Practicing What We Preach in Humanistic and Positive

Practicing What We Preach in Humanistic and Positive

psychologists but seem not to trouble positive psychologists. He similarly argued that they dif- fer in their epistemology because their adher- ents read separate literatures. Last, Waterman argued that their approaches to practical appli- cations differ in that humanistic psychothera- pies typically emphasize the value of working in the present, while positive psychotherapies typically emphasize using specific intervention techniques. Even if any of these generalizations might be true or somewhat true, how would they demonstrate irreconcilable differences rather than, more simply, just differences?

In fact, his last argument of irreconcil- able differences pertaining to practical appli- cations is especially curious, as Waterman (2013) illustrated his point with a specific intervention favored by positive psychology, namely, promoting mindfulness. However, focusing on experience in the present, which he attributed to humanistic psychology, is essentially the same as using mindfulness techniques (Friedman, 2010). There are other contradictions mentioned by Waterman, such as his linking the notion of a “true self” with positive psychology—and arguing that hu- manistic psychologists would reject this con- struct. In fact, the conjecture of a true self is central to many humanistic psychology the- ories (e.g., Friedman, 1983) and something I think most positive psychologists would, in- stead of accepting, soundly reject. In his dis- cussion of the true self, Waterman argued that integrating the humanistic and positive psychology perspectives would require rec- onciling in ways seldom attempted, as if rar- ity supports the contention that these are ir- reconcilable. Likewise, Waterman dismissed reconciling qualitative and quantitative re- search, despite admitting that they are com- plementary, by arguing that few psychology research efforts employ mixed methods, which again does not support that humanistic and positive psychology are incommensu- rate. Perhaps Waterman’s clinching argu- ment is that an integration of the two would require a desire on the part of humanistic and positive psychology researchers to address issues relevant to both sides of their divide. Once more, this surely does not support his central contention of an incommensurable di- vide, and, as a counterexample, I might men- tion that much of my recent research (e.g., Needham-Penrose & Friedman, 2012) has specifically been oriented to bridging this rift.

In conclusion, Waterman (2013) has provided some broad-brush generalizations about differences between humanistic psy- chology and positive psychology, many of which do not hold in all cases, and he has pointed out some difficulties that would be involved in reconciling them. However, he has not presented any convincing argument that the two are irreconcilable. Essentially,

Waterman has confounded difficulties with impossibilities by concluding these are in- commensurate. Worse, the founding of pos- itive psychology involved a political agenda in attacking its own precursor, and this article subtly continues that founding tradition. In contrast, humanistic psychology has tried to be conciliatory in the face of the lambasting given it by positive psychology, as exempli- fied by the plea of a prominent humanistic psychologist in an article aptly subtitled “Why Can’t We Just Get Along?” (Sch- neider, 2011). Although Waterman pro- claimed that humanistic and positive psy- chology should abandon hope for any reconciliation and, instead, should operate as independent silos, he offered only evidence that bringing them together would have some difficulties. I have argued elsewhere in great detail how these difficulties could be sur- mounted (e.g., Friedman, 2008, 2013), and in examining many of the same concerns as Waterman did, I drew the opposite conclu- sion, namely, that humanistic and positive psychology are commensurate and, for a va- riety of reasons, should be reconciled.

REFERENCES

Friedman, H. (1983). The Self-Expansiveness Level Form: A conceptualization and mea- surement of a transpersonal construct. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 15, 37–50.

Friedman, H. (2008). Humanistic and positive psychology: The methodological and epis- temological divide. The Humanistic Psy- chologist, 36, 113–126. doi:10.1080/ 08873260802111036

Friedman, H. (2010). Is Buddhism a psychol- ogy? Commentary on romanticism in “Mind- fulness in Psychology”. The Humanistic Psy- chologist, 38, 184 –189. doi:10.1080/ 08873267.2010.485899

Friedman, H. (2013). Reconciling humanistic and positive psychology: Bridging the cultural rift. Self & Society, 40(2), 21–25.

Needham-Penrose, J., & Friedman, H. (2012). Moral identity versus moral reasoning in reli- gious conservatives: Do Christian evangelical leaders really lack moral maturity? The Hu- manistic Psychologist, 40, 343–363. doi: 10.1080/08873267.2012.724256

Schneider, K. J. (2011). Toward a humanistic positive psychology: Why can’t we just get along? Existential Analysis, 22, 32–38.

Seligman, M. E., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduc- tion. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5

Waterman, A. S. (2013). The humanistic psycholo- gy–positive psychology divide: Contrasts in philosophical foundations. American Psycholo- gist, 68, 124–133. doi:10.1037/a0032168

Correspondence concerning this comment should be addressed to Harris Friedman, Depart- ment of Psychology, University of Florida, 1270

Tom Coker Road, LaBelle, FL 33935. E-mail: harrisfriedman@hotmail.com

DOI: 10.1037/a0034868

Practicing What We Preach in Humanistic and Positive

Psychology

Scott D. Churchill University of Dallas

Christopher J. Mruk Bowling Green State University

After presenting his assessment and some evidence concerning what may be under- stood as an insurmountable divide between them, Alan Waterman (April 2013) con- cluded that it is best for humanistic and positive psychologists to “look for those occasions on which mutual benefit is pos- sible, and get on with respective projects, with as few recriminations as possible coming from either side” (p. 131). Al- though such a recommendation may be preferable to some alternatives, there are at least two problems with this position. One is that there is more evidence for an opti- mistic conclusion than meets the eye in the Waterman article, and the other is that such a decidedly pessimistic position runs the risk of becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy.

It is true that the logical positivism un- derlying positive psychology is clearly and irrevocably at odds with the existential-phe- nomenological foundations of the humanistic position in their most radical or pure forms. However, it can also be argued that such differences largely occur at the theoretical level rather than at applied levels. Although the early founders of positive psychology took an unfortunately dismissive stance to- ward their humanistic forebears (Seligman & Csikszentmihalyi, 2000), what can be called “second-generation” positive psychologists are much more open to genuine dialogue with humanistic psychology (Mruk, 2013). For example, positive psychologists Linley and Joseph (2004) reached a conclusion very different from Waterman’s when they wrote,

Humanistic psychology is a broad church, and there are parts of it we would not recognize as positive psychology; but in our view, the ideas of the main humanistic psychology writ- ers . . . deserve to be set center stage within positive psychology. Theirs was an empirical stance, explicitly research based. . . . We ought to respect this lineage, and we encour- age those who are not familiar with this earlier work to visit it. (p. 365)

Similarly, although there certainly are hu- manistic and existential psychologists who sharply distinguish their work from the log-

T hi

s do

cu m

en t

is co

py ri

gh te

d by

th e

A m

er ic

an Ps

yc ho

lo gi

ca l

A ss

oc ia

tio n

or on

e of

its al

lie d

pu bl

is he

rs .

T hi

s ar

tic le

is in

te nd

ed so

le ly

fo r

th e

pe rs

on al

us e

of th

e in

di vi

du al

us er

an d

is no

t to

be di

ss em

The post Practicing What We Preach in Humanistic and Positive appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

psy 55555 module 2

psy 55555 module 2

psychologists but seem not to trouble positive psychologists. He similarly argued that they dif- fer in their epistemology because their adher- ents read separate literatures. Last, Waterman argued that their approaches to practical appli- cations differ in that humanistic psychothera- pies typically emphasize the value of working in the present, while positive psychotherapies typically emphasize using specific intervention techniques. Even if any of these generalizations might be true or somewhat true, how would they demonstrate irreconcilable differences rather than, more simply, just differences?

In fact, his last argument of irreconcil- able differences pertaining to practical appli- cations is especially curious, as Waterman (2013) illustrated his point with a specific intervention favored by positive psychology, namely, promoting mindfulness. However, focusing on experience in the present, which he attributed to humanistic psychology, is essentially the same as using mindfulness techniques (Friedman, 2010). There are other contradictions mentioned by Waterman, such as his linking the notion of a “true self” with positive psychology—and arguing that hu- manistic psychologists would reject this con- struct. In fact, the conjecture of a true self is central to many humanistic psychology the- ories (e.g., Friedman, 1983) and something I think most positive psychologists would, in- stead of accepting, soundly reject. In his dis- cussion of the true self, Waterman argued that integrating the humanistic and positive psychology perspectives would require rec- onciling in ways seldom attempted, as if rar- ity supports the contention that these are ir- reconcilable. Likewise, Waterman dismissed reconciling qualitative and quantitative re- search, despite admitting that they are com- plementary, by arguing that few psychology research efforts employ mixed methods, which again does not support that humanistic and positive psychology are incommensu- rate. Perhaps Waterman’s clinching argu- ment is that an integration of the two would require a desire on the part of humanistic and positive psychology researchers to address issues relevant to both sides of their divide. Once more, this surely does not support his central contention of an incommensurable di- vide, and, as a counterexample, I might men- tion that much of my recent research (e.g., Needham-Penrose & Friedman, 2012) has specifically been oriented to bridging this rift.

In conclusion, Waterman (2013) has provided some broad-brush generalizations about differences between humanistic psy- chology and positive psychology, many of which do not hold in all cases, and he has pointed out some difficulties that would be involved in reconciling them. However, he has not presented any convincing argument that the two are irreconcilable. Essentially,

Waterman has confounded difficulties with impossibilities by concluding these are in- commensurate. Worse, the founding of pos- itive psychology involved a political agenda in attacking its own precursor, and this article subtly continues that founding tradition. In contrast, humanistic psychology has tried to be conciliatory in the face of the lambasting given it by positive psychology, as exempli- fied by the plea of a prominent humanistic psychologist in an article aptly subtitled “Why Can’t We Just Get Along?” (Sch- neider, 2011). Although Waterman pro- claimed that humanistic and positive psy- chology should abandon hope for any reconciliation and, instead, should operate as independent silos, he offered only evidence that bringing them together would have some difficulties. I have argued elsewhere in great detail how these difficulties could be sur- mounted (e.g., Friedman, 2008, 2013), and in examining many of the same concerns as Waterman did, I drew the opposite conclu- sion, namely, that humanistic and positive psychology are commensurate and, for a va- riety of reasons, should be reconciled.

REFERENCES

Friedman, H. (1983). The Self-Expansiveness Level Form: A conceptualization and mea- surement of a transpersonal construct. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 15, 37–50.

Friedman, H. (2008). Humanistic and positive psychology: The methodological and epis- temological divide. The Humanistic Psy- chologist, 36, 113–126. doi:10.1080/ 08873260802111036

Friedman, H. (2010). Is Buddhism a psychol- ogy? Commentary on romanticism in “Mind- fulness in Psychology”. The Humanistic Psy- chologist, 38, 184 –189. doi:10.1080/ 08873267.2010.485899

Friedman, H. (2013). Reconciling humanistic and positive psychology: Bridging the cultural rift. Self & Society, 40(2), 21–25.

Needham-Penrose, J., & Friedman, H. (2012). Moral identity versus moral reasoning in reli- gious conservatives: Do Christian evangelical leaders really lack moral maturity? The Hu- manistic Psychologist, 40, 343–363. doi: 10.1080/08873267.2012.724256

Schneider, K. J. (2011). Toward a humanistic positive psychology: Why can’t we just get along? Existential Analysis, 22, 32–38.

Seligman, M. E., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduc- tion. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5

Waterman, A. S. (2013). The humanistic psycholo- gy–positive psychology divide: Contrasts in philosophical foundations. American Psycholo- gist, 68, 124–133. doi:10.1037/a0032168

Correspondence concerning this comment should be addressed to Harris Friedman, Depart- ment of Psychology, University of Florida, 1270

Tom Coker Road, LaBelle, FL 33935. E-mail: harrisfriedman@hotmail.com

DOI: 10.1037/a0034868

Practicing What We Preach in Humanistic and Positive

Psychology

Scott D. Churchill University of Dallas

Christopher J. Mruk Bowling Green State University

After presenting his assessment and some evidence concerning what may be under- stood as an insurmountable divide between them, Alan Waterman (April 2013) con- cluded that it is best for humanistic and positive psychologists to “look for those occasions on which mutual benefit is pos- sible, and get on with respective projects, with as few recriminations as possible coming from either side” (p. 131). Al- though such a recommendation may be preferable to some alternatives, there are at least two problems with this position. One is that there is more evidence for an opti- mistic conclusion than meets the eye in the Waterman article, and the other is that such a decidedly pessimistic position runs the risk of becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy.

It is true that the logical positivism un- derlying positive psychology is clearly and irrevocably at odds with the existential-phe- nomenological foundations of the humanistic position in their most radical or pure forms. However, it can also be argued that such differences largely occur at the theoretical level rather than at applied levels. Although the early founders of positive psychology took an unfortunately dismissive stance to- ward their humanistic forebears (Seligman & Csikszentmihalyi, 2000), what can be called “second-generation” positive psychologists are much more open to genuine dialogue with humanistic psychology (Mruk, 2013). For example, positive psychologists Linley and Joseph (2004) reached a conclusion very different from Waterman’s when they wrote,

Humanistic psychology is a broad church, and there are parts of it we would not recognize as positive psychology; but in our view, the ideas of the main humanistic psychology writ- ers . . . deserve to be set center stage within positive psychology. Theirs was an empirical stance, explicitly research based. . . . We ought to respect this lineage, and we encour- age those who are not familiar with this earlier work to visit it. (p. 365)

Similarly, although there certainly are hu- manistic and existential psychologists who sharply distinguish their work from the log-

T hi

s do

cu m

en t

is co

py ri

gh te

d by

th e

A m

er ic

an Ps

yc ho

lo gi

ca l

A ss

oc ia

tio n

or on

e of

its al

lie d

pu bl

is he

rs .

T hi

s ar

tic le

is in

te nd

ed so

le ly

fo r

th e

pe rs

on al

us e

of th

e in

di vi

du al

us er

an d

is no

t to

be di

ss em

in at

ed br

oa dl

y.

90 January 2014 ● American Psychologist

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08873260802111036
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08873260802111036
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08873267.2010.485899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08873267.2010.485899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08873267.2012.724256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08873267.2012.724256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0032168
mailto:harrisfriedman@hotmail.com
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0034868
ical positivism that underlies positive psy- chology (Taylor, 2001), there are a good number of us who actively welcome inte- grations of qualitative and quantitative methods in our work in order to better achieve our knowledge aims.

Contemporary humanistic psycholo- gists have made a sincere effort to enter into dialogue with positive psychologists, not only in our division programming, but also in the content of our publications. For example, since 2007 the American Psycho- logical Association’s Division 32 journal The Humanistic Psychologist has published 12 articles devoted to a dialogue with pos- itive psychology, which represents a re- spectable 10% of its article content. Two special issues devoted entirely to the inter- face between humanistic and positive psy- chologies have appeared (Vol. 36, No. 2, and Vol. 37, No. 1), in which one of the guest editors explicitly invited an open, friendly exchange, acknowledging that the editor-in-chief of the journal had “ex- pressed . . . our great obligation to set the right tone to genuinely foster the possibility of more conversation among humanistic and positive psychologists” (Robbins, 2008, p. 108). Waterman’s (2013) cautionary note that there is little evidence of interest on either side “to expand common ground” may therefore be more a reflection of personal opinion than a “philosophic divide” (p. 131).

There has been a noticeable in- crease in research and work on research methodology in contemporary humanis- tic psychology; thus Waterman’s (2013) assertion that “the five [sic] decades of work on humanistic psychology” has now “waned” (p. 131) is more than ques- tionable. The American humanistic move- ment began in the late 1930s; and, even if we have often been presumed by others to be “holders-on” to the legacy of our found- ing fathers, it has been our work in recent decades to forge ahead with an expanding philosophical foundation (which currently includes hermeneutics, social construction- ism, and feminist orientations in addition to classical humanism and phenomenology), with implications for becoming better ser- vice providers to those in need (see, e.g., Sass, Parnas, & Zahavi, 2011). In a review conducted of the past seven years of pub- lished articles in The Humanistic Psychol- ogist, there were 49 articles (42%) report- ing research and another 18 (or 15%) on research methodology, with several special “Methods” issues that have been devoted exclusively to research and methodology. Waterman (2013) was correct in observing that humanistic psychologists “are associ- ated with the extensive and rigorous use of qualitative methodologies” (p. 128). How- ever, research methods in humanistic psy-

chology are now, as they always have been, pluralistic. In the aforementioned sample, 69.3% of the research articles were quali- tative, 16.3% were quantitative, and 14.3% used mixed methods. Thus, with over 30% of our research articles utilizing quantita- tive methods, it is not reasonable to view humanistic psychologists as being too tied to our philosophical foundations to show interest in the “nomological” objectives of positive psychology.

With regard to philosophical founda- tions, Waterman’s (2013) presentation sig- nificantly misrepresented both the current and past ontological and epistemological foundations of humanistic psychology. Two very important issues require clarifi- cation: the characterization of the ontolog- ical foundation as irremediably individual- istic, and the implication drawn from this that it is not possible to know (or even communicate effectively with) other peo- ple from the existential epistemological standpoint, which presumably would limit us to “individual isolation and aloneness” (p. 127). With regard to the first point, Waterman exaggerated the relationship of humanistic psychology to the French exis- tential writers Sartre and Camus. More troubling, he mischaracterized phenomeno- logical philosophy (he named Husserl, Heidegger, and Merleau-Ponty—to which we would add Levinas) as hopelessly indi- vidualistic because of a presumed inherent solipsism built into its ontological founda- tion. On the contrary, we refer the reader here to the Handbook of Humanistic Psychology (soon to appear in a revised 2014 edition) for ample references to the consistent emphasis on human sociality and therapeutic commu- nication that would disavow such views.

A hallmark of phenomenology is its fundamental emphasis on relationality, be- ginning with Heidegger’s early lectures on Aristotle, in which he argued vehemently against the Cartesian starting point taken by other philosophers (including positiv- ists) and in favor of a “relational” philoso- phy that would direct us toward those as- pects of human existence that are always already grounded in “caring” and “encoun- ter” (Heidegger, 1921–1922/2001, pp. 61– 97). Husserl himself wrote thousands of pages on intersubjectivity, portions of which were published in the three volumes known as his “Intersubjectivity Papers” (Husserl, 1973). The works of Husserl and Heidegger on the fundamentally relational, intersubjective dimension of human expe- rience have informed the later phenomeno- logical ethics of Levinas, which emphasize human responsibility and accountability to others. Finally, Merleau-Ponty’s ontologi- cal reflections on “expression,” “institu-

tion,” and “history” would preclude any slippage into isolationism, and his concept of “the body as speech” further recognizes that communication between persons hap- pens quite spontaneously and is not ham- pered by existential isolation.

In closing, it is possible to make two points worth consideration within the con- straints of this comment. One is that shared interests, a growing dialogue, and coopera- tive attitudes between the two approaches will allow for a more fruitful future than the one that results from a distorting lens focused on philosophical, paradigmatic, and historical commitments. Second, being convinced that there is little likelihood of success in reaching across such borders is far more likely to cre- ate a self-defeating cycle—in contrast to the more virtuous process associated with a gen- uinely positive stance. Waterman’s (2013) conclusion would keep humanistic psychol- ogists locked in their past, as if their contri- butions were forever limited to those of the first generation of humanistic luminaries. On the contrary, the humanistic psychology movement continues to grow by enlarging its dialogue not only with the phenomenological and hermeneutic philosophies but also with the ongoing developments in transpersonal, feminist, constructivist, and mainstream psy- chological thought.

With a largely backward glance cast toward humanistic psychology’s early suc- cesses, Waterman’s (2013) article con- cluded by turning toward positive psychol- ogy’s “vibrant” future and pointed to irreconcilable differences that would limit further dialogue between the two fields. From our perspective, such an assessment results in premature closure on the relation- ship between the two subdisciplines, as we in the humanistic tradition continue to ap- preciate and place our trust in the power of dialogue. Psychologists on both sides of this epistemological boundary might there- fore benefit from focusing on the possibil- ities offered by an interface between the two approaches rather than on a divide that is far more likely to push us apart.

REFERENCES

Heidegger, M. (2001). Phenomenological inter- pretations of Aristotle: Initiation into phenom- enological research (R. Rojcewicz, Trans.). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. (Original lecture course presented 1921–1922 and published 1985)

Husserl, E. (1973). Husserliana 13, 14, 15: Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität [To- wards a phenomenology of intersubjectivity]. The Hague, The Netherlands: Martinus Ni- jhoff. (Original works written 1905–1935)

Linley, P. A., & Joseph, S. (Eds.). (2004). Pos- itive psychology in practice. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. doi:10.1002/9780470939338

T hi

s do

cu m

en t

is co

py ri

gh te

d by

th e

A m

er ic

an Ps

yc ho

lo gi

ca l

A ss

oc ia

tio n

or on

e of

its al

lie d

pu bl

is he

rs .

T hi

s ar

tic le

is in

te nd

ed so

The post psy 55555 module 2 appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Personality Theory at Work in Popular Media

Personality Theory at Work in Popular Media

Prior to beginning work on this discussion, please read the required Churchill and Mruk (2014), Hayes (2012), and Waterman (2013) articles, and review the APA’s Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct Links to an external site. and Chapters 14 through 17 in your textbook.

For this discussion, you will choose a person who has an important presence in popular media today. This person might be a political, business, human rights, education, or entertainment figure. Examine the major theoretical approaches studied in the class so far (psychodynamic, behavioral, learning, trait and type, and humanistic). Briefly describe your chosen figure’s personality from the point of view of each of these five approaches. Evaluate and describe any cultural considerations which may affect the personality assessment within each of the given approaches. Analyze the ethical implications of basing your personality assessment on the information available through the popular media. Select the theoretical approach you think best describes the person and elaborate on his or her personality using this approach.

The post Personality Theory at Work in Popular Media appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

“Ending Slavery Through Disunion”

“Ending Slavery Through Disunion”

Please respond to the following:

Investigate the degree to which the Missouri Compromise and the Fugitive Slave Act propelled the United States to Civil War. Provide specific examples of both the significant impediments to African-Americans’ service in the Civil War as well as the primary areas in which these soldiers excelled.

Give your opinion of the fundamental reasons why Lincoln issued the Proclamation, and outline the major reasons why the Proclamation did not apply to all areas of the United States. Speculate on the extent to which Lincoln’s vision of freedom for the freed people aligned with those of black soldiers and philosophers of the day. Provide a rationale for your response.

The post “Ending Slavery Through Disunion” appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

waist circumference-Nutrition recommendations and interventions

waist circumference-Nutrition recommendations and interventions

Nutrition Recommendations and Interventions for Diabetes A position statement of the American Diabetes Association

AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION

M edical nutrition therapy (MNT) isimportant in preventing diabetes,managing existing diabetes, and preventing, or at least slowing, the rate of development of diabetes complications. It is, therefore, important at all levels of di- abetes prevention (see Table 1). MNT is also an integral component of diabetes self-management education (or training). This position statement provides evi- dence-based recommendations and inter- ventions for diabetes MNT. The previous position statement with accompanying technical review was published in 2002 (1) and modified slightly in 2004 (2). This statement updates previous position statements, focuses on key references published since the year 2000, and uses grading according to the level of evidence available based on the American Diabetes Association evidence-grading system. Since overweight and obesity are closely linked to diabetes, particular attention is paid to this area of MNT.

The goal of these recommendations is to make people with diabetes and health care providers aware of beneficial nutri- tion interventions. This requires the use of the best available scientific evidence while taking into account treatment goals, strategies to attain such goals, and changes individuals with diabetes are willing and able to make. Achieving nu- trition-related goals requires a coordi- nated team effort that includes the person with diabetes and involves him or her in the decision-making process. It is recom- mended that a registered dietitian, knowl- edgeable and skilled in MNT, be the team member who plays the leading role in providing nutrition care. However, it is

important that all team members, includ- ing physicians and nurses, be knowledge- able about MNT and support i ts implementation.

MNT, as illustrated in Table 1, plays a role in all three levels of diabetes-related prevention targeted by the U.S. Depart- ment of Health and Human Services. Pri- mary prevention interventions seek to delay or halt the development of diabetes. This involves public health measures to reduce the prevalence of obesity and in- cludes MNT for individuals with pre- diabetes. Secondary and tertiary prevention interventions include MNT for individuals with diabetes and seek to prevent (sec- ondary) or control (tertiary) complica- tions of diabetes.

GOALS OF MNT FOR PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF DIABETES

Goals of MNT that apply to individuals at risk for diabetes or with pre-diabetes To decrease the risk of diabetes and car- diovascular disease (CVD) by promoting healthy food choices and physical activity leading to moderate weight loss that is maintained.

Goals of MNT that apply to individuals with diabetes 1) Achieve and maintain

● Blood glucose levels in the normal range or as close to normal as is safely possible

● A lipid and lipoprotein profile that re- duces the risk for vascular disease

● Blood pressure levels in the normal

range or as close to normal as is safely possible

2) To prevent, or at least slow, the rate of development of the chronic complica- tions of diabetes by modifying nutrient intake and lifestyle 3) To address individual nutrition needs, taking into account personal and cultural preferences and willingness to change 4) To maintain the pleasure of eating by only limiting food choices when indicated by scientific evidence

Goals of MNT that apply to specific situations 1) For youth with type 1 diabetes, youth with type 2 diabetes, pregnant and lactat- ing women, and older adults with diabe- tes, to meet the nutritional needs of these unique times in the life cycle. 2) For individuals treated with insulin or insulin secretagogues, to provide self- management training for safe conduct of exercise, including the prevention and treatment of hypoglycemia, and diabetes treatment during acute illness.

EFFECTIVENESS OF MNT

Recommendations ● Individuals who have pre-diabetes or

diabetes should receive individualized MNT; such therapy is best provided by a registered dietitian familiar with the components of diabetes MNT. (B)

● Nutrition counseling should be sensi- tive to the personal needs, willingness to change, and ability to make changes of the individual with pre-diabetes or diabetes. (E)

Clinical trials/outcome studies of MNT have reported decreases in HbA1c (A1C) of �1% in type 1 diabetes and 1–2% in type 2 diabetes, depending on the duration of diabetes (3,4). Meta- analysis of studies in nondiabetic, free- living subjects and expert committees report that MNT reduces LDL cholesterol by 15–25 mg/dl (5,6). After initiation of MNT, improvements were apparent in 3–6 months. Meta-analysis and expert committees also support a role for lifestyle modification in treating hypertension (7,8).

● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●

Originally approved 2006. Revised 2007. Writing panel: John P. Bantle (Co-Chair), Judith Wylie-Rosett (Co-Chair), Ann L. Albright, Caroline M.

Apovian, Nathaniel G. Clark, Marion J. Franz, Byron J. Hoogwerf, Alice H. Lichtenstein, Elizabeth Mayer- Davis, Arshag D. Mooradian, and Madelyn L. Wheeler.

Abbreviations: CHD, coronary heart disease; CKD, chronic kidney disease; CVD, cardiovascular disease; DPP, Diabetes Prevention Program; FDA, Food and Drug Administration; GDM, gestational diabetes mel- litus; MNT, medical nutrition therapy; RDA, recommended dietary allowance; USDA, U.S. Department of Agriculture.

DOI: 10.2337/dc08-S061 © 2008 by the American Diabetes Association.

P O S I T I O N S T A T E M E N T

DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 31, SUPPLEMENT 1, JANUARY 2008 S61

ENERGY BALANCE, OVERWEIGHT, AND OBESITY

Recommendations ● In overweight and obese insulin-

resistant individuals, modest weight loss has been shown to improve insulin resistance. Thus, weight loss is recom- mended for all such individuals who have or are at risk for diabetes. (A)

● For weight loss, either low-carbohy- drate or low-fat calorie-restricted diets may be effective in the short term (up to 1 year). (A)

● For patients on low-carbohydrate diets, monitor lipid profiles, renal function, and protein intake (in those with ne- phropathy), and adjust hypoglycemic therapy as needed. (E)

● Physical activity and behavior modifi- cation are important components of weight loss programs and are most helpful in maintenance of weight loss. (B)

● Weight loss medications may be con- sidered in the treatment of overweight and obese individuals with type 2 dia- betes and can help achieve a 5–10% weight loss when combined with life- style modification. (B)

● Bariatric surgery may be considered for some individuals with type 2 diabetes and BMI �35 kg/m2 and can result in marked improvements in glycemia. The long-term benefits and risks of bariatric surgery in individuals with

pre-diabetes or diabetes continue to be studied. (B)

The importance of controlling body weight in reducing risks related to diabe- tes is of great importance. Therefore, these nutrition recommendations start by considering energy balance and weight loss strategies. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute guidelines define overweight as BMI �25 kg/m2 and obe- sity as BMI �30 kg/m2 (9). The risk of comorbidity associated with excess adi- pose tissue increases with BMIs in this range and above. However, clinicians should be aware that in some Asian pop- ulations, the proportion of people at high risk of type 2 diabetes and CVD is signif- icant at BMIs of �23 kg/m2 (10). Visceral body fat, as measured by waist circumfer- ence �35 inches in women and �40 inches in men, is used in conjunction with BMI to assess risk of type 2 diabetes and CVD (Table 2) (9). Lower waist cir- cumference cut points (�31 inches in women, �35 inches in men) may be ap- propriate for Asian populations (11).

Because of the effects of obesity on insulin resistance, weight loss is an im- portant therapeutic objective for individ- uals with pre-diabetes or diabetes (12). However, long-term weight loss is diffi- cult for most people to accomplish. This is probably because the central nervous sys- tem plays an important role in regulating energy intake and expenditure. Short- term studies have demonstrated that

moderate weight loss (5% of body weight) in subjects with type 2 diabetes is associ- ated with decreased insulin resistance, improved measures of glycemia and li- pemia, and reduced blood pressure (13). Longer-term studies (�52 weeks) using pharmacotherapy for weight loss in adults with type 2 diabetes produced modest re- ductions in weight and A1C (14), al- though improvement in A1C was not seen in all studies (15,16). Look AHEAD (Ac- tion for Health in Diabetes) is a large Na- tional Institutes of Health–sponsored clinical trial designed to determine if long-term weight loss will improve glyce- mia and prevent cardiovascular events (17). When completed, this study should provide insight into the effects of long- term weight loss on important clinical outcomes.

Evidence demonstrates that struc- tured, intensive lifestyle programs involv- ing participant education, individualized counseling, reduced dietary energy and fat (�30% of total energy) intake, regular physical activity, and frequent participant contact are necessary to produce long- term weight loss of 5–7% of starting weight (1). The role of lifestyle modifica- tion in the management of weight and type 2 diabetes was recently reviewed (13). Although structured lifestyle pro- grams have been effective when delivered in well-funded clinical trials, it is not clear how the results should be translated into clinical practice. Organization, delivery, and funding of lifestyle interventions are all issues that must be addressed. Third- party payers may not provide adequate benefits for sufficient MNT frequency and time to achieve weight loss goals (18).

Exercise and physical activity, by themselves, have only a modest weight loss effect. However, exercise and physi- cal activity are to be encouraged because they improve insulin sensitivity indepen- dent of weight loss, acutely lower blood glucose, and are important in long-term maintenance of weight loss (1). Weight loss with behavioral therapy alone also has been modest, and behavioral ap- proaches may be most useful as an ad- junct to other weight loss strategies.

Standard weight loss diets provide

Table 1—Nutrition and MNT

Primary prevention to prevent diabetes: Secondary prevention to prevent complications: Tertiary prevention to prevent morbidity and mortality: ● Use MNT and public health interventions in those with obesity and pre-diabetes

● Use MNT for metabolic control of diabetes ● Use MNT to delay and manage complications of diabetes

Table 2—Classification of overweight and obesity by BMI, waist circumference, and associ- ated disease risk

BMI (kg/m2) Obesity

class

Disease risk*

WC: men �40 inches; women �35 inches

WC: men �40 inches; women

�35 inches

Underweight �18.5 Normal 18.5–24.9 Overweight 25.0–29.9 Increased High Obesity 30.0–34.9 I High Very high

35.0–39.9 II Very high Very high Extreme obesity �40 III Extremely high Extremely high

*Disease risk for type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and CVD. Adapted from ref. 9. WC, waist circumference.

Nutrition recommendations and interventions

S62 DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 31, SUPPLEMENT 1, JANUARY 2008

500–1,000 fewer calories than estimated to be necessary for weight maintenance and initially result in a loss of �1–2 lb/ week. Although many people can lose some weight (as much as 10% of initial weight in �6 months) with such diets, without continued support and follow- up, people usually regain the weight they have lost.

The optimal macronutrient distri- bution of weight loss diets has not been established. Although low-fat diets have traditionally been promoted for weight loss, two randomized controlled trials found that subjects on low-carbohy- drate diets lost more weight at 6 months than subjects on low-fat diets (19,20). Another study of overweight women randomized to one of four diets showed significantly more weight loss at 12 months with the Atkins low-carbohy- drate diet than with higher-carbohy- drate diets (20a). However, at 1 year, the difference in weight loss between the low-carbohydrate and low-fat diets was not significant and weight loss was modest with both diets. Changes in se- rum triglyceride and HDL cholesterol were more favorable with the low- carbohydrate diets. In one study, those subjects with type 2 diabetes demon- strated a greater decrease in A1C with a low-carbohydrate diet than with a low- fat diet (20). A recent meta-analysis showed tha t a t 6 months , low- carbohydrate diets were associated with greater improvements in triglyceride and HDL cholesterol concentrations than low-fat diets; however, LDL cho- lesterol was significantly higher on the low-carbohydrate diets (21). Further research is needed to determine the long-term efficacy and safety of low- carbohydrate diets (13). The recom- mended dietary allowance (RDA) for digestible carbohydrate is 130 g/day and is based on providing adequate glu- cose as the required fuel for the central nervous system without reliance on glu- cose production from ingested protein or fat (22). Although brain fuel needs can be met on lower-carbohydrate di- ets, long-term metabolic effects of very- low-carbohydrate diets are unclear, and such diets eliminate many foods that are important sources of energy, fiber, vita- mins, and minerals and are important in dietary palatability (22).

Meal replacements (liquid or solid prepackaged) provide a defined amount of energy, often as a formula product. Use of meal replacements once or twice daily

to replace a usual meal can result in sig- nificant weight loss. Meal replacements are an important part of the Look AHEAD weight loss intervention (17). However, meal replacement therapy must be con- tinued indefinitely if weight loss is to be maintained.

Very-low-calorie diets provide �800 calories daily and produce substantial weight loss and rapid improvements in glycemia and lipemia in individuals with type 2 diabetes. When very-low-calorie diets are stopped and self-selected meals are reintroduced, weight regain is com- mon. Thus, very-low-calorie diets appear to have limited utility in the treatment of type 2 diabetes and should only be con- sidered in conjunction with a structured weight loss program.

The available data suggest that weight loss medications may be useful in the treatment of overweight individuals with and at risk for type 2 diabetes and can help achieve a 5–10% weight loss when combined with lifestyle change (14). Ac- cording to their labels, these medications should only be used in people with dia- betes who have BMI �27.0 kg/m2.

Gastric reduction surgery can be an effective weight loss treatment for obesity and may be considered in people with di- abetes who have BMI �35 kg/m2. A meta- analysis of studies of bariatric surgery reported that 77% of individuals with type 2 diabetes had complete resolution of diabetes (normalization of blood glu- cose levels in the absence of medications), and diabetes was resolved or improved in 86% (23). In the Swedish Obese Subjects study, a 10-year follow-up of individuals undergoing bariatric surgery, 36% of sub- jects with diabetes had resolution of dia- betes compared with 13% of matched control subjects (24). All cardiovascular risk factors except hypercholesterolemia improved in the surgical patients.

NUTRITION RECOMMENDATIONS AND INTERVENTIONS FOR THE PREVENTION OF DIABETES (PRIMARY PREVENTION)

Recommendations ● Among individuals at high risk for de-

veloping type 2 diabetes, structured programs that emphasize lifestyle changes that include moderate weight loss (7% body weight) and regular physical activity (150 min/week), with dietary strategies including reduced calories and reduced intake of dietary

fat, can reduce the risk for developing diabetes and are therefore recom- mended. (A)

● Individuals at high risk for type 2 dia- betes should be encouraged to achieve the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) recommendation for dietary fi- ber (14 g fiber/1,000 kcal) and foods containing whole grains (one-half of grain intake). (B)

● There is not sufficient, consistent infor- mation to conclude that low–glycemic load diets reduce the risk for diabetes. Nevertheless, low– glycemic index foods that are rich in fiber and other important nutrients are to be encour- aged. (E)

● Observational studies report that mod- erate alcohol intake may reduce the risk for diabetes, but the data do not sup- port recommending alcohol consump- tion to individuals at risk of diabetes. (B)

● No nutrition recommendation can be made for preventing type 1 diabetes. (E)

● Although there are insufficient data at present to warrant any specific recom- mendations for prevention of type 2 di- abetes in youth, it is reasonable to apply approaches demonstrated to be effec- tive in adults, as long as nutritional needs for normal growth and develop- ment are maintained. (E)

The importance of preventing type 2 diabetes is highlighted by the substan- tial worldwide increase in the preva- lence of diabetes in recent years. Genetic susceptibility appears to play a powerful role in the occurrence of type 2 diabetes. However, given that popu- lation gene pools shift very slowly over time, the current epidemic of diabetes likely reflects changes in lifestyle lead- ing to diabetes. Lifestyle changes char- acterized by increased energy intake and decreased physical activity appear to have together promoted overweight and obesity, which are strong risk fac- tors for diabetes.

Several studies have demonstrated the potential for moderate, sustained weight loss to substantially reduce the risk for type 2 diabetes, regardless of whether weight loss was achieved by life- style changes alone or with adjunctive therapies such as medication or bariatric- surgery (see ENERGY BALANCE section) (1). Moreover, both moderate-intensity and vigorous exercise can improve insulin

Position Statement

DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 31, SUPPLEMENT 1, JANUARY 2008 S63

sensitivity, independent of weight loss, and reduce risk for type 2 diabetes (1).

Clinical trial data from both the Finnish Diabetes Prevention study (25) and the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) in the U.S (26) strongly support the potential for moderate weight loss to reduce the risk for type 2 diabetes. The lifestyle intervention in both trials em- phasized lifestyle changes that included moderate weight loss (7% of body weight) and regular physical activity (150 min/week), with dietary strategies to reduce intake of fat and calories. In the DPP, subjects in the lifestyle inter- vention group reported dietary fat in- takes of �34% of energy at baseline and 28% of energy after 1 year of interven- tion (27). A majority of subjects in the lifestyle intervention group met the physical activity goal of 150 min/week of moderate physical activity (26,28). In addition to preventing diabetes, the DPP lifestyle intervention improved several CVD risk factors, including dsylipidemia, hypertension, and in- flammatory markers (29,30). The DPP analysis indicated that lifestyle inter- vention was cost-effective (31), but other analyses suggest that the expected costs needed to be reduced (32).

Both the Finnish Diabetes Preven- tion study and th

The post waist circumference-Nutrition recommendations and interventions appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

2 Page Summary

2 Page Summary

You are required to find and summarize two scholarly articles from peer reviewed journals: 2 pages APA format 12 font.

Type 2 diabetes:

One which describes the nature of the problem

One which describes an approach or approaches to solve the problem, i.e. health promotion interventions to address this problem

I attached the Articles and I named each one according to the step

attachment
Interventionfortheproblem.pdf
attachment
TheProblem.pdf

The post 2 Page Summary appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

North korea-Summarize the reading that are uploaded in the files in 750 words minimum.

North korea-Summarize the reading that are uploaded in the files in 750 words minimum.

DEAR LEADER

Poet) Spy) Escapee- A Look Inside North Korea

Jang Jin-sung

Translated by Shirley Lee

371NK ATRIA

NEW YORK· LONDON· TORONTO· SYDNEY· NEW DELHI

•371NKATR IA BOOKS A Division of Simon & Schuster, Inc. 1230Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10020

Copyright II:> 2014 by lang lin-sung

All rights reserved. including the right to reproduce this book or portions thereof in any form whatsoever. For information, address Atria Books Subsidiary Rights Department, 1230 Avenue of the Americas. New York. NY 10020.

First 37 lnkl Atria Books hardcover edition May 2014

37INI:. I ATR IA SOCKS and colophons are trademarks of Simon & Schuster, Inc.

For information about special discount’s for bulk purchases, please contact Simon & Schuster Special Sales at 1-866-506-1949 or business@simonandschuster.com.

The Simon & Schuster Speakers Bureau can bring authors to your live event. For more information or to book an event, contact the Simon & Schuster Speakers Bureau at 1-866-248-3049 or visit our website at www.simonspeakers.com.

Front cover photographs © Getty Images

Manufactured in the United States of America

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2

Library of Congress Cataloging- in -Publication Data

jang, lin-sung. Dear Leader: poet, spy, escapee: a look inside North Korea! Jang lln-sung ;

translated by Shirley Lee. pagescm 1. [ang, [in-sung. 2. Korea (North)-Politics and government-1994-201 L

  1. Kim, Chong-il, 1942-2011. 4. Propaganda-Korea (North). 5. Political refugees-Korea (North)-Biography. 6. Poets-Korea (North)-Biography.
  2. Korea (North)-Biography. 1. Title. DS935.7773.j36A32014 951.9305’1092-dc23 [B1 2014010236

ISBN 978-1-4767-6655-3 ISBN 978-1-4767-6657 -7 (ebook)

CONTENTS

Map vii Prologue lX

PART ONE: DICTATOR

1 Psychological Warfare 3 2 Going Home 25 3 My Hometown Transformed 41 4 The Crime of Peering over the Border 60 5 A Farewell Sin 73 6 In the Rifle Sight 84

PART TWO: FUGITIVE

1 Yanbian Looks to the World, the World to Yanbian! 95 2 Framed for Murder 106 3 “Annals of the Kim Dynasty” 125 4 Criminal Operations 142 5 North Korean Women Sold as “Pigs” 161 6 At a Loss 178 7 Farewell, Young-min 190

vi I DEAR LEADER PART THREE: FREEDOM

1 From Yanji to Shenyang 205

2 A Fateful Meeting with Wang Cho-rin 224

3 Becoming a Piano Teacher 239

4 The Kim [ong-il Strategy 252

5 Meeting Cho- rins “Intended” 266

6 A Murderous Regime 281

7 Long Live Freedom! 293

Epilogue 309

Afterword 315

Translator’s Note 319

Glossary 323

Index 325

-Changchun

CHI N A

-Shenyang

NORTH KOREA

ePyongyang

f,’ ====~l~okmso I SOUTH

__ l::.:oo~m:ls~~,~3~~e~K~llOREASeoul

o

May 1999 PROLOGUE

ALITTLE after midnight, just as I’m settling into bed, the phonebegins to ring. I decide not to answer before the fifth ring, and hope it will stop before then. When it rings a sixth time, I imagine my parents waking up, disturbed, and I pick up. I am ready to give whoever is on the other end a good telling-off. “Hello?” In the silent house my voice sounds more intrusive than

the ringing phone. “This is the first party secretary.” At these words, I jerk upright and jar my skull against the

headboard. “I am issuing an Extraordinary Summons. Report to work by one

a.m. Wear a suit. You are not to notify anyone else.” Although in this country we are accustomed to obeying even

the strangest command as a matter of course, it’s disconcerting that the first party secretary himself has just given me an order. He is the Central Party liaison for our department. Under normal circumstances, I would expect to receive orders from the party secretary of Division 19 or Section 5, in keeping with my position in the party’s organizational hierarchy. On top of that, he has used the term “Extraordinary Summons:’ , This usually refers to the mobilization of troops. When the United

States and South Korea perform joint military exercises on the Korean peninsula, our nation responds by conducting nationwide mobilization drills. The call to take part in these is referred to as

x I DEAR LEADER

an “Extraordinary Summons:’ But we are usually notified through deliberate leaks in advance of such a call. Individual Workers’ Party units and sections, under fierce pressure to outperform their rivals, are always seeking to gain an edge: employees of those well connected enough to be in the know remain at work on the specified day, reporting for duty ahead of those who unwittingly went home for the evening. However, if this were a standard military mobilization summons,

I would not have been asked to wear a suit. We cadres who belong to the Central Party, unlike ordinary North Koreans attached to regional or departmental Party branches, know that an “Extraordinary Summons’ can also lead to an encounter with Kim Iong-il, our “Dear Leader.” When someone is summoned to meet him, there is no advance

notification. Not even the highest-ranking generals are made awareof the operational details of these meetings. An invitation to meet Kim is relayed through a first party secretary, who is summoned to a party committee room that has been placed under lockdown by the Dear Leader’s personal bodyguards. Under their close surveillance, the first party secretary receives a list of names and issues the individual summons for each cadre, with the logistics of the encounter carried out in strict secrecy. In this situation, the term “Extraordinary Summons’ is the code phrase that sets this clandestine process in motion. But the same phrase can have a third, more perturbing meaning.

The Ministry of State Security uses it when carrying out secret purges of high-ranking officials. On receiving an “Extraordinary Summons’ at night, a cadre might leave his house alone, taking care not to wake his family, before disappearing into a prison camp or being executed. Thankfully, I am confident that the third scenario will not apply to

me. In fact, I can’t wait to leave the house. Only a few days ago, the first party secretary dropped a subtle hint of glory to come.

PROLOGUE I xi

As instructed, I put on my best suit and tie. In Pyongyang, there are no taxis available after midnight, and motor vehicles must have a special night license to travel after this time. So although it is pitch dark outside, I hop on my bicycle and pedal to work. Bicycles are one of the main forms of transport, but unlike most bikes, mine is brand new and has been specially shipped to me by a relative stationed overseas. Outside, there are no streetlights lit. The silence of the capital city

is so absolute that I can only sense the presence of passers-by before their dark shapes loom into my vision. The electricity supply is in a perpetual state of emergency, even though there are two power stations serving the city. The ageing Pyongyang Thermoelectric Plant was built with Soviet support in 1961, and the East Pyongyang Thermoelectric Plant was built in 1989, but neither produces enough power to supply more than one district of the city at a time. So, like a roaming ghost, power settles in rotation on sections of Pyongyang for about four hours a day. One area of the city is always bright, though: the Ioong-gu area,

which lies at the heart of Pyongyang. This is where Central Party offices, senior cadres’ residential areas, and buildings for foreigners, such as the Koryo Hotel, are located. My workplace, Office 101 of the United Front Department (UFD), lies at the heart of this bright central district. Nearing the compound, I notice that it is more brightly lit than usual, with the grounds as well as the usual guard posts lit up. As I enter the gates, I exclaim to myself, “Yes!I am going to meet the General!” In the courtyard stand thirty or more soldiers dressed in the dark

mustard -colored uniform of the Dear Leader’s personal guards. They wear the characteristic X-shaped leather harness that supports a pistol on each side. Three beige Nissan vans with curtained windows are parked one behind the other, each big enough for a dozen passengers. The party secretary for South Korean Affairs greets

xii I DEAR LEADER

me in person, beside whom the prestige of the first party secretary, who phoned me earlier, pales in comparison. He leads me toward a two-star general with a clipboard, who seems to be supervising the operation. The other soldiers refer to the man as Comrade Deputy Director.

After briefly looking me up and down, the general barks, “Stand him over there!” I look over to where he ispointing and see the nation’s most senior cadres in the sphere of inter- Korean relations standing in line: the party secretary for South Korean Affairs Kim Yong-sun, UPD First Deputy Director Im Tong-ok, UPD Policy Director Chae Chang-guk, UPD Policy Deputy Director Park Young-su, and two other cadres from the Department for the Peaceful Unification of the Homeland. The atmosphere is tense, and with six powerful men standing in line like schoolchildren, I feel uncomfortable about greeting them. I go to stand at the end of the line.

“Are we meeting the General?” As I whisper to the man in front of me, a voice yells, “Don’t talk! Understand?”

I look indignantly at the soldier, about to demand that he speak to me in a more respectful way, but the vicious light in his eyes quickly puts me in my place.

One by one, Comrade Deputy Director checks our identification documents against his list. We climb in silence into the middle vehicle according to our position on the list. We take our assigned seats. The soldier who yelled at me for whispering is the last to step into the van. I’d thought he had treated me condescendingly because I am only in my twenties, but now I hear him speaking in a rude, officious manner even to Central Party cadres who are twice his age.

“Don’t open the curtains! Don’t get out of your seat! Don’t talk!” he barks. Even more alarming than his insolence is the fact that my comrades meekly reply, “Yes, sir.” Even Kim Yong-sun and Im Tong-ok, two of the most senior cadres in the country, are lowly men in the presence of the Dear Leader’s personal guards.

PROLOGUE I xiii

Through the open door of the van, I watch the remaining soldiers scramble into the other two vehicles. Soon, the door is pulled shut and the engine starts. As the van begins its journey, my stomach churns with anxiety, but I know that an encounter with the Dear Leader is a wondrously momentous event. Thick brown curtains seal off the windows and separate us from

the driver. Unable to see out of the van, I begin to feel a little carsick. After a two-hour journey in silence, and much to my relief, we finally arrive at a railway station. It is around 4 a.m. We climb out of the van and as I regain my bearings I realize we have come to Yongsung, a First Class station. In a population of over 20 million, there have only been two First Class Citizens: Kim II-sung and Kim Iong-il, First Class stations are reserved exclusively for their use, and there are dozens of these stations scattered across the country. The station roofs are camouflaged in green to make them difficult to spot through satellite imagery. At ground level, the buildings are unmarked, but heavily armed guards patrol them and they are enclosed by high walls. Yongsung Station is in the northern outskirts of Pyongyang,

usually less than half an hour away from where we began our journey. I recognize my surroundings because I have passed by the place on several occasions. At first, I’m puzzled that it has taken so long to get here, but I can’t suppress a grin when I realize that the vans have tried to confuse us by taking a deliberately circuitous route. As we move from the van to a train, we go through another series of identity checks. The special train reserved for this occasion is different from

ordinary trains. The sides of the carriage are painted grass green and the roof is white. From the outside, the markings suggest that it was made in China: above the door handles the word “Beijing” is painted in bright red Chinese characters. But when I step into the carriage, I spot prominent Mitsubishi logos that betray its true origin in Japan. The seats in the carriage have been replaced by single beds and

xiv I DEAR LEADER

I

“III

everything is arranged open-plan, presumably so that the guards can keep watch over us.

As at the start of the journey, the rules are barked out: “Don’t touch the curtains. There are blankets under the beds. Remain in your bed throughout the journey. Sleep until the train comes to a stop. Notify us if you wish to use the toilet. Break any of these rules and you’ll be removed from the train-immediately.”

The guard takes care to put added emphasis on that final word. I feel that if I make one wrong move, I might be thrown off this train and out of my privileged existence altogether. During the long night ride no one speaks a word, not even to ask to use the toilet. There is only the sound of the train rattling along the tracks. I close my eyes and count the rhythmic beats, trying hard to fall asleep.

The special train dispatched for just seven civilians comes to a halt at around six in the morning. We have stopped at Galma, a First Class station in Gangwon province. When I step down from the carriage, the cool dawn air on my face is refreshing. I realize how tense I’ve been in the presence of the soldiers. Policy Director Chae Chang-guk elbows me as he overtakes me and flashes a grin. He’s like a child, unable to contain his excitement.

We are transferred once again, to another waiting van. After an hour’s drive, again in silence, we climb out at a small pier surrounded on all sides by cement barriers, where we board a waiting launch. The waves lap gently, but the brackish smell of seawater is overwhelming.

The boat starts with a lurch and a deafening roar as the engine sparks into life. A moment later, I absorb the fact that I am on a boat for the first time in my life. It accelerates recklessly, seemingly intent on tossing me into the waves. I lean forward to hold on to the railing, but a soldier suddenly puts his arms around me from behind and pins down my hands. A shiver runs down my spine. I tell myself that the closer we get to the Dear Leader, the stronger must be our show of faith in him. I glance around and see that each of the six other

PROLOGUE I xv

passengers is similarly held in place by a soldier acting as a human safety belt. Staring back into the distance, where the two strands of white foam in our wake merge into one continuous stream, I shout at the top of my voice over the engine’s roar, “Is this a Navy boat?” My guard smirks, even as his forehead wrinkles with the effort of

understanding what I am trying to say above the racket of the engine. “The Navy? Hah! The Navy doesn’t have a boat as speedy as this. This one’s ours. It belongs to the Guards Command. It’s pretty fast, isn’t it?” The Guards Command is responsible for the protection of Kim’s household. It comprises one hundred thousand infantry, seamen, and pilots. Although he has to shout, I notice how my guard has abandoned

his officiousness and talks conversationally, perhaps because we are speaking without an audience. This makes me feel a little more at ease. The boat is very fast: a cap blows off the head of one of the guards and flies off into the sea, where it lands on the water. I watch it grow smaller among the waves and then disappear. After about twenty minutes, we slow down near a tree-covered

island. I wonder if we have been going round in circles within a small area, just as we had done on the journey to Yongsung Station. The bow of the boat drops and the island comes into clear view. From the pristine wharf to the manicured woods on either side of the pavement, everything is spotless. It looks as though the place was completed yesterday. I realize I had been expecting to find our Dear Leader waiting for us on the pier with wide-open arms, just as he does in the revolutionary movies. It is a bit startling to see that no one is here to greet us. The guards lead us to a large hut, where we take our seats in a

room that is about three-fifths of a square mile. We are told to remain silent. Everything is white: the chairs, the floor, the walls. There are no windows. Instead, there are squares of green-tinged light shining from built-in wall panels.

I

xvi I DEAR LEADER

At half past noon, more than four hours after we arrived on the island, there is a sudden burst of activity around us. Guards wearing white gloves spray something onto the chair where the Dear Leader will sit.

Comrade Deputy Director makes us stand in line again. We are ordered to take off our watches and hand them in, as part of the security procedure. Each of us is then handed a small envelope. The outer packaging has Japanese characters printed on it. Inside, there is a small cotton wipe that smells of alcohol. Comrade Deputy Director instructs us: “You must clean your hands before shaking hands with the General.” He then comes forward, singling me out for a stern instruction: “You must not look into the General’s eyes.” He gestures to the second button of his uniform jacket and says, “You must look here. Understand?”

I wonder whether this is intended to impress on me my inferiority to Dear Leader, but the thought quickly passes. We continue to wait as Comrade Deputy Director finalizes seating arrangements. Again, I’m at the back of the line. There are seven civilians in the room, and more than twenty guards around us. We stand rigidly, staring in silence at a pair of closed gates for perhaps ten more minutes. They are large and white, and decorated with gilded flowers.

When the gates finally open, a guard with the rank of colonel marches through and stands to attention. “The General will now enter the room,” he announces.

Everyone and everything turns to stone. Keeping my head still, I focus my gaze on a point halfway up the arch where Kim·Jong-irs face will soon appear.

Another minute seems to pass. Unexpectedly, a small white puppy tumbles into the room. It is a Maltese with a curly coat. An old man follows, chasing after the puppy that belongs to him. We raise our voices in unison to salute Dear Leader.

“Long live the General! Long live the General!” Our combined cheer hurts my eardrums, but the puppy is

PROLOGUE I xvii

unperturbed by the noise, probably used to such fanfare. However, the Dear Leader must be pleased that his puppy has shown such courage, because he bends down to stroke it. He then mutters something into its ear. I feel let down when I see the Dear Leader up close, because I

am confronted by an old man who looks nothing like the familiar image of the People’s Leader. Even though we are clapping fervently and cheering for him, he doesn’t respond or even seem to notice. He continues to play with his puppy, as if resentful of being surrounded by men who are younger than him. Seeming to read my mind, he looks up and my heart skips a beat. As ifwe had all been waiting for this moment, we cheer even more loudly. “Long live the General! Long live the General!” He glances round the room, then strides in my direction. I prepare myself for the glorious encounter, but he walks straight

past me, halting before a slogan displayed on the wall behind us. In yellow letters on a red background, it reads: Let’s Serve Great Leader Comrade Kim long-it by Offering up our Lives! He calls out, “Kim Yong-sun!” Party Secretary Kim Yong-sun

hurries to his side. Kim Iong-il asks him, “Is this hand-painted? Or is it printed?” In this close proximity, his voice indeed belongs to a great leader. Every syllable resonates with absolute authority. Seeing Kim Yong-sun falter, the comrade deputy director answers

in his place: “Sir, it’s hand-painted.” Kim Jong-il says, “This looks good. When I went somewhere last

week, I saw slogans printed on enamel. But this hand-painted one looks much better, don’t you think?” This time, Kim Yong-sun is ready with his answer. “Yes,sir, I agree.

In fact, I already made inquiries about this. But I was informed that we will continue to produce enameled slogans, as hand-painted slogans require the use of costly imports.” Kim Iong-il ignores him. He steps back a few paces, inspects the

slogan for a few more seconds, and gives an order with a quick wave

xviii I DEAR LEADER

;’1

of his hand: “Replace existing versions of this slogan throughout the country with hand-painted ones.”

I attempt some mental arithmetic. How much would this project cost? At that very moment, the General wheels round, catching me off guard, and thunders, “You, boy! Are you the one who wrote that poem about the gun barrel?”

I bark my carefully worded response: “Yes,General! I am honoured to be in your presence!”

He smirks as he approaches me. “Someone wrote it for you, isn’t that right? Don’t even think about lying to me. I’ll have you killed.”

As I begin to panic, the Dear Leader bursts into hearty laughter and punches me on the shoulder. “It’s a compliment, you silly fool. You’ve set the standard for the whole Songun era.”

I find myself unable to respond, and it doesn’t help that Kim Yong-sun is glaring at me. Before the General takes his seat, Kim Yong-sun finds an opportunity to scold me. “You stupid bastard. You should have thanked him. You should have responded by offering to write poems of loyalty even from your grave,” he hisses into my ear.

When he is done with me, he puts his joyous face back on and rushes to attend to Kim Iong-il. Returning to his own seat, he gently smoothes his hands over his buttocks before they touch the chair, just as a woman does with her dress as she sits down. The other cadres are no less formal. Instead of real people sitting on chairs, it is as if sculptures are set around the room, incapable of movement. The Dear Leader’s Maltese puppy is the most active being in the room, whimpering excitedly and pacing around its owner’s feet.

Kim Iong-il seems not to be interested in small talk and the white Maltese puppy holds his attention. The General remains focused on what the dog is doing, what it might be thinking. But every now and then he shouts, “Hey, Im Tong-okl” or “Hey, Chae Chang-guk!” and the chosen man rushes toward him to be consulted. It makes for a strange scene, in which he holds the puppy in higher esteem than any of his most loyal men.

I

PROLOGUE I xix

Ten or fifteen minutes later, a pair of double doors opens. Men in white dinner jackets and red bow ties appear with salvers held high. At the other end of the room technicians are bent double, humbly moving to and fro on the stage, adjusting the microphone and lighting. The band are seated and strike up; the feast is about to begin. I can’t help but feel it’s all a bit of an anticlimax, having expected to hear a sublime new saying or pearl of wisdom from the Dear Leader. But as the food and music get under way, I lose myself in the occasion. I become mesmerized. Every time a new course is brought into the room, the lights in the

wall panels change to an eerie new color. When the vegetable dish comes out, the lights go from a vivid grass green to light purple; with the meat dish, the lights go from pink to a deep red. It is astonishing to discover that lighting can be part of a meal’s presentation. As for the fish course, the platter it is presented on glitters so spectacularly that I can’t taste the food. Tiny spotlights are set around the big gray serving platter, making the fish scales shimmer. The wine is slightly tangy. My steward, who like all Kim Iong-ils

staff belongs to the Guards Command and has a military rank, points to a label on the bottle that reads Baedansul. He describes its contents as an 80 percent-proof liquor developed by the Foundational Sciences Institute. This is the academic body devoted to the study of the Dear Leader’s health, and as such also falls under the Guards Command. Three thousand researchers work there, planning and preparing medicines and dishes specifically designed to extend Kim Iong-ils longevity. In order to test the effects of different medicines and foods, they operate a testing unit made up of men selected from a nationwide pool that shares his illnesses and physique. I am proud to understand more than most about this important work, as a friend’s older brother works at the institute. The climax of our banquet is dessert. I am presented with a glass

containing a large scoop of ice cream, over which the steward pours clear liquor. He lights the spirit and the flames dance blue and wild.

xx I DEAR LEADER

‘I II I’

I I

As I scoop some of it up with a small spoon, flames rise with it. Kim Yong-sun taps me on the shoulder and advises me, “Blow it out first, then eat it. Don’t have too much, though. It’s very strong stuff.” He shares the information boastfully.

I lose myself momentarily in the contradictory sensations of heat and cold in my mouth. Then Kim Iong-il waves me over.

When you visit the house or workplace of a cadre who has had the privilege of attending a banquet hosted by the Dear Leader, the wineglass that clinked against his in a toast is always kept in pride of place in a display cabinet. I realize that the Dear Leader wants to provide me with such a treasure. The steward, who has been lingering close by for this moment, quickly hands me a large wineglass. Unprepared, I hastily take it over to Kim Iong-il, who fills it with dark red wine, saying, “Keep up the good work.”

As I stand bent double at the waist in a deep bow, my eyes cast down, I can see his feet under the tablecloth. He has taken off his shoes. Even the General suffers the curse of sore feet! I had always thought him divine, not even needing to use the toilet. That’s what we were taught at school and that’s what the party says: our General’s life is a continuous series of blessed miracles, incapable of being matched even by all our mortal lifetimes put together. With this glorious invitation into his circle, I had thought I would enter and partake of a divine dimension in time.

But here I am, looking into his shoes, which have high heels and an inner platform at least two and a half inches high. Those shoes have deceived his people. Although his thin, permed hair adds to the illusion of height, the Dear Leader can’t be more than five feet three inches without those shoes.

After his earlier majestic commands, the way the General speaks at the table confounds me too. He uses coarse slang. In all the books and lectures quoting his words that I’ve read and heard since my childhood, his words serve not only as examples of perfect usage, but also reveal the truth of our homeland. The Dear Leader’s speech is

PROLOGUE I xxi

always elegant, beautiful, and, above all, courteous to his people. Yet tonight he muddles subject and predicate. He doesn’t even call anyone Comrade, but addresses cadres as “You!” or “Boy!” It’s disconcerting. Towards the end of dessert, the colored lights dim. A woman

appears onstage wearing a Western-style white dress that reveals her shoulders. The band starts to play an instrumental prelude, and she begins to sing a Russian folk song. As she sings, Kim Iong-il starts to twitch. Although the spotlight

is on the woman, the protocol of the occasion dictates that we should focus our attention on him alone. We watch as he draws out a gleaming white handkerchief. I blink, and the cadre sitting next to me reaches for his own handkerchief. Oddly, others also begin to withdraw their handkerchiefs. Then the General bows his head a little and starts dabbing at the corners of his eyes. I cannot believe what I am seeing. Here am I, beholding his tears! What will become of me after witnessing such an intimate thing? My eyes shut tight in awe and terror. When I open them, I see the most extraordinary thing I have

ever seen in my life. My comrades, who have been beaming with the joy of feasting with the Dear Leader, have begun to weep; How did this happen? Can I escape this banquet with my life intact? But before I can think any further, my own eyes feel hot and tears begin to flow down my cheeks. Yes, I must cry. I live my life in loyalty to the General. Loyalty not merely in thought and deed, but loyal obedience from my soul. I must cry, like my comrades. As I repeat these words in my heart, I must cry, I must cry,my tears grow hotter, and anguished shouts burst from somewhere deep within me. Amid my uncontrollable shaking, the song comes to an end. There

is no applause, but the room has filled with the sound of wailing. As the lights are slowly turned up, our crying quickly diminishes to whimpers, as if we had practiced together in advance. Wiping my eyes, I glance round, to look at the faces of the cadres

around me. They were crying only moments ago, but they are now

I I xxii I DEAR LEADER

watching the Dear Leader intently, awaiting instructions for the next act of synchronicity. For the first time in my life, loyal obedience makes me cringe.

On my journey back home, I find myself haunted by seeing the General cry. I am aware that North Korea’s Propaganda and Agitation Department chose to portray him as full of tears after his father Kim II-sung’s death in 1994, when the state distribution system fell apart all over the country. By early 1995, the rumors that people were starving to death in the provinces were made plausible by what was happening in Pyongyang itself.

When food distribution centers started shutting their doors and the numbers of people absconding from work to find food increased like a virus, the party slogan “If you survive a thousand miles of suffering, there will be ten thousand miles of happiness” was introduced. The state of food emergency was officially referred to as the “Arduous March” and the population was urged to follow the example set by our General, at the forefront of the struggle.

As evidence, the song “The Rice Balls of the General” was played over and over again on television. The song’s lyrics claimed that the Dear Leader was traveling hundreds of miles around the country each day to offer support to his people, all while sustained by just one rice ball. Before the Arduous March, television broadcasts had only ever shown the smile of our Leader, as he led us towards a socialist victory. So when they saw the tears of our divine Dear Leader for the first time on television, people began to cry spontaneously, uncontrollably, and en masse.

As I continue on my way homewards, I am profoundly unsettled by my reaction to seeing Kim Jong-il’s tears in the flesh. A distressing thought grips me, and it is hard to shake off: those were not the tears of a compassionate divinity but, rather, of a desperate man.

PART ONE

DICTATOR

,

!

II I , ,

II

PSYCHOLOGICAL 1 WARFARE

IWAS loyal and fearless. I didn’t have to live in terror of theconsequences of being late for work. Nor did I need to keep my head down like other cadres in an attempt to be invisible at Party meetings, for fear of becoming the next target of criticism. I had immunity, thanks to the Dear Leader, who had sanctified me after being moved by a poem I wrote in his honor. The world might damn North Korea as a ruthless regime that

kills its own people, claiming that the system is oppressive and run by physical force. But this is only a partial view of how the country is governed. Throughout his life, Kim long-il stressed, “I rule through music and literature.” Despite being the commander in chief of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) and chairman of the National Defense Commission, he had no military experience. In fact, he began his career as a creative professional, and his preparation for his succession to power began with his work for the party’s Propaganda and Agitation Department (PAD). To express this in the language of “dictatorship’ understood by the

outside world, Kim Iong-il wielded a double-edged sword: yes, he was a dictator by means of physical control, but he was also a dictator in a more subtle and pervasive sense-through his absolute power over the cultural identity of his people. As with socialism, where ideology is more important than material goods, he monopolized the media and the arts as a crucial part of his ambit of absolute power. This is why every single writer in North Korea produces works according

4 I DICTATOR

to a chain of command that begins with the Writers’ Union Central Committee of the Party’s Propaganda and Agitation Department. Anyone who composes a work that has not been assigned to

the writer through this chain of command is by definition guilty of treason. All written works in North Korea must be initiated in response to a specific request from the Workers’ Party. Once the writer has handed in his piece, it must then be legally approved before being accepted as a new work. Those writers who produce distinguished works under these standards are of course rewarded. The role of a North Korean writer, in each set task, is to create the best articulation of the assigned idea according to a combination of aesthetic requirements determined in advance and in consultation with the Workers’ Party. It is not the job of a writer to articulate new ideas or to experiment with aesthetics on his or her own whim. There are no novels, histories, or biographies that have not been commissioned and then ratified by the ruling Kim. Literature thus plays a central role not only in North Korean arts

but also in the social structure of the country. Before 1994, when Supreme Leader Kim ll-sung was alive, the art of the novel was preeminently in vogue. Nearly all the top state honors such as the “Kim ll-sung Medal:’ the “Order of Heroic Effort:’ and the title of “Kim II-sung Associate” were swept up by the state’s novelists. The novel provided a perfect narrative format through which writers might expound upon the great deeds of the Supreme Leader.

It also helped that in his last years, Kim ll-sung lived immersed in the world of novels. He took special interest in works written by novelists belonging to the April 15 Literary Production Group, a First Class literary institution whose mandate is the revolutionary history of Kim Il-sung and Kim Iong-il. As is the case with First Class train stations, the term “First Class” is incorporated into the job title of the nation’s professionals who work only on matters directly related to the Kim family. In fact, Kim ll-sung’s own memoir, With the Century,

PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE I 5

was compiled by a group of First Class novelists from the April 15 Literary Production Group. In elite circles, the memoir was known as one of Kim Il-sungs favorite books. Once, at a gathering of North Korean cadres who had family connections in Japan, Kim II-sung described, to the amusement of his guests, how much he enjoyed reading With the Century. After his death, and as his son Kim Iong-ils rule became established in the institutions of the state, the status of novelists changed. Poetry became the literary vogue. This was not due solely to Kim Iong-ils preference for the form. The phenomenon was reinforced, if not triggered, by a shortage of paper when the North Korean economy collapsed and people scrambled just to survive. When there wasn’t even enough paper in the country to print school textbooks, not many people could afford to own a hefty revolutionary novel. With poetry, however, the necessary tenets of loyalty to the Kim dynasty could be distilled potently into a single newspaper page. Thus poetry emerged as the dominant literary vehicle through which Kim Iong-il exercised his cultural dictatorship. With the decrease in the number of novelists, and an increase in

demand for poetry and poets, a more stringent professional hierarchy was needed. Epic poets write long poems, lyric poets write shorter ones; and this generic distinction came to determine a poet’s rank, although only the Workers’ Party could decree which genre a poet might adopt and which poets might be permitted the honor of praising Kim Iong-il through poetry. The epic genre of Kim Iong-il poetry in particular was restricted to just six poets, who were also the poets laureate of North Korea. At the age of twenty-eight, in 1999, 1 became the youngest of this tiny elite of court poets. Based on age and experience alone, I had accomplished the impossible. Unlike my fellow poets, however, I was also an employee of the United Front Department -a job that allowed me entry into a world completely unknown to most ordinary North Koreans, where I was given access not only to state secrets, but to a world that lay far beyond the mandate of the Workers’ Party.

6 I DICTATOR

The United Front Department (UFD) is a key section in the Workers’ Party, responsible for inter-Korean espionage, policy- making and diplomacy. Since 1953, Korea has been divided by an armistice line known as the Korean Demilitarized Zone (DMZ), held in place by military force on each side. The division of the Korean peninsula is not based on a difference in language, religion, or ethnicity, but on a difference in political ideology. The North Korean version of socialism, founded as it is on the maintenance of absolute institutional unity, regards pluralism and individual determination as its greatest enemy. The Workers’ Party has therefore been active and diligent in psychological warfare operations aimed at Koreans in both the North and the South for over half a century.

Entrusted to this most sanctified mission, I worked in Section 5 (Literature), Division 19 (Poetry) of Office 101. In spite of the uncanny and unintended echo of Orwell’s Room 101, this office was, ironically, so named precisely in order to avoid any hint of the nature of our work. The institution had been established in 1970, and the ratification from Kim II-sung had been issued on October 10, hence Office “10l:’

When it was first set up, my department specialized in conducting psychological warfare operations against and about the South through cultural media such as the press, literary arts, music, and film. After the 1970s, it strove particularly to amplify anti-American sentiment and foster pro-North tendencies among the South Korean population, exploiting the democratic resistance movements that had risen against the then military dictatorship. Work produced here was circulated under the names of South

Korean publishers, and even took on their distinctive literary style, preferred fonts, and quality and weight of paper. In music too, the styles of instrumental and vocal arrangements were copied from South Korean recordings. Books and cassettes produced in this way were systematically distributed by our department through

, I

I”

I

PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE I 7

pro-North organizations in Japan or through other Southeast Asian nations, and passed on to democratic resistance movements in South Korea. My department in this way sowed the seeds of what might at first appear to be a political paradox: even today, sympathy towards the DPRK among South Koreans is almost entirely concentrated within the democratic, progressive and anti -authoritarian camp of the nation’s political divide. Just as on a beach, wearing a swimsuit is more appropriate than

a business suit, in the spirit of being faithful to the South Korean context, the institutional slogan of the UFD was “Localization:’ We were required to absorb the character and identity of South Koreans. My first day at work in Office 101, and therefore my entry into its South Korean bubble, was August 12, 1998. I was twenty-seven and never more proud of myself than that day, as I stepped into the secret world of the UFD. My office was in the built-up neighborhood of Ryunghwa District

in Pyongyang’s central area. The strikingly different world of Office 101 was evident as soon as I crossed the threshold of the compound. There was a large steel gate with high walls alI around, representing the exclusivity of a world that ordinary people could not peer into. Employees used a small entrance that was part of the gate, and which allowed only one man at a time to squeeze through. A single soldier stood guard. The presence of the soldier was also a mark that distinguished

this institution from the rest of North Korean society, where employees usually took turns to serve as guard and surveillance for and against fellow employees. As if to confirm that guard duty was a separate duty from UFD duties in this institution, a male cadre of our department’s party committee had to be fetched to explain my presence to the guard, and have my identification double-checked before I was allowed to set foot in the compound for the first time. Once I entered, in contrast to the small and unassuming entrance,

8 I DICTATOR

the yard was very large. Everything was paved with cement, without a trace of visible bare earth. The cadre who came to fetch me explained that the four-story building opposite us was the headquarters of Office 101. The main building was flanked to the left by a library of South Korean literature and an assembly hall. Communications Office 813, to the right, was where counterfeit books were printed under the imprints of South Korean publishers. Pointing to the library, the cadre told me that the library building had been the only school for courtesans in Pyongyang at the time of the Japanese occupation. Adding that the Wolhyang-dong in the Moranbong area, not far from here, was a famous courtesan area in the past, he smiled knowingly at me.

My office in Division 19 (Poetry) was on the second floor of the main building and in my time there were eight of us in the team: seven men and one woman. Opening the office door, I immediately saw long wooden desks on two sides of the room. Each desk sat four, and we would face the wall as we worked. As I set foot on the marble floor of the office, I almost turned back to leave: it was as if! had just blundered onto the scene of North Korea’s most terrifying crime- treason-the extent of which no one else in the country could begin to imagine or exaggerate. The forbidden materials so casually littering every surface in the room would have brought a death sentence in any other room in all of North Korea and, anywhere else in the country, the shocking slogan framed in’ pride of place on the wall would have been far beyond the pale in its daring contradiction of half a century’s demonizing of the South. The enemy newspapers and books strewn carelessly about the office were only slightly less astonishing to my eyes than the mandate for Office 101 from Kim [ong-il, respectfully framed and displayed prominently on the otherwise bare white wall: “Inhabit Seoul, although you are in Pyongyang:’ An act of abominable treason outside these walls was not only permitted within them, but actively encouraged by Kim Iong-il himself] The leader required us

PSYCHOLOG[CAL WARFARE I 9

to inhabit South Korea’s collective psyche so as to undermine and triumph over it. Every day that I worked in the UFD I never lost my sense of wonder at our world’s stark and secret contrast with the closed society outside our compound. With our Workers’ Party passes in our shirt pockets, we arrived

at Office 101 every morning at 8 a.m. and began our working day by reading the South Korean newspapers. Although North Korea’s official name is the Democratic People’s Republic of Chosun, it refers to itself as Chosun and South Korea as southern Chosun, and defines the borders of Korea from the DPRK point of view. However, in the course of our work in Office 101, we saw the term “South Korea” everywhere in the papers and it became second nature to us. In North Korea, the southern administration was portrayed as a treasonous regime led by a sycophantic leader, who continued to betray the Korean people and their land in order to make them puppets of the United States; but through the media that filled the room, we came to know their leader as the South Korean president. As no one within our office was allowed to talk about their job, or

know anything about a colleague’s, there were no items on anyone’s desk that were not strictly necessary to the task at hand-apart from a calendar. The only item that stood out in the room was a small mirror on the table of our female colleague, fiercely marking her territory as a woman. If it weren’t for the different locks on each of our desk drawers, the rest of us might forget which desk was our own. Just as our drawers were always locked, members of my team rarely

talked about their personal lives, although there were only the eight of us. Once, I cautiously asked the reason for this on my way home with a senior acquaintance at the UFO, His answer was unexpected. He said the reason why everyone kept to him – or herself inside the office compound was not so much because of security constraints, but because of the nature of our work. Outside, we were Pyongyang residents and North Koreans. Inside, however, we were South Korean

10 I DICTATOR

citizens, each one of us. As there was not much to talk about while in these foreign shoes, the lack of conversation on personal topics had become an institutional habit. After this explanation, I understood better how the essence of “Localization” was our chameleonlike duality. Nevertheless, this privileged “Localization” was strictly controlled.

South Korean newspapers were only loaned out for a day at a time, and we had to return them to the library before leaving work. In the case of South Korean novels or poems, we could borrow them for several days, but we had to keep them in our locked drawers when leaving the UFD premises. Taking any South Korean materials out of this area was forbidden, and the librarian sometimes visited the office unannounced to check that our reading materials were kept securely. Our main task, from the moment we arrived at work to the

moment we left, was to transform ourselves into South Korean poets and write South Korean poetry. To be more precise, we were to be South Korean poets who were supporters of Kim Iong-il. My South Korean pseudonym was Kim Kyong-min. Our names and surnames had to be different from our real names, and when asked to choose a pseudonym I had used the name of the first relative who came to mind. Supervisor Park Chul deliberated for over three hours on whether the name sounded plausible as that of a South Korean poet before he granted permission for me to assume it. In return for our specialist work, and on top of our standard

rations, we received additional rations of imported food every Saturday. Because of our identity as inhabitants of the outside world, the resources we received-different each time-came from the outside world. They were taken from humanitarian materials donated by the UN and the rest of the international community, as well as from South Korean NGOs and religious organizations. In the eleven-pound packages that we received, there would be rice from the United States, cheese, butter, olive oil, mayonnaise, and even

PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE I 11

underwear and socks. Sometimes, there were cookies and sweets, or milk powder intended for babies. Because we were given so much, it was a chore to collect our regular rations from the public distribution system, on which the rest of North Korea depended for survival. The foreign packages always came to us with their labels intact.

The existence of such international aid was viewed as a shameful secret that the regime could not afford to reveal to its ordinary citizens at a time of widespread famine, as it would undermine the state’s ideology of “self-reliance:’ But as our department’s role was to live and work as outsiders, it seemed logical that we should receive outside goods. We had been handpicked for this work and were trusted not to be tarnished by association with these outside voices and supplies. It felt like a blessing to be allowed to inhabit such a privileged world. Consuming outside products was easy,but thinking like an outsider

was not. One day, feeling it was too difficult to write successfully like a South Korean, I consulted Supervisor Park Chul. He was a man who struck me as imposing, despite his balding head. He had double eyelids and thick eyebrows that bristled with charisma.

“I don’t really know much about southern Chosun,” I said. ”And I just don’t have the knowledge or experience to make literature out of southern Chosun life. So exactly what kind of writing should I do here?” Supervisor Park Chullaughed so hard that his comb-over flopped

down over his eyebrows. He patted it back into place. “Neither you nor I have been to Seoul!” he said. ”Although we’re all countrymen, Northerners and Southerners, our cultures are different now. But it doesn’t make much difference, because we’re actually working with the Northern audience in mind, not the people of southern Chosun.” He paused to crumble some cooked egg yolk into a fish tank

containing three bright red fish. After tipping’ the rest of the egg yolk

12 I DICTATOR

into his mouth, he wiped his hands and continued, “To succeed here, you have to give up on anything like your own name or renown as a writer. You know, when I used to work for the Writers’ Union, I was a star on the rise. You’ve probably read my poems. Take, for example, ‘Longing for my Townsfolk:” “Yes,” I replied, though the title didn’t ring any bells. He continued, “If I’d stuck to being a poet, Id probably be a

household name by now. But since I’ve spent my life as a UFD operative, no Koreans here or in the south will ever recognize my work. Still, at least we have an easy life, working here.”

Hearing him sigh, I thought of him as a lonely, ageing man who had to keep his secret life to himself and his colleagues. Just as hed said, working at the UFD meant not only hiding our work from our countrymen in the south, but also from those in the north. With the increasing economic discrepancy between the North and South, the ideological warfare against the South was perceived as futile by the 1990s, and the propaganda campaigns against the South had run out of steam. By my time, the UFD was using the experience and techniques

previously employed against South Korea’s citizens to conduct psychological offensives against our own people. The. experience and techniques that had been learnt were replicated in psychological operations aimed at North Koreans, though, in other ways, we were still fighting a cultural war on two fronts. The work of Office 101 was never confined to a single genre or

medium. It employed speeches, video, music, and other forms of cultural expression-all under the names of South Korean or foreign authors-that could be used to infiltrate and influence the values of Koreans. In April 1998, for example, four months before the start of my

work at UFD, Office 101 Section 1 (Newspapers) produced an article that received praise from Kim Jong-il. The piece was written

PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE [13

under an assumed outsider’s name and declared our Great Leader, Kim Il-sung, to be the Sun of the World. The evidence in question was the sinking of the Titanic. April 15, 1912 is the date on which the RMS Titanic sank, and it also happens to be the date of Kim Il-sung’s birth. Using this coincidence as a form of historical proof, Section 1 explained that, “as the Sun set in the West, it rose in the East.” Such creations of the United Front Department were then published in the party newspaper, the Rodong Sinmun, or broadcast on television-which only shows state-run channels-as the works of foreign authors, journalists, and intellectuals. The North Korean people could never have imagined that all these apparently foreign works were produced by Office 101 in the very heart of their capital, Pyongyang. Isolated from the outside world, it’s not surprising that they believed that the people of the world, including South Koreans, admired our country’s strong leadership and many achievements. After Kim Il-sung’s death in 1994, epic poetry became the chief

vehicle of political propaganda with the publication of a poem by Kim Man-young of the Writers’ Union Central Committee. The work took the form of a prayer for the eternal life of Kim II-sung. Kim Iong-il published that lengthy poem about his father in the Rodong Sinmun and proclaimed Kim Man-young the most loyal worker in North Korea. Soon afterwards, the poetry of Shin Byung-gang was promoted by the military’s Propaganda Department in order to demonstrate their loyalty to the Dear Leader. Kim Iong-il declared Shin’s works, along with those of Kim Man-young, to be “People’s Literature”; and the two poets were presented with imported cars and household appliances, as well as extravagantly decorated luxury apartments whose furnishings included sets of gold-plated cutlery. Within my department, a panic ensued. Although the UFD also

employed poets, it had not been able to satisfy Kim [ong-il with a single epic poem-a serious omission that could potentially lead to an accusation of insufficient loyalty on the part of the United Front

‘I 1’1II I

I

14 I DICTATOR

Department as a whole. By the time I joined the department, it was a source of great concern. The problem had been exacerbated by the type of personnel they

employed. Due to the constraints of psychological warfare which we were waging, operatives were highly trained in ideological persuasion but had not investedmuch thought in the literary qualities of the work they produced. It was perhaps the tragic and inevitable consequence of making art anonymously, as Supervisor Park Chul had suggested when he described not being able to publish his works in his own name. UFD writers had to internalize two lies unique to them in the writing process: they had to pretend to be South Koreans in their feelings of adoration for Kim [ong-il, and this had to be expressed in a fabricated South Korean way of writing. Although I was the youngest writer on board, at twenty-seven, the

onus of rectifying this situation fell on me. When I was summoned to UFD headquarters to receive orders from First Deputy Director Im Tong-ok, I could hardly believe my own ears. Im Tong-ok was the highest authority in the UFD, and even the head of Office 101could not meet him without being explicitly summoned. To be summoned outside of the standard chain of command was a striking anomaly. The headquarters of the UFD lies in Jeonseung-dong of the

Moranbong District in Pyongyang. The long, three-story building, privy to the secrets of the history of the Workers’ Party and our nation’s history of espionage, looked even more imposing than Office 101. As if to hide its secrets from the world, the building faced north, away from the sunlight, and was covered in ivy. The deputy policy director of Office 101 led me to the door of

Director Im Tong-ok’s office, on the first floor of the building. The wooden floorboards creaked beneath our feet with every step. The majestic old building seemed to be in built in an old Russian style, with its high ceilings and large windows, and the imposing double doors to Director Ims office added to the sense of grandeur.

PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE 115

My guide knocked and entered, revealing another, open door. He mumbled something into the room, and a loud voice answered from within. “Ask him to come in. Come in!” said First Deputy Director Im

Tong-ok. His title of “First Deputy Director” meant that he acted with the

absolute authority of Kim Iong-il in one of the nation’s key ministries. There were only six institutions considered important enough to be headed by a First Deputy Director: the Organization and Guidance Department (Kim jong-ils executive chain of command, which sits above the constitution and has unrestricted jurisdiction to intervene in any sphere), the Propaganda and Agitation Department (whose first deputy directorship was left vacant until 1998, after which Tung Ha-chul was appointed to the post by Kim Iong-Il), the United Front Department, Office 38 (in charge of Kim Iong-il’s personal wealth), Office 35 (conducts intelligence activities overseas) and the Ministry of State Security (the secret police). Director Im came to meet me at the door. His piercing gaze and

countenance suggested that he indeed had the authority to lead alI matters related to South Korea and to the external presentation of North Korea as the representative of Kim Iong-il. However, perhaps he was dumbfounded by the situation he found himself in, assigning such a critical task to an inexperienced young man, or perhaps he was just at a loss for words. He wiped his wide forehead, mustered alI the concern he could gather into his deep wrinkles, and made it clear, in his long-winded way, that this task was not one he was assigning lightly. Then he suddenly stood to attention, saying with utmost conviction: “Now the General’s order will be communicated.” Whenever Kim’s words are disseminated in an order, letter or

certificate of appreciation, the speaker must stand to attention and make sure his appearance is properly respectful, that his uniform is impeccable, and that all his shirt buttons are done up properly.

I

I

16 I DICTATOR

Loyalty to Kim Iong-il had to be demonstrated even in the smallest action as well as through one’s overall attitude. As Director Im stood to attention, I instinctively did the same, waiting for his next words. “The General has issued an order for an epic poem to be used in

the conducting of psychological warfare,” he continued. “This work must promote the notion that our Songun policy has been formulated to protect South Korea. The United Front Department assigns this operation to Comrade Kim Kyong-min,” he said, using my assumed South Korean name. Director Im looked as if he were about to continue speaking, but

paused when he noticed that I was biting my lip in consternation. The Songun or “military-first” policy was supposed to unify the entire Korean peninsula under Kim Iong-il through the superior might of our military force, and to defend our Socialism. I now had to write a poem based on the premise that such a policy protected the South. Without realizing it, I had grimaced at the evident impossibility of such a task. Director Im assumed a severe expression, but seemed to be at a loss for further words. “You have two months,” he said, and the meeting was over.

It was mid-December 1998. From that day on, I worked round the clock on the task that had been assigned to me. The basic argument was straightforward: it was my job to praise Kim Jong-il as the master of the gun, the bringer of justice, and the People’s Lord who knew only victory. But the essence of the task was to find evidence for these truths and shape them into a literary form. To help me accomplish this, I spent an entire month reading South Korean literature, identifying themes that supported the argument I was to explore through poetry.

I decided on a comparison of South Korea’s Mangwoldong Memorial for the Martyrs of Democracy with North Korea’s Sinmiri Memorial for Revolutionary Martyrs, with a pun linking Gukgun

PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE I 17

(the name of South Korea’s National Army) and Songun (the military- first policy of North Korea). This allowed me to compare South and North as two sides of the same coin: while the democratic martyrs of South Korea had been killed by the bullets of their Gukgun, the revolutionary martyrs of North Korea would be looked after even in their afterlife by our policy of Songun. My poem portrayed South Korea’s military as aggressive, and that of North Korea as concerned solely with defending the Korean people. When I submitted my proposal, Director Irn and the other UFD officials heaped praise on the approach I had chosen. On May 16, 1961, a military coup ended civilian rule in South

Korea and ushered in the military dictatorship of Park Chung-hee. His long rule of eighteen years was ended by his assassination by an associate, but in the instability that followed, Cheon Doo- hwan positioned himself as the new military dictator. In this way, the divided peninsula was ruled by a military dictator not only in North Korea, but also in the South. On May 18, 1980, however, South Korean democratic activists

rose up in protest in the provincial city of Gwangju in South Korea. They were violently suppressed in the streets by South Korean soldiers, whose authoritarian leader claimed that the protesters, armed and harming government property and the police station, were North Korean agents who had infiltrated the country. Taking my inspirational starting point from the fact that the South Korean military had once massacred its own citizens, I wrote in the passionate voice of a South Korean poet visiting Pyongyang in May. To the poet, a Korean spring could not come about through

Nature’s will alone. It could only be brought about and sustained by the committed protest of the people rising for their rights. The South Korean poet, knowing only a blood -soaked spring, recognizes in Pyongyang a true Korean spring: here, both Koreas are protected by Kim [ong-il’s policy of Songun, as he wields the very gun handed to

18 I DIeT A TOR

him by his father, Kim Il-sung, who once used the weapon to free the Korean people from Iapanese rule. This is how the poet concludes his praise of that gun;

So this is the Gun that in the hands of an inferior man can only commit murder, but, when wielded by a great man, can overcome anything. As history has shown, war and carnage belong to the weak. General Kim Iong-il, the General alone, is Lord of the Gun, Lord of Justice, Lord of Peace, Lord of Unification. Ah, the true Leader of the Korean people!

The poem was presented to Kim Iong-il in time for the anniversary of the Gwangju uprising on May 18, 1999. After publication, I received the moving news that Kim [ong-il

had read my poem many times, underlining key phrases as he went. He even wrote next to the title of the poem in his own hand, “This is the artistic standard of the Songun era.” It was a historic moment of triumph for the UFD in establishing itself above the military and the Party’s propaganda departments in the sphere ofliterary arts.

Most importantly for me, I gained the personal approval of the single most powerful man in our country. The personal endorsement from Kim Tong-ilwas followed by an order for nationwide publication. Four days after my submission of the poem, on May 22, 1999, “Spring Rests on the Gun Barrel of the Lord” was distributed throughout the

PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE 119

nation in the Rodong Sinmun newspaper, which led to my invitation to become one of the “Admitted” of Kim Iong-il. My entry into this circle changed the course of my life in the way

that winning the lottery might do in a capitalist nation. My career ahead was full of opportunities from which I could cherry-pick as I chose. But most importantly, my new status guaranteed a privilege of immunity that was powerful beyond imagination: not even the highest authorities of the DPRK could investigate, prosecute, or harm one of the Admitted. The only way prosecution could possibly occur was for the crime to be treason and for the Organization and Guidance Department to receive explicit permission from Kim Iong-il himself. Nobody wanted to push too far and risk the ill will of the General himself, so such a process was rarely pursued. The party’s Organization and Guidance Department, responsible

for the protection of Kim Iong-il, operated a special section dedicated to serve those who were Admitted. The criteria were strict and the circle small. As was the case with me, Kim Iong-il had personally to request your presence and spend time with you behind closed doors for more than twenty minutes. Bursting with pride at my admission to this tiny and exclusive elite, I felt like a new man each day. My first year of work at the UFD passed by very quickly.

In North Korea, the anniversary on July 8, of Kim Il-sungs death- referred to as the Celebration of Kim Il-sungs Eternal Life-is a field of battle among cadres desperate to demonstrate their loyalty to the cult of Kim. Director Im Tong-ok announced during the UFD’s agenda meeting for the year 2000 that wewould be the ones to offer the best epic poem to Kim Iong-il, outshining the military and party’s propaganda departments once again. As I was now one of the Admitted, there was no question of the glorious task falling to anyone other than me, and my primary task for the year was the completion of this assignment.

II

, [

20 I DICTATOR

Director Im took the reins with great gusto from the start of the first thematic planning meeting. “Quiet, please. We will now begin our meeting to discuss the

literary work of the United Front Department that will be published to commemorate the Supreme Leader’s immortal life on July 8. I have already asked Comrade Kim Kyong-min to call his poem ‘An Ode to the Smiling Sun: In any event, we must stick to the ‘Smiling Sun’motif.” As Director Im said, the only way to eulogize the Supreme Leader’s

immortal life was through the motif of the “Smiling Sun:’ The Workers’ Party had conducted propaganda activities focused on Kim II-sung and his successor, Kim Iong-il, for over half a century. In the context of this tradition, “Smiling Sun” was a relatively new motif. It had first been seen at the funeral of Kim II-sung in 1994.

Usually, funeral portraits showed the deceased wearing a sombre expression. However, declaring that “The Supreme Leader is alive and with us forever;’ Kim Iong-il ordered that the standard funeral portrait of his father be exchanged for one of him smiling. From then on, the Supreme Leader was referred to as a “Sun’ whose immortal life was a “smile:’ On Iuly 8, 1997, exactly three years after Kim Il-sung’s death,

the Central Party Committee, Central Military Committee, National Defense Commission, Central People’s Committee, and Parliamentary Committee issued a joint declaration that Kim I1-sung’s birthday was to be inaugurated as the “Sun Festival:’ At the same time, it was declared that our calendar was to be changed. Kim Il-sungs birthday, April 15, 1912, was set as the first year of the new [uche Calendar, [uche being the state-ratified philosophy of North Korea based on the principle of self-reliance. The year AD 2000 became luche 89.

“Now, Comrade Kim Kyong-min will expound on this theme.” Only after someone tapped me on the arm did I realize that

everyone was waiting for me to rise and speak. I leapt to my feet.

PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE I 21

”Although the title of this work refers to the ‘Smiling Sun: I would like the poem to make a literary allusion to tears.”

I could hear murmuring around me. “If you examine the ‘Smiling Sun’ works produced until now

by the party or military, they refer to the Supreme Leader’s smile predominantly in the context of our achievements,” I explained. “For example, the Supreme Leader smiles from the height of his immortality because he is satisfied with the great virtue and legacy politics of our General’s rule, or as he peers down with pleasure at our unique kind of Socialism, which remains steadfast despite threats and pressure from imperialistic forces. In my view, it is time for the United Front Department to steer towards satisfying our audience’s literary sensibilities, and to move beyond agitating their political fervor.”

“That’s all very well, but how will you satisfy their literary sensibilities?” DirectorIm asked curtly.

“This is what I propose to say: when I traced the history of the ‘Smiling Sun: I discovered that our Supreme Leader was surrounded by tears from early childhood. Embarking on his life in this manner, the Supreme Leader triumphed over individual suffering and anguish and dedicated his entire life to his people and homeland by smiling. In other words, our Supreme Leader lived for his people and not for himself. This progression will lead to the following conclusion: ‘All the tears that were to have been shed by his people, our Supreme Leader took on himself alone to shed. What smiles he had, he gave them all so that his people might smile: By juxtaposing his tears and his smiling, the ‘Smiling Sun’ will appear to shine more brightly. This also allows for the Smiling Sun to be ascribed with the following poetic qualities: ‘When the Supreme Leader gave the people his gift of smiling, it manifested as his Love; when he sowed his gift on our lands, it manifested as rays of the Sun; and as he left his gift for history, it manifested as Immortal Life:”

I

II

III1 ,111″_1

22 I DICTATOR

The post North korea-Summarize the reading that are uploaded in the files in 750 words minimum. appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Popular Culture Association in the South

Popular Culture Association in the South

The NFL’s “Violence Against Women Problem”: Media Framing and The Perpetuation of Domestic Abuse Author(s): Chris B. Geyerman Source: Studies in Popular Culture, Vol. 38, No. 2 (SPRING 2016), pp. 99-124 Published by: Popular Culture Association in the South Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/44259601 Accessed: 25-04-2019 21:28 UTC

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide

range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and

facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at

Terms and Conditions of Use

Popular Culture Association in the South is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Studies in Popular Culture

This content downloaded from 216.145.162.122 on Thu, 25 Apr 2019 21:28:34 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

The NFL’s “Violence Against Women Problem”: Media Framing and The Perpetuation of Domestic Abuse

Chris B. Geyerman

During the 2014 season, the National Football League (NFL) experienced a “domestic violence crisis” when a series of highly publicized cases figured prominently in the landscape of American popular culture, the most notable of which stemmed from an incident that occurred seven months before the season began, in the early hours of February 15, 2014. Upon returning from a Valentine’s Day celebration with friends, in an elevator at the Revel Casino Hotel in Atlantic City, New Jersey, Baltimore Raven’s running back Ray Rice and his then-fiancée, now wife, Janay Palmer1 were involved in a verbal altercation when Palmer reached for Rice’s cell phone and he spit at her and then punched her in the head, rendering her unconscious. Months later, when the incident was the center of a media firestorm, Terry O’Neill, President of the National Organization for Women, would proclaim that “The NFL has lost its way. It doesn’t have a Ray Rice problem; it has a violence against women problem” (O’Keeffe). In itself, the event was sadly unremarkable.

A woman is beaten in the U.S. every nine seconds; each year, more than 4.5 million women are subjected to physical violence at the hands of their intimate partner. Intimate partner homicide is the leading cause of death among pregnant women; from 2001-2012 almost twice as many women were killed by current or former intimate male partners as soldiers were killed in Afghanistan. One in four women will be the victim of severe intimate partner violence during the course of their life; one in seven men will be the victim of severe intimate partner violence during the course of his life-and the list goes on (Vagianos). Domestic violence is, quite literally, epidemic.

However, the Ray Rice case was remarkable. In fact, it was so remarkable that when NBC News released its Year in Review: The

Top Stories of 2014, “Domestic Violence in the NFL” was number 8, and the Rice case was featured most prominently (Leitsinger). For one week in September 2014, the Rice case dominated the sports news

Spring 2016 99

This content downloaded from 216.145.162.122 on Thu, 25 Apr 2019 21:28:34 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

Geyerman

and was featured in virtually every national newspaper and television news broadcast, such as CBS This Morning and the Today Show, to name just two. The Ray Rice case was the subject of great publicity for several key reasons. First, Rice was an all-pro running back for the Super Bowl champion Baltimore Ravens. When on February 1 5, 2014, both he and his fiancée Palmer were arrested and charged with “simple assault,” it made national news, especially in the sports media. Second, and more significant, on February 19, 2014, TMZ, the celebrity gossip and entertainment website, released video of Rice literally dragging the limp bodied, unconscious Palmer from the Atlantic City casino elevator in which the incident occurred. The sports media followed closely and reported the developments in the Ray Rice case from this point forward, and it played out in typical fashion: Rice’s indictment by an Atlantic City grand jury on a third degree assault charge on March 27, 2014; his and Palmer’s marriage the next day; Rice’s plea of not guilty on May 1, 2014; and his subsequent application to and acceptance in a “diversionary” program for first-time offenders, which meant that Rice would be clear of criminality after one year. Rice and his wife also met in person with NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell. Everything went as expected until on July 24, 2014 NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell announced a two-game suspension as punishment for Rice. Goodell was widely and almost universally criticized for his handling of the case, and the two-game suspension was viewed by most as, at best, woefully inadequate, and, at worst, misogynistic and tone deaf. Third, and without question most significant, on Monday, September 8, 2014, the day culminating week one of the 2014 NFL season, TMZ released another video, this time of surveillance footage from inside the Atlantic City casino elevator. It graphically portrayed the vicious blow to the head that rendered Palmer unconscious and Rice’s nonchalant response. Year in Review: The Top Stories of 2014 begins its description of domestic violence in the NFL with these words: “The NFL has struggled with the gravest scandal in its history. A video surfaced earlier this year of Baltimore running back Ray Rice punching and knocking out his then fiancée, now wife, and dragging her out of a hotel elevator” (Leitsinger). By the end of the day, the Baltimore Ravens terminated Rice’s contract, and he was suspended indefinitely from the NFL by Goodell. The Ray Rice domestic violence case was “the story of the moment,” and the media frenzy was on in full force.

Given the prominent and sensational nature of the Rice case, it comes as no surprise that domestic violence emerged as a more

100 Studies in Popular Culture 38.2

This content downloaded from 216.145.162.122 on Thu, 25 Apr 2019 21:28:34 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

The NFL’s “Violence Against Women Problem”

visible social problem, and the increase in public scrutiny of domestic violence in the NFL was especially acute. Enter Greg Hardy, then all- pro defensive end for the Carolina Panthers, and Adrian Peterson, all- pro running back for the Minnesota Vikings.2

Hardy played in Carolina’s 2014 season opener on September 7, 2014, despite having been arrested for assault and communicating threats on May 13, 2014, after allegedly beating and threatening to kill his girlfriend, Nicole Holder. Hardy was found guilty by a North Carolina judge that July, but when, on appeal, Holder failed to appear in court, North Carolina prosecutors dismissed charges. In the face of intense public criticism, fomented in large part by the release of the second Rice video, the Panthers deactivated Hardy on September 14, 2014, and the NFL placed him on the commissioner’s exempt list.3 Hardy played no more in the 2014 season. In April 2015, during the off-season, he was suspended for ten games by NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell and then was traded to the Dallas Cowboys. The suspension was reduced to four games in arbitration, and in game five of the 2015 NFL season, Hardy made his debut as a member of the Dallas Cowboys. Despite missing the first four games, Hardy finished the 2015 season with six sacks, second highest by the Cowboys, and he likely led the league in public controversy.

Like Hardy, Adrian Peterson played in week one of the 2014 NFL season. Unlike Hardy and Rice, Peterson was not suspended for domestic violence against a woman. Rather, Peterson was placed on the commissioner’s exempt list after being indicted on September 12, 2014, by a Texas grand jury on felony charges of reckless or negligent injury to a child after beating his four-year-old son with a “switch.” TMZ posted on its website photographs of the bloody wounds on the boy’s legs, back, and genital area, and Peterson’s 2014 NFL season was over. Peterson avoided jail time by reaching a plea agreement in which he pled “no-contest” to the lesser charge of “recklessly assaulting” the child. Peterson was subsequently cleared to play during the 2015 NFL season, in which he led the Vikings to the playoffs and the NFL in rushing, with 1485 yards on 327 carries, scoring 1 1 touchdowns and being selected to the Pro Bowl.

Because they involve famous people and generate such publicity, the Ray Rice, Greg Hardy, and Adrian Peterson cases provide especially visible examples of public discourse on domestic violence. An analysis of sports media representations of these cases can be used to explicate the dominant media frames employed, giving particular attention to the attributions for

Spring 2016 101

This content downloaded from 216.145.162.122 on Thu, 25 Apr 2019 21:28:34 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

Geyerman

domestic violence. Through this approach, this study contributes to research on media coverage of domestic violence in general (e.g., Gillespie et al.; Rothman et al.; Nettieton; McManus and Dorfman; Berns, Framing the Victim )4 and on domestic violence in world sports in particular (e.g., Dabbs; Enck-Wanzer; McDonald; “Out of Bounds”; Welch).

Frame Analysis, Media Framing, and Attribution Theory

The analysis following is based on a close reading of media reports of domestic violence in the NFL from February 2014 to November 2015. There is no question that the Rice case, because of the graphic video footage, serves as the most significant motivating factor in the increased concern about domestic violence in the NFL. In fact, the Rice case is most often referred to in media reports of other NFL domestic violence cases, including those of Hardy and Peterson. In this sense, the Rice case serves as the context for the media reporting of the cases that have (and likely will) follow. For example, on ESPN Radio’s The Dan Le Batard Show, which airs Monday through Friday from 10am to 1pm EST, Le Batard and co-host Jon “Stugotz” Weiner on November 1 1, 2015 engaged in a discussion about the unrepentant Greg Hardy and whether he was the most disliked person in sports. During the course of the November 11, 2015, discussion, Stugotz wondered aloud if Hardy’s refusal to act contrite causes people to view Hardy differently than Rice, who is “out there in the community saying the right things, he’s showing contrition, he’s doing the right things.” Le Batard countered with “no, but we still have a video of him knocking his wife … his fiancée unconscious in an elevator, and that speaks louder than any of it, and he’s not in the league anymore.” Because the Rice case occupies a central place in current public discourse on domestic violence in the NFL, it functions as the primary reference and point of departure in this analysis.

Framing analysis in communication and media studies can be traced initially to the work of Gregory Bateson and Erving Gofïman. At its most basic, framing analysis posits that communication “sources,” especially media sources, present information and “facts” in specific ways that simultaneously encourage the making of particular meanings and discourage or even preclude the conceptual possibility of others. In Bateson’s words, frames are both inclusive and exclusive:

just as “the frame around a picture says ‘Attend to what is within and do not attend to what is outside,’” the (discursive) frames of media

102 Studies in Popular Culture 38.2

This content downloaded from 216.145.162.122 on Thu, 25 Apr 2019 21:28:34 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

The NFL’s “Violence Against Women Problem”

events direct attention to that which is framed as it is framed, not to potential alternative framings, and the perception of the picture-in this

case domestic violence in the media coverage of the Rice, Hardy, and Peterson cases – is “positively enhanced” (187). In short, to employ framing analysis as a method is to examine “the organization of experience” as it is “governed” by “subjective involvement” in social events thus experienced (Goffman 10-11). With respect to social problems like domestic violence, “by identifying what the problem is about and what its causes are, a frame at least implies, if not stated outright, what should be done to solve it” (Berns, Framing the Victim 8). Thus, media frames function as a form of “cultural pedagogy” (Kellner 9), and framing analysis focuses on the explication of those cultural lessons.

In the absence of experience, meaning is derived via some form of mediated communication, and the mass media here figure most prominently. To explicate how domestic violence is represented in the media framing of the Rice, Hardy, and Peterson cases, basic premises of attribution theory are used because this theory is concerned with “trying to make sense of others’ behavior” (Fogler, Poole, and Stutman 52). The behavior of others, according to attribution theory, is made sense of by attributing their actions to dispositional factors and situational factors. According to Fogler, Poole, and Stutman, dispositional attributions are causes for behavior that are seen as “arising from the individual,” whereas situational attributions are seen

as “stemming from external forces” (52). Dispositional and situational attributions that characterize dominant media framing of these cases (re)constitutes an understanding of domestic violence in which blame is to varying degrees dispersed from the NFL and the perpetrators.

Media Framing of Domestic Violence in the NFL

The media representations of domestic violence around the Rice, Hardy, and Peterson cases are marked by the emergence of two distinct frames. First, media coverage of these cases framed domestic violence as an NFL problem. In so doing, the media coverage of these cases diverted attention away from domestic violence as a widespread social problem and set up a dynamic which allowed the NFL to attribute its domestic violence problem to ignorance and reposition itself as part of the solution. Second, because domestic violence, by definition, involves persons in a relationship, it should come as no surprise that media coverage of these cases of domestic violence is framed

Spring 2016 103

This content downloaded from 216.145.162.122 on Thu, 25 Apr 2019 21:28:34 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

Geyerman

by referencing the nature of the relationship between the perpetrator and victim. Specifically, media reporting on these cases framed the relationship between the principles at the time of the incidents as one marked by an interpersonal bond. The analysis demonstrates that, taken together, these media framings of domestic violence in the NFL serve two critical functions. First, they mollify both the NFL and the three perpetrators by reducing their culpability for these violent acts; second, they constitute conditions for redemption that invoke a patriarchal value structure which promotes an understanding grounded in American identity.

Frame One: Domestic Violence is an NFL Problem

As indicated by the epigraph and the fact that NBC News named “Domestic in the NFL” a top story for 2014, the sports and national media in its coverage of the Rice, Hardy, and Peterson cases recurrently

framed domestic violence as a problem especially prevalent in the NFL. The framing of domestic violence as an NFL problem did indeed focus public attention to its occurrence and subsequent handing by the NFL. More important, it also set off a dynamic that allowed the NFL to employ rhetorical strategies by using a series of dispositional and situational attributions that blame the problem on its own ignorance and on society at large. The rhetorical strategies used by the NFL in its response to the media framing of domestic violence as an NFL problem allowed the NFL to reposition itself as part of a solution to the problem. This repositioning resulted in large part from two themes that characterize this frame: the competence of NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell and the NFL’s newfound recognition that domestic violence is a complex and pervasive social problem.

Goodell had been the subject of public criticism for the two- game suspension he handed down to Ray Rice on July 24, 2014, but criticism was nothing new to Goodell. Since assuming his role as NFL Commissioner in September 2006, Goodell had become known as the “law and order” commissioner for his no-nonsense attitude and

handing down harsh penalties for player and team misconduct. Yet when the video was released of Rice punching Palmer in the head and knocking her out, the public criticism (and scrutiny) of Goodell reached heretofore unseen heights. The criticism of Goodell centered on his handling of the Ray Rice case and his refusal to deal proactively with NFL problems, instead dealing with them only as a reaction to public-opinion pressure. Also, it was primarily concerned with the

104 Studies in Popular Culture 38.2

This content downloaded from 216.145.162.122 on Thu, 25 Apr 2019 21:28:34 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

The NFL’s “Violence Against Women Problem”

three themes of demanding his resignation, questioning his competence

regarding when he first saw the video of Rice punching Palmer in the head, and deciding to extend Ray’s suspension indefinitely following the release of that video.

The speculation over Goodell’s reign as NFL Commissioner was widespread, and it became the subject of debate by former NFL players and coaches, many of whom are current NFL analysts, and interested members of the public. For example, ESPN published an article that stated Goodell was “called into question . . . [by] former NFL players, an owner, a league sponsor and a leading U.S. legislator” (“Roddy White”), a story in the Washington Post indicated that “in fact, those in and around the NFL community have begun scrutinizing Goodell’s priorities and, in some cases, calling for his job” (Babb and Maske), and the International Business Times reported that “Fire Roger Goodell” was trending on Twitter (Price). One of the most important and far-reaching criticisms of Goodell came from the National Organization for Women (NOW), which on September 10, 2014, issued a statement calling for Goodell’s resignation (Armour and “NOW Wants”). According to the release, the president of NOW, Terry O’Neill stated: “The NFL has lost its way. It doesn’t have a Ray Rice problem; it has a domestic violence problem …. The only workable solution is for Roger Goodell to resign” (“NOW Wants”). As the story was transformed from one about domestic violence to the survival of Goodell as NFL Commissioner, in which, ironically, NOW played a critical role, it soon became apparent that Goodell would weather the storm and retain his job. On the same day that NOW issued its press release, USA Today published a story that opened with these words: “The desk pounding cries for Roger Goodell’s head are a waste of breath. He is not quitting and the NFL owners, money flooding their houses like a melting Arctic island, are not firing him” (Whicker).

Even though it became apparent Goodell would retain his job, his credibility was nonetheless the subject of criticism, particularly regarding when he actually viewed the video of Rice punching Palmer. The speculation was that he had seen the video, and ESPN, com published a September 28, 2014 story that leads with “A law enforcement official says he sent a video of Ray Rice punching his then-fiancée to an NFL executive five months ago, while league officials have insisted they didn’t see the violent images until this week” (“Report: Rice Video”). Goodell, of course, denied seeing the video before September 8, 2014 but said in an interview with

Spring 2016 105

This content downloaded from 216.145.162.122 on Thu, 25 Apr 2019 21:28:34 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

Geyerman

USA Today that “when he did, he found it ‘sickening’” (Brennan). Regardless of whether Goodell had seen the video before Monday of that week, the media attention given to the issue functioned to keep Rice as a perpetrator of domestic violence in the background and serves as another example of how the media framing of domestic violence often obscures the perpetuator’s responsibility.

When Rice did become the focus of attention in this frame, it was

the result of Goodell increasing his initial two-game suspension to an indefinite suspension because the latter was consistent with the “new domestic violence policy” (Brennan). Goodell was widely criticized for increasing Rice’s punishment on the grounds that because Rice already had been punished for his assault on Palmer with a two-game suspension, the increase to an indefinite suspension was arbitrary and unjust, nothing more than a “PR stunt” to placate public outcry. Former U.S. District Judge Barbara S. Jones, who heard Rice’s appeal in November 2014, agreed. She overturned Rice’s suspension on the grounds that Goodell ‘s indefinite suspension was “an abuse of discretion . . . and arbitrary” (“Ray Rice Wins Appeal”). The decision made Rice a free agent, eligible to sign with any NFL team. Regardless of whether one thinks he should have been eligible to play in the NFL during the 2015 season or that Goodell over-stepped his authority, the focus on the suspension of Rice from the NFL further diverted attention away from him as the perpetuator of violence against women,

this time in an alternative persona of the abuser, i.e., Rice the football player..

During the height of media attention on Goodell, he gave an interview that was aired on CBS This Morning. In the post-script to the interview, which was televised an hour later, Goodell was “asked what he learned from his pre-discipline meeting with Ray Rice and his wife, Janay. ‘He [Ray] indicated what he and Janay are doing as a couple to try to address their issues,’ Goodell said. ‘It’s a very difficult issue for families. What I’m learning about this whole issue of domestic violence is that it’s very complicated. Very difficult on families. There are victims, there are family members that are impacted by this’” (Florio).The net result of the media attention around the competence of Roger Goodell was that the problem was transformed from a private, family problem between Rice and Palmer to a public problem about the future of Goodell as commissioner (and, by extension, the NFL) and Ray Rice the football player. When Goodell was asked what he learned from his pre-discipline meeting (June 16, 2014) with Rice and Palmer, he referred to “victims” and “families” in the plural, a

106 Studies in Popular Culture 38.2

This content downloaded from 216.145.162.122 on Thu, 25 Apr 2019 21:28:34 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

The NFL’s “Violence Against Women Problem”

rhetorical strategy used widely by the NFL and the sports media to emphasize that domestic violence is a permeating social problem.

Domestic violence, previously illustrated by the statistics, is indeed a widespread, common, and thus permeating social problem, so it comes as no surprise that incidents of domestic violence occur among NFL players. By employing a rhetorical strategy that attributes domestic violence in the NFL to the fact that it is a permeating social problem, the NFL and sports media function to attribute the problem of domestic violence outside the culture of the NFL and reposition the NFL as part of the solution. “Human violence” is an anti-feminist frame that removes gender from the problem of domestic violence by assigning culpability to both men and women (i.e., domestic violence is not a male or female problem, but rather a human problem), and the result is that women are held as partially responsible for the abuse they

endure (Berns, Framing the Victim 106). In much the same way, the “domestic violence as permeating social problem” rhetorical strategy in the Rice, Hardy, and Peterson cases functions to remove the NFL from the problem (i.e., domestic violence is not an NFL problem, but rather a socio-cultural problem). The result is that domestic violence is deinstitutionalized as an NFL problem, and thus this rhetoric functions as a sort of implicit rebuttal to claims, like the one advanced by NOW president Terry O’Neill, that the NFL “doesn’t have a Ray Rice problem; it has a domestic violence problem” (“NOW Wants”). The strategy of situating domestic violence as a permeating social problem came from the NFL itself, those critical of the league and Goodell, and those reporting on the Rice, Hardy, and Peterson cases.

The focusing of attention on domestic violence as a permeating social problem was a strategy employed by the NFL office even before the release of the second video, in the construction of the letter

Goodell sent to all 32 NFL teams, which was published in USA Today on August 28, 2014. In the letter, Goodell outlines the actions he has directed to “reinforce and enhance” NFL policies with respect to domestic violence. In describing the fifth directive, he writes “Fifth, we recognize that domestic violence and sexual assault are broad social issues, affecting millions of people” (“Roger Goodell’s Letter”). By using this rhetorical strategy, which extends domestic violence into the larger social system, Goodell situates domestic violence as not intrinsically germane to the NFL, thus “deinstitutionalizing” the problem from the NFL per se. Because this strategy functions to reject the individuation of the NFL as a specific site of domestic violence, it comes as no surprise that it is widely employed by league officials

Spring 2016 107

This content downloaded from 216.145.162.122 on Thu, 25 Apr 2019 21:28:34 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

Geyerman

and apologists. However, the strategy is also unwittingly employed by others, even when they are criticizing the NFL.

Describing domestic violence as a permeating social problem is evident in Phil Taylor’s “The Brutal Truth,” which was published in the September 1 5, 20 14 issue of Sports Illustrated, the cover of which features a grainy security camera photo of Rice and Palmer entering the elevator. The overall tone of the story is critical of Goodell and the NFL’s handling of the Rice case, noting that it should not have taken the release of the video in which Rice knocks out Palmer for

Goodell and the league to take more serious action. Nevertheless, when Taylor describes the effects of that video, he writes “The video was so shocking, so brutal and so repulsive that it intensified the reaction of Johnson and countless others, who have suffered, directly or indirectly, from the scourge of domestic violence” (Taylor). When Taylor uses the phrase “countless others,” the implication is clear: the pain associated with domestic violence extends well beyond the confines of the NFL. Even in his criticism of the NFL, Taylor frames the problem of domestic violence so that the league is a place, one among many, where the ills of the larger society are played out.

In responding to the fallout from its handling of the Rice case, the NFL announced the implementation of new policies and practices with respect to domestic violence. On September 15, 2014 – one week to the day after the release of the second Rice video – ESPN, com published a report about one such development. On the surface, the report titled “NFL Hires Domestic Violence Advisors” is short and simple. Running just seven brief paragraphs and less than one printed page, it simply describes the “three experts in domestic violence [that] will serve as senior advisers to the league” (para 1). The important part of the report for this analysis is the description of the domestic violence advisors hired by the NFL, which reads as follows: “Friel was the head of the Sex Crimes Prosecution Unit in the New York

County District Attorney’s Office for more than a decade. Randel is the co-founder of No More, a campaign against domestic violence and sexual assault. Smith is the former executive director of the National

Coalition Against Domestic Violence.” By adhering to the journalistic convention of listing the credentials of experts, the report’s author clearly situates domestic violence as a problem exceeding the borders of the NFL. This rhetorical strategy, coupled with the Boston Globe headline “Roger Goodell Admits Mistake, Toughens NFL’s Domestic Violence Policy,” in which Goodell ‘s letter to all NFL teams states that “I did’t get it right” (Fendrich), implicitly exonerates Goodell and

108 Studies in Popular Culture 38.2

This content downloaded from 216.145.162.122 on Thu, 25 Apr 2019 21:28:34 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

The NFL’s “Violence Against Women Problem”

the NFL from responsibility precisely because they did not understand the depth and complexity of the problem of domestic violence. With the newfound knowledge that domestic violence is such a complex social problem, the “tougher policies” represent progress toward solving the problem. In short, the narrative gives the NFL a pass based on ignorance of the domestic violence problem, despite the fact that domestic violence cases in the NFL were by no means a new phenomenon (“Out of Bounds” 1048-65; Dabbs 167-99).

The prevalence of domestic violence in society at large is also a major theme in the media reports of Peterson’s child abuse. Almost from the moment he was indicted, Peterson’s legal team, led by Russell “Rusty” Harden, a Texas attorney with an established track record of winning favorable verdicts for athletes, employed the strategy of attributing Peterson’s actions to the situational factor that he was disciplined in the same manner as a child. The media ran with it, from USA Today to CBS News to Time Magazine. One typical example is from the Los Angeles Times, which quotes Peterson from the first public remarks since his arrest: “I have to live with the fact that when I disciplined my son the way I was disciplined as a child, I caused an injury that I never intended or thought would happen …. My goal is always to teach my son right from wrong and that’s what I tried to do that day” (Schilken). This strategy serves two important functions in terms of media framing of domestic violence in the NFL. First, it situates domestic violence as outside the confines of the NFL and relocates it in Peterson’s upbringing. Second, because this strategy implies that he did not know any better than to beat a four- year-old with a switch, it at least partially exonerates Peterson from responsibility for his own intentional actions and suggests that he is a loving parent concerned with teaching his child right from wrong and developing a productive father/son relationship. In addition to framing domestic violence as an NFL problem, the media’s coverage of the Rice, Hardy, and Peterson cases employed another dominant frame by focusing on domestic violence as a relational problem.

Frame Two: Domestic Violence is a Relational Problem

One of the most dominant frames employed by the media in its coverage of domestic violence focuses on the nature of the relationship between those involved. In this frame, domestic violence as a social problem is concealed, the victims (Palmer and Holder) in the Rice and Hardy cases are held as at least in part responsible, and the role

Spring 2016 109

This content downloaded from 216.145.162.122 on Thu, 25 Apr 2019 21:28:34 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

Geyerman

of perpetrators is minimized and obscured. In this frame Peterson is represented as a loving father who unintentionally harmed his son. In its reporting on these incidents, the media framing of the relationship between abuser and abused implies specific meanings about the nature of perpetrators of domestic violence and about the role that men and women play in incidents of abuse.

Through a series of dispositional attributions, some made even by her, Janay Palmer is represented in the media as responsible for the violence she endured at the hands of her soon-to-be husband, Rice.

This phenomenon is nothing new. For example, Nettleton (139) has suggested women’s magazines place the responsibility for preventing domestic violence on the women. Similarly, Berns has suggested that as the problem of domestic violence is “degendered,” the blame for domestic violence is “gendered” and as a result “places the burden of responsibility [for domestic violence] on women” (“Degendering the Problem” 278). In short, the victim of domestic violence is at once blamed for “provoking the abuse and held responsible for ending abuse” (Berns, Framing the Victim 3), and the media framing of Palmer was no exception.

On the day of the incident it was reported widely that both Palmer

and Rice were arrested after they “struck each other with their hands” and were each charged with “simple assault” (“Key Events”). The mere fact that Palmer was also arrested and charged establishes her as at least partially to blame for the incident, and this trend continued throughout the media coverage of this case. For example, on Friday, July 25, 2014, on the daily ESPN television program First Take, sports analyst Stephen A. Smith made comments while discussing the Rice case that implied women can “provoke” domestic abuse. Smith was, of course, criticized widely, and on Monday, July 28, 2014, Time Magazine reported that he had apologized and “retracted statements that implied women can provoke domestic violence” (Dockterman). Perhaps the most blatant example of Bern’s notion of “degendering” domestic violence and “gendering” the blame unfolded on Friday, May 23, 2014, when the Ravens held a press conference with Rice and Palmer appearing together. During the press conference, Rice apologized for “the situation my wife and I were in” (“Key Events”; Maine); Palmer apologized for “my role in the incident,” and following the press conference the Ravens tweeted “Janay Rice says she deeply regrets the role that she played the night of the incident” (Taylor). Palmer continued along this path of self-blaming right through her exclusive November 5, 2014, interview with ESPN’s

110 Studies in Popular Culture 38.2

This content downloaded from 216.145.162.122 on Thu, 25 Apr 2019 21:28:34 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

The NFL’s “Violence Against Women Problem”

Jemele Hill, which, incidentally, took place at the home of Janet Rice, the assailant’s mother. Palmer described herself as that day as “annoyed” (Rice) because she was not going to get the Valentine’s Day celebration she had wanted – just the two of them – as Rice had made plans with friends. In recalling the moments prior to the incident,

Palmer said, “As we were arguing, he [Rice] was on his phone and not looking at me. I went to reach for his phone, and when he grabbed it back, he spit at me and I slapped him” (Rice). Later in the interview, Palmer recalled the May 23, 2014, press conference with these words: “Looking out over the media, I became angry …. When it was my turn to speak, I said I regretted my role in the incident …. I’m not saying that what Ray did wasn’t wrong …. It’s been made clear to him that it was wrong. But at the same time, who am I to put my hands

on somebody?” (Rice). These media representations clearly illustrate the gender dynamics described by Bern. The problem is degendered here via situational attribution: when Rice apologizes and thus accepts responsibility only for being “in a situation” with his wife – as if the situation were already there, independent of them – the incident is clearly seen as emanating from something external to Rice. By choosing to not include content that situates responsibility for Rice’s actions solely on him, the blame for the violence is “gendered” here via dispositional attribution: when Palmer apologizes for “the role she played in the incident,” which ultimately emanated from her being “annoyed” because Valentine’s Day did not go as she desired, the cause for the incident is clearly established as arising from “within” Palmer, in the form of stereotypical feminine “annoyance.”

The media framing, in addition to situating much of the blame on Palmer and thus degendering the problem of domestic violence, at least partially exonerates Rice, primarily through dispositional attributions characterizing him as a basically good guy who just made one terrible mistake that was not indicative of his underlying character, as well as situational attributions that suggest alcohol consumption and his upbringing were in part responsible. For example, on February 2 1 , 20 14,

just six days after Rice knocked Palmer unconscious, it was reported in the media that “Baltimore Ravens Head Coach John Harbaugh speaks at the NFL [scouting] combine about Rice’s arrest: ‘There are a lot of facts and a process that has to be worked through in anything like this. There are a lot of question marks. But Ray’s character, you guys know his character. So you start with that’” (“Key Events”). Then, on March 27, 2014, when Rice was indicted by an Atlantic County grand jury for aggravated assault in the third degree and charges against Palmer

Spring 2016 111

This content downloaded from 216.145.162.122 on Thu, 25 Apr 2019 21:28:34 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

Geyerman

were dropped, the Ravens issued the following statement: “This is part of the due process for Ray. We know there is more to Ray Rice than this one incident” (“Key Events”). Dispositional and situational attributions that in part exonerate Rice were also made by the victim. In her exclusive interview with ESPN’s Jámele Hill (Rice), Palmer tells her story of the incident. During the course of telling her story, Palmer notes that “we were drunk and tired,” “Ray never knew his father because he was murdered when Ray was just a year old,” “since Ray didn’t have a father growing up, getting close to my father meant a lot to him,” Ray “asked my dad” before proposing marriage, “Ray accepted responsibility from the moment we left the police station,” and

that “This came out of nowhere. Nothing like this had ever happened before. I knew it wasn’t him.”

The media framing of the relationship between Hardy and Holder was much different than between Rice and Palmer. Whereas

Rice and Palmer were characterized as essentially a couple devoted to working through their shared problem, Hardy and Holder were characterized as estranged, with Holder pressing assault charges, resulting in Hardy’s conviction by a judge. Nonetheless, the media framing of this relationship is characterized by attributions assigned to their relationship and to Holder which function to animate their relationship, place at least partial blame on Holder, and objectify and sexualize Holder.

Reporting for Sports Illustrated on Friday, September 12, 2014 – at the height of the media frenzy fomented by the Rice case – in a story questioning whether Hardy would be allowed to play in that Sunday’s game, Wertheim and Kaplan write that “Even during the heights of their coupling-when, for instance, Holder flew to Hawaii to accompany Hardy to the Pro Bowl-their relationship was volatile by any measure.” Two critical points can be drawn from Wertheim and Kaplan’s language. First, by attributing the quality of volatility to the relationship between Hardy and Holder, the relationship is reified and thus assumes a state of thingness. The implication is clear: both Hardy and Holder were caught up in a volatile relationship with its own agency, rather than Hardy being a volatile and abusive man. Second, by writing that Holder flew with Hardy to the Pro Bowl, the implication is that she chose not to end the volatility and, by extension,

the abuse and is thus in part to blame for what she experienced at the hands of Hardy. This attribution implicitly placed on Holder manifested itself in Rolling Stone’s February 25, 20 1 5, story on Hardy

just after the case against him was dismissed. In the story, Kenneth

112 Studies in Popular Culture 38.2

This content downloaded from 216.145.162.122 on Thu, 25 Apr 2019 21:28:34 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

The NFL’s “Violence Against Women Problem”

Arthur writes, “Regardless of his actual guilt, Hardy’s association with a violent incident is enough to warrant a suspension, given the league’s supposed deviation from a laissez-faire attitude regarding domestic violence.” With these words, Arthur at once both casts doubt on Hardy’s guilt and, by stating “his association with a violent incident,” subverts his agency in choosing to beat and threaten to kill Holder. Although the content of media frame here is much different than with Rice and Palmer, the form is essentially the same. To use Bern’s framework, the problem is degendered when the relationship is reified (i.e., it is the relationship, not Hardy, that is volatile), and the

blame is gendered when the implication is that Holder shares in the responsibility for her abuse – Hardy was merely “associated with the incident” (“Degendering the Problem” 262).

Despite the fact that Hardy and his victim, Holder, were represented

as not continuing their relationship, even after he was convicted of beating, threatening to kill, and throwing her into a futon on which sat several loaded assault rifles, the media nonetheless referred to them as a couple. In reporting on the July 2014 trial finding of Hardy’s guilt for assaulting and threatening to kill Holder, The Charlotte Observer published a story that, incredibly, included these lines: “Even in court, Hardy and Holder made a striking pair. He wore a black suit and Pantheresque blue-and-black tie. She came to court in a stylish black dress with towering high heels” (Gordon, Person, and Jones). By referring to them as “a striking pair,” many of the dynamics

discussed above that place blame on Holder come into play. More insidious is the objectification and sexualization of Holder. Whereas a men’s suit signifies the attribute of occupational success, high heels, especially “towering” high heels, function as an ingrained cultural signifier which attributes to the wearer the desire to be more sexually attractive by creating the illusion of “longer legs.” Women’s heeled shoes “have obvious sexual aspects: display, the tilting of the body when high heels are worn so as to emphasize the breasts and other sexual characteristics, forcing the woman to walk in a certain way. This sexual aspect of the shoe is found in the Cinderella story, where the prince discovers Cinderella by putting a glass slipper on her foot” (Berger 256). Thus, the implication is that Holder desired to appear sexually attractive at the criminal trial of the man convicted of beating and threatening to kill her. By so describing Hardy and Holder, the authors invoke a patriarchal world view and value structure.

The media framing of the relationship between Peterson and his son is marked by two critical elements. First, Peterson is characterized

Spring 2016 113

This content downloaded from 216.145.162.122 on Thu, 25 Apr 2019 21:28:34 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

Geyerman

as a man intending his son no harm. For example, in reporting on Peterson’s first public remarks after being arrested and indicted on child abuse charges, the Los Angeles Times published a story that quoted Peterson as writing “I am not a perfect parent, but I am, without

a doubt, not a child abuser

and did not intend to cause him any injury. No one can understand the hurt that I feel for my son and for the harm I caused him” (Schilken). Since Peterson issued his statement in writing, it prevented the author from framing the incident in any other way – for instance by focusing

on what he had learned about child abuse as a social problem – and the implied dispositional attribution applied here to Peterson is that, because he “has to live” with the fact, regrets causing injury to his son,

and in trying to teach his son “right from wrong” was well intentioned.

Second, Peterson is characterized as loving his son. In reporting on the November 2014 plea bargain that reduced his crime from a felony to a misdemeanor, Eric Prisbell and Brent Schrotenboer of USA Today write “‘I truly regret this incident,’ Peterson said outside the courthouse. ‘I stand here and take full responsibility for my actions. I love my son more than any one of you could even imagine. I am looking forward to and I am anxious to continue my relationship with my child. “‘ In addition to attributing to Peterson the quality of parental love, the choice he made to beat his child with a switch is hidden in the

vague language of “regretting the incident” and taking responsibility for “his actions.”

The media frame of domestic violence as a relational problem, especially in the Rice and Hardy cases, is consistent with previous research on attributions regarding causality in spouse abuse. Overholser and Moll found that perpetuators tend to “attribute their violent behavior to external causes” whereas “victims often attribute

the abuse to defects within themselves or situational factors affecting their spouses” (107). As illustrated previously, the media frame of domestic violence as a relational problem is constructed in much the same way. The problem of domestic violence in the NFL is degendered and the blame is gendered (Berns, “Degendering the Problem” 262) when the media framing disperses blame from the perpetrators to the “situation” and attributes the actions of the victims – often tacitly – as contributing in some way to the causes and perpetuation of their own abuse.

While the Rice, Hardy, and Peterson cases were playing out, one of the more persistent themes, in print, sports radio, and sports televi- sion, dealt with whether and when they should get a second chance.

114 Studies in Popular Culture 38.2

This content downloaded from 216.145.162.122 on Thu, 25 Apr 2019 21:28:34 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

The NFL’s “Violence Against Women Problem”

The overwhelming consensus has been that they should get a second chance, once they have paid for their sins. Almost all sports media commentary has espoused this attitude, most often on the grounds that

ours is a society of second chances.

Searching the American Soul: The Rhetoric of Second Chances and the Perpetuation of Domestic Violence

There is little question that redemption is endemic to American national identity. Ernest Lee Tuveson, in his 1968 classic Redeemer Nation, demonstrates that redemption is rooted in America’s origins and explains the American belief in its role as preordained to make the world a better place. Wilfred M. McClay takes Tuveson’s notion of redemption, which “flowered . . . particularly with regard to the nation’s external relations and foreign policy” and notes that the “logic of redemption is just as applicable, if not more so, to individuals as well as nations.” McClay’s notion here is consistent with Ross Poole, who in Nation and Identity writes that the nation is an “imagined community” and a “form of identity” (12-13). In The Redemptive Self: Stories Americans Live By , Dan P. McAdams illustrates both the rootedness of redemption in the American experience and its expression as a form of identity in individual stories, noting that “sources” for stories of redemption “come from family experiences, music, schooling . . . heritage, ideas about literature and art, current events, the media, and everyday talk” (19). A central characteristic of redemption is that, in order to be redeemed, one must rise from a fall of some sort and emerge as a better person. Rice, Hardy, and Peterson each suffered a fall from the grace of NFL stardom when they were arrested for domestic violence, and in order to achieve atonement (i.e., redemption), each man must meet certain conditions, the most important of which is the public display of contrition. Rice and Peterson have publicly displayed contrition, and the sports media is replete with reports that each is deserving of a second chance, whereas Hardy has remained steadfastly unrepentant, even taunting, and is represented in the media as less deserving. The rhetoric of second chances enveloping the Rice, Hardy and Peterson cases thus displays the dynamic between American identity and the “conditionality of secular salvation” (i.e., redemption) (Geyerman 61-63). That dynamic can be seen in the reasons given as to why and to what extent each man deserves a second chance, and those reasons are grounded in a patriarchal value structure and originate from the idea of hegemonic

Spring 2016 115

This content downloaded from 216.145.162.122 on Thu, 25 Apr 2019 21:28:34 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

Geyerman

masculinity (i.e., a culturally preferred form of masculinity which values and naturalizes stereotypical masculine traits that operate in the realm of the mundane so as to subordinate and marginalize the feminine and alternative forms of masculinity). Nick Trujillo identifies distinguishing features of hegemonic masculinity as physical force and control, occupational achievement, familial patriarchy, frontiersmanship, and heterosexuality (1). Sports-mediated second chance rhetoric in the Rice, Hardy, and Peterson cases illustrates where, in each case, hegemonic masculinity is naturalized.

Occupational achievement and familial patriarchy in particular are featured prominently in the sports-mediated call for Rice’s second chance. One of the more typical displays of patriarchy naturalizing hegemonic masculinity through occupational achievement and familial patriarchy played out in the media around the Ravens’ 2014 home opener versus the Pittsburgh Steelers, their archrival. In reporting on events around the game, one of the main story lines was how many female Ravens’ fans demonstrated their support for Rice by wearing his #27 Ravens jersey. When interviewed, most of them indicated they supported Rice for two reasons: first, they believed that he was unjustly penalized when released by the Ravens and suspended indefinitely from NFL; second, most felt the situation with Ray and Janay was a personal matter (i.e., private) and not properly the province of public discourse. In perhaps the most telling example, Laken Litman of USA Today published a story the day after the game about three women who publicly supported Ray Rice – two of them victims of abuse at the hands of their intimate male partners. The story begins with these words: “LaTonya Jones is a survivor. The first time her husband hit her, she got out of that relationship immediately. She was strong for her kids, she said. But that isn’t keeping her from wearing her Ray Rice jersey. ‘I’m keeping my jersey,’ she said. ‘I’m not going to trade it in …. I don’t agree with how they went from a two-game suspension to ending this man’s career,’ Jones said. ‘This is someone’s livelihood. He has a family …. they should not have took that man’s job away …. We shouldn’t be involved in their personal life” (Litman). The story includes the testimony of another survivor, Robin Manahan, who is the proud owner of four Ray Rice jerseys, one which she wears in an accompanying photo. Manahan is quoted as saying she “absolutely 100% supports] him” as an “awesome guy” and “upstanding guy” and that he “should not have lost his job.” Finally, the third woman, Maria Priovolikos, who “doesn’t own a Ray Rice jersey …. but if she did would have worn it” because he is

116 Studies in Popular Culture 38.2

This content downloaded from 216.145.162.122 on Thu, 25 Apr 2019 21:28:34 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

The NFL’s “Violence Against Women Problem”

“such a sweet guy. He never said no when I asked for pictures or an autograph or anything.” As the story concludes, Priovolikos is quoted as saying, “They’re both to blame . . . she put her hands on him . . . I don’t think what he did was right, but you know what, it happens every day. They were drunk. They’re both to blame.” The sports media also featured Rice’s endorsement for a second chance from

A Call To Men , a national organization that advocates men ending domestic abuse. In ESPN’s report on the development, senior writer and expert NFL analyst Adam Schefter quotes the organization’s co- founders as saying, “We have been around a lot of abusive men, but our experience with Ray has been tremendously positive …. We feel strongly about him having the opportunity of having a second chance. He’s deserving of it.” Schefter’s report “was consequently aggregated by sites including The Sporting News, nj.com [the e-version of the Star-Ledger, the largest circulated newspaper in New Jersey and also the state where Rice played college football at Rutgers], Bleacher Report and The Christian Science Monitor” (Starchan). Then, two days later, the co-founders of A Call To Men issued a public apology for the endorsement, noting that “male entitlement played a role in our decision to not consult those most impacted” and that they were “irresponsible” when they “characterized Rice’s actions as a ‘mistake.’” They added that “domestic violence is not a mistake. Men’s violence against women is a choice rooted in patriarchy and sexism, used to gain power and control over another person” (Starchan). Not surprisingly, this story never became part of the Ray Rice narrative, and the sports media push for his second chance continues.

Hardy is an enigma. When he was signed by the Dallas Cowboys and appeared in game five after serving his reduced suspension, he simply needed to show contrition and some modicum (even false) of humility, and the stage would be set for the sports media to construct a narrative that he deserves a second chance. However, Hardy could not stay out of his own way, and his tweets played a critical role. He became, perhaps, America’s most vilified athlete of 2015. Consider these headlines from sports news stories on Hardy’s exploits on Twitter since signing with the Cowboys: from CBS Sports, “Cowboys DE Greg Hardy Makes Tasteless Twin Towers Joke on Twitter”; from Fox News, “Cowboys’ Greg Hardy Slammed on Twitter Over 9/11 Related Joke”; from The Washington Post, “Greg Hardy Tweets Out ‘Regret 4 What Happened in Past’”; from dallasnews.com, “National Reaction to Greg Hardy Twitter Apology: ‘He’s Not Sorry’; ‘Crass Move’”; from foxsports.com, “Cowboys’ Greg Hardy Makes Bizarre Comment

Spring 2016 117

This content downloaded from 216.145.162.122 on Thu, 25 Apr 2019 21:28:34 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

Geyerman

About Tom Brady’s Wife Gisele”; from USA Today, “Tom Brady on Greg Hardy’s Ridiculous Comments About His Wife: ‘I’m Focused on My Job”; from the Star-Telegram , “Cowboys Admonish Hardy After Comments on Brady’s Wife, Guns.” The vitriol toward Hardy during the season became so widespread that on November 12, 2015, during ESPN Radio’s Mike and Mike in the Morning, cohosts Mike Golic and Mike Greenberg were discussing Hardy, and Greenberg said “Do I think he’s [Hardy] a despicable human being? Yes, I do.” The absence of contrition makes it virtually impossible for the dominant media to situate Hardy as deserving a second chance, and, given Hardy’s refusal to express remorse for beating and threatening to kill Holder, it

is precisely this impossibility that reconstitutes the American sense of identity-rooted redemption.

Unlike Rice, who demonstrated contrition but has yet to get a second

chance to play in the NFL, and Hardy, who has been given a second chance to play but has demonstrated little if any contrition, Peterson has both expressed remorse and re-emerged as an NFL superstar. The sports media push for redemption is on, in full force. Even before the re-emerged as an NFL star, there were many calls for him to get a second chance. Before the season began, nfl.com published a story titled “Vikings A.R Feels the Love at ‘Adrian Peterson Day’” (Sessler). The story quotes Peterson’s coaches and teammates attributing to him the masculine qualities of being “extremely explosive” and having “electric foot speed.” Toward the end of the season the sports media redemption of Peterson began in earnest, and it was primarily centered

on familial patriarchy. During the telecast of the Vikings game against the Atlanta Falcons on Sunday, November 29, 201 5, Peterson rushed for

158 yards and two touchdowns, leading Minnesota to a 20-10 victory. Peterson scored a touchdown late in the fourth quarter with a 35-yard run to seal the win for the Vikings, whereupon the announcer referred

to him as “the great Adrian Peterson.” The sports media at the end of the 2015 NFL season launched a full-scale redemption campaign with respect to Peterson, and two of its most prominent media outlets were ESPN’s weekly program NFL Countdown and Sports Illustrated. On the January 10, 2016, telecast of NFL Countdown, just hours before Peterson’s Vikings were to play their first-round playoff game, the cast discussed Peterson’s child-abuse case and his return to the NFL.

During the course of the discussion, in which Peterson was basically represented as a wonderful human being, cast member Mike Ditka, the only man inducted into the Professional Football Hall of Fame as both a player and coach, said “My father whipped me a lot. And I thank

118 Studies in Popular Culture 38.2

This content downloaded from 216.145.162.122 on Thu, 25 Apr 2019 21:28:34 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

The NFL’s “Violence Against Women Problem”

God every day that he did. He made me a better person

a problem with this and I’m not politically correct, so I can’t talk about

it” (“NFL Countdown”). The next day, when the January 1 1 issue of Sports Illustrated was released, the headline tease for the secondary cover story read “The Complicated Exile of Adrian Peterson.” The story, in its essence, describes him as a reformed and hence redeemed man, noting that “Peterson says that through counseling he learned other methods of discipline. He says he’ll never use a switch again,” and then quotes an expert as saying that when he admitted his mistake and changed how he parents, it represents “terrific progress” (Bishop 30). Predictably, because atonement for the “sin” of child abuse is founded essentially in familial patriarchy, the story resonates with many in the American public because becoming a “good” father confirms that part of American identity rooted in redemption.

Domestic violence in the NFL currently occupies a space of significance in popular culture, and rightly so. However, the NFL functions in a larger social system where the scales of justice are unbalanced, tilted by patriarchy in favor of men. Despite the fact that being arrested for domestic violence “is associated with less repeat offending” (U.S. Department of Justice), past research has found that more than 62% of “the most serious charges (aggravated batteries) were more likely to end without arrest . . . than with arrest” (Bourg and Stock 177). This problem is compounded and perhaps understood when considered in the context of research on domestic violence among members of law enforcement, which “suggests that family violence is two to four times higher in the law-enforcement community than in the general population” (Friedersdorf). Finally, as of May 2015, eight states still have laws that allow perpetrators of domestic violence to enter pre-trial diversion programs (Widgery), like the one then available in New Jersey that allowed Rice to escape being prosecuted and, eventually, even charged, thus wiping the slate clean. Social and political structures like those just described serve to marginalize victims of domestic abuse, and, in order to make meaningful progress regarding the social problem of domestic violence, they must be addressed. Until such time as violence from men directed at women

and children is no longer trivialized through its normalization – and in some cases even legitimation – in the socio-political system, that violence will continue, and perpetrators of domestic abuse will in all likelihood be both forgiven and forgotten.

Spring 2016 119

This content downloaded from 216.145.162.122 on Thu, 25 Apr 2019 21:28:34 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

Geyerman

Notes

1 . Janay Rice is referred to by her maiden name of Palmer so as to avoid confusion with her husband, Ray Rice.

  1. There were four high profile domestic violence cases in the NFL during this time. I omitted the case of Ray McDonald from my analysis because it assumed essentially the same form as the Rice and Hardy cases.
  2. For an explanation ot the commissioners exempt list, see Jason La Canfora’s “How the Exempt/Commissioner’s Permission List Works.”
  3. For more on media coverage of domestic violence, see Gillespie et al. 222-245; Rothman et al. 733-744; Nettieton 139-160; McManus and Dorfman 43-65; Berns, Framing the Victim.
  4. For more on domestic violence in sports and media coverage of domestic violence in sports, see Dabbs 167-199; Enck-Wanzer 1-18; McDonald 111-133; “Out of Bounds” 1048-1065; Welch 392-411.

The post Popular Culture Association in the South appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

04/25(MM Vr2)

04/25(MM Vr2)

Watch the video on shopability found at (1000 words) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJc3-x0A_Ig

The post 04/25(MM Vr2) appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"