Write about Gasland. Be mindful of page length requirements (2 pages double spaced not including headers, 1″ margins/12-point times new roman font, and regular spacing size). In your writings you must demonstrate that you have watched the film in entirety by writing about new facts you have gained.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Part of the research process is formalizing the research you have been collecting. One way of formalizing research is through an annotated bibliography. An annotated bibliography is a collection of annotations that are comprised of summaries and evaluations of each of the sources included in a research investigation. Writing annotations develops your skills as an informed researcher because you learn how to describe each source’s content, credibility, and relevance. This annotated compilation may help you find connections between your sources, or find how they compare to one another. Recognizing connections can be helpful when synthesizing your information, and synthesis can support you in identifying future areas of research in your subtopic issue or in identifying a preliminary argument.

This Part 4 assignment begins to formalize your research process and develops research skills that include effective summarizing and assessing credibility and usefulness of sources. You will practice incorporating higher order thinking skills (i.e. synthesizing) into your research process as you use your research to analyze the links and patterns that connect the sources. You will conclude by reflecting on your research process as you consider the people, groups, associations (i.e., stakeholders) that might be interested in your selected research focus.

Skills & Strategies

This Part 4 assignment will help you to

• compile an annotation of the sources you have read
• practice effective summarizing
• assess credibility and usefulness of sources
• determine current findings in a particular research area
• synthesize research by searching for links and patterns among sources
• identify similarities and variances among sources
• see big picture concepts among sources
• continue to narrow your research focus: selected subtopic
• consider audiences interested in your subtopic research
• compose a comprehensive introduction and preliminary thesis statement

Description (and Step by Step)

This Part 4 assignment asks you to annotate the three sources you identified in your Project 1 Part 3 assignment and compile the annotations into an informal annotated bibliography. After writing the annotations, you will include an introductory paragraph and preliminary thesis statement that identifies the area of research and your initial findings.

Step by Step

Step 1. For each source, your annotation will include two paragraphs (approximately 300 words total). The first paragraph will summarize the source’s key ideas. Use the 4-sentence rhetorical summary model addressed in Project 1 Part 1. The second annotation paragraph will address the credibility of the source and note the links, patterns, similarities, and/or variances between the source and the other two sources.

Step 2. After you have compiled your annotations and synthesized their arguments and drawn preliminary conclusions about your subtopic, you are ready to write your introduction. This opening paragraph should introduce your reader to your subtopic area and identify what people/stakeholders might be interested in or influenced by your subtopic. The introduction will briefly explain why this research is important. To conclude the introduction, you will (a) represent your initial findings based on the research compiled in the annotated bibliography and (b) write a preliminary thesis statement that begins to frame these findings.

You will upload this Part 4 assignment to MyReviewers by the assigned due date.

Helpful Hints

When writing your introduction, remember that you are still in the process of researching your subtopic. This means that your information will be brief, the conclusions you draw will be preliminary, and the thesis you compose will be representative of initial trends in ongoing research. Do not worry; you don’t have to have all the answers yet!

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

ASSIGNMENT:

This essay should be 1500 word essays, roughly 6-7 pages double spaced. You should feel freer to incorporate more than one or two main works, though depth is far more important than breadth. the essay should develop a strong thesis around a theme, idea, or issue firmly rooted in one or more of the assigned texts. I recommend limiting your substantive engagement to no more than 2 works; indeed, focus on one work is really ideal for this kind of paper. However, you may, of course, mention other relevant or related texts to demonstrate the breadth of your thinking. That said, given the number of World War I poets and poems available, you may consider more than one of these authors, but not in a simplistic “compare and contrast” mode. To be clear, a comparison is not an unworthwhile thing if it is in the service of an argument. (Comparison and contrast for the sake of comparing and contrasting is not appropriate at this level.) The paper is fundamentally an extended close-reading project that requires no outside research. Context, biography, history, theory may be useful, but as a secondary emphasis. Of course, any material included on Blackboard or in the course anthology may be utilized. Just remember that, when exploring your chosen text, the words themselves are the most important evidence you have for your points!

An essential key to this assignment involves making observations about what is happening in the work/passage in question (what the work is doing)—and then inquiring into the implications (the meaning or significance) of those observations. The “obvious” in a given reading is vital, but pursuing the implications of your observations means not settling for merely the first thought. Keep plumbing the text. Ultimately, you are working towards a reading that explores what the text means to you. Your creative faculties are essential in any academic interpretation. However, this is not an exercise in creative writing per se; all your assertions must be rigorously tied to the evidence of the text itself. Again, the literary text is your evidence.

Furthermore, to avoid vast, nebulous, generic, and banal openings that merely tread water and serve no real purpose, I strongly suggest that all papers begin with well-selected epigraphs that articulate the issue or question to be analyzed. Explanation of what the epigraph means and how it applies to the larger thrust of the paper will facilitate the movement into a thesis that is specific and thoughtful.

Quoting generously from the primary text/s is essential. Please use the MLA parenthetical format for citations. This will mean listing author (Hardy, Yeats, etc.) and page number in the Norton. In the event that you are quoting or paraphrasing from multiple works by the same author, you will need to abbreviate the title and include it in the parenthetical citation. Two examples might be: (Hardy, “Hap” 44) and (Hardy, “Convergence” 54). If you are using only one text by an author, skip the abbreviated title in the parenthetical citation. Each paper should have a Works Cited listed at the end of the essay—though this should not be a separate page. (Don’t waste the paper.) NB: Regardless of what any official MLA guidelines state, do not cite poems by line numbers unless you are citing books/cantos and line numbers from an epic. In the real world, no publisher uses line numbers for citations of lyric poems; publishers use page numbers from actual texts.

Several seemingly minor points that make a difference:

Include a word count at the end of the paper.
Include page numbers in the upper right corner of all pages after the first page.
Include an original and creative title that speaks to your topic and thesis.
Staple all papers. I do not want paper clips or loose pages or dog-eared pages.
Avoid sentence fragments; every sentence must have a subject and a verb.
Avoid fused sentences, semicolon problems, and run-on sentences as well.
Limit any use of first and second person pronouns. Keep the language objective and scholarly for the most part—yet, do not be afraid to use a first person pronoun if you find such use strategically beneficial. Every word, punctuation mark, quotation… is there for a purpose!

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY ( ROBOTS IN HEALTHCARE)- GOING AGAINST IT
The references may not be older than 5 years.

Following the direction offered by Jackson and Newberry (2016) in Chapter 12, complete an argumentative essay on the issue you chose in Week 6. Be sure your essay contains

an introduction containing a thesis that states the issue, your position on the issue, what the paper will cover, and in what order;
at least two paragraphs that each contain a well-supported (and documented) claim or sub-argument that will provide strong support for your fallacy-free argument;
at least one paragraph discussing a documented, reasonable counterclaim to your position that needs to be a legitimate claim that someone has actually made as a counter-position on your issue;
at least one paragraph offering a reasonable, documented response to that counterclaim; and
a conclusion that summarizes the argument and conclusion.
This argumentative essay should

be no less than 750 words;
have no fewer than five sources;
be submitted as a Microsoft Word document, using proper APA formatting (cover page, one-inch margins, and double-spacing); and
follow APA documentation protocol

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"