Research Essays for Organisational Behaviour Assessment Type: Research Essay –

Research Essays for Organisational Behaviour Assessment Type: Research Essay – individual assessment. 1500 (+/- 10%) words in essay format. The word count excludes the cover sheet, contents page, references, appendices, and illustrations (e.g. diagrams, graphs and tables) Purpose: To allow students to research organisational behaviour theory and to enable students to examine and critically analyse one aspect of organisational behaviour in depth. Students will also develop an understanding of some of the activities that make up scholarly research and to see the way in which knowledge is built gradually. Topic: A current issue in Organisational Behaviour. Task Details: Students are required to analyse a range of literature in relation to the given topic. Following the analysis, students will be required to make supported recommendations to answer the question posed. Students need to apply their own interpretation and judgement to the question, based on approved and valid research. Students who simply regurgitate Research Essay – 30% Length: 1500 words (10% leeway) All students are required required to develop an arguable proposition on which to write an essay. Your paper should be presented in standard academic essay format. The format must be in 12pt font and 1.5 spaced. The purpose of this assignment is to develop/improve skills in writing, analysis, and argumentation in addition to adding to the depth of understanding about organizational behavior in the workplace. You will be assessed on the quality of sources of information, how well you use these resources to support your arguments and your referencing skills. You are expected to use at least eight (8) different peer-reviewed journals. The use of WIKIPEDIA online encyclopaedia is not allowed. Use of Wikipedia may result in a fail grade in this essay. You must use the HARVARD referencing system to acknowledge your sources of information (both in-text and as a reference list at the end). Learning Outcomes Targeted: Outcome a) Explain how theories of organisational behaviour may be applied in an organisational setting. Outcome b) Evaluate potential organisational problem situations and formulate proactive managerial interventions, with special sensitivity to cultural, ethical and social concerns. Outcome c) Locate relevant research and compare and critique the findings on current developments in organisational behaviour In the process of recruiting and selecting employees, managers are concerned with the personality of the people they wish to place in positions in the organisation. Explain why personality is so important in matching people to jobs. Use theories and concepts from the subjects and examples to illustrate your points.

The post Research Essays for Organisational Behaviour Assessment Type: Research Essay – appeared first on graduate paper help.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Assessment Type: Research Project – 2500 + 10% word essay – individual assessme

Assessment Type: Research Project – 2500 + 10% word essay – individual assessment Purpose: This assessment allows students to demonstrate their ability to identify, research, and analyse issues/problems in the banking and finance industry in Australia, and to develop supported recommendations taking into account stakeholder expectations. This assessment relates to Learning Outcomes a, d, e. Task Details: Students need to research all aspects of the topic from the viewpoint of various stakeholders – as a minimum this should include the financial institution, its customers and Government(s). Students need to develop their analysis and findings, with conclusions as to the probable future relating to the problem/issue, into a professionally presented, 2500 + 10% word essay. Research Students need to support their analysis with reference from the text and a Requirements: minimum of eight (8) suitable, reliable, current and academically acceptable sources – check with your tutor if unsure of the validity of sources Financial Institutions “APPLYING FOR A BANKING LICENCE IN AUSTRALIA” Topic: Your topic is: “APPLYING FOR A BANKING LICENCE IN AUSTRALIA” “You have been approached by a Director of the Brilliant Bank, a global bank with a head office in New York, for advice on the operation of the banking system in Australia and the requirements for and method of applying for a banking licence in Australia. It wishes to set up a bank here. “Prepare a report for the director, carefully addressing the following issues: – an analysis of the structure of the current financial system in Australia; – structure of and developments in the current Australian banking industry; – the regulation of banks in Australia – historical and current provisions; – the opportunities and structure for another foreign bank in Australia; – the risks facing a foreign bank starting a new operation in Australia; – in terms of meeting official requirements and best practice, what the Brilliant Bank must do to obtain a banking licence in Australia; and – recommendations and conclusion – re- recommended operational structure, the feasibility of making the application, and its likely success.” Presentation and Lodgment You should follow the following typing conventions: • Times New Roman font (at minimum , 12 pitch) • 1.5 line spacing • Top, bottom, left and right margins to be at least 2.5 cms from the edge of the page • A4 paper; and • Length – 2,500 words + / – 10%. Research and Referencing You should begin by reading the references relating to the topic and subject content in the text-book. It is suggested that you search these references via the Index at the back of the text. You will need to discover at least 6 other references. This should include at least one other book and one journal article. Search the web-sites suggested in the text and the SO. Use Harvard referencing! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harvard_referencing

The post Assessment Type: Research Project – 2500 + 10% word essay – individual assessme appeared first on graduate paper help.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Subject Outline Subject Name: Practical or Research Project Subject Code: LB5

Subject Outline Subject Name: Practical or Research Project Subject Code: LB5235:03 Study Period: SP22, 2015 Study Mode: Internal Campus: Brisbane Subject Coordinator: Dr Darren Lee-Ross Lecturers: Dr Aaron Hsiao & Dr Ashley Orth This subject outline has been prepared by Dr Darren Lee-Ross for the College of Business, Law and Governance, Division of Tropical Environments and Societies, James Cook University. Updated November 2015. Q1. This subject is offered across more than one campus and/or mode and/or teaching period within the one calendar year. Yes x No Q2. If yes [Q1], the design of all offerings of this subject ensure the same learning outcomes and assessment types and weightings. Yes x No Q3. If no [Q2], _________________________ has authorised any variations, in terms of equivalence. © Copyright 2014 This publication is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism, or review as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process or placed in computer memory without written permission. Contents Section 1. Subject at a Glance 4 1.1 Staff contact details 4 1.2 Student participation requirements 4 1.3 Key dates 4 Section 2. Subject Details 5 2.1 Subject description 5 2.2 Subject and course learning outcomes 6 2.3 Learning and teaching in this subject 6 2.4 Student feedback on subject 6 2.5 Subject resources and special requirements 7 Section 3. Assessment Details 7 3.1 Requirements for completion of subject 7 3.1.1 Clinical or professional experience requirements [delete section if not applicable] 7 3.2 Feedback on student learning 7 3.3 Assessment Tasks 7 Section 4. Other Information about Assessment and Student Support 9 4.1 Submission and return of assessment 9 4.2 Plagiarism and referencing 10 4.3 Important advice relating to examinations 10 4.4 Student support 10 Section 5. Subject Calendar 12 Section 6. Assessment Criteria Sheets 14 Section 1. Subject at a Glance The following summary provides a quick reference to the most important aspects of this subject. Please ensure that you have read the entire subject guide in full. 1.1 Staff contact details The following staff members are responsible for the preparation or delivery of this subject. Please contact the relevant staff member if you have any concerns during the study period. Teaching team Staff member Campus Room Phone# Email Consultation times* Subject Coordinator Dr Darren Lee-Ross Cairns A1.216 1452 Darren.leeross@jcu.edu.au Refer to Lecturer Lecturer Dr Aaron Hsiao Brisbane 303 30017809 Aaron.hsiao@jcu.edu.au Consultations by appointment: Tues 10am Lecturer Dr Ashley Orth Brisbane 303 30017886 Ashley.orth@jcub.edu.au Consultations by appointment: *Other consultation times by appointment only 1.2 Student participation requirements The JCU Learning, Teaching and Assessment Policy (4.3) indicates that, “a 3 credit point subject will require a 130 hour work load of study-related participation (including class attendance) over the duration of the study period, irrespective of mode of delivery”. This work load comprises timetabled hours and other attendance requirements, as well as personal study hours, including completion of assessment requirements. Note that “attendance at specified classes may be a mandatory requirement for satisfactory completion of some subjects” (Learning, Teaching and Assessment Policy, 5.9); and that additional hours may be required per week for those students in need of English language, numeracy or other learning support. • This research methods component of this class is taught simultaneously in external/online and internal lectures/workshops. All students have the same lectures, assessments and complete the same workshop activities. However, these are differentiated by completion mode for the workshop activities which are undertaken in class for internal students and provided as self-completion activities for external/online students. • Each session has the equivalent of three hours content with the lecture component being recorded and made available through LearnJCU. All students should allocate adequate time prior to commencement of the subject to watch these videos prior to either attending face to face or attempting the self-completion activities (external/online students). • Internal students are required to attend the three-hour workshop sessions (see below) • External/online students are required to allocate three hours per day for the above period to complete the workshop activities. Outline the participation requirements for this subject in the table: Key subject activities Time Day/ Date Room/ Location Lecture, Tutorial and Consultation 1– 5pm For information on the days and times when lectures, tutorials, workshops, etc. are scheduled for all of your subjects, visit JCU Lecture Timetables at http://www.jcub.edu.au/students/subject-information.aspx 1.3 Key dates A summary of the assessable items for LB5235 is provided in the table below. Please read through the assessment details presented later in this subject guide. Item Supervised individual assessment Weight Due Date Census date see 2015 Study Period and Census Dates Last date to withdraw without academic penalty see 2015 Study Period and Census Dates 1. Assessment 1 – Project proposal 30% Week 5 2. Assessment 2 – Practical or research project 70% Week 10 You must obtain a final mark of at least 50% to pass the subject. In addition, the expectation is to obtain at least an average of 50% over all invigilated components (supervised individual assessment) within a subject to pass the subject overall. Any student who does not achieve a pass in the invigilated components may, in exceptional circumstances, be reviewed by the College Assessment Committee. Students who have completed less than 100% of the assessment will be subject to review by the College Assessment Committee which could result in an overall fail. Section 2. Subject Details 2.1 Subject description This subject combines theoretical material covered in the MBA program and applies it directly in the workplace. A focus on work integrated learning is used as a platform from which to produce a substantive piece of applied research-based work. The aim is to integrate work experience flexibly into a research report/dissertation. One option is for students who are already employed to develop an independent research project. They are required to negotiate with their employer and prepare a workplace relevant project proposal and research report/dissertation. Students who have no current employer must also identify a suitable work-based applied research project via their supervisors and industry-based partners. This also includes community-based organizations. Alternatively, students may opt to fully integrate work and learning through a professional internship in a relevant, approved industry workplace using the same pathway as above (Brisbane only). Assessment items include the production of an applied research proposal and final report/dissertation. These options need to be approved by the subject coordinator/lecturer. Additionally, for the input and analysis of quantitative data during the taught component of this subject you are required to download PSPP free stats software from here: https://www.gnu.org/software/pspp/ (External students only). LB5235 is a core capstone subject drawing on all MBA subjects and equipping you with research skills which may then be applied directly in an organization in order to produce a practically-based research report. In a wider business context, knowledge and skills gained from LB5235 will assist students working in all organizational areas. 2.2 Subject and course learning outcomes The following table shows the alignment between the learning outcomes at the course and subject level and assessment. Students who successfully complete this subject will be able to: Subject Learning Outcomes Assessment 1. apply discipline-specific learning outcomes to the world of work Proposal Practical or research project 2. apply high level personal skill, autonomy and accountability in research planning, execution, communication of results Written practical or research project Course Learning Outcomes Assessment K1 Critically analyse complex business-related knowledge and practice from both historical and recent perspectives Proposal Practical or research project S1 Research and apply established concepts to solve business and professional practice problems Practical or research project S4 Present complex business analyses and information appropriately to differing audiences using effective oral presentation skills and through clear and fluent written communication Practical or research project K – Knowledge; S – Skills 2.3 Learning and teaching in this subject This subject uses a combination of approaches to teaching and learning, including student-centred and teacher directed approaches and work integrated learning. The content of the subject is disseminated using a variety of teaching strategies including workshops, group work, case studies, discussions, readings, guest speakers when available and through work experience. At the beginning of each workshop (July 27 to August 1), you will be made aware of the expected learning outcomes, how such outcomes are relevant to the world of business, and the resources that support the learning outcomes of this subject. You are expected to be an active participant in the learning process and internal students are encouraged to participate in workshops (externals participate in online activities) and undertake readings. LB5235 runs over a defined period, but involves at least three face-to-face appointments with your supervisor agreed by the student, supervisor and employer/industry partner. These progress meetings allow students to receive feedback on their project culminating in a final report. 2.4 Student feedback on subject As part of our commitment at JCU to improving the quality of our courses and teaching, we regularly seek feedback on your learning experiences. Student feedback informs evaluation of subject and teaching strengths and areas that may need refinement or change. YourJCU Subject and Teaching Surveys provide a formal and confidential method for you to provide feedback about your subjects and the staff members teaching within them. These surveys are available to all students through LearnJCU. You will receive an email invitation when the survey opens. We value your feedback and ask that you to provide considered feedback for each of your subjects. 2.5 Subject resources and special requirements Prescribed Texts » Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill (2012) Research Methods for Business Students, 6th Ed., Pearson. » SPSS Grad Pack: http://www.hearne.com.au/Software/SPSS-Grad-Packs-for-Students-by-IBM/Editions#version_Statistics%20Premium%20Grad%20Pack%20v22 Further Reading » Additional readings are provided per topic and available on LearnJCU » Please read Student Internship/Placement Guidelines document available in the subject information folder on LearnJCU Online and Electronic Resources The following libguides available from the JCU Library website will provide details on referencing, plagiarism, findings marketing books and journals http://libguides.jcu.edu.au/referencing http://libguides.jcu.edu.au/content.php?pid=63980&sid=472370 Learning & Writing Skills workshops and notes to assist with writing an essay; presentations etc http://www.jcu.edu.au/learningskills/index.htm Subject Website on LearnJCU Access the subject website through LearnJCU at learnjcu.jcu.edu.au for all materials relevant to the subject. Login using your JCU email username and password. The site for this subject is opened to all participants enrolled in the subject at least seven days prior to the commencement of the subject. Browser requirements for LearnJCU are provided on the opening webpage of LearnJCU. Section 3. Assessment Details 3.1 Requirements for completion of subject You must obtain a final mark of at least 50% to pass the subject. In addition, the expectation is to obtain at least an average of 50% over all invigilated components (supervised individual assessment) within a subject to pass the subject overall. Any student who does not achieve a pass in the invigilated components may, in exceptional circumstances, be reviewed by the School Assessment Committee. Students who have completed less than 100% of the assessment will be subject to review by the School Assessment Committee which could result in an overall fail. It is important to be aware that assessment “is always subject to final ratification following the examination period and that no single result represents a final grade in a subject” (Learning, Teaching and Assessment Policy 5.21.). 3.2 Feedback on student learning Students should have feedback within 21 days after due date of submission. 3.3 Assessment Tasks ASSESSMENT TASK 1: Project proposal (30%) Aligned course & subject learning outcomes • SLO 1- Apply discipline-specific learning outcomes to the world of work • CLO K1- Critically analyse complex business-related knowledge and practice from both historical and recent perspectives individual Project proposal Weighting / Length 30% – 1000 words Due date Week 5 – in class (hard copy). ASSESSMENT TASK 1: DESCRIPTION Using the template provided on LearnJCU, write a project proposal. The proposal should contain: • Project title • Analyzing the Business Decision or Problem • What is Already Known about the Decision or Problem • Bibliography of Relevant Reports and Papers • The Overall Research Design – Evaluating Options • What are the Key Variables and How Will you Measure Them and How the Project will Contribute to Workplace/industry • Sample Requirements & Sampling Options • Ethical Issues • References and timeline Provide a clear description of the proposal, how it addresses the industry issue/challenge and expected outcomes. Feedback will be provided by your supervisor and industry partner. ASSESSMENT TASK 1: CRITERIA SHEET See rubric in section 6 ASSESSMENT TASKS 2: Practical or Research Project (70%) Aligned course & subject learning outcomes • SLO 2 Apply high level of personal skill, autonomy and accountability in research planning, execution, communication of results • CLO S1 Research and apply established concepts to solve business and professional practice problems • CLO S4 Present complex business analyses and information appropriately to differing audiences using clear and fluent written communication Individual Research project Weighting / Length 70% – 6,000 – 7,0000 words Due date Week 10 – in class (hard copy). ASSESSMENT TASK 2: DESCRIPTION Using the template provided on LearnJCU, write a project report. The report should contain: • Executive Summary/Abstract • Introduction (Background to the Business Decision or Problem/Context/Literature Review) • The Specific Research Questions to be Addressed • Critical Analysis of the Methods • The Data to be used in This Report • Results and Discussion • Implications for the Business Decision or Problem • References ASSESSMENT TASK 2: CRITERIA SHEET See rubric in section 6 WIL PLANNING AND INDUSTRY PARTNER APPRAISALS Preparation of the Student Placement Plan At the commencement of the WIL, students will be required to complete a placement plan that has been negotiated with their supervisor (see section 7). The placement plan must be completed by the student within the first week of the WIL as it must be approved by the subject coordinator to ensure that the WIL complies with the subject requirements. Partner Organisation Supervisor Meetings In addition to at least two meetings with an appropriate academic, it is a requirement of the WIL that the student meets with the partner organisation’s supervisor mid-way through the placement to review the placement plan, discuss progress, obtain feedback and determine future tasks and goals if necessary. It is the student’s responsibility to ensure that a meeting date and time is set to discuss their progress with their industry partner supervisor. This should occur at approximately the mid-way point of their placement. The purpose of the progress report is to ensure that feedback has been provided to the student and that learning objectives are on the way to being met. Amendments and additions can be made to the original placement plan if required, to more accurately reflect the workplace experience (see section 7). Final Supervisor Appraisal Report The final supervisor appraisal report must be completed by the supervisor at the end of the WIL and forwarded to the subject coordinator. Any additional feedback will provide the student with a valuable tool to assist in their career development (see section 7). Section 4. Other Information about Assessment and Student Support 4.1 Submission and return of assessment The ability to adhere to deadlines is a highly desirable attribute that employers seek in our graduates. Right from the beginning, new students should acquire the habit of meeting deadlines for their work, by organising their study time appropriately. The following points apply to the submission of assessment 1. Extensions will be granted in cases of illness or personal issues (medical certificate/counsellor’s statement required). It is at the discretion of the subject co-ordinator/lecturer that extensions will be granted for inescapable, unexpected, documented work commitments (provide documentation). You should contact your lecturer before the due date if you are likely to require an extension. 2. Where no prior extension has been approved, late submissions will incur a penalty of 5% per day or part thereof. Weekends are treated as a single full day because university buildings are not usually accessible of over the weekend to allow for submission. Assessment tasks will generally not be graded after 14 days past the due date. 3. Assignments must be submitted to a Safe Assignment drop box on the subject site, LearnJCU. Students may not email or fax an assignment without prior approval from the Subject Coordinator/Lecturer. Submission could be required as Safe Assignment and in hard copy form. Internal students: Assessment items submitted in hard copy such as written assignment are to be submitted to the assignment box located as follows: • Townsville: College of Business, Building 27, Level 3 at top of spiral stairs in subject labelled box. • Cairns: College of Business, Building A1, Level 2, at drop box outside College Office room 209 Please ensure that you have attached the Business Assignment Coversheet and date stamped your assignment with the date stamp. A copy of the cover sheet is available online at: http://www.jcub.edu.au/students/subject-information.aspx The assignment boxes will be cleared at 5.00pm each day and the date/time stamp on each assignment will be checked. Any assignments received after the due date and time will be deemed to be -late- and will not be collected until 5.00pm the following working day. Please note that some lecturers may have specific assignment requirements and it is your responsibility to check these with your lecturer. 4. External/online students: assessment materials should be submitted through the Safe Assignment Drop Box on the subject site (LearnJCU). Assessments must be submitted by 5pm on the due date unless otherwise specified. 5. The assessment will be returned with feedback within 21 days of submission. Marked assessments with feedback will be provided to external/online students via email and to internal students in scheduled classes. 4.2 Plagiarism and referencing Plagiarism occurs when writers claim ownership of written words or ideas that are not their own. Plagiarism is a form of cheating and any instances of plagiarism will be dealt with promptly according to University procedures. Please see the JCU Student Academic Misconduct Requirements Policy http://www.jcu.edu.au/policy/student/rights/JCUDEV_005375.html Referencing is a systematic way of acknowledging the sources that you have used. Students should check out the very helpful online resources relating to academic writing, referencing and avoiding plagiarism at: • Writing and Maths Skills Online http://www-public.jcu.edu.au/learningskills/resources/wsonline/index.htm (In particular, the booklet Summarising, Paraphrasing & Avoiding Plagiarism is a very useful guide). • The Referencing Libguide http://libguides.jcu.edu.au/referencing • What is Plagiarism? http://www.jcu.edu.au/student/assessmentexams/JCU_090850.html 4.3 Important advice relating to examinations If you experience difficulties or serious circumstances before or up to the day of your exam, which you believe may affect your ability to sit the exam successfully or perform at your best, you can apply for special consideration in the marking of your exam. Please see the JCU Special Consideration, Supplementary, Deferred and Special Examinations Requirements http://www.jcu.edu.au/student/assessmentexams/ If you are unable to attend an exam at the scheduled time due to extenuating circumstances/circumstances beyond your control, you may apply for a deferred exam. Deferred exams are granted in exceptional circumstances such as severe medical conditions or family or personal trauma. For further information, visit http://www.jcu.edu.au/student/assessmentexams/JCU_096668.html 4.4 Student support James Cook University is committed to ensuring people with disabilities, injuries, illnesses or health conditions are able to participate to the fullest possible extent in the educational programs offered by the University and all other aspects of University life. Students with disabilities, injuries, illnesses or health conditions, who require special arrangements or consideration, should contact AccessAbility Services (see table below). Provide any additional campus-specific information relating to student support. If you want further information regarding: Visit the URL Accommodation Concierge Services, Ground Floor Careers and employment www.joblinx.com.au Counselling (Personal or Emotional Support) Email: June.Menzies@JCUB.edu.au Office: Level 9 or visit Concierge Services, Ground Floor to arrange an appointment Enrolment http://www.jcu.edu.au/student/enrolment/index.htm or Concierge Services, Ground Floor Feedback and complaints http://www.jcu.edu.au/student/complaints/index.htm Fees and financial support Finance Officer – Ground Floor Inclusion and engagement http://www.jcu.edu.au/studentequity/ Indigenous student support http://www.jcu.edu.au/getready4uni/life/JCU_117712.html Information for current students www.jcu.edu.au/student/ Learning skills/ Language support Language and Learning Centre – Room 801 Online Learning skills/ Language support http://www-public.jcu.edu.au/learningskills/ and Library (online) and computing services http://www-public.jcu.edu.au/libcomp/index.htm Librarians and library collection Resource Centre – Level 2 Responsibilities and rights http://www.jcu.edu.au/student/responsibilities/index.htm Review of Assessment and Student Access to Scripts and Materials Policy http://www.jcu.edu.au/policy/allitoz/JCUDEV_005333.html Special Consideration, Supplementary, Deferred and Special Examinations Requirements http://www.jcu.edu.au/policy/allitoz/JCUDEV_005344.html Student Academic Misconduct Requirements http://www.jcu.edu.au/policy/allitoz/JCUDEV_005375.html Student Policies http://www.jcu.edu.au/policy/student/ Student Council http://www.jcub.edu.au/students/student-services/student-council.aspx Students with a Disability Concierge Services, Ground Floor Students enrolled at JCUS, JCUB or BJUT should access support services provided on their campus. Section 5. Subject Calendar Week/ Date Topic Readings Related Assessment Workshop 1 Session 1: Introduction to nature of business and management research Session 2: Attributes of a good research topic Chapters 1, 2 Proposal 1 2 Session 3: Research design and reviewing the literature Session 4: Research ethics Chapters 5, 6 Proposal, Report 2 3 Session 5: Observation Session 6: Interviewing Chapters 9, 10 Proposal, Report 3 4 Session 7: Surveys and analysing quantitative data Session 8: Analysing qualitative data Session 9: Writing your report Chapters 11, 12, 13, 14 Proposal, Report 4 5 Formal consultations Hand in Proposal 5 Study week – no classes 6 Formal consultations 7 Formal consultations 8 Formal consultations 9 Formal consultations 10 Formal consultations Hand in Report Section 6. Assessment Criteria Sheets Proposal Rubric: Grading Criteria (30% of assessment) Levels of Achievement Mark Criteria Graduate certificate fail (8) Graduate certificate pass (8) MBA fail (9) Graduate certificate exceeds (8) MBA pass (9) P C MBA exceeds (9) D HD A Understands required current applied knowledge and practice and their application in the workplace CLO K1/SLO 1 Weight: 30% Fails to identify key historical knowledge and practice or does not explain relevance to the chosen organization, no link between proposal and organization Explains key historical knowledge and practice and their relevance to the chosen organization, tenuous link between proposal and organization Comprehensively explains key historical knowledge and practice and their relevance to the chosen organization Comprehensively explains and critically analyzes key historical knowledge and practice and their relevance to the chosen organization B Demonstrate the interrelationship between appropriate complex business knowledge and practice through direct application in the workplace CLO K1/SLO 1 Weight: 30% Project proposal fails to include research outline which draws any links between business knowledge and practice Proposal includes research outline explaining the relationships between business knowledge and practice Proposal has a design which comprehensively explains (using established concepts) the relationships between business knowledge and practice Through inclusion of established, appropriate concepts, the proposal comprehensively explains and critically analyzes the relationships between business knowledge and practice C Draw conclusions CLO K1/SLO 1 Weight: 20% Conclusions in the proposal are not linked logically to historical and contemporary knowledge and practice The proposal draws logical conclusions from historical and contemporary knowledge and practice Draws and explains logical conclusions from historical and contemporary knowledge and practice Draws and critically justifies conclusions from historical and contemporary knowledge and practice D Apply historical knowledge and practice in the workplace CLO K1/SLO 1 Weight: 20% Incomplete potential application of knowledge and practice in the chosen organization Applies historical knowledge and practice in a contemporary context in the chosen organization Effectively applies significant and relevant historical knowledge and practice in the chosen organization Produces a comprehensive application of significant and relevant historical knowledge and practice in the chosen organization and shows innovation in application Total /100 Practical or Research Report Rubric: Grading Criteria (70% of assessment) Levels of Achievement Mark Criteria Graduate certificate fail (8) Graduate certificate pass (8) MBA fail (9) Graduate certificate exceeds (8) MBA pass (9) P C MBA exceeds (9) D HD Explain and apply research concepts/techniques CLO S1/SLO 2, 3 Weight: 20% Fails to identify and apply research concepts/techniques in a business and professional context Explains and applies key research concepts/techniques in a business and professional context Comprehensively explains and applies key research concepts/techniques in a business and professional context Superior comprehensive explanation, application and critical analysis of key research concepts/techniques in a business and professional context Identify and obtain research data CLO S1/SLO 2, 3 Weight: 20% Fails to identify obtain relevant research data Identifies and obtains relevant research data or can demonstrate hypothetically Comprehensively identifies and obtains relevant research data or can demonstrate hypothetically Comprehensively identifies and obtains relevant research data from a range of sources and critically analyzes these sources for currency and reliability or can demonstrate hypothetically Analyze research data CLO S1/SLO 2, 3 Weight: 20% Fails to analyze research data logically and meaningfully Demonstrates robust knowledge of the research process and analysis techniques Demonstrates advanced knowledge of the research process, analysis techniques drawing appropriate conclusions Demonstrates superior knowledge of the research process, techniques critical, analysis and synthesis drawing appropriate conclusions Use clear and fluent written skills to effectively and appropriately communicate with an audience showing focus, purpose and knowledge of aims and objectives CLO S4/SLO 2, 3 Weight: 10% Report contains communication which is unclear with poor focus and purpose showing little knowledge of aims and objectives Report contains clear communication with some demonstration of focus, purpose and knowledge of aims and objectives Report contains clear communication is demonstrating sound focus, purpose and intent Report contains superior communication demonstrating excellence in knowledge of focus, purpose and intent Use clear and fluent written skills to effectively and appropriately communicate with an audience demonstrating logic, knowledge of context, theory, application, critical analyses and synthesis CLO S4/SLO 2, 3 Weight: 10% Report contains unclear communication with poor logic and context knowledge and no evidence of theory, application, critical analysis and synthesis Report contains clear communication with some demonstration of logic and context knowledge, some evidence of theory and application with minor evidence of critical analysis and synthesis Report contains clear communication demonstrating sound logic and context knowledge, robust evidence of theory and application with clear evidence of critical analysis and synthesis Report contains superior communication demonstrating excellence in knowledge of context, theory and application, critical analysis and synthesis Use clear and fluent written skills to effectively and appropriately communicate with an audience following a range of discipline-specific academic and/or professional conventions CLO S4/SLO 2, 3 Weight: 10% Report contains unclear communication and fails to demonstrate any discipline-specific academic and/or professional conventions Report contains clear communication with some demonstration of discipline-specific academic and/or professional conventions Report contains clear communication demonstrating sound adherence to discipline-specific academic and/or professional conventions Report contains superior communication demonstrating excellence in utilizing discipline-specific academic and/or professional conventions Use clear and fluent written skills to effectively and appropriately communicate with an audience adhering to fundamental syntax protocols, spelling and punctuation CLO S4/SLO 2, 3 Weight: 10% Report contains unclear communication with poor syntax, spelling and punctuation errors Report contains clear communication with some syntax, spelling and punctuation errors Report contains clear communication demonstrating a sound knowledge of writing mechanics, i.e. syntax, spelling and punctuation errors Report contains superior communication demonstrating excellence in knowledge and application of writing mechanics, i.e. syntax, spelling and punctuation errors Total /100 Section 7. WIL Plan and Industry Partner Report Forms WIL Plan WIL Details: Student Name: ………………………………………………………………………..… Name of Workplace: ……….………………………………………………………..…. Name of Supervisor: ……….……………………………………………………..…….. First Date of Placement: ……….……………………………………………………….. Days/Times for Placement: ….….……………………………………………………… Completion Date: ……………….….…………………………………………………… Student Checklist: I, …………………………………………………….. confirm that I have read the Student Placement Guidelines, completed and the Approval to Undertake Work Experience/Community Placement form. Signed: …………………………………………………… Dated: ……………………………………………………. Skills Audit: This

The post Subject Outline Subject Name: Practical or Research Project Subject Code: LB5 appeared first on graduate paper help.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Resource Tyre Company –II *Assignment 2 Question Research Proposal Developmen

Resource Tyre Company –II *Assignment 2 Question Research Proposal Development Prelude: The senior marketing manager of Resource Tyre Company, Jerry Bowman assigns the two marketing officers, James and Nadia, with the task of identifying the key information necessary to support their firm’s strategy of embarking in a new market segment, i.e., the 4-wheel drive tyres. In response, James and Nadia first develop a draft of the company’s marketing strategy which focuses on branding adventurism and establishing closer links with the field operators (i.e., adventure tourism car rental firms), which was subsequently approved by Jerry. To achieve their marketing strategy, James and Nadia further venture to identify that how they could measure the two variables ‘adventure branding’ and ‘closeness to field operators’. They determine that adventure branding is captured in terms of advertisement minutes and field operator perceptions of the company’s adventure focus on a sliding scale of 1-5. Closeness to field operators is captured by both the number of field operators in the company’s register and the number of marketing visits between the firm and the operators. To capture data on the above measures, James and Nadia developed a questionnaire and circulated the same among a random sample of 550 field operators within each state and Northern Territory in Australia (cluster sampling technique). The resultant response rate was excellent with close to 80% of the questionnaires filled out. Findings: The results suggested that Resource Tyre Company is currently viewed by the market as a “dependable and professional passenger car tyre supplier” with good value for money. Entering the new market segment would, according to the results, need an additional image as a “rugged and yet stylish 4-wheel drive tyre supplier”. To build that additional image, the results offered a list of factors that Resource Tyre Company must build, which in turn, will likely help the company to generate its targeted rate of market share (in terms of a sustained quantity of sales) in the new market segment. Among others, these factors include: adventure branding, product durability, servicing quality, and driving ease. The senior marketing manager now involves Trish McGregor, the newly recruited research specialist in the team with James and Nadia and asks the three of them to develop a formal research proposal to understand the role (in statistical terms, the degree of significance) played by each of the above-mentioned variables, among others that you may like to control. * Based on the Consolidated Learning Model©, this case-study is prepared by VG Sridharan as a topical extension of the first part prepared for Assignment 1. Intended only for the sole purposes of learning for the students of MAA753 unit at Deakin University. Assignment Insertion: August 22, 2015 Assignment Submission Due: September 21, 2015 (before 11.59 pm) The proposal must set out to draft the following: 1. State the research problem in a lucid paragraph of 200 words 2. Develop a theoretical framework that is relevant to the problem in about 400 words 3. Develop the relevant hypotheses in about 300 words 4. Identify the dependent, independent and other control variables in about 100 words 5. Determine and justify the choice of suitable measures for the variables in about 400 words 6. Identify what types of data are required in about 300 words 7. Describe where and how you will collect the data from, in about 300 words 8. Explain the planned sample selection process in about 300 words 9. Identify how you plan to organise the data (e.g., coding, merging) in about 300 words 10. Explain how you plan to analyse the data (software, types of tests) in about 300 words 11. Conclude by saying what you expect to learn from this project in about 100 words

The post Resource Tyre Company –II *Assignment 2 Question Research Proposal Developmen appeared first on graduate paper help.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

20% literature review consists of 2 sections Section 1 (2000 words) and Sect

20% literature review consists of 2 sections Section 1 (2000 words) and Section 2 (500 words) Both sections need to pasted into a single document and this document needs to be submitted to turnitin, Use APA referencing put the reference list for section 1 and 2 AFTER section 2. Since the assignment is being submitted to turnitin the reference list for all sections need to go at the end. Section 1 critical literature review on the topic of plagiarsm at university , Student are required to make the topic more specific so it is suitable literature review (2,000 words) Description of the Task: a review of the literature directly related to the topic of plagiarism at , followed by a critical analysis and discussion of how the literature addresses a particular NARROW research question, do the articles you have reviewed fail to address a major issue (describe the “gap” in the research) . You need to find 5 journal articles yourself, Use google scholar or EBSCO, *EBSCO’s find similar results feature is useful because you have to find articles about the same narrow topic refer to the instructions given in the powerpoint given on week 8 of moodle. Section 2, A short task to demonstrate you have actually read your literature review (500 words) description of the task. a) Read the examples on pages 3-5 of this document where students cheat and give a short description of how SOME students at KOI have the wrong attitude when attempting assignments and this attitude needs to be changed. b) If someone wanted to change the attitude of the students discussed in part (a) , Would they find the articles you discussed in your literature helpful? Explain why or why not c) If someone wanted to change the attitude of the students discussed in part (a), Is it possible they would find the new research you propose in your literature review helpful? Explain why or Why not? Refer to page 2 for the marking guide and refer to page 3 to 5 for the examples for section 2 Marking Guide: The following rubric will be used and the total mark scaled to a mark out of 20 80%-100% Full understanding of the topic and its importance to the broader context. Evidence of conceptually sophisticated thinking e.g. by inclusion of personal views, connections with other subject areas etc. Arguments supported by evidence and examples. Student will have consulted a wide range of appropriate sources (journal articles) . Appropriate referencing in a standard format with minimal errors. Excellent overall standard of presentation, exhibiting a high standard of English and clarity of expression. Appropriate use of fonts and effects. Rich, flowing text, pleasure to read with minimal errors. Appropriate separation of text into sections/sub-sections. Summarize all the results effectively for example use original tables and figures to summarize data from multiple sources to support an argument. 70%-79% Student will have demonstrated substantial understanding of the topic area and its place in the broader context. Critical evaluation and arguments supported by evidence and examples with some evidence of independent thinking, for example compare two of the articles, do the articles agree or disagree. Evidence of consulting a range of appropriate Sources (journal articles) which are appropriately referenced. No significant errors. High standard of presentation, exhibiting a good standard of English and clarity of expression. Appropriate use of fonts and effects. Writing is accurate 50%-59% Understanding of the topic demonstrated, but with limited evaluation of its importance. Restricted use of evidence and examples. Some errors. At least acceptable standards of English, but with ambiguities and awkward expression. Some attention to layout and formatting. References in text and bibliography correctly cited. Writing mostly accurate, but uninteresting. Less than 50% Limited understanding of the topic area. Frequent factual or other errors. Inadequate standard of presentation. Poor use of English and inappropriate use of fonts and effects. Writing has frequent ambiguities, errors of expression, verbose or too brief. Insufficient reading around the topic. Referencing contains errors. Almost no attempt to provide a logical structure, or consider layout and formatting. No evidence of independent thought Ist example of cheating from semester 1 2015 Part of a students assignment on plagiarism from semester 1 2015 is given below, Notice they clearly used an automatic paraphraser to change the words of another students assignment The student denied they use an automatic paraphraser and the student asked for a second change even though they were not entitled to one because it was clear that they did no work they just got another students assignment and used the computer to change the words. The following paragraph and references were taken from the cheaters essay. “The both article have diverse subject. The article by (Liao, M.T. & Tseng, C.Y., 2010) characterizes the why understudy do unoriginality. There are different explanations for this like absence of flawlessness in English, absence of comprehension the material, and their arrangement of instruction in back nation. Absence of certainty and deficiency of delivering force prompts duplicate the material. The issue behind the EFL written falsification is the flow looks into are not considering the individual esteem, their social, their fundamental training framework and their present perspectives about study and current style of living. Reference Liao, M. T., & Tseng, C. Y. (2010). Students’ Behaviors and Views of Paraphrasing and Inappropriate Textual Borrowing in an EFL Academic Setting.Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 187-211.” 2nd example of cheating from semester 1 2015 The student used a “business” to write the essay for them, many students do not think it is obvious, the student that submitted the essay thought it was good and was surpised they got caught cheating. For example the Huh, S. (2010). was about actual medical doctors accidentally plagiarising journal articles, The student claimed to do the work themselves and demanded to see the proof that they did not do the work themselves. To convince they student it was clear that they cheated a staff member to ask the student to explain the article Huh, S. (2010) and they could not. The student asked to be able to do the assignment again even though they did no work themselves and tried to make it look like they did. The following paragraph and references were taken from the cheaters essay. There are different reasons for plagiarism. The students faced the problems of plagiarism as in most of the cases, it has been observed that they have lack of bookish knowledge and they lacked the proper reasoning power behind doing any kind of research. They also lacked the proper attitudes behind doing any kind of researches (East, 2009).On the other hand, the other researchers like Fuqua et al.(2015), puts forward the fact that there have been constantly occurring the poor academic results by the students and therefore in that case and so it is ultimately leading to the problems of plagiarism. It has also been observed that the students are not confident enough to complete any kind of academic work that has been assigned to them and the competition among the students has been considered as one of the major issue of plagiarism. In many cases, it has been observed that the students have no proper grip over their own knowledge and language and therefore in that case, they fail to paraphrase the materials, which has been written in the content (Huh, 2010). Reference East, J. (2009). Judging plagiarism: a problem of morality and convention. High Educ, 59(1), pp.69-83. Fuqua, Jason, Votteler, Nancy K., and Gerber, Hannah R., (2015). Mitigating Plagiarism With English Language Learners Through Collaborative Writing Programs: A Review of the Literature. STEM Journal, 16(1), pp.153-169. Huh, S. (2010). Plagiarism. Journal of the Korean Medical Association, 53(12), p.1128. The reference the student could not explain is Huh, S. (2010). Plagiarism. Journal of the Korean Medical Association, 53(12), p.1128. ?????? ?? ??? ?? ??, ??, ??? ? ? ??? ????? ??? ???? ? ???? ????. ????? ??? ?? ????? ???? ? ?? ??? ?? ? ???? ?? ??? ? ??? ?? ?? ????. ????? ? ??? ?? ??? ? ?? ?? ?? ??? ?? ????. ???‘??? ????, ??, ???, ?? ?? ??? ???? ?? ?? ??? ? ??’? ???[1]. ? ??? ?? ???? ??? ? ? ?? ?? ??? ???? ?? ??? ????? ? ? ??? ?? ???. ???? KoreaMed? ?? ?? ??? 5.9%? ?????? ?? ??? ??[2]. ??? ??? ??? ????? ?? ?? ?? ???? ??? ?? ???? ??? ??. ???? ??? ?? ??? ??? ???? ???? ?? ??? ???? ??????? ? ?? ????. ???? ??? ???? ?? ??? ?? ?? ??? ?? ??? ??? ?? ?? ???. ? ??? ???? ?? ????? ??? ???? ??? ???? ?? ??? ?? ?? ????. ??? ????? ??????? ???? ??? ? ? ??? ?? ??? ?????. ?? ???????? ??? ??? ?? ???? ??? ??? ????? ? ?? ??? ??. ? ???? ?? ??? ?? ??? ? ? ??? ?? ???? ?? ??? ??? ??? ?? ????? ???? ??? ??? ?? ?? ?? ??? ? ?? ??? ???? ?? ?? ?????. ?? ?? ??? ???? ?, ??? ??? ? ?? ?? ??? ? ???? ??? ??? ???? ??? ?? ???[3]. ????? ??? ?? ??? ??? ??? ????? ???? ??. ??? ?? ?? ??? ??? ??? ? ?? ? ? ??? ??? ?? ????, ?? ?? ??? ? ??? ??? ??, ????? ??? ??? ??? ?? ??. ?? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ?? ?? ???? ??. ?? ??? ??? ?? ?? ??? ????? ????????? ??? ???? ???? ?? ? ??. ?? ???? ??? ??? ? ??? ?? ???? ?? ?? ??? ??. ???????? ??? ?? KoreaMed Synapse[4]? ???? ??? ??? ? ? ?? ?? ??? ???? Google?? ?? ???? ? ???? ??? ?? ????. ?? ?? ??? ??? ???????? ???? ? ? ??? ???? ?????? ??? ??? ? ?? ???. Abstract Plagiarism, the use of text and ideas from published works without proper permission or citation, is difficult to detect since the whole text should be searched and compared to literature databases. Nevertheless, this process has become simpler with the advent of web-based technologies and more powerful search tools. Recently, a case of plagiarism was detected in an invited manuscript submitted to the Journal of the Korean Medical Association. In the withdrawn manuscript, there were figures and figure legends copied from other papers with neither permission nor citation. Only the citation is enough to use content, figures, or tables from other papers when the original journal is open access with Creative Commons License. Otherwise, to use such data, it is essential to obtain permission from that paper’s journal publisher. If plagiarism is detected after publication, the author will face harsh disciplinary action before the office of research integrity in his or her institute. Also, the paper may be retracted by the editor. This is the first time that Editorial Board has detected plagiarism before publication. Screening for plagiarism and other ethical violations will continue so that we can pursue the status of the representative journal of Korean physicians and develop a positive reputation for Korean science internationally by maintaining the utmost quality and integrity in our publications

The post 20% literature review consists of 2 sections Section 1 (2000 words) and Sect appeared first on graduate paper help.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Pricing assignment

Pricing assignment

Assignment

For this assignment, you will be using the “Atlantic Computer: A Bundle of Pricing Options” case information. In the case, Jason Jowers identifies four pricing options: status-quo, competition-based, cost-plus, and value-in-use (pp. 5-6 of the case). Jowers has also identified a potential new customer, DayTraderJournal.com (DTJ), that would provide a good illustration of the impact of these pricing options.

Your pricing assignment is to calculate the total price Jowers should charge DTJ for each option, using an Excel spreadsheet. Be sure to carefully consider all the information given you in the case, along with the class discussion, notes, and hints below, in calculating each option.

Hints:

· All your pricing should be in terms of what DTJ would pay in total. As part of this, you may have to calculate the individual prices first.

· Tronn is Atlantic’s entry into the Basic Server market; Atlantic serves the High Performance market with their Radia model.

· Ontario’s Zink is the primary competitor for this business.

· Conservatively, 2 Tronns with PESA equals 4 Zinks. Use this assumption in your calculations.

· Assume that Tronn’s basic unit price is the direct and indirect cost of the Tronn plus the 30% profit margin, and does not include the cost of PESA.

· Footnote 5 on page 6 of the case includes valuable information for your cost-plus pricing analysis. Note that you will need to calculate the size of Atlantic’s market over three years as part of calculating the cost of PESA. Total market size, Atlantic’s assumed market share, attach rates (how many of the Basic they’ll sell with PESA vs. without), profit margin, and PESA development costs are provided in the case/footnote.

· Footnote 6 on page 6 provides valuable information for calculating the value-in-use price. Note that the number of years you will be using is different than the cost-plus analysis.

· Your value-in-use calculation should start with the maximum you could charge DTJ for the hardware plus customer savings. In making a price recommendation, however, you may wish to consider sharing the savings and not charging DTJ the maximum value-in-use price.

Format

You will submit your Excel spreadsheet using the Pricing Assignment link in the Assignments folder on Blackboard. The usual requirements for an Excel spreadsheet apply: it must be a “working” spreadsheet with formulas in any cells requiring calculations (no credit will be given if it’s not), and must be clearly laid out in an easy-to-understand format. Any assumptions or data that is not clear from the case should be annotated so the source of your data and calculations is clear.

Grading

The pricing assignment will be graded on Blackboard using the point distribution below. Your spreadsheet must demonstrate correct use of provided information, appropriate formulas, annotations of anything that might not be clear, and a readable and easy-to-understand format. Point values for each price calculation are:

· Status-quo – 10 points

· Competitive – 15 points

· Cost-plus – 30 points

· Value-in-use – 35 points

· Mechanics (clear, easy-to-read, properly annotated, with appropriate formulas) – 10 points

(S19)

The post Pricing assignment appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Recent Question/Assignment Research Paper 2 Due date: 21 September 2015 Val

Recent Question/Assignment Research Paper 2 Due date: 21 September 2015 Value: 30% Background This assessment item covers thechapters 5-8 of your textbook. In the previous assessment item you selected an organisation, and provided information on the current security state and made suggestions of improvements to their security. Use this organisation for this assessment item as well. Depending on the size of the organisation (small, medium, large) you are asked to assist in developing a security program. Reflect on the current roles and titles of the security personnel and make suggestions of improvements. Provide a plan to make these changes incorporating training requirements. Determine if the organisation uses any ISO security standards and provide reasoning which security model would be more suitable. Determine the suitability of certification. Justify by using threat identification and provide risk assessment for this organisation. As in the previous assessment item, please make sure NOT to divulge any sensitive information. If you are working for an organisation, use the internet to determine what information is available to the public. To protect security of the organisation, you are requested to invent the current security situation of this organisation. This will allow you to create a scenario that you can then use to apply your knowledge of the course material. Write a report in accordance to the recommendations of the links on the study desk. The word-count limit for the introduction, body and conclusion of this report is set at about 3000 words. Use five (5) or more resources for your citing and referencing in Harvard style. Submission requirements • Submit your word document through your study desk – a link will be available on the study desk. Marking criteria for research paper 2 – CIS8018 Student name: ___________________________ Student number: ____________________ Marks Structured development of report Logical flow leading the reader from start to finish on a clear path of addressing the assessment requirements; clear identification and description of current state; clearly leading into the solutions; application of correct report format. Excellent meets all the requires for this objective 21-30 Good work – minor issue 11-20 Requires more work 5-10 Very poor effort 0-5 Comment: /30 Depth of research/ critical reflection Reason to support findings: showing depth of understanding critical security issues of an organisation; being able to reason for the most suitable security model, training, roles to address these issues; showed depth of understanding threat identifications, ISO, model, etc. (chapter 1-4 concepts); selections of addition journal articles specifically address and support. Excellent meets all the requires for this objective 21-30 Good work – minor issue 11-20 Requires more work 5-10 Very poor effort 0-5 Comment: /30 Understanding of key ideas and concepts Understood the course material; able to identify key ideas and concept within a real life scenario of issues; able to explain an issue with the use of key ideas and concepts; able to relate own experience to course material and issue by introducing own perspective Excellent meets all the requires for this objective 21-30 Good work – minor issue 11-20 Requires more work 5-10 Very poor effort 0-5 Comment: /30 Evidence of support Citing and referencing: Correct within text Harvard citing; correct Harvard referencing; used more than five (5) sources (book, journal article, report, news article on the internet) in addition to the course text book. Excellent meets all the requires for this objective 9-10 Good work – minor issue 7-8 Requires more work 4-6 Very poor effort 0-3 Comment: /10 Total /100 General Comments:

The post Recent Question/Assignment Research Paper 2 Due date: 21 September 2015 Val appeared first on graduate paper help.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Encryption and Hashing Algorithms: Tools and Commands

Encryption and Hashing Algorithms: Tools and Commands

Due Week 3 and worth 100 points

The CIA and FBI have been working as a joint task force to unearth the meaning behind a vast amount of intercepted digital communiqué between two known operatives believed to be spies. They have recruited your company to assist with the decryption of these messages.

Part 1:

Write a paper in which you answer the following:

Before you start on this mission, both national organizations want to verify your ability to identify hash and encryptions standards. Answer the following questions, providing specific details for each topic:

Explain how to identify the type of hash, identifying a tool that can integrate with Linux and Windows so desktop users are able to verify hash values. Specify any online tools.

Describe the difference between RSA and ECDSA encryption algorithms and name a well-known product that uses each type of encryption. Be sure to cite your references.

Use at least three (3) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar websites do not qualify as quality resources.

Part 2:

Here is a useful online resource to help with your tasked assignment from the FBI. Using the following link, decrypt the random messages and put them together into a useful missive. Identify the hash type and rearrange the messages in logical order to assemble the message.

http://hashtoolkit.com/

Contact your supervisor (professor) to receive the communiqué, if it is not shared with you first .

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

Describe cryptology and its impact on cybercrime response.

Use technology and information resources to research issues in cybercrime techniques and response.

Write clearly and concisely about topics related to cybercrime techniques and response using proper writing mechanics and technical style conventions.

The post Encryption and Hashing Algorithms: Tools and Commands appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Assessment 3: Individual Research Paper 35% Due Date: END WEEK 14 Assessment

Assessment 3: Individual Research Paper 35% Due Date: END WEEK 14 Assessment Overview: Write an individual paper on a company in the textiles or fashion industry. You will apply various product development and production management tools, with the view of appraising the best structure and strategies for the organisation with a strong focus on sustainability and industry standards. Assignment instructions: This individual research paper will demonstrate the application of thorough research in all the aspects of product development, production management, quality assurance and quick response practices. Having chosen a company within the textiles or fashion industry, examine and appraise the product development and production management strategies. Include quality assurance strategies, quick response practices employed and sustainability systems as part of your appraisal and assessment. Reflect on these strategies and practices and assess in relation to the chosen company’s industry sector. Examine industry practices of quality management and sustainability systems and reflect on and assess your company’s practices against this industry benchmark. The following criteria will be considered and assessed: Choice of Label for Analysis page18image12792 Structure and flow of presentation page18image15864 page18image16768 Correct bibliography and referencing Thorough research from primary and secondary sources 5 page18image19504 Depth of topic, research and reference material 5 page18image22400 Examination and appraisal of the following systems: – Product development – Production management – Quality management – Quick response practices – Sustainability systems 10 Industry practices of production, quality, quick response and sustainability management within the chosen sector 5 page18image30720 Evaluation of company product management practices against industry benchmarks 10 TOTAL page18image35272 35 page18image36624 page18image37048 Unit Guide: Product development and Sustainability – HFB102 18 Ver.1.2 (Revised 2015)

The post Assessment 3: Individual Research Paper 35% Due Date: END WEEK 14 Assessment appeared first on graduate paper help.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"