause of death, cancer, accounting for one in six fatalities in 2018 caused an estimated total of 9.6 million fatalities (2). Lung cancer, the most common cancer, accounted for 2.09 million deaths, followed closely by breast cancer with 2.08 million deaths, a stark contrast when compared to diabetes mellitus, another well-known and prevalent endocrine disease that only caused 1.6 million deaths in 2017 (2 + 4). A peer-reviewed literature examination revealed that these global incidence rates of mortality and other associated morbidities relevant to lung cancer, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, were concentrated among lower socioeconomic groups (SEG) with incidence rates 50% higher than those in high SEGs (income > NZD68,800) (5 and 6). These findings reflect the 2017 Manatu Hauora New Zealand cancer statistics which identified the lung cancer mortality rate as 1 in 5.5 people diagnosed with cancer (6). Again, mortality and morbidity were observed more commonly in lower SEGs, such as those who were unemployed, chronically stressed and those who lacked social support, access to education and finances (6 + 2 + one more).

Task 2: Using the Biopsychosocial Model (Engel, 1977) for understanding the causes of health and illness. (30pts, Maximum 500 words)

Paragraph 1 – 150 words (199)
Medical conditions that cause ill-health are complex pathophysiological processes that are often influenced by the interplay of many social, biological and psychological factors that often detrimentally effect the quality of life of individuals and the societies in which they live (REF). Historically, models of health have attempted to understand these risk factors of disease, their influence on individuals and population groups and their pathophysiological significance in disease progression (REF). Some models such as the Biomedical Model, have attempted to achieve this, however, often failed as their application restricted the health practitioner’s foresight to no more than the diagnostic effort in finding the disease – a result, solely because of abnormal physiological processes (REF). Thus, to understand how social factors and individual subjectivity influence health states, the Biopsychosocial Model, a framework outlining the philosophy of interdisciplinary clinical care that encourages a holistic medical practice was proposed by George Engel in 1977 (REF – 1977). This model, in contrast to others, recognised that health status is a result of biological, social and psychological determinants, individually as well as through complex interactions – modifying and modernising the Biomedical Model to be all-inclusive (REF). The model explains that all three factors are equally important in the health and wellbeing of people, and that biological factors cannot be held solely and completely responsible for either health issues, or wellness (REF). Thus, the model broadens the scope of health providers to acknowledge the interplay of dynamics that may affect the expression of disease, coping methods, adherence to treatment, and recovery (REF).

Paragraphs 2-4 – 100 words each
– Write one paragraph describing each individual component of the model and also how the individual components are related to each other.

– Make sure you give examples of the kind of processes or factors that make up each component. What are the types of biological, psychological and social processes or factors that influence health? Don’t try to apply it to a specific health issue, just outline the general processes and factors involved.

Paragraph 2 – Biological characteristics (100 words)

Biological factors: genetic material, function and structure of physiology, immune responses, anatomical systems

The biological aspect of the Biopsychosocial model deals with the study and comprehension of the physiological causes of disease. It recognises that the human body is a complex interaction of sophisticated systems that can affect the psychology and physical functioning of human beings (REF). Biological risk factors of an individual’s health such as genetic makeup, chemical composition, blood flow, organ function, gastrointestinal process and the nervous system all contribute to an individual’s overall health, wellbeing, and level of functioning and that changes in either of these levels can have a profound impact on the body and thus, disease formation – a core concept of the biomedical model (REF). Although the biological concept is a core component of the BPS Model, it clearly states the non-biological factors also heavily influence the processes and expression of an individual’s disorder in those with pre-existing genetic risks.

Paragraph 3 – Psychological factors (100 Words)

The psychological component of the BPS Model seeks to find a psychological foundation for a particular symptom or array of symptoms (impulsivity, irritability, overwhelming sadness etc.) that contribute to disease processes. It also recognises that underlying mental health issues contribute to the manifestation of an illness. Engels Model recognises that a person’s internal reality can have a significant impact on disease and that personal beliefs about illness can affect how a person responds to a diagnosis as well as how the person follows through on treatments. Individuals with a genetic vulnerability may be more likely to display aspects of negative thinking that puts them at risk for depression; alternatively, psychological factors may exacerbate a biological predisposition by putting a genetically vulnerable person at risk for other risk behaviours. Increased risk-taking behaviours lead to an increased likelihood of disease. An individual’s coping strategies, including thoughts and feeling about one’s health, have been shown to affect the severity of an illness with individuals feeling hopeless and powerless more likely to experience sever symptoms than those who maintain positive perspectives. Psychological factors can also impact on whether a person is even aware of their illness, as well as the persons motivation to adhere to treatment recommendations. Thus, the medical expert prescribing treatment based on the principals of the BPS Model must identify any psychological problems that may be affecting the patient’s health directly or indirectly

Psychological factors: Behaviour, lifestyle, choices, decision-making, cognition, beliefs, knowledge, emotion/affect, mental health, personality, motivation

Engel’s Model recognises that a person’s internal reality can have a significant impact on disease and that personal beliefs about illness can affect how a disease manifests

Paragraph 4 – Social conditions (100 Words)

The social component of the BPS Model refers to the environment in which the individual exists. This aspect analyses the disease from a sociological point of view and determines the external factors that may have influenced the manifestation of the illness in the patient. These external factors may be anything from religion, economic background, financial stability, social support networks and cultural environments. The social and cultural components are conceptualised as a particular set of stressful events that may differently impact the mental health of people from different social environments and histories. Such life events may predispose an individual to developing psychological risk factors or alter the biological composition of the individual, which may, in turn, contribute to physical health disorders. Cultural factors such as the differences in circumstances, expectations and belief systems of different cultural groups can contribute to different prevalence rates and symptom expression of disorders. Culture can change biology, as research in epigenetics suggests that the environment can alter an individual’s genetic makeup. For example, those exposed to overcrowding and poverty are more at risk for developing depression with actual genetic mutations forming over a single generation.

Cultural norms and societal expectations can contribute to health or illness significantly. Ones culture provides values as to whether it is acceptable to seek treatment for a problem or whether the condition is seen as the persons own doing. Other cultural or social standards such as the acceptance or rejection of medication, reliance on communal rather than medical support, emphasis on physical symptoms rather than psychological factors. Cultural and social factors can impact a persons diet, exercise levels, religious practices, and other behaviours. Social connections can also impact on an individual’s ability to cope with health or illness. Studies have shown that the existence of strong social supports can speed up recovery and contribute to longer life expectancies. Individuals with strong social support often show better adherence to treatment because family and friends are motivators during the process. Each of the previous concepts can contribute significantly to both the development and the treatment of a condition; therefore, integration of all these areas is a key feature of the biopsychosocial model. The knowledge of when and where to refer a client for additional support is also an important part of integrated care and requires cross-disciplinary relationships.

Social factors: relationships, support, families, community, environment, availability of resources, SES, gender, ethnicity/race, age.

Summary 3 sentences.
Task 3: The relevance of the Biopsychosocial Model for understanding the causes of lung cancer. (30pts, Maximum 500 words)

Paragraph 1:
o Your first paragraph should focus on describing the way in which the model has been used to understand the causes of different health issues.
o Give some evidence for the effectiveness of the model for understanding different health issues. Don’t look at the effectiveness and/or relevance of each component and just focus on the overall effectiveness of the model.

Paragraphs 2-4:
o Write one paragraph for each component in the model explaining the relevance for understanding the causes of lung cancer. Focus specifically on the types of processes and factors within the components of the model for understanding the causes of lung cancer. Provide an example and evidence from the literature to show the relationship between each component and lung cancer.

Task 4: Summary and Conclusions. (10pts, Maximum 200 words)

Paragraph 1:
o Write a sentence or two summarising what you have written for tasks 1-3.

Paragraph 2:
o Write a couple of concluding sentences about the usefulness of the Biopsychosocial Model for understanding the causes of lung cancer.

Address the broader determinants of health, reduce social inequities, empower individuals and communities and promote interprofessional collaboration.

10 pts will be allocated to writing style, referencing, evidence and finding two new quality resources.

*Indent the first line of each paragraph – Size 12 font – No spaces between paragraphs

*Reference List – Hanging indent

1. https://www.health.govt.nz/publication/selected-cancers-2015-2016-2017
2. https://www.nzma.org.nz/journal/read-the-journal/all-issues/2010-2019/2018/vol-131-no-147927-july-2018/7641
3. https://bpac.org.nz/BPJ/2012/November/upfront.aspx
4. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death
5. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0192999
6. file:///C:/Users/eddie/Downloads/nzsei-2013%20(1).pdf
7. https://www.health.govt.nz/publication/cancer-new-registrations-and-deaths-2013
8. file:///C:/Users/eddie/Desktop/The_SAGE_Encyclopedia_BioPsychoSocial_Model___(Pg_164–169).pdf

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Compose a one or two paragraphs (minimum 150 words) that describes your understanding of the UMUC plagiarism policy and how you will abide by it.

Each student is to read the information provided by the UMUC policy found in our LEO Classroom under CONTENT -> SYLLABUS->Academic Policies -> Policies & Procedures ASSIGNMENT: Compose a one or two paragraphs (minimum 150 words) that describes your understanding of the UMUC plagiarism policy and how you will abide by it.

FORMAT: Heading: Student’s Name, Name and Number of the Course, Date of submission One (1) paragraph, double spaced, 12 font, 1 inch margins The Statement should be an MS Word document attached to the Assignment Folder for Exercise Plagiarism Policy Although it is a form of "self-plagiarism," for the purpose of this assignment students may copy/paste the response to the Plagiarism Exercise they have submitted for other Criminal Justice classes. NOTE: Project 1 will not be graded until/unless the Plagiarism Exercise is completed.

Please Read ……. AAll members of the University of Maryland University College community are expected to maintain the highest level of integrity across the academic experience. For students, intellectually honest academic work represents independent analysis, acknowledges all sources of information that contribute to the ideas being explored, and ensures the ability to engage in life and work authentically. A Message from Chief Academic Officer and Senior Vice President, Alan Drimmer, PhD visiThe vision of University of Maryland University College is to build the skills, competencies, and capabilities of our students to realize their professional aspirations. Integrity is the foundation of this vision to guide institutional and individual professional behaviors. Academic integrity refers to a set of shared values, principles, behaviors, and skills that lie at the heart of learning and scholarship. University of Maryland University College has a long history of commitment to academic integrity, reflecting its values of truth, honesty, fairness, respect, and responsibility. University of Maryland University College students, faculty, and staff are accountable for upholding a culture of integrity. Maintaining academic integrity in our work includes mastery of essential skills and competencies, such as integrating others’ ideas into an analysis, thinking critically about sources, and directly citing the work of others. Integrity also means mastering the knowledge, skills, and abilities within disciplines and fields authentically and demonstrably. The university is committed to helping students learn and succeed in these ways. The academic integrity webpage is a resource for the entire university community to learn about integrity in academic work—the core of everything we do at University of Maryland University College. Included on this webpage is the university’s philosophy of academic integrity. By adopting a philosophy of academic integrity, University of Maryland University College is reaffirming a foundational commitment to the highest ethical standards in teaching and learning and articulating a clear vision for the place and purpose of integrity in the academic experience. Alan Drimmer, PhD Chief Academic Officer Senior Vice President, Academic Affairs oThis statement, adopted in June 2018, establishes a vision for teaching, learning, and supporting student success with integrity across the academic experience at University of Maryland University College. It is aspirational, describing high-level values, commitments, and principles that will guide the university’s efforts to intentionally instill, maintain, and enhance a shared culture of integrity, through integrity-related policy, process, and operations. Our Philosophy of Academic Integrity The vision of University of Maryland University College is to build the skills, competencies, and capabilities of our students to realize their professional aspirations.1 Integrity is the foundation of this vision. In alignment with the International Center for Academic Integrity, University of Maryland University College defines integrity as "the commitment, even in the face of adversity, to six fundamental values: honesty, trust, fairness, respect, responsibility, and courage."2 More than avoiding or sanctioning misconduct, teaching and learning with integrity ensures the knowledge, skills, and abilities that students develop are authentic and demonstrable, and thus support autonomy and self-determination in life and work. Our Commitments to a Culture of Teaching and Learning with Integrity The fundamental values of integrity are core components of character, and they are lived out in specific contexts, moments, and situations. Accordingly, a culture of academic integrity involves two equally important commitments. First, because integrity is a collective good, a culture of academic integrity must establish and uphold a shared commitment to the highest standards of ethics and morality for everyone at all times in all things. Second, because integrity is challenged in specific situations, a culture of integrity requires a commitment to grappling with what it means to live, work, teach, and learn with integrity in all the fields, disciplines, and careers represented in higher education. Our Principles for a Culture of Teaching and Learning with Integrity 1. Students, faculty, staff, and administrators are accountable individually and collectively for upholding a culture of integrity by living out its values every day. 2. Teaching and learning give students at all levels opportunities to increasingly master the skills central to the practice of academic integrity (including information literacy, paraphrasing, synthesis, independent analysis, peer collaboration, and proper citation practices). 3. Educating with integrity seeks not only to eradicate academic misconduct but also to illuminate and give opportunities for practicing the ways that the values of integrity are implicit and essential to all academic programs, fields, disciplines, and careers. 4. Cultivating a culture of integrity is a process that can include failure as part of students’ formation as academic citizens and successful professionals. 5. Lapses in integrity arising from gaps in knowledge, skills, abilities, or understanding are often most effectively addressed through remedial instruction. 6. Cheating, deception, and fraud corrupt education and authentic assessment of learning. Fair and appropriate sanctions for academic corruption uphold the principle of shared accountability central to a culture of academic integrity.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

digital photo manipulation

# how has digital photo manipulation affected our perception of people and events in society, and in the advertizing/celebrity world. what is the history of photo alteration and how have techniques changed?explore the impact upon photojournalism. show examples. # may require analysis with justification of your ideas citing sources.(ie. books, websites, magazines and news sites) #present the photos at minimum 5×7 size as photocopies for essay reference . 1200 words maximum.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Traveling Salesman

The assignment requires that students answer questions related to a graph and write a 2-full page essay; Part I- Part IV. The expectations are simple for the assignment: 1. There are no page limits. Write what you need to write, neither more nor less. Make each sentence count! (Having said that; it’s unlikely that one page would be enough, and very likely that eight pages would be too much.) 2. Ensure that your answer reflects your detailed understanding of the theory and techniques taught in this module. 3. References and citations are required. This requirement can be satisfied by citing the “Home” page and/or the DOD CPI Guidebook

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

How to write a portfolio

#choose a minimum of four photo by a photojournalist and analyze their work. explore why their work is of interest and why it is powerful .examine how content and visual form. work together to make the photos successful. do not present a standard biography-you must define why their photos move us. #should be your own analysis based on what you have learned during the course. avoid shopping list analysis, link your ideas to themes and symbolism. #present the photos atnimum 5×7 size as photocopies for esay reference . 1200words maximum

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Financial Management – Evaluation Balance Sheet

From and live in the US. US University Text: Corporate Finance – Stephen Ross; Randolph Westerfield; Jeffrey Jaffe; Bradford Jordan US Company I have chosen for this essay – Facebook

The best way to evaluate any company’s balance sheet is by assessing and analyzing its working capital adequacy, asset performance and capital framework. This research paper aims at evaluating the strength of a balance sheet through professional evaluation of its capital structure.

Choose a U.S. Company – My company is Facebook

The paper should be 3-6 pages of content excluding title and references page. APA formatting required. Use title page, references page, and citation. Please use reliable academic references.

Include in your paper general history and background of your company. Describe the owner’s method of financing the start of the company. Did the owner borrow the funds, use personal funds, raise capital by issuing stock? Also, include specific ratios (and apply them to your company) as seen on page 86 in your textbook. Compare the ratios and financial condition of your company to that of its industry.

Evaluate your company’s working capital adequacy, its cash flow, its financing history (has it borrowed money from financial institutions, or issued bonds, stocks, etc.) and future plans. If the company issues stock, is it growth or income-oriented. Tell a little about its dividend history and earnings projections. What are the future plans for the company?

I have scanned pg 85-86 and uploaded all the PDF’s from this course.

Thank You

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Finance Assignment Help

This is complete write up of your portfolio formation in a Word file, with calculations copied and pasted in it from your Excel file.

1. Select the stocks of three publicly traded companies from different industries. My choices Apple, HDFC and Facebook

2. Retrieve monthly data on adjusted closing prices of your securities from Yahoo Finance for the past 10 years and calculate the monthly rate of return of the stocks for every month.

3. Calculate the mean, variance, and standard deviation of the stocks’ monthly returns.

4. Calculate the correlation coefficient between every possible pair of stocks’ returns.

5. Decide what percentage of your money (weights) you want to invest in each stock and state the criteria you used to select those weights.

6. Now calculate your portfolio’s mean monthly return, variance, and standard deviation.

7. Assuming your portfolio return follows a normal distribution, calculate the chance that your portfolio loses 10% of its value during any month?

8. Assuming you have invested $100,000 in your portfolio, what is value at risk (VaR) of your portfolio at any particular month at 99% confidence level?

9. Now randomly change your portfolio’s weights 100 times (note total weights should always be 100%), for each weight combination calculate the mean and standard deviation of your portfolio, and then draw the efficient frontier.

10. For each item mentioned above explain your rationale and cite peer-reviewed and/or seminal sources.

Provide your explanations and definitions in detail and be precise. Comment on your findings. Provide references for content when necessary. Provide your work in detail and explain in your own words. Support your statements with peer-reviewed in-text citation(s) and reference(s).

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"