Unit.8.Marketing

Unit.8.Marketing

For this activity, prepare a reflection paper, and consider the concepts that you have learned during your readings. Think about what you understand completely and what did not quite make sense. The purpose of this assignment is to provide you with the opportunity to reflect on the material you have read and to expand on it. This is not a summary.

In the Unit I introduction to this course, Theodore Levitt’s remarks about the contrasting needs of the seller and the marketer were shared. Levitt described how satisfying the needs of the customer is now the pathway to marketing success. This concept and others related to the four Ps of product, price, promotion, and place were further explored throughout the units. For this reflection paper, respond to these three prompts:

§ Reflect on how this introductory marketing course has changed your view of how the field of marketing works.

§ What was the most surprising thing you learned? What do you need to learn more about?

§ Do you see the rise of consumer power through evolving changes in technology? If so, how? If not, why not?

Your reflection paper must be at least four pages in length and formatted according to APA guidelines. If you use any paraphrased or quoted material, you must have accompanying in-text citations and references. Title and reference pages do not count toward the minimum length requirement.

The post Unit.8.Marketing appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

prepare a reflection paper

prepare a reflection paper

For this activity, prepare a reflection paper, and consider the concepts that you have learned during your readings. Think about what you understand completely and what did not quite make sense. The purpose of this assignment is to provide you with the opportunity to reflect on the material you have read and to expand on it. This is not a summary.

In the Unit I introduction to this course, Theodore Levitt’s remarks about the contrasting needs of the seller and the marketer were shared. Levitt described how satisfying the needs of the customer is now the pathway to marketing success. This concept and others related to the four Ps of product, price, promotion, and place were further explored throughout the units. For this reflection paper, respond to these three prompts:

§ Reflect on how this introductory marketing course has changed your view of how the field of marketing works.

§ What was the most surprising thing you learned? What do you need to learn more about?

§ Do you see the rise of consumer power through evolving changes in technology? If so, how? If not, why not?

Your reflection paper must be at least four pages in length and formatted according to APA guidelines. If you use any paraphrased or quoted material, you must have accompanying in-text citations and references. Title and reference pages do not count toward the minimum length requirement.

The post prepare a reflection paper appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Please I want This Tomorrow

Please I want This Tomorrow

Step 1: Watch the following movie on Licensing Intellectual Property. This is necessary because it contains vocabulary and explanations of licensing that will be helpful in preparing the deliverable in step 2.

Licensing IP 3-24-14, 3.17 PM.mov84 MB

Step 2. Select one of the topics from the list below and sign up for it here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VvOi3uxzHY8cpyGKzSiW_h45vAmcg5g2SwbdZyY71qw/edit?pref=2&pli=1#gid=0. Each student in your class must choose a different scenario so there are no repeats of topics.

How to License and Record a Cover Song to Post on YouTube and on a CD Licenses a Business, Venue or Event Needs to Play Music: Rights of Public Performance

Rights Releases in Modeling Contracts

Celebrity Endorsement Deals (Right of Publicity, Trademark, etc.)

Product Placement: Licensing Brands for Film Merchandising Licenses for Movie Promotional Items

Licensing Sports Statistics for Use in a Mobile Application

Event Sponsorships: Trademark Cross-Licensing and Quality Control

Rights Contained in an Option Agreement to Turn a Book into a Movie

Franchise Agreements: Exploring the Trademark License from the Franchise Owner to Licensees

Licensing a Song to Use in a Movie, Video Game or TV Show: Rights and Payments

The Difference Between a License and a Sale: Getting Distribution for Your Food Product in a Grocery Store

Affiliate Marketing: How it Works

Distributing a Movie Through Amazon Prime Instant Video, Netflix, Amazon Fire TV and Apple TV

Distributing Music on iTunes, Amazon Prime Music, Spotify and Pandora

User Agreements: How Can Users use Music They Get through iTunes, Amazon Prime Music, Spotify and Pandora?

Placing Your Book in Libraries and in the Kindle Lending Library

Retransmission of Live Sports Events: Do You Need a License?

Trademark Merchandising: How Does a Licensor Exercise Quality Control?

Font Licenses

Stock Photo Licensing: How to Sell Your Photos to Getty and iStock Photos and What Licenses do These Outlets Offer Users

Paparazzi: How to Sell Your Celebrity Photos to TMZ and Other Media Outlets

Licensing Film Clips to Use in Your Blog

Licensing Characters for Video Games

Revenue Structures: Calculating Licensing Payments and Royalties

How to License NFL Player Images for Products

How to Get a License from the NBA (hint: find the application)

Getting a License from CLC for College Merchandise

How to Get a FIFA License for Merchandise (hint: find the application)

How to Get a Synch License from SONY/ATV

How to License a Film Clip from Disney

Step 3. Write a post (or create a presentation–your choice) that is a “how-to” guide for your classmates.

Research the topic, then prepare a “how-to” explaining the topic to the class. To make the post or presentation as practical as possible, give ins and outs, best practices, tips and cautions, etc., and an example (one from the real world or one from your imagination–i.e., what you’d like to do).

Your post or presentation should go into substantial detail demonstrating your expertise in the area. A purely high level explanation will not earn the highest grade–helpful details are key.

Ensure that your post or presentation includes:

The topic you selected.

An explanation of how licensing works in the topic area.

An example of a licensing deal you might do in the topic area (to illustrate the material you just explained).

References in APA format.

Your copyright notice (circled C, year, name).

The post Please I want This Tomorrow appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Nursing Theories: a Framework for Professional Practice

Nursing Theories: a Framework for Professional Practice

Peer replies Theory

Related to “Theory of Bureaucratic Caring and the Theory of Successful Aging “

1 -cygnai

The Theory of Bureaucratic caring focuses on caring in organizations; caring is contextual and is influenced by organizational structure. The caring practice involves a connection, mutual recognition, and involvement between nurse and client and enables peoples to create meaning in their lives. When clients perceive the encounter to be caring, their sense of dignity and self-worth is increased, and feelings of connectedness are expressed. Common caring patterns include: knowing the client, nursing presence, empowering the client, compassion, and competence. In the other hand, the framework of the Theories of successful aging includes: chronic illness allowed, but limited disability and multi-dimensional perspective.

Elements of successful aging include physical health, cognitive, social, and productive functioning; this organizational structure influences the theory of bureaucratic caring. This theory can be related to the Essential II: Organizational and Systems Leadership. This essential recognizes that organizational and systems leadership are critical to the promotion of high quality and safe patient care. Leadership skills are needed that emphasize ethical and critical decision making, effective working relationships, and a systems perspective; the practice of the Master Essential II also can help us to apply this theory safely, prevent diseases and get better outcomes.

Reference

Masters, K., & University of Southern Mississippi College of Nursing Mississippi Kathleen Masters. (2014). Nursing Theories: a Framework for Professional Practice. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Publishers.

Hesook Kim, R., & Kollak, I. (2006). Nursing Theories: Conceptual and Philosophical Foundations, Second Edition. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.

2-katiana

The theory of Bureaucratic caring was developed in 1981 by Marilyn Ray and is viewed as a grounded theory.Subsequently the theory of successful aging states that optimal aging occurs when individuals participate in activities, pursuits, and relationships. Additionally it is understood that optimal aging occurs when, ” The theory of Successful Aging deals with the process that people have to go through before they can stop being active in the society” (In Smith, 2015). Moreover the similarities between the Theory of Bureacratic Varing and the Theory of Successful Aging lie in the fact that they both involve care and place significant emphasis on care. This ensures that the patients are well taken care of and are assisted and provided with optimal care. Moreover the Bureaucratic caring theory correlates to the AACN Masters Essentials because it provides a formula that assists with understanding how nursing can take place in a contemporary health care setting and this is achieved by highlighting the importance of spiritual and ethical caring as it relates to organizations , cultures , economies and other Aspects of Health policy and advocacy

                                                                          References

In Smith, M., & In Parker, M. (2015). Nursing theories & nursing practice. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company.

The post Nursing Theories: a Framework for Professional Practice appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Peer response Theory

Peer response Theory

Related to “Theory of Bureaucratic Caring and the Theory of Successful Aging “

1 -cygnai

The Theory of Bureaucratic caring focuses on caring in organizations; caring is contextual and is influenced by organizational structure. The caring practice involves a connection, mutual recognition, and involvement between nurse and client and enables peoples to create meaning in their lives. When clients perceive the encounter to be caring, their sense of dignity and self-worth is increased, and feelings of connectedness are expressed. Common caring patterns include: knowing the client, nursing presence, empowering the client, compassion, and competence. In the other hand, the framework of the Theories of successful aging includes: chronic illness allowed, but limited disability and multi-dimensional perspective.

Elements of successful aging include physical health, cognitive, social, and productive functioning; this organizational structure influences the theory of bureaucratic caring. This theory can be related to the Essential II: Organizational and Systems Leadership. This essential recognizes that organizational and systems leadership are critical to the promotion of high quality and safe patient care. Leadership skills are needed that emphasize ethical and critical decision making, effective working relationships, and a systems perspective; the practice of the Master Essential II also can help us to apply this theory safely, prevent diseases and get better outcomes.

Reference

Masters, K., & University of Southern Mississippi College of Nursing Mississippi Kathleen Masters. (2014). Nursing Theories: a Framework for Professional Practice. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Publishers.

Hesook Kim, R., & Kollak, I. (2006). Nursing Theories: Conceptual and Philosophical Foundations, Second Edition. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.

2-katiana

The theory of Bureaucratic caring was developed in 1981 by Marilyn Ray and is viewed as a grounded theory.Subsequently the theory of successful aging states that optimal aging occurs when individuals participate in activities, pursuits, and relationships. Additionally it is understood that optimal aging occurs when, ” The theory of Successful Aging deals with the process that people have to go through before they can stop being active in the society” (In Smith, 2015). Moreover the similarities between the Theory of Bureacratic Varing and the Theory of Successful Aging lie in the fact that they both involve care and place significant emphasis on care. This ensures that the patients are well taken care of and are assisted and provided with optimal care. Moreover the Bureaucratic caring theory correlates to the AACN Masters Essentials because it provides a formula that assists with understanding how nursing can take place in a contemporary health care setting and this is achieved by highlighting the importance of spiritual and ethical caring as it relates to organizations , cultures , economies and other Aspects of Health policy and advocacy

                                                                          References

In Smith, M., & In Parker, M. (2015). Nursing theories & nursing practice. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company.

The post Peer response Theory appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Evaluate Buzz Aldrin went to space and therefore would have experienced zero gravity.

Evaluate Buzz Aldrin went to space and therefore would have experienced zero gravity.

One of the most common and important argument forms is the appeal to authority. For this assignment you will read all three post below and respond, you will discuss this argument form, as well as how to use it to improve your reasoning and your life.word count min 75words.

  1. Three appeals to authority:
  2. My primary care physician found a lump on my throat during today’s visit and told me I have cancer.

Evaluation: The argument, in this case, is given by an overall medical physician who will have some knowledge of the diagnosis. He does not have the ability to tell if a lump is cancerous without further testing.

  1. The coffee barista said a large coffee would help me wake up.

Evaluation: The coffee shop wants to make more money. Therefore, I will feel more awake after drinking it. Which it did wake me up but had way too much caffeine.

  1. Smacking children is wrong and should be banned. The biologist professor Alice Bloggs has stated so.

Evaluation: Professor Bloggs is a biologist and not a child psychologist or relevant expert in the field. The fact that she is highly qualified in one area does not mean that she’s therefore an expert in all areas.

Appeals to Authority in General:

You must ensure that your source is credible. This can be achieved by either showing the reputation and reviews of your source or even simply through research. You may want to build up the credibility over time, but without hard proof of facts such as a review from a consumer and research, you will not know if the person/company is truly reputable or reliable.

How do we know which sources are reliable and trustworthy? The only way to find out if its reliable is to find other resources that talk about the same thing. We all use google and look things up so by finding something google usually pops up about 6-20 different articles about the same thing yet they can word it different but mean the same.

Do you find that there are some types of sources of which people are too trusting? Appeal to authority is a great place to start from, without having some kind of trust people would not be able to believe anything that a person or even a book states. Sources that are reliable will have documentation to support their expertise. Professors and doctors for example, have received years of training making them a reliable source. The type that can be trusting is actors or athletes. Most people will go off every word a famous actor or athlete says.

How might we learn to display the proper amount of skepticism and trust in relation to sources?

The way to learn to display skepticism and trust would be to use it as a starting point. A person would need make sure that the information provided was from reliable source. Social media has become a major part of how people receive information. People tend to believe everything that is on the internet and especially social media. The way to overcome is like everything else, just use it as a starting point and then do your own research on the matter. RUIZ

  1. Give three examples of appeals to authority (they can be from real source or experiences, or you can make them up). One should be very strong, one very weak, and one in the middle. Evaluate the quality of each.
  2. Buzz Aldrin says there is no gravity in space

Evaluation: Buzz Aldrin went to space and therefore would have experienced zero gravity.

  1. CNN Says President Trump is going to be the next president in 2016

Evaluation: CNN takes in pole numbers from all parts of the U.S. and therefore can accurately assume who won the presidency.

  1. Matthew McConaughey says that every hour spent on mars will be seven years back on earth

Evaluation: Matthew McConaughey played an astronaut who went to a planet. He has no credibility as to time relevance on a particular planet.

Provide an example of a time in which you or someone you know was fooled by trusting a source that turned out to be unreliable.

Most recently it is the amount of ‘Fake News’ that we all see on our social media accounts from supposedly credible news stations, and this goes for both democrat and republican. For democrats it is CNN. President Trump will do or say something and it is completely warped into something else. For the conservatives it is FOX News. Trump says or does the smallest thing but FOX reports it as the next major milestone in American History, so they make it seem. If someone were to only follow one of those news sources their point-of-view on our political system would be drastically swayed one way or the other.

How do we know which sources are reliable and trustworthy?

In today’s world where anyone can publish anything with a chance that millions of people can see the publication in a second’s notice, it is often difficult. One way to verify the validity of the source is to check whether or not the source is an authority on the subject (Hardy, Foster & Postigo, 2015).

Do you find that there are some types of sources of which people are too trusting?

I do think that people are too trusting of particular sources. One source is social media in general. Most people have several dozen, at least, friends on facebook with multiple posts per day so it is easy for someone to see an article and believe it since it was from their Mom, Dad, or Aunt or Uncle. One example I can think of is one of my friends on social media shared a parody article about the military. This source is just for humor but he actually believed it since he saw it on Facebook.

How might we learn to display the proper amount of skepticisms and trust in relation to sources?

I think we need to do more research on the person presenting the publication or statement. We cannot just assume just because an article is from a prominent news station, book or magazine that it is 100% credible. We need to do our own research in the author to better understand their credentials. If we know the person, say a close family friend, that states a fact that he or she is an expert in their field then we can generally take that as fact, but just because we read an article on social media that your Aunt Kathy posted doesn’t make it credible. Research the outlet and author to better understand them.BAILEY

  1. Give three examples of appeals to authority (they can be from real source or experiences, or you can make them up). One should be very strong, one very weak, and one in the middle. Evaluate the quality of each.
  2. The Police Officer said that I was going to get a traffic ticket for speeding.

Evaluation: The Police Officer has the authority to issue traffic tickets to anyone who is in violation of any traffic laws.

  1. Steven A. Smith says the Golden States Warriors are favored to win the NBA Finals this year.

Evaluation: Steven A. Smith is a renowned sports journalist who has been covering sports for over 20 years. The Golden State Warriors have won the NBA championship the last two years and currently owns the best record in the league. There is no guarantee that they will win but the probability is high that they will.

  1. My friend says her grandmother told her that the reason why she suffers from pain in her knee is due to the weather outside.

Evaluations: My friend’s grandmother is not a medical expert but she trusts everything that her grandmother tells her.

Provide an example of a time in which you or someone you know was fooled by trusting a source that turned out to be unreliable.

Social Media has turned into a huge source for information, whether it is wrong or right. One day I was going through my timeline and a friend of mine had posted an article with the comments RIP Sinbad. Sinbad is a comedian/actor who was very popular in the 90s. I immediately open the article to see that it stated that the Comedian had passed away in his home the night before. I initially was sad about it because I grew up watching him on television and he was one of my favorite comedians. I then decide to do more research on how he passed away, so I Google information on his death. It turns out that it was a death hoax.

How do we know which sources are reliable and trustworthy?

It is hard to tell whether or not a source is reliable and trustworthy because people cater to the base that they support. However, you will have to find the truth out for yourself by verifying the information from multiple sources.

Do you find that there are some types of sources of which people are too trusting?

Yes, there are plenty of sources of which people are too trusting. Facebook, CNN, FOX News are a few that comes to mind. I get so agitated when I see people re-post information that they see on Facebook just because it caters to their beliefs. The same happens with certain news outlets. Depending on what the political affiliation you have, usually determines what news outlet is watched. Republicans watch FOX News and Democrats watch CNN and although they might report the same news, the rhetoric is totally different to the point that if you want to know the truth, you would have to do further research.

How might we learn to display the proper amount of skepticism and trust in relation to sources?

To display the proper about of skepticism and trust in relation to sources, one would have to become objective and not fall for the first thing that you see or hear just because it is something that you agree with. Do more research and find more experts who state the same factual information.

Are people too trusting of media sources, and is there a way to overcome these tendencies? How can we make sure those are the best sources and not be deceived by deceptive ones?

Yes, I think people are too trusting of media sources but we are taught to trust them because it is their job to tell us the truth. The way to overcome those tendencies is to stay objective and look to other sources on the matter. Deceptive sources are known for being just that. It’s a lot of trial and error involved but as long as you’re able to verify information from multIple sources, you are likely to find the truth.JOHNSON

The post Evaluate Buzz Aldrin went to space and therefore would have experienced zero gravity. appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Government Versus Private Funding

Government Versus Private Funding

Before the end of the week, begin commenting on at least two of your classmates’ responses. You can ask technical questions or respond generally to the overall experience. Be objective, clear, and concise. Always use constructive language, even in criticism, to work toward the goal of positive progress. Submit your responses in the Discussion Area.

Complete this discussion in a 150 – 300 response.

Government Versus Private Funding

Explore the difference between the following:

Medicare, Medicaid, and a private insurance of your choice (such as Major Medical, PPO or HMO):

Respond to the list of questions below for each, supporting your answers with resources appropriate to the topic

  1. Describe how this insurance is paid for? Who pays for it?
  2. Who is eligible to have this insurance? Why?
  3. How does the insurance work? (Co-payments, Deductibles, Premiums, Capitation, etc.?
  4. Give an example of a healthcare service covered under this insurance type? Evaluate how the service is paid for and what is needed for the individual to obtain the service.
  5. Is their any political impact on the financial support of these insurance types?

To support your work, use your course and textbook readings and also use the South University Online Library. As in all assignments, cite your sources in your work and provide references for the citations in APA format.

Your initial posting should be addressed at 150-300 words. Submit your document to this Discussion Area by the due date assigned. Be sure to cite your sources using APA format.

Respond to your peers throughout the week. Justify your answers with examples, research, and reasoning. Follow up posts need to be submitted by the end of the week.

The post Government Versus Private Funding appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Response Post 3

Response Post 3

One of the most common and important argument forms is the appeal to authority. For this assignment you will read all three post below and respond, you will discuss this argument form, as well as how to use it to improve your reasoning and your life.word count min 75words.

  1. Three appeals to authority:
  2. My primary care physician found a lump on my throat during today’s visit and told me I have cancer.

Evaluation: The argument, in this case, is given by an overall medical physician who will have some knowledge of the diagnosis. He does not have the ability to tell if a lump is cancerous without further testing.

  1. The coffee barista said a large coffee would help me wake up.

Evaluation: The coffee shop wants to make more money. Therefore, I will feel more awake after drinking it. Which it did wake me up but had way too much caffeine.

  1. Smacking children is wrong and should be banned. The biologist professor Alice Bloggs has stated so.

Evaluation: Professor Bloggs is a biologist and not a child psychologist or relevant expert in the field. The fact that she is highly qualified in one area does not mean that she’s therefore an expert in all areas.

Appeals to Authority in General:

You must ensure that your source is credible. This can be achieved by either showing the reputation and reviews of your source or even simply through research. You may want to build up the credibility over time, but without hard proof of facts such as a review from a consumer and research, you will not know if the person/company is truly reputable or reliable.

How do we know which sources are reliable and trustworthy? The only way to find out if its reliable is to find other resources that talk about the same thing. We all use google and look things up so by finding something google usually pops up about 6-20 different articles about the same thing yet they can word it different but mean the same.

Do you find that there are some types of sources of which people are too trusting? Appeal to authority is a great place to start from, without having some kind of trust people would not be able to believe anything that a person or even a book states. Sources that are reliable will have documentation to support their expertise. Professors and doctors for example, have received years of training making them a reliable source. The type that can be trusting is actors or athletes. Most people will go off every word a famous actor or athlete says.

How might we learn to display the proper amount of skepticism and trust in relation to sources?

The way to learn to display skepticism and trust would be to use it as a starting point. A person would need make sure that the information provided was from reliable source. Social media has become a major part of how people receive information. People tend to believe everything that is on the internet and especially social media. The way to overcome is like everything else, just use it as a starting point and then do your own research on the matter. RUIZ

  1. Give three examples of appeals to authority (they can be from real source or experiences, or you can make them up). One should be very strong, one very weak, and one in the middle. Evaluate the quality of each.
  2. Buzz Aldrin says there is no gravity in space

Evaluation: Buzz Aldrin went to space and therefore would have experienced zero gravity.

  1. CNN Says President Trump is going to be the next president in 2016

Evaluation: CNN takes in pole numbers from all parts of the U.S. and therefore can accurately assume who won the presidency.

  1. Matthew McConaughey says that every hour spent on mars will be seven years back on earth

Evaluation: Matthew McConaughey played an astronaut who went to a planet. He has no credibility as to time relevance on a particular planet.

Provide an example of a time in which you or someone you know was fooled by trusting a source that turned out to be unreliable.

Most recently it is the amount of ‘Fake News’ that we all see on our social media accounts from supposedly credible news stations, and this goes for both democrat and republican. For democrats it is CNN. President Trump will do or say something and it is completely warped into something else. For the conservatives it is FOX News. Trump says or does the smallest thing but FOX reports it as the next major milestone in American History, so they make it seem. If someone were to only follow one of those news sources their point-of-view on our political system would be drastically swayed one way or the other.

How do we know which sources are reliable and trustworthy?

In today’s world where anyone can publish anything with a chance that millions of people can see the publication in a second’s notice, it is often difficult. One way to verify the validity of the source is to check whether or not the source is an authority on the subject (Hardy, Foster & Postigo, 2015).

Do you find that there are some types of sources of which people are too trusting?

I do think that people are too trusting of particular sources. One source is social media in general. Most people have several dozen, at least, friends on facebook with multiple posts per day so it is easy for someone to see an article and believe it since it was from their Mom, Dad, or Aunt or Uncle. One example I can think of is one of my friends on social media shared a parody article about the military. This source is just for humor but he actually believed it since he saw it on Facebook.

How might we learn to display the proper amount of skepticisms and trust in relation to sources?

I think we need to do more research on the person presenting the publication or statement. We cannot just assume just because an article is from a prominent news station, book or magazine that it is 100% credible. We need to do our own research in the author to better understand their credentials. If we know the person, say a close family friend, that states a fact that he or she is an expert in their field then we can generally take that as fact, but just because we read an article on social media that your Aunt Kathy posted doesn’t make it credible. Research the outlet and author to better understand them.BAILEY

  1. Give three examples of appeals to authority (they can be from real source or experiences, or you can make them up). One should be very strong, one very weak, and one in the middle. Evaluate the quality of each.
  2. The Police Officer said that I was going to get a traffic ticket for speeding.

Evaluation: The Police Officer has the authority to issue traffic tickets to anyone who is in violation of any traffic laws.

  1. Steven A. Smith says the Golden States Warriors are favored to win the NBA Finals this year.

Evaluation: Steven A. Smith is a renowned sports journalist who has been covering sports for over 20 years. The Golden State Warriors have won the NBA championship the last two years and currently owns the best record in the league. There is no guarantee that they will win but the probability is high that they will.

  1. My friend says her grandmother told her that the reason why she suffers from pain in her knee is due to the weather outside.

Evaluations: My friend’s grandmother is not a medical expert but she trusts everything that her grandmother tells her.

Provide an example of a time in which you or someone you know was fooled by trusting a source that turned out to be unreliable.

Social Media has turned into a huge source for information, whether it is wrong or right. One day I was going through my timeline and a friend of mine had posted an article with the comments RIP Sinbad. Sinbad is a comedian/actor who was very popular in the 90s. I immediately open the article to see that it stated that the Comedian had passed away in his home the night before. I initially was sad about it because I grew up watching him on television and he was one of my favorite comedians. I then decide to do more research on how he passed away, so I Google information on his death. It turns out that it was a death hoax.

How do we know which sources are reliable and trustworthy?

It is hard to tell whether or not a source is reliable and trustworthy because people cater to the base that they support. However, you will have to find the truth out for yourself by verifying the information from multiple sources.

Do you find that there are some types of sources of which people are too trusting?

Yes, there are plenty of sources of which people are too trusting. Facebook, CNN, FOX News are a few that comes to mind. I get so agitated when I see people re-post information that they see on Facebook just because it caters to their beliefs. The same happens with certain news outlets. Depending on what the political affiliation you have, usually determines what news outlet is watched. Republicans watch FOX News and Democrats watch CNN and although they might report the same news, the rhetoric is totally different to the point that if you want to know the truth, you would have to do further research.

How might we learn to display the proper amount of skepticism and trust in relation to sources?

To display the proper about of skepticism and trust in relation to sources, one would have to become objective and not fall for the first thing that you see or hear just because it is something that you agree with. Do more research and find more experts who state the same factual information.

Are people too trusting of media sources, and is there a way to overcome these tendencies? How can we make sure those are the best sources and not be deceived by deceptive ones?

Yes, I think people are too trusting of media sources but we are taught to trust them because it is their job to tell us the truth. The way to overcome those tendencies is to stay objective and look to other sources on the matter. Deceptive sources are known for being just that. It’s a lot of trial and error involved but as long as you’re able to verify information from multIple sources, you are likely to find the truth.JOHNSON

The post Response Post 3 appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Complete this discussion in a 150 – 300 response.

Complete this discussion in a 150 – 300 response.

Before the end of the week, begin commenting on at least two of your classmates’ responses. You can ask technical questions or respond generally to the overall experience. Be objective, clear, and concise. Always use constructive language, even in criticism, to work toward the goal of positive progress. Submit your responses in the Discussion Area.

Complete this discussion in a 150 – 300 response.

Government Versus Private Funding

Explore the difference between the following:

Medicare, Medicaid, and a private insurance of your choice (such as Major Medical, PPO or HMO):

Respond to the list of questions below for each, supporting your answers with resources appropriate to the topic

  1. Describe how this insurance is paid for? Who pays for it?
  2. Who is eligible to have this insurance? Why?
  3. How does the insurance work? (Co-payments, Deductibles, Premiums, Capitation, etc.?
  4. Give an example of a healthcare service covered under this insurance type? Evaluate how the service is paid for and what is needed for the individual to obtain the service.
  5. Is their any political impact on the financial support of these insurance types?

To support your work, use your course and textbook readings and also use the South University Online Library. As in all assignments, cite your sources in your work and provide references for the citations in APA format.

Your initial posting should be addressed at 150-300 words. Submit your document to this Discussion Area by the due date assigned. Be sure to cite your sources using APA format.

Respond to your peers throughout the week. Justify your answers with examples, research, and reasoning. Follow up posts need to be submitted by the end of the week.

The post Complete this discussion in a 150 – 300 response. appeared first on graduatepaperhelp.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"