Identifying Misleading Information in an Argument

“Identifying Misleading Information in an Argument” Please respond to the following:

    Consider the following argument: There are many arguments for the elimination or modification of current U. S. drug laws, but one of the most persuasive involves what negative effects drug laws are having on society in comparison with the effects of the drugs themselves. In the past ten years, most forms of drug use have dropped significantly, especially among teens. Despite this, non-violent drug offenders accounted for 21.1 percent of the federal prison population. First time drug offenders serve, on average, a sentence three months longer than kidnappers, nine months longer than burglars, and thirty-three months longer than sex abusers. In 1992, the average cost of keeping an inmate in either state or federal prison was about $20,000 per prisoner per year. The United States has the highest incarceration rate in the world, with 455 prisoners per 100,000 population. It is maintaining these prisoners at great expense in an environment where they are unlikely to develop a socially constructive attitude. Perhaps it is time that we reconsider our attitudes toward those who choose to use drugs; failure to do so may cost society even more than it already has.

        Determine whether or not the argument uses any deceptive statistics. Give your opinion on whether or not the argument has persuaded you. Explain why or why not.

        Determine the primary ways in which statistics or authority are used in your current position in developing persuasive arguments, and provide examples of such use.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

The completed analysis should be 1,000-1,250 words and should connect to your identified practice problem of interest.

Prepare a critical analysis of a qualitative study focusing on the problem statement, study purpose, research question, literature review, and theoretical framework. This can be one of the selected articles from your previous literature review or a new peer-reviewed article.

The completed analysis should be 1,000-1,250 words and should connect to your identified practice problem of interest.

Refer to “Research Critique Part 1.” Questions under each heading should be addressed as a narrative, in the structure of a formal paper.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Research Critique, Part 1

To write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of the research study conducted, respond to each of the questions listed under the headings below.

Do not answer the questions with a yes or no; rather, provide a rationale or include examples or content from the study to address the questions.

CRITICAL APPRAISAL GUIDELINES: QUALITATIVE STUDY

Problem Statement

· Identify the clinical problem and research problem that led to the study. What was not known about the clinical problem that, if understood, could be used to improve health care delivery or patient outcomes? This gap in knowledge is the research problem.

How did the author establish the significance of the study? In other words, why should the reader care about this study? Look for statements about human suffering, costs of treatment, or the number of people affected by the clinical problem.

Purpose and Research Questions

Identify the purpose of the study. An author may clearly state the purpose of the study or may describe the purpose as the study goals, objectives, or aims.
List research questions that the study was designed to answer. If the author does not explicitly provide the questions, attempt to infer the questions from the answers.
Were the purpose and research questions related to the problem?
Were qualitative methods appropriate to answer the research questions?

Literature Review

Did the author cite quantitative and qualitative studies relevant to the focus of the study? What other types of literature did the author include?
Are the references current? For qualitative studies, the author may have included studies older than the 5-year limit typically used for quantitative studies. Findings of older qualitative studies may be relevant to a qualitative study.
Did the author evaluate or indicate the weaknesses of the available studies?
Did the literature review include adequate information to build a logical argument?

Conceptual / Theoretical Framework

Did the author identify a specific perspective from which the study was developed? If so, what was it?
When a researcher uses the grounded theory method of qualitative inquiry, the researcher may develop a framework or diagram as part of the findings of the study. Was a framework developed from the study findings?

Reference

Burns, N., & Grove, S. (2011). Understanding Nursing Research (5th ed.). Elsevier. ISBN-13: 9781437707502

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

One evidence-based solution you might use to address the public health problem you identified for your Scholar-Practitioner Project community health assessment

As a public health professional, it is important that, whenever possible, the solutions you pose have evidence to support them. In your Scholar-Practitioner Project, you will practice applying an evidence-based solution to a perceived public health problem.

The Assignment (4-5 pages):

Submit a 4 to 4-page paper describing the following:

  • One  evidence-based solution you might use to address the public health problem you identified for your Scholar-Practitioner Project community health assessment
  • A rationale for your choice of this solution
  • An explanation of how you could determine the feasibility of this solution
  • An explanation of how this evidence-based solution might be integrated into your Scholar-Practitioner Project
 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Try to select at least two philosophers that coincide with your viewpoints, but if you have more, then discuss them as well, and why they match up to your views.

two insights and/or ideas that you gained from your coursework this week that you believe are integral to creating an environment that fosters learning, and explain how these ideas are in sync with your philosophy of teaching and learning. Cite your ideas or insights, and explain if, in any way, current politics have affected your thinking.

 Try to select at least two philosophers that coincide with your viewpoints, but if you have more, then discuss them as well, and why they match up to your views.

3 paragraphs!

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Explain the difference between someone’s belief in the Loch Ness monster and the Christian’s belief in God, according to Williams.

As I mentioned in class last week, we’re now into the section of the class that focuses on Christianity, particularly how Christians view what it means to be human in a world created by God. The author, Rowan Williams, was the archbishop of Canterbury, which is the highest authority in the Anglican Church (the branch of Christianity that began in England with Henry VIII). In this text, he talks about Christian belief and the issue of trust in a world where people are trained to be suspicious. Don’t worry if you feel a little confused the first time through this article… I’d suggest giving it a quick read through, then go back and focus closely on the sections that these questions direct you to. 

1. Explain the difference between someone’s belief in the Loch Ness monster and the Christian’s belief in God, according to Williams.

2. You may have noticed Williams often referring to some of the “great questions” that we have returned to numerous times throughout the semester. One of these great questions, especially given the wide variety of interpretations of Scripture or the existence of other major religions like Buddhism, is this: “Why should we put our confidence in God the Father almight, maker of heaven and earth?” (p 7). Write a couple of sentences that explain how Williams answers this question on pages 7-10.

3. Williams states: “You won’t be surprised to hear that I haven’t yet found the decisive new argument that will prove once and for all that there really is a God” (p. 20) Try to explain why this doesn’t really bother Williams. Hint: consider where he thinks many people’s belief in God begins (p. 21)

4. Choose 1 of the 2 stories that he recounts in the final few pages of the article about people who “take responsibility for making God credible in the world” and briefly explain how that person did “make God credible.”

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

What is the function of fat in nutritional health beside serving as the body’s primary means of storage for excess calories?

150-200 word ,per question ,reference APA format  

1.What is the function of fat in nutritional health beside serving as the body’s primary means of storage for excess calories?  What is the basis of our current concern about saturated fats cholesterol and trans-fatty acids?   2 What role does Medicare and Medicaid play in meeting the health care needs of the American public? Which portion of Medicare is universal? What elective option does Medicare offers? 

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Explain one benefit and one limitation for using software-assisted quantitative data analysis in the preparation of a community health assessment report and justify your response

This week, you revisit methods for data assessment and analysis including software and computers. These tools have enabled researchers to collect, clean, manage, and analyze quantitative and qualitative data at high speed. For example, GIS is a helpful tool for quantitative analysis in community health assessment, and NVivo has been widely used in qualitative data analysis. Yet both continue to be problematic to many practitioners. You evaluate the benefits and limitations of data analysis methods including the use of software. Finally, you evaluate some of the reasons why technology may not be a panacea to all the problems of manual data analysis but, rather, a source of new challenges.

For this Discussion, consider this week’s Resources. Think about your personal experiences with data collection software, even if it was not related to community health assessment, and think about some of the challenges it posed. 

With these thoughts in mind:

Post 4 pages of your answer to one of the following:

  • Explain one benefit and one limitation for using software-assisted quantitative data analysis in the preparation of a community health assessment report and justify your response, or
  • Explain one benefit and one limitation for using software-assisted qualitative data analysis in the preparation of a community health assessment report and justify your response.
  • Finally, describe one method for data analysis for which you would not use software and explain why.
 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Post a PowerPoint summary of your Scholar-Practitioner Project.

A community health assessment is incomplete without a final report, but even a final report may be read by very few people. Most people do not have the time to read a lengthy report. Your findings and recommendations will find a wider audience if you can present them in a concise summary covering key points. Knowing how to extract and present the most important elements of each section of an assessment report is a critical skill so that the findings may be disseminated to the widest possible audience.

With these thoughts in mind:

Post a PowerPoint summary of your Scholar-Practitioner Project. Then, explain the insights you gained or conclusions you drew from having completed your community health assessment.

Use the Resources and current literature to support your response.

Refer to the Discussion Rubric and the PowerPoint Presentation Rubric in the Course Information area to complete the Discussion.

Read a selection of your colleagues’ postings

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

The Institutional Review Board (IRB) is in place to ensure the safety and confidentiality of information for those individuals who participate in research studies.

The Institutional Review Board (IRB) is in place to ensure the safety and confidentiality of information for those individuals who participate in research studies. For most research in the field of health care, you are required to have your research preapproved by at least two organizations—Walden University and the health facility with which you will be working.

Understanding the level of review required for your research and why it is vital to be approved prior to beginning your dissertation research will protect you, the University, and the individuals who participate in your research.

Review the “Institutional Review Board (IRB) Frequently Asked Questions” self-paced tutorial included in this week’s Learning Resources, as well as the materials presented at the Institutional Review Board for Ethical Standards in Research website (also included this week’s Learning Resources).

Post 3-4 pages brief description of your dissertation topic. Then, explain the types of consent and precautions you think the Institutional Review Board may require for your research study, and why. Be sure to note how your research design, methods, participants, and type of data might affect the level of institutional review required.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"