Locate two articles from the University Library or the Internet and discuss the following, in 75 to 100 words per article: Is the information contained in the articles reliable? Explain. Are the authors credible or non-credible? Why or why not? Is the article credible?

Step 1 of 3:

Provide your opinion on one of the following issues, in at least 50 to 75words.

  • Healthcare system – (Prefered)
  • Climate change
  • National debt
  • Ask your instructor for approval of a social, political or educational issue.

Step 2 of 3:

  • Locate two articles from the University Library or the Internet and discuss the following, in 75 to 100 words per article:
  • Is the information contained in the articles reliable? Explain.
  • Are the authors credible or non-credible? Why or why not?
  • Is the article credible?

Step 3 of 3:

Reflect on your original opinion of your topic in 50 to 75 words. Consider the following questions for your response:

  • Which of the two articles was more persuasive? Why?
  • Has your opinion changed after reading the articles? Why or why not?
  • What type of information and research would you need to change your opinion if it did not change?

Cite your references.

Format your responses consistent with APA guidelines.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Analyze the impact of your individual’s contribution on today’s public health system. HELP: You are asking “what happened as a result of this contribution at the national and community level?” For example, some elements you could address include: did it change attitudes did it change protocols and policies did behavior change result did it add/eliminate laws

Significant Contributions to Public Health – Part II

This is a continuation of your final project, which you started in Week 3. This last piece involves an analysis of how your individual’s contribution from the past continues to contribute to today’s public health system and how it might guide future work within the industry. As you recall, in week 3, you researched an individual and their contribution to community and public health. To begin, you need to review the feedback given to you from Week 3. Then, make the necessary revisions to Part I of this project. Then, you will be adding the second half to your project.

Follow this outline to help formulate your paper or presentation:

ACTION: Make sure you review all the feedback from your Week 3 (Part I) assignment and apply any necessary revisions. Your week 3 assignment should have included each of the following elements:

  • GRADED ELEMENT : Describe your selected person’s experience
  • GRADED ELEMENT : Analyze the climate of the time period in terms of political, socioeconomic, environmental and technological context in which this person worked.
  • GRADED ELEMENT : Examine the personal beliefs of your person that prompted this work.
  • GRADED ELEMENT : Examine how this individual overcame any adversities to succeed in his/her task.
  • GRADED ELEMENT : Describe the final outcome of this individual’s contribution to community and/or public health.
  • GRADED ELEMENT : Explain what his/her contribution did for overall community and/or public health at the time.
  • GRADED ELEMENT : Explain why this contribution was so important at that particular point in history.

ACTION: Think about the individual’s contribution to community/public health

  • GRADED ELEMENT : Analyze the impact of your individual’s contribution on today’s public health system.
    • HELP: You are asking “what happened as a result of this contribution at the national and community level?” For example, some elements you could address include:
      • did it change attitudes
      • did it change protocols and policies
      • did behavior change result
      • did it add/eliminate laws
  • GRADED ELEMENT : Analyze how this contribution is still relevant today
    • HELP: Was this contribution only applicable at the time it occurred, or is it still applied today? Why or why not? Explain your response
  • GRADED ELEMENT : Examine how this contribution could support or be expanded for future community and public health benefits
    • HELP: Using solid critical thinking, look at the historical value of the contribution and examine how it could be used for the future (is it applicable to another health issue, can it lead to more policy change, could it promote advocacy work or public health laws, etc.)

You have a choice of which format you wish to present your findings:

Format 1: Written Paper

  • Must be at least 6 pages in length (not including title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
  • Must include a separate title page with the following:
    • Title of paper
    • Students name
    • Course name and number
    • Instructor’s name
    • Date submitted
  • Must use at least eight scholarly sources (one of those may be the course text).
  • Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
  • Must include a separate reference page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

OR

Format 2: Presentation (w/audio or w/speaker’s notes)

  • Must be at least 18 minutes in length (not including title and reference slides) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
    • Must include a separate title slide with the following:
    • Title of presentation
    • Students name
    • Course name and number
    • Instructor’s name
    • Date submitted
  • Must use at least eight scholarly sources (one of those may be the course text).
  • Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

Carefully review the Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

What are some of the complex issues related to gender? What are some of the complex issues related to culture and diversity?

Fair and Equitable?

 

As you have learned from the text and perhaps from your own experiences, characteristics such as gender, culture, socioeconomic status, learning styles, disabilities, and at-risk status can impact the ways that adults relate to and interact with children. As a professional, it is vital that you evaluate your own attitudes and strive to be fair, equitable, and proactive in your interactions with children and families.

 

Review the “Student Characteristics and Teacher Interaction” section (pages 245-266) of your text.

 

Then consider the following questions:

 

  • What are some of the complex issues related to gender?
  • What are some of the complex issues related to culture and diversity?
  • Do all children have an equal opportunity to succeed in school?

 

Choose two characteristics covered in the section you reviewed that concern you the most in terms of the potential for inequitable treatment of young children.



Post your thoughts with regard to the following:

 

  • Identify the two characteristics you chose, and explain why each is of special concern to you.
  • Explain how you as a professional can advocate for young children and families in each area. Be sure to also explain how you will ensure that your own behavior with regard to each characteristic is fair and equitable to children you work with and their families.
 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Dynamic Habitats: Marine Intertidal Communities :Compare and contrast estuarine wetlands and the rocky shore which are influenced by tides.

Question 3. Dynamic Habitats: Marine Intertidal Communities :Compare and contrast estuarine wetlands and the rocky shore which are influenced by tides. Include in your answer: a. a comparison of the estuarine and rocky shore habitats, b. the influence of tides on these two types of habitats, highlighting the differences, c. the special adaptations of organisms which live in these two communities, d. zonation occurring in these communities.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Freshwater Wetlands and Vernal Pools :Describe the pattern of life in freshwater wetlands and vernal pools and the roles they play in the lives of animals that rely on them.

Question 2. Freshwater Wetlands and Vernal Pools :Describe the pattern of life in freshwater wetlands and vernal pools and the roles they play in the lives of animals that rely on them. Include in your answer: a. the similarities and differences of freshwater wetlands and vernal pools b. a description of resource partitioning in these aquatic habitats that allows high biodiversity c. the life histories of dragonflies and tiger salamanders and the value of possessing a larval stage in a life history

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Communities and Guilds: Describe the ecological concepts of community and guild.

Question 1. Communities and Guilds (25 points) Describe the ecological concepts of community and guild. Include in your answer: a. the definitions of the terms guild, niche, keystone species, and key ecological function b. the definitions of a biological community and the opinions that communities are simply overlapping species that can survive in a particular habitat or that communities are superorganisms, the coherence of which is dependent on species interactions c. an explanation of how guilds may include unrelated plants and animals d. how competition has been reduced between members of sympatric populations belonging to the same guild

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Discuss the negative impact of social media on adolescents.

*This is an Argumentative Essay Outline* To complete this assignment, follow the instructions below. State the topic clearly. Create a thesis paragraph expressing what you will be arguing (the point you want to make) and a general order for the paper. Include a reference list of no fewer than five properly APA-formatted references for sources you intend to use in the paper. The list of possible topics includes: human involvement in climate change (no or yes and to what degree); the use of robots in healthcare; the impact (positive or negative) of social media on a specific generation; whether social security will be sustainable into the future; the value of DNA therapies in treating cancer; using technologies like CRISPR/Cas9 to eliminate genetic diseases (or create designer babies); whether animals should have rights equal to humans; whether vegetarianism is healthier than eating meat; and whether either medical or recreational marijuana should be legal. Hopefully, there is something here that will interest you. Note: As you do your research, it is permissible to change your sources. Also, because of the recency and relevance of these issues, no sources older than 5 years should be used other than as historical information. Critical thinkers do the research first and then side with the preponderance of evideTo complete this assignment, follow the instructions below. State the topic clearly. Create a thesis paragraph expressing what you will be arguing (the point you want to make) and a general order for the paper. Include a reference list of no fewer than five properly APA-formatted references for sources you intend to use in the paper. The list of possible topics includes human involvement in climate change (no or yes and to what degree); the use of robots in healthcare; the impact (positive or negative) of social media on a specific generation; whether social security will be sustainable into the future; the value of DNA therapies in treating cancer; using technologies like CRISPR/Cas9 to eliminate genetic diseases (or create designer babies); whether animals should have rights equal to humans; whether vegetarianism is healthier than eating meat; and whether either medical or recreational marijuana should be legal. Hopefully, there is something here that will interest you. Note: As you do your research, it is permissible to change your sources. Also, because of the recency and relevance of these issues, no sources older than 5 years should be used other than as historical information.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

In 500 words or more, explain why Carr chooses Robert Frosts poem to conclude his argument

In 500 words or more, explain why Carr chooses Robert Frosts poem to conclude his argument. Additionally, comment on how this final chapter reinforces Carrs ideas in regards to human happiness in the age of automation. Nicholas Carr asserts, Many of the cognitive talents weve considered uniquely human, it turns out, are anything but (11). Also, include a Works Cited page Be specific in addressing the prompt. If you simply ramble on without direct references to Carrs ideas, you will receive a zero

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

How else might future research overcome technological limitations to bolster critical thinking and avoid its decline?

The rise of the digital age ushered with it countless and pivotal benefits that have made modern life easier and convenient. This is seen through the rapid development of communication and the efficient accessibility of knowledge and information. It is now possible to connect with anyone across the globe, access bank accounts and manage finances at any given time, discover and learn just about anything through online learning and e-training platforms- the possibilities of technological advancement seems boundless, ergo, is it reasonable to infer that modern technology has the capacity to bolster higher-order cognitive processes such as critical thinking? According to Sternberg (1986), cognitive thinking constitutes mental operations and procedures that facilitate learning and cognition, decision-making and problem-solving strategies which raise the likelihood for an expedient outcome (Halpern, 1998). Technological proficiency and critical thinking are valuable assets not only for students in education but in the working environment (Swart, 2017) and in everyday life. Technology has made information readily accessible and it is imperative for educational establishments to prime students to become discerning professionals who will utilise first-rate information to deliver quality solutions and results (Swart, 2017). One of the ways critical thinking can be honed by technology is through the familiarisation of students with practical applications. The technology used must be feasible and the consolidation of material purposeful in order to achieve the required results (Swart, 2017). Software such as Top Hat use polling methods called the classroom response system which is employed to collect student feedback and enables instructors to scope student engagement and comprehension of the course material (Deal, 2007., DeBourgh, 2008., Fies & Marshall, 2006., Lander & Stoekel, 2012., as cited by Swart, 2017). According to Brady, Seli, & Rosenthal (2013) ,DeBourgh (2008), Mollborn & Hoekstra (2010), Siau, Sheng & Nah (2006), Trees & Jackson (2007), as cited by Swart (2017), the classroom response system not only reinforce interactivity and participation but also encourage and vitalise critical thinking. As per Anthis (2011), as cited by Swart (2017, Improving student awareness of self-monitoring ability to comprehend the material being taught, as is accomplished through the classroom response system, can promote met cognitive ability, which can be beneficial to student learning and critical thinking. Another way is through incorporating online discussion forums (Swart, 2017) where students can reflect on tasks, answer questions and interact with their peers stimulating both low-level and higher-level critical thinking skills (Mansbach, 2015). Tied to this are peer review activities which improve communication and writing skills and allow students to practice the art of discernment- to question what it is they are reading and to introduce and compare alternative outlook and solutions (Mansbach, 2015). UoEOs student forum and collaborative learning question activity benefits from both these functions. However, despite the tried and tested benefits technology plays in cultivating critical thinking, it is not without its limitations. Research conducted by Patricia Greenfield in UCLA suggests that critical thinking and analytical skills have declined with the progression of technology (UoC, 2009). Upon her evaluation of 50 studies on learning and technology, Greenfield discovered that students have more visual literacy and less print literacy which creates a barrier as reading develops crucial cognitive skills including higher-level critical thinking. Greenfield asserts that there should be a balance in the utilisation of educational mediums (UoC, 2009). How else might future research overcome technological limitations to bolster critical thinking and avoid its decline?

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"