Sharp Printing, AG

Decide what you would do if you were the project manager on this project. Identify which suggestions offered were supportive to the end result of the project. Answer the corresponding questions provided at the end of the case (500-750 words). Use references from the reading materials to support your response. Sample Solution

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Supplier Code of Conduct

You have been appointed as the Chief Compliance Officer of one of the below companies. You must prepare a presentation for your suppliers regarding your Supplier Code of Conduct.

BUS475 Company List Tesla Wells Fargo Hilton Hotels Coca-Cola Progressive Insurance L’Oreal Personal Care Products Uber Kroger’s Grocery Northrop Grumman Corporation Starbucks

PowerPoint Presentation Create a four to six (4-6) slide PowerPoint presentation in which you:

Summarize your chosen company’s Supplier Code of Conduct information In your own words, explain how each aspect of your Supplier Code of Conduct is committed to ethical business practices and society social responsibility. Discuss your company’ s stance on each of the following areas: a. Empowering Workers b. Labor and Human Rights c. Health and Safety d. The Environment e. Accountability Identify the key ways that your company’s Code of Conduct has changed in recent years (i.e. have there been any improvements made). Examine the manner in which your company’s Supplier Code of Conduct helps the organization operate as a socially responsible organization. Provide detailed speaker notes of what you would say if you were delivering the presentation. Submit a reference page with at least two (2) quality references from the past 2 years that you have used for this presentation / paper. Note: Wikipedia and other websites do not qualify as academic resources.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Product Returns Processing

The source is provided – attachment. Stock, J. R., & Mulki, J. P. (2009). PRODUCT RETURNS PROCESSING: AN EXAMINATION OF PRACTICES OF MANUFACTURERS, WHOLESALERS/DISTRIBUTORS, AND RETAILERS. Journal of Business Logistics, 30(1), 33-VII. Retrieved from https://search-proquest- com.ezproxy2.apus.edu/docview/212658538?accountid=8289

Instructions: Review the case study from this week- Stock, J., & Mulki, J.. (2009). Product Returns Processing: An Examination Of Practices Of Manufacturers, Wholesalers/Distributors, And Retailers. Journal of Business Logistics, 30(1), 33-VII. In a 2-3 page report, identify the main points, positives, negatives, and your take away from this case study.

Submission Instructions: Please attach the assignment in Word Format. Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines. This assignment should include a title page, flowing paragraphs in the body IAW APA formatting, and an APA formatted references page.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Unit 1 Writing Assignment MSL 643

Prompt: Siciliano says that managers must (a) safeguard the assets of the organization by properly accounting for them and monitoring their use and (b) organize information so that it helps managers function effectively. Using your own research, find an example of an organization in which management did not carry out those functions. Then, discuss what led to the failure and the results of management’s failure to perform those two important functions. Requirements: Minimum 300 words; enough references to support your assertions; APA format

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Digital Forensics in the Criminal Justice System

CCJS 321 6382 Digital Forensics in the Criminal Justice System (2198)

Assignments Project #1 – Understanding Investigative Parameters Project #1 – Understanding Investigative Parameters Hide Assignment Information Instructions Project #1 – Understanding Investigative Parameters

No directly quoted material may be used in this project paper. Resources should be summarized or paraphrased with appropriate in-text and Resource page citations. Scenario Characters:

You: Information Security Analyst, Provincial Worldwide

Ms. Carol McPherson: Information Security Director, Provincial Worldwide (Your supervisor)

Mr. Harold Newman: Human Resources Director, Provincial Worldwide

Mr. John Belcamp: (former) engineer, Product Development Division, Provincial Worldwide

Ms. Evelyn Bass: Product Engineering Manager; Product Development Division, Provincial Worldwide (John Belcamp’s Supervisor)

**Characters will carry through Project 1, 2 and the Final Project. However, please remain conscious of who you are/what roll you play in EACH project and in regards to specific questions.

For the purposes of this project, imagine you are a Corporate Security Analyst, an employee of Provincial Worldwide and assigned to the company’s Corporate Protection Team.

In this case, you have been notified by Mr. Newman, Human Resources Director for Provincial Worldwide, that the company has just terminated Mr. John Belcamp, a former engineer in the company’s New Products Division, for cause (consistent tardiness and absences from work). Mr. Newman tells you that during Mr. Belcamp’s exit interview earlier that day, the terminated employee made several strange statements that seem to elude to a current program the company is working on.

Mr. Belcamp’s statements made Mr. Newman fear he might be taking Provincial’s intellectual property with him to his new employer (undoubtedly a competitor). In particular, Mr. Newman is worried about the loss of the source code for “Product X,” which the company is counting on to earn millions in revenue over the next several years. Mr. Newman provides you a copy of the source code to use in your investigation. Lastly, Mr. Newman tells you to remember that the Company wants to retain the option to refer the investigation to law enforcement in the future, so anything you do should be with thought about later potential admissibility in court. He tells you that in a conversation with other Corporate executives that their understanding of the investigative technological issues and how they have anything to do with a person’s right as an employee seem a bit lacking; so you will need to be detailed in any explanation.

The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” While the Fourth Amendment is most commonly interpreted to only affect/restrict governmental power (e.g., law enforcement), the fact that a formal criminal investigation is a possibility (and the Company has no desire to be named in a civil lawsuit) means you must consider its effect to your actions.

With the above scenario in mind, thoroughly answer the following questions (in paragraph format, properly referring to and citing materials used in this course as well as outside research, where appropriate, and within a reference page at the end of the project paper).

1. Prior to any incident happening, it is important for any company to implement a “forensic readiness” plan. Discuss the benefits of a forensic readiness plan and name what you believe are the top two (2) requirements to establish forensic readiness within a private sector business like Provincial Worldwide. Support your answers. (Please note that while cyber security and digital forensics have overlaps in incident response preparation, please limit your answers here to forensic readiness in the digital forensic arena, not cyber security.)

2. Ms. McPherson, out of concern for the theft/sharing of the “Product X” source code, and after discussing the issue with one of the Corporate attorneys is requesting that you and Ms. Bass start searching the areas in which Mr. Belcamp had access within the building. Can you or Ms. Bass search Mr. Belcamp’s assigned locker in the Company’s on-site gym for digital evidence, and why? Additionally, can you or Ms. Bass use a master key to search Mr. Belcamp’s locked desk for digital evidence, whether still on site, or after Mr. Belcamp has left the premises? Support your answer.

3. A check with security confirms that John Belcamp passed through the security checkpoint when coming in to work in his vehicle. A sign at the checkpoint states that the purpose of the checkpoint is for security staff to check for weapons or other materials that may be detrimental to the working environment and employee safety. Screening is sometimes casual and usually consists of verification of an employee’s Company ID card. Can security staff at this checkpoint be directed to open Mr. Belcamp’s briefcase and seize any potential digital evidence, why or why not? Support your answer.

4. There is a page in the Company’s “Employee Handbook” that states that anything brought onto the Company’s property, including the employees themselves, are subject to random search for items belonging to Provincial Worldwide. There is a space for the employee to acknowledge receipt of this notice. Mr. Belcamp has a copy of the handbook but never signed the receipt page. Does that matter; why or why not? Explain.

5. The police have not been called or involved yet, however, Mr. Newman asks if involving the police will change your incident response. Describe how you will respond to her concerning the parameters of search and seizure, and if it will change by involving the police in the investigation at this time. Support your answer.

6. You know as an Information Security Analyst that it is important to document the details of your investigation if the company wants to insure admissibility of any evidence collected in the future. However, Mr. Newman or Ms. Bass have never heard of the term “chain of custody.” How would you explain what chain of custody means, why it is important, and what could occur if the chain of custody is not documented. Support your answer.

Project Requirements:

• Each question should be answered thoroughly looking at all the issues presented, so do your research, be specific, be detailed, and demonstrate your knowledge; submitting your project through the appropriate assignment folder.

• This project should be submitted in a single Microsoft Word document (.DOC/.DOCX), with answers separated and/or numbered in respect to the question, so as to make it clear which question is being answered. It may be in a question and answer format, or as described with answers to the associated question numbers;

• The paper should be written in third-person grammar, not first person (which means – I, me, myself, etc.);

• The submission is to have a cover page that includes course number, course title, title of paper, student’s name, and the date of submission per APA writing format;

• Format: 12-point font, double-space, one-inch margins;

• It is mandatory that you do some research, and utilize outside resources! You must have a reference page at the end of your project that is consistent with APA citation style and format (see https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/ for help).

Rubric Name: A MODEL Rubric for CCJS Projects – Max points This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Criteria Equivalent to an A Equivalent to a B Equivalent to a C Equivalent to a D or F Overall content of paper or project. Value: 20 points 20 points The paper is exemplary. Content of the paper exceeds all information required by assignment, demonstrates critical thinking skills, sophisticated analysis and other perspectives.

Points available: 18-20

17.9 points Paper indicates effort above and beyond the Project Description in the areas of research, analysis, critical thinking, etc.

Points available: 16-17.9

15.9 points In general, the content of the paper addresses the information required by the assignment.

Points available: 14-15.9

13.9 points The overall content of the paper addresses less than the minimal amount of the information required by the assignment. It demonstrates marginal work and does not reflect an understanding of the project.

Points available D: 12 -13.9

Points available F: 11.9

/ 20 Overall analysis and critical thinking Value: 20 points 20 points Analysis and critical thinking is evident throughout the paper, beyond the requirements in the Project Description

Points available: 18-20

17.9 points Paper includes evidence of analysis and critical thinking beyond the requirements in the Project Description

Points available: 16-17.9

15.9 points The analysis and critical thinking is consistant with the requirements in the Project Description

Points available: 14-15.9

13.9 points The analysis and critical thinking reflected in this paper did not meet the requirements in the Project Description

Points available D: 12-13.9

Points available F: 0-11.9

/ 20 Responsiveness to Project Description: All elements are included. Value: 10 points 10 points Assignment is formatted exactly as required.

Points available: 9-10

8.9 points Assignment is formatted as required with minor/ inconsequential deviations.

Points available: 8-8.9

7.9 points Assignment mostly formatted as required but missing some required element(s).

Points available: 7-7.9

6.9 points Assignment is missing major elements,

Points available D:6 – 6.9

Points available F: 0-5.9

/ 10 Responsiveness to Project Description : Application of theory and knowledge to the facts presented, accurate use of terminology, etc. Value: 10 points 10 points Excellent understanding and application of theory and knowledge to the facts.

Terminology is correct in all uses.

Points available: 9-10

8.9 points Clear application of theory and knowledge to the facts.

Most terminology references are correctly applied.

Points available: 8-8.9

7.9 points Application of theory, knowledge and terminology indicate understanding of the concepts and focus of the project

Points available: 7-7.9

6.9 points Theory and knowledge does not apply to the facts presented.

Use of terminology indicates a lack of understanding of the concepts and focus of the project

Points available D: 6-6.9

Points available F: 0-5.9

/ 10 Responsiveness to Project Description: Organization. Value: 10 points 10 points Organization is relevant to topic, clear and understandable with logical flow that makes the project easier to follow.

Points available: 9-10

8.9 points Organization is clear and does not distract from the project’s content.

Points available: 8-8.9

7.9 points Organization presents some MINOR distractions from the project’s content.

Points available: 7-7.9

6.9 points Organization lacks relevance, is unclear, difficult to understand, or logic is missing that causes distraction for the reader.

Points available D: 6-6.9

Points available F: 0-5.9

/ 10 Formatting, references, and APA citations Value 15 points 15 points Assignment is formatted exactly as required, all required citations and references are present and APA standards are followed in every respect.

Points available 13.5-15

13.4 points Assignment is formatted as required with minor/ inconsequential deviations, resource requirements are met, citations and references are present and APA standards are followed.

Points available: 12-13.4

11.9 points Assignment mostly formatted as required but missing some required elements/ sources or some APA errors are evident.

Points available: 10.5-11.9

10.4 points Assignment is missing major elements, lacks required sources or APA is not followed however a different citation method is used correctly.

Points available D: 9 – 10.4

Points available F: 0-8.9

/ 15 General Grammar/Mechanics Value 15 points 15 points No or minor English and grammar usage errors.

Points available 13.5-15

13.4 points A few minor/ inconsequential mistakes in English and grammar.

Points available 12-13.4

11.9 points Some, but acceptable mistakes in English and/or grammar.

Points available: 10.5-11.9

10.4 points Many mistakes evident in English/grammar usage.

Points available D: 9 – 10.4

Points available F: 0-8.9

/ 15 Total / 100 Overall Score Equivalent to an A90 points minimum Equivalent to an B80 points minimum Equivalent to an C70 points minimum Equivalent to a D or an F0 points minimum Submit Assignment Files to submit (0) file(s) to submit

After uploading, you must click Submit to complete the submission. Comments Skip Toolbars for Comments.

skip to main content My Home

CCJS 321 6382 Digital Forensics in the Criminal Justice System (2198)

Assignments Project #1 – Understanding Investigative Parameters Project #1 – Understanding Investigative Parameters Hide Assignment Information Instructions Project #1 – Understanding Investigative Parameters

No directly quoted material may be used in this project paper. Resources should be summarized or paraphrased with appropriate in-text and Resource page citations. Scenario Characters:

You: Information Security Analyst, Provincial Worldwide

Ms. Carol McPherson: Information Security Director, Provincial Worldwide (Your supervisor)

Mr. Harold Newman: Human Resources Director, Provincial Worldwide

Mr. John Belcamp: (former) engineer, Product Development Division, Provincial Worldwide

Ms. Evelyn Bass: Product Engineering Manager; Product Development Division, Provincial Worldwide (John Belcamp’s Supervisor)

**Characters will carry through Project 1, 2 and the Final Project. However, please remain conscious of who you are/what roll you play in EACH project and in regards to specific questions.

For the purposes of this project, imagine you are a Corporate Security Analyst, an employee of Provincial Worldwide and assigned to the company’s Corporate Protection Team.

In this case, you have been notified by Mr. Newman, Human Resources Director for Provincial Worldwide, that the company has just terminated Mr. John Belcamp, a former engineer in the company’s New Products Division, for cause (consistent tardiness and absences from work). Mr. Newman tells you that during Mr. Belcamp’s exit interview earlier that day, the terminated employee made several strange statements that seem to elude to a current program the company is working on.

Mr. Belcamp’s statements made Mr. Newman fear he might be taking Provincial’s intellectual property with him to his new employer (undoubtedly a competitor). In particular, Mr. Newman is worried about the loss of the source code for “Product X,” which the company is counting on to earn millions in revenue over the next several years. Mr. Newman provides you a copy of the source code to use in your investigation. Lastly, Mr. Newman tells you to remember that the Company wants to retain the option to refer the investigation to law enforcement in the future, so anything you do should be with thought about later potential admissibility in court. He tells you that in a conversation with other Corporate executives that their understanding of the investigative technological issues and how they have anything to do with a person’s right as an employee seem a bit lacking; so you will need to be detailed in any explanation.

The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” While the Fourth Amendment is most commonly interpreted to only affect/restrict governmental power (e.g., law enforcement), the fact that a formal criminal investigation is a possibility (and the Company has no desire to be named in a civil lawsuit) means you must consider its effect to your actions.

With the above scenario in mind, thoroughly answer the following questions (in paragraph format, properly referring to and citing materials used in this course as well as outside research, where appropriate, and within a reference page at the end of the project paper).

1. Prior to any incident happening, it is important for any company to implement a “forensic readiness” plan. Discuss the benefits of a forensic readiness plan and name what you believe are the top two (2) requirements to establish forensic readiness within a private sector business like Provincial Worldwide. Support your answers. (Please note that while cyber security and digital forensics have overlaps in incident response preparation, please limit your answers here to forensic readiness in the digital forensic arena, not cyber security.)

2. Ms. McPherson, out of concern for the theft/sharing of the “Product X” source code, and after discussing the issue with one of the Corporate attorneys is requesting that you and Ms. Bass start searching the areas in which Mr. Belcamp had access within the building. Can you or Ms. Bass search Mr. Belcamp’s assigned locker in the Company’s on-site gym for digital evidence, and why? Additionally, can you or Ms. Bass use a master key to search Mr. Belcamp’s locked desk for digital evidence, whether still on site, or after Mr. Belcamp has left the premises? Support your answer.

3. A check with security confirms that John Belcamp passed through the security checkpoint when coming in to work in his vehicle. A sign at the checkpoint states that the purpose of the checkpoint is for security staff to check for weapons or other materials that may be detrimental to the working environment and employee safety. Screening is sometimes casual and usually consists of verification of an employee’s Company ID card. Can security staff at this checkpoint be directed to open Mr. Belcamp’s briefcase and seize any potential digital evidence, why or why not? Support your answer.

4. There is a page in the Company’s “Employee Handbook” that states that anything brought onto the Company’s property, including the employees themselves, are subject to random search for items belonging to Provincial Worldwide. There is a space for the employee to acknowledge receipt of this notice. Mr. Belcamp has a copy of the handbook but never signed the receipt page. Does that matter; why or why not? Explain.

5. The police have not been called or involved yet, however, Mr. Newman asks if involving the police will change your incident response. Describe how you will respond to her concerning the parameters of search and seizure, and if it will change by involving the police in the investigation at this time. Support your answer.

6. You know as an Information Security Analyst that it is important to document the details of your investigation if the company wants to insure admissibility of any evidence collected in the future. However, Mr. Newman or Ms. Bass have never heard of the term “chain of custody.” How would you explain what chain of custody means, why it is important, and what could occur if the chain of custody is not documented. Support your answer.

Project Requirements:

• Each question should be answered thoroughly looking at all the issues presented, so do your research, be specific, be detailed, and demonstrate your knowledge; submitting your project through the appropriate assignment folder.

• This project should be submitted in a single Microsoft Word document (.DOC/.DOCX), with answers separated and/or numbered in respect to the question, so as to make it clear which question is being answered. It may be in a question and answer format, or as described with answers to the associated question numbers;

• The paper should be written in third-person grammar, not first person (which means – I, me, myself, etc.);

• The submission is to have a cover page that includes course number, course title, title of paper, student’s name, and the date of submission per APA writing format;

• Format: 12-point font, double-space, one-inch margins;

• It is mandatory that you do some research, and utilize outside resources! You must have a reference page at the end of your project that is consistent with APA citation style and format (see https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/ for help).

Criteria Equivalent to an A Equivalent to a B Equivalent to a C Equivalent to a D or F Overall content of paper or project. Value: 20 points 20 points The paper is exemplary. Content of the paper exceeds all information required by assignment, demonstrates critical thinking skills, sophisticated analysis and other perspectives.

Points available: 18-20

17.9 points Paper indicates effort above and beyond the Project Description in the areas of research, analysis, critical thinking, etc.

Points available: 16-17.9

15.9 points In general, the content of the paper addresses the information required by the assignment.

Points available: 14-15.9

13.9 points The overall content of the paper addresses less than the minimal amount of the information required by the assignment. It demonstrates marginal work and does not reflect an understanding of the project.

Points available D: 12 -13.9

Points available F: 11.9

/ 20 Overall analysis and critical thinking Value: 20 points 20 points Analysis and critical thinking is evident throughout the paper, beyond the requirements in the Project Description

Points available: 18-20

17.9 points Paper includes evidence of analysis and critical thinking beyond the requirements in the Project Description

Points available: 16-17.9

15.9 points The analysis and critical thinking is consistant with the requirements in the Project Description

Points available: 14-15.9

13.9 points The analysis and critical thinking reflected in this paper did not meet the requirements in the Project Description

Points available D: 12-13.9

Points available F: 0-11.9

/ 20 Responsiveness to Project Description: All elements are included. Value: 10 points 10 points Assignment is formatted exactly as required.

Points available: 9-10

8.9 points Assignment is formatted as required with minor/ inconsequential deviations.

Points available: 8-8.9

7.9 points Assignment mostly formatted as required but missing some required element(s).

Points available: 7-7.9

6.9 points Assignment is missing major elements,

Points available D:6 – 6.9

Points available F: 0-5.9

/ 10 Responsiveness to Project Description: Application of theory and knowledge to the facts presented, accurate use of terminology, etc. Value: 10 points 10 points Excellent understanding and application of theory and knowledge to the facts.

Terminology is correct in all uses.

Points available: 9-10

8.9 points Clear application of theory and knowledge to the facts.

Most terminology references are correctly applied.

Points available: 8-8.9

7.9 points Application of theory, knowledge and terminology indicate understanding of the concepts and focus of the project

Points available: 7-7.9

6.9 points Theory and knowledge does not apply to the facts presented.

Use of terminology indicates a lack of understanding of the concepts and focus of the project

Points available D: 6-6.9

Points available F: 0-5.9

/ 10 Responsiveness to Project Description: Organization. Value: 10 points 10 points Organization is relevant to topic, clear and understandable with logical flow that makes the project easier to follow.

Points available: 9-10

8.9 points Organization is clear and does not distract from the project’s content.

Points available: 8-8.9

7.9 points Organization presents some MINOR distractions from the project’s content.

Points available: 7-7.9

6.9 points Organization lacks relevance, is unclear, difficult to understand, or logic is missing that causes distraction for the reader.

Points available D: 6-6.9

Points available F: 0-5.9

/ 10 Formatting, references, and APA citations Value 15 points 15 points Assignment is formatted exactly as required, all required citations and references are present and APA standards are followed in every respect.

Points available 13.5-15

13.4 points Assignment is formatted as required with minor/ inconsequential deviations, resource requirements are met, citations and references are present and APA standards are followed.

Points available: 12-13.4

11.9 points Assignment mostly formatted as required but missing some required elements/ sources or some APA errors are evident.

Points available: 10.5-11.9

10.4 points Assignment is missing major elements, lacks required sources or APA is not followed however a different citation method is used correctly.

Points available D: 9 – 10.4

Points available F: 0-8.9

/ 15 General Grammar/Mechanics Value 15 points 15 points No or minor English and grammar usage errors.

Points available 13.5-15

13.4 points A few minor/ inconsequential mistakes in English and grammar.

Points available 12-13.4

11.9 points Some, but acceptable mistakes in English and/or grammar.

Points available: 10.5-11.9

10.4 points Many mistakes evident in English/grammar usage.

Points available D: 9 – 10.4

Points available F: 0-8.9

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

How significant was propaganda in Germany from 1933 to 1945?

Please follow the attached information on the coursework. There will be guides and examples for you to follow. As well as sentence structures and a list of topics to write about

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Reflect on this natural disaster

Watch the "Diary of Medical Mission Trip" videos dealing with the catastrophic earthquake in Haiti in 2010. Reflect on this natural disaster by answering the following questions:
Propose one example of a nursing intervention related to the disaster from each of the following levels: primary prevention, secondary prevention, and tertiary prevention. Provide innovative examples that have not been discussed by previous students.
Under which phase of the disaster do the three proposed interventions fall? Explain why you chose that phase.
With what people or agencies would you work in facilitating the proposed interventions and why?

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

TOPIC- DIGITAL MEDIA AND IT’S EFFECT ON LIFESTYLE AND HEALTH

PLAN/ STRUCTURE:

TOPIC- DIGITAL MEDIA AND IT’S EFFECT ON LIFESTYLE AND HEALTH

QUESTION/ PROBLEM- explore the effects of digital media on family life, and relationships today.

SIGNIFICANCE- find out more about psychological aspects leading to physical health, generational gaps and how humans are adapting to the new media and its influence on society.

PRIMARY RESOURCES- case studies x2, online survey (10-15 q), 10-20 respondents

SECONDARY RESOURCES- articles, reliable data from reports and previously published journals.

METHODS- online survey/ experiments or interviews conducted face to face;

JUSTIFICATION- Using these methods the finding or results achieved would be more reliable and will show a better understanding of the project. It will also be a recent update on the issue, from various perspectives.

LIMITATIONS if any

ALSO MUST HAVE LITERATURE REVIEW . *** HAVE ATTACHED SAMPLE STUDENT WORK, REFER TO THAT FOR THE STRUCTURE. THANK YOU

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

422 fr3

What is Access Control? What is SSO and what are some of parts and types of Access Control?

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"