What is your past experience with research and report writing?

/in /by

For this fourth reflective essay, simply develop answer each question/set of questions in a paragraph, for a total of at least five paragraphs (NOTE: Do not use the five paragraph essay structure, just answer the questions).

  1. What is your past experience with research and report writing? Has it been easy, difficult, somewhere in between? Why/how?
  2. What kinds of subject have you researched before? What did you like/not like in your past research experiences?
  3. What has been easy about the research and report writing process for you so far with this project?
  4. What are you struggling with in regards to the research/writing process of this project?
  5. How could I make the assignment more engaging/beneficial for you and other students?

For this fifth reflective essay, simply develop answer each question/set of questions in a paragraph, for a total of at least five paragraphs (NOTE: Do not use the five paragraph essay structure, just answer the questions).

  1. What is your past experience, if any, with peer review? What was it like? Was it useful?
  2. What do you expect out of online peer review? What are you apprehensions? How can I help with those?
  3. What have you done with peer review feedback in the past? What makes/would make you willing to apply a peers’ feedback? In other words, what type of feedback would you readily apply?
  4. What kind of feedback would you dismiss in peer review? Why?
  5. Describe your ideal way to receive feedback and why. Do you prefer written feedback, verbal feedback, etc.?

1. Revise the following paragraph to make the reader the center of attention.

We are happy to announce that we are offering for sale an empty parcel of land at the corner of Mission and High Streets. We will be selling this parcel for $89,500, with a minimum down payment of $22,500. We have had the lot rezoned M-2 for student housing. We originally purchased this lot because of its proximity to the university and had planned to erect student housing, but our investment plans have changed. We still believe that our lot would make a profitable site for up to three 12-unit buildings.

2. Revise the following sentences to eliminate wordy phrases by substituting a single word wherever possible. You may find other opportunities to tighten for conciseness.

  1. Due to the fact that two of the three highway lanes were closed for repairs, I was nearly 20 minutes late for my appointment.
  2. We have the ability to vote for the best performer on TV by text messaging the on- screen telephone number.
 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Relevant historical or political context that readers need to know in order to understand your analysis;

/in /by

YOU COULD CHOOSE ANY TOPIC YOU WANT

15 Page Analytical Essay (50%) (due at the end of the semester)

Throughout the semester, you will work on a paper that will be a minimum of 15 pages, not counting the Works Cited page. You will choose a public figure and thoroughly analyze his or her rhetoric in context. Your paper should contain the following:

  1. A thesis statement that identifies your figure’s main argument and supporting claims that will be the focus of your paper;
  2. Relevant historical or political context that readers need to know in order to understand your analysis;
  3. A thorough analysis of your figure’s rhetorical strategies (that is, how s/he is attempting to persuade their audience, and for what purpose). Use quotes and examples from your figure’s speeches, writings, or interviews to support your analysis;
  4. A thorough evaluation of the persuasive value of his or her rhetoric–is it persuasive? Is it truthful? Deceitful? Explain why you find it persuasive or unpersuasive and truthful or deceitful (or a combination).
  5. A substantive discussion of the significance of this figure and why understanding this person’s rhetoric is important.

Your paper should have the following additional features:

  1. It must contain at least one primary source of rhetoric from your chosen figure, but it can also combine multiple (for example, you may analyze one speech or a pastiche of speeches).
  2. It must contain at least 2 additional resources, not from your figure, to support your analysis.
  3. It must adhere to MLA citation format.
  4. It must use language and style conventions appropriate for an academic audience.
  5. It must be thoroughly edited.

I realize that writing a 15 page paper may seem daunting to you, but I have found that students really improve their writing more quickly (and learn more) when they craft, edit, and perfect one solid writing example. However, it is essential that you work on it throughout the semester; it is very easy to tell when papers are thrown together in a last-minute panic. I strongly encourage you to make appointments with me to go over ideas and drafts throughout the semester; again, I cannot stress enough, do not wait until the last minute. If you want quality, substantive feedback from me, you must make sure you proactively seek it throughout the semester. I will not be able to sit down with you at an hour and the end and tell you how to “fix” your paper.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

What is equality? Is there a form of equality that is more important?

/in /by

Choose 3 topics and write 3 essays (each essay 4 pages)

  • Is democracy a system meant to safeguard individual rights, or is it perhaps a system in which individuals become aware of themselves as part of a wider collective body?
  • Can democracy justify coercion by a group or leader that subordinates individual will to a higher collective interest?
  • What is equality? Is there a form of equality that is more important?
  • What is a citizen, and how does a citizen differ from a subject?
  • What should a citizen do?
  • Do rights exist in the state of nature? Which ones and why?
  • I. Argument (Thesis, Claims, Support) – 45%
    1. Thesis: This is primary proposition of the essay as well as the main conclusion for your main argument. It should address the main issue in the question/prompt, and is usually clearly presented in the introduction of the essay. A thesis requires an argument and a rationale. (e.g. Rousseau’s concept of human nature is too optimistic (Argument) because he fails to account for self-interest, violence, and irrationality that affected people in Revolutionary and post-Revolutionary France (rationale).)
    2. Claims: The main premises/reasons that you offer in support of your thesis and argument. Your claims should provide reasonable and relevant support for your thesis and core argument.
    3. Support: Altogether, your claims should provide adequate support for your thesis to persuade a reasonable and informed reader that your thesis is acceptable.
    II. Structure (Theoretical framework, Organization) – 35%
    1. Theoretical Framework: Arguments should reflect a commitment to a coherent, developed, and reasonable theoretical framework. Your argument and any subarguments or claims introduced should reflect this.
    2. Organization: A good essay will have an introduction that states the thesis and briefly provides an overview of the argument, a body that logically develops the key arguments, and a conclusion that pulls it all together.
    III. Grammar (Mechanics, Style) – 20%
    1. Mechanics: The essay should essentially be free of errors in spelling, punctuation, grammar, and syntax.
    2. Style: You should try to present your ideas clearly and succinctly, avoiding vagueness and ambiguous language and using precise terms and examples. Including correct spelling, avoiding run-on sentences, and use of active rather than passive voice.
 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Meet your trainers, the people who have trained you how to behave, think and live well: your parents, teachers, lawmakers, politicians and religious leaders.

/in /by

Your essay should be divided into separate parts; each part should respond to the appropriate set of questions. Make sure you specify which section you are writing about?
Example
Part 1:
First- write the question (copy/paste)Then- your responsePart 1
After taking a philosophy class, you, a well-mannered student, began asking some difficult questions from your parents and friends about the meaning of life.
Part 2
From childhood on you have been told who you are, how the world works and how you must operate in it if you wish to be successful in it. You were told what to think and feel; what foods to eat, what sort of people to associate with, what music you should listen to, what books to read and what words to use. In short, you have been told the good and the bad, the right and wrongs of things. Failure is pursuing what is bad and success is the result of pursuing the good.
Part 3 Meet your trainers, the people who have trained you how to behave, think and live well: your parents, teachers, lawmakers, politicians and religious leaders. These people have inherited their “wisdom” from their parents, teachers, lawmakers, politicians and religious leaders.
Part 4You have been told that you are intelligent and have sufficient decision-making power. But upon closer examination you come to realize who and what you are is the product of your trainers: parents, teachers, lawmakers, politicians and religious leaders.
Part 5

Eric, 45, is married to Joanne, 43, and they have three teenage children. They have been married for 20 years. Generally speaking, they have a pretty good marriage, except for their sex life. Although they both know it is poor, they don’t discuss it very often.

Over a period of several months Joanne notices a change in Eric, and finally asks him if there is anything wrong. Eric blurts out that he has been seeing someone for several months and may even be in love.

Joanne is so angry and hurt that she immediately demands that he leave the house and states that she wants a divorce. They both refuse to seek help such as therapy or marriage counseling. Eventually, divorce ensues at a great emotional cost to Eric, Joanne and their three children.

Part 6
Here is your final task. Your success or failure in this class is not defined by a letter grade, but rather, how self-reflective and self-aware you have become through the readings, lectures, in-class discussions and the essay you have written. To put your self-awareness to test observe the following:

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Summarize how the play is a tragedy, as defined in Aristotle’s Poetics, noting the moment of peripetia and anagnorisis.

/in /by

This first graded essay assignment, due by midnight Friday, March 9, is to be typed, double-spaced, around 6-8 pages. You have to submit the essay as a file upload in Word Doc; any other format — like pages or Google Doc — would be difficult to read. If you don’t have Word Doc on your computer, you can use any of the campus computers to transfer the draft. Also, as a student you can download a free Microsoft Office program (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Any paper turned in past the due date will be given partial credit.

Preview the document
Preview the document
Preview the document

The paper will be reviewed under the three criteria of the Student Learning Outcomes: organization, contentand grammar. Please make sure to quote and cite appropriately from the play to show support of your argument. [Use the handouts here and here.] DO NOT do any additional, outside research about the play for your paper; I am simply interested in your reading of the text.Please don’t hesitate to consult with me via message or email.

The assignment will require a structural analysis of William Shakespeare’s tragedy, Othello, first in terms of race and then of gender, with certain restrictions to be explained shortly.

Introduction: Summarize how the play is a tragedy, as defined in Aristotle’s Poetics, noting the moment of peripetia and anagnorisis. Summarize enough of the play in the introduction to set up the analysis, but keep it brief.

Thesis: Transition from the introduction to the thesis by answering the following question:

As a tragedy, how does Othello display the structural binaries of race (colonialism) and gender in the characters of Brabantio/Othello and Iago/Emilia, respectively?

Thus, an outline of the body parts of your paper will first consider race relations (or colonialism) in terms of Brabantio and Othello, and then consider gender in terms of Iago and Emilia. You will have to explain the characters and their relations to one another, and find passages in the play from each to illustrate these binaries. Again, quote and cite appropriately. So,…

…in the first body part of your essay, focus on how race or “other” backgrounds impact the community’s treatment of Othello and his “outsider” status. You may consider how Brabantio view Othello as inferior, despite his military heroism. [Remember that structural binaries always considers one side as “better” than the other; hence, the Eurocentric prejudice (in this case, Italian or Venetian) over non-European ethnic groups (African, Arabs, Turks, etc.).] You may consider other characters in the analysis (the Duke, for instance), but the focus needs to be on Brabantio and Othello.

In the second body part of your essay, argue the impact of gender bias within the relationship between Iago and Emilia. Consider how the two genders here (male and female) view one another and themselves. How are these stereotypes supported and/or challenged in the play? Again, you may consider other characters (like Cassio or Desdemona) but the focus needs to be on Iago and Emilia.

Conclusion: Compare these perspectives on race and gender to current views of racism, xenophobia and sexism, to analyze the cultural relevance of the play. When commenting on current sentiments, give specific examples for support and not generalizations.

The following module will focus on Othello and these theories of structuralism, colonialism and gender studies, so if you are having difficulties with how to approach this assignment, these lessons will greatly help.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Do the benefits of vaccines outweigh the risk associated with them (generally speaking or a specific vaccine of your choice?

/in /by

Question Description
In this argument, you may support a middle ground (that you support vaccines but maybe we shouldn’t receive so many at once, at a young age, etc.). You have more flexibility in your topic compared to the Mary Mallon Essay. However, I still expect your essays to be well-written and coherent with a clearly identifiable thesis. Be sure to provide supporting evidence and proper citation whenever necessary. As you have more time to complete this essay compared to the previous essay, I recommend making an appointment with the writing center. The same 30 point scale rubric will be applied. The only difference is that I am letting you choose what the topic/research question. The expected word count is 800+ words.

General Guidelines

I DO NOT want a summary of the documentary-I was there
You are allowed to express concerns against vaccines-there are some cases of seizures and the risk may not outweigh the benefit for you personally. You may believe in a more holistic approach to medicine and seek as little medical help as possible. If that is your stance, I am interested in you arguing your reasons why?
What you cannot do is argue that vaccines cause autism.
Topic Ideas

If you struggle with having too much flexibility in a topic you may use any of the following:

As of 2015, California has removed personal and religious exemptions for vaccines. Only medical exemptions (children who are too sick to receive the vaccine) are allowed. Do you support this notion? You may want to consider using evidence from the documentary in support of your argument.

Do you think Florida should follow California’s example?

You may choose to focus on a specific vaccine, for example, should the HPV vaccine be required of every student before starting high school?

Do the benefits of vaccines outweigh the risk associated with them (generally speaking or a specific vaccine of your choice?

Do people have a justified fear surrounding vaccines?

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Develop and write up a literary interpretation of one of the fairy tales presented in the textbook

/in /by

A Literary Interpretation moves beyond comprehension to offer a theory about the meaning of a given story–and uses evidence from the story in support of that theory. Interpretation of written material is a skill you will use over and over throughout college (and beyond).

Objectives:

  • to approach literature with an inquiring attitude because it presents us with more than one possible meaning.
  • to extract the meaning from what was read as a practice of critical thinking.
  • to develop a unique, logical perspective and support it with evidence from the source.
  • to write down a supported opinion on a particular story, so (potentially) others can respond to that interpretation.

Assignment:

You will develop and write up a literary interpretation of one of the fairy tales presented in the textbook. (You cannot choose the one used for your discussion lead.) Choose wisely. Think about a story that evoked an emotional reaction from you or a class discussion in which you were particularly engaged—now go back and figure out why.

Your interpretation will offer an original idea or thesis (you came up with it based on your own reading, thoughts, and analysis) that is fully supported by evidence from the fairy tale. There is no need for any outside research.

Allowed sources:

The only source you are allowed is the actual story: your opinion, supported by the story you are analyzing. Do not use any other outside sources—do not read other essays or interpretations (another’s idea).

Rely on your abilities & our discussions. You have already done every part of this, but now you are giving your ideas shape, formality, and putting them on paper.

Aim for approximately 900-1000 words.

Include:

  • Brief, specific summary of the story (maximum of two sentences)
  • Clear, strong opinion (interpretation of what the story means)
  • Clear support (specific elements that support the main idea)
  • Correct incorporation of quoted material (inclusion, punctuation, & citation) Note: quoted material should be less than 20% of the essay—it’s there to support your ideas
  • MLA, APA or Chicago Style
  • Correct Works Cited (one source, full citation)
Elements of EssayAssessment Criteria
Content/OrganizationIs my paper well-defined, showing insightful analysis and interpretation? Does the format & structure of my essay work with my main idea? Balanced introduction and conclusion? Graceful and effective transitions?
DictionDoes my writing include compelling word choice, demonstrating insightful use of figurative language?
Sentence StructureAre my sentences carefully formed and positioned with attention to emphasis, rhythm, and pace to engage the reader?
Grammar and MechanicsDoes my writing demonstrate a mastery of grammar, creating compelling prose, with few to no errors?
Research and DocumentationAre my included examples relevant? Are they accurately and skillfully quoted, included, and discussed as support of my ideas? Are my sources in correct MLA or APA format, both in-text and in the Works Cited?

——————————————————– **important **————————————————————–

use the book as the one and only source please dont go to any other source.

book name : The Classic Fairy Tales, edited by Maria Tatar (Norton) **Second Edition**

it’s a literature class

***i’m an international student so please write like an international student dont use hard vocabs be simple as much as you can ***

tell me which story from the book did you choose to talk about.

use MLA

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

I had a essay just need some help finishing it

/in /by

I had a essay just need some help finishing it. I received feedback from a peer on this essay and need a few corrections made.

Heres the feedback

Hello Daryl, I think that you chose a topic that gave a very good argument. I did like how your title gave pretty much a summary of your entire paper. When reading the title I immediately knew what your argument was going to be about. Something that stood out to me was how you began your paper with a question as your thesis statement. It made me think to myself and form an opinion of my own before even reading the paper. I could tell after reading your paper that you agree with technology posing a threat to our private lives. I also agree with you and am for the argument because honestly, technology is scary now. It can do so much and we only know so little about what all technology knows about us. I was able to follow your paper and paragraphs when transitioning. However, there are a few little mistakes that I think you could tweak before turning in the final copy. Be sure to check the MLA format again before submitting this paper because your name and stuff should be in the top left corner under the header which I did not see also. Sometimes my computer goes crazy so this may not even be a problem, it’s just not appearing correctly on mine if so. When you are quoting what someone says like in paragraph three about Solove, be sure to put quotations around what was said. In your very first sentence, instead of saying “How many are we out there depending on…,” you might could say how many other people in the world are depending on…” In the third sentence be sure to capitalize “we.” In paragraph five, maybe you could end the sentence after every single step taken, and then begin the next sentence with for example. These are just a few little things I caught that could help you achieve a better grade. Overall, I enjoyed reading your essay and experiencing your point on your topic. 

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Does the introduction set up the reader for understanding the topic and subject of the essay?

/in /by

Question Description

Revise the essay

  • Use instructor feedback(Red font in file”Essay one draft”) and peer workshop material(Below) to revise and submit a final, polished, revised draft of Essay 1
  • Revisit the Essay 1 Assignment Sheet for specifics about formatting and guidelines
  • Include the Annotated Bibliography as part of the essay, paginated accordingly. It should appear after the References page.
  • Submit the final draft to the E1 Assignment by the due date/time listed in the assignment.

Peer workshop material:

After reading your partner’s essay, type responses to the following questions. Be thoughtful and detailed. Save this document to return to your partner when you’re finished.

In your own words and in a sentence or two, explain the writer’s argument:

  • The writer’s argument is that the acquisition of the Louisiana changed the development of America. The purchase of Louisiana led to the unlimited expansion of America.

Does the introduction set up the reader for understanding the topic and subject of the essay? (An introduction to the essay’s broader topic? To a specific event? Does it include a clear and argumentative thesis?)

  • The introduction sets up the reader for comprehending the topic and subject of the essay. The introduction introduces the reader to the wider topic. However, the writer can improve the thesis to make it clearer.

How could the writer begin the essay with more intensity or clarity? (How could the writer improve his or her “hook”?)

  • The writer could begin the essay with more clarify by making the thesis clearer than it is.

Which writing tools and strategies does the author use that are effective? Which need attention or are not as effective as they could be?

  • The writer effectively arranges his paper properly with an introduction, body, and a conclusion. The writer uses proper grammar, and a good flow of ideas. However, the writer could improve on the grammar.

Which specific areas or ideas within the body of the paper are confusing or do not clearly relate to the thesis? And, what ideas could be added or elaborated upon to better support the thesis? (Be specific. Give examples.)

  • I find all the ideas in the body of the paper very related to the thesis. The writer can improve the body of the essay by using more conjunctions to link the ideas and make them flawless.

Comment on the organization of the essay. Are the essay’s body paragraphs arranged logically? Are there paragraphs that shift focus and interrupt the flow of the essay? Where do you sense gaps in the logic of the argument or support?

  • The organization of the essay is very good and the flow of ideas is logical. The only thing the writer can work on is the linking of ideas from one paragraph to the other. I feel that the writer has not used conjunctions effectively.

How does the author’s conclusion tie into the thesis, or, if it doesn’t, how does it has strayed from its purpose? Compare the introduction to the conclusion—Does the conclusion state more strongly the intention of the paper?

  • The author’s conclusion ties directly to the conclusion since the writers states the thesis at the conclusion. The conclusion and the introduction are very directly related and they both state the intention of the paper.

Does the writer use the outside source(s) effectively to support his/her argument, including specific references to the sources? Are the sources used only to provide information or to enhance his or her argument? How could the writer make better use of the sources?

  • The writer effectively uses outside sources effectively to support his argument. The sources used to provide information to enhance the writers’ argument. In my view, the writer has used the sources the best way possible.

What are the most interesting and/or convincing parts of the essay? (Be specific. Give examples.)

  • One of the most convincing part if the introduction. The writer uses a very good hook by quoting Greek philosopher Heraclitus “the only thing that is constant is change.” Another convincing part is the conclusion which clearly restates the thesis.

What could be eliminated from the paper, if anything, while maintaining the paper’s central focus? (In other words, what portions of the paper are distracting or stray away from its main point?)

  • In my view, there is nothing that should be eliminated from the paper given that no part of the paper that strays away from the main idea.

Is the paper properly cited and formatted using APA style? References page? Annotated Bibliography? Note areas that appear to be incorrect.

  • The paper did not have Annotated Bibliography.

Essay Rubric

ArgumentOrganization and paragraphsStyle and sentencesConventions
5•The paper presents a logical, persuasive, scholarly argument about a particular topic.
•The paper addresses relevant authorities on the topic and clearly explains its relationship to their ideas.•The paper weighs a wide range of viewpoints, and persuasively articulates the reasons for its position on the topic.
•The paper creates genuine interest in the topic.		•The structure of the paper’s overall argument is remarkably clear and logical.
•Individual paragraphs are always unified and coherent.•Transitions between paragraphs underscore the links in the paper’s argument.
•The paper possesses a skillful and interesting introduction and conclusion.		•The sentences are consistently clear, coherent, and syntactically varied. •Precise word choice and an appropriate tone support the paper’s purpose and display a command of the conventions of academic writing.•The grammar, spelling, punctuation, and usage conform to conventions of academic writing.
•References to sources are accurately cited and documented according to the appropriate style manual.•Format is consistently correct and appropriate.
4•The paper presents a logical argument about a particular topic in a scholarly manner.
•The paper often engages relevant authorities on the topic and employs their ideas.•The paper considers a range of viewpoints and presents them fairly in the course of explaining its position on the topic.
•The paper is able to express the interest that the topic might possess.		•The structure of the paper’s overall argument is clear and logical.
•Individual paragraphs are almost always unified and coherent.•Transitions link the paragraphs.
•The paper possesses an introduction and conclusion that accurately reflect the paper’s content.		•Sentences are usually clear, coherent, and syntactically varied.
•Word choice and tone support the paper’s purpose and usually display a command of the conventions of academic writing.		•The paper is free of serious errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or usage. •References to outside sources are usually cited accurately and documented according to the appropriate style manual.•Format is correct and appropriate.
3•The paper presents a reasonably successful argument about a topic, although its force may at times be compromised by faulty logic or superficial thinking.
•The paper sometimes engages relevant authorities on the topic; its stance regarding their ideas could be clearer.
•The paper’s presentation of alternative viewpoints on the topic is occasionally lacking.
•It does not consistently engage its audience.		•The clarity and logic of the paper’s organizational structure could be somewhat clearer.
•Individual paragraphs occasionally lack unity or coherence.
•Transitions between paragraphs seem wooden and arbitrary.
•The introduction and conclusion are perfunctory, but do present the content of the paper, albeit not in an interesting way.		•Sentences are generally clear and correct; however, some may be basic, choppy, or lack syntactic variety.
•Word choice and tone generally support the paper’s purpose but may less consistently display a command of the conventions of academic writing.		•Errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or usage occasionally interfere with communication and damage the writer’s credibility.•References to outside sources are generally cited and documented, but not always in the appropriate style.
•Format is generally correct and appropriate.
2•The paper’s argument about a topic is only marginally successful.
•The paper’s attention to what others have said on the topic is minimal.
•The paper’s presentation of alternative viewpoints is often lacking.
•The paper does not attempt to engage the audience in the topic or explain its interest.		•The paper’s organizational structure is unclear; the reader may be confused by the direction of the argument.
•Paragraphs often lack unity or coherence. •Transitions are occasionally missing or illogical.•The introduction and conclusion are awkward; they may not relate clearly to the content of the paper.		•Sentences are frequently basic, choppy, or repetitive in structure and may display lapses in clarity or coherency. •Inappropriate word choice or tone detract from the paper’s purpose and frequently display a lack of command of the conventions of academic writing.•Many errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, and usage impede communication and undercut the writer’s credibility.•References to outside sources are not clearly cited; documentation style is inappropriate.
•Format is not consistently correct or appropriate.
1•The paper’s argument about a topic is unsuccessful; it might be confusingly unclear, obviously biased, or insufficiently developed.
•The paper neglects to consider what others have said or written on the topic.
•The paper’s presentation of the material seems to use sources solely to support its own point, without considering opposing viewpoints.
•The paper does not attempt to engage the reader in the topic or explain its interest.		•The paper’s organizational structure is underdeveloped.
•Most paragraphs seem to have no unifying idea, and may include gaps in logic; often they simply summarize a series of events.•No effort is made to link paragraphs with transitions.
•The introduction or conclusion may be missing or underdeveloped.		•Sentences are mostly basic, choppy, or repetitive in structure and display lapses in clarity or coherency.
•Inappropriate word choice or tone detract from the paper’s purpose and display a general lack of command of the conventions of academic writing.		•Numerous errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, and usage impede communication.
•References to outside sources are not cited.•Format is not consistently correct or appropriate.
 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"