What does this   artifact mean to you? Please explain. To explore this, consider these additional questions:  How has it inspired or moved you? Has this artifact helped   make your life or the life of others better? How does it connect to your life   or to the educational journey you are starting along with your classmates?  

Artifact Analysis Worksheet

An artifact is something made by a human.

It can be a form of art or a form of self-expression that has meaning to you. It can be anything that a human conceived of as art and deliberately crafted.

For this assignment, you are being asked to share your artifact with your classmates. Please consider this as you select your artifact by choosing something you are comfortable sharing and avoiding potentially offensive material.

In the Learning Resources area, there is also a document on “reading” images and text. It includes many questions which can guide deeper analysis of your artifact.

 

Share your artifact   or a link to your artifact in the space below. 

Include a   description of the artifact and include research on the background of the   artifact. For example, information about the artist involved.

*** Make sure to   cite your sources by including a list of any outsides sources of information   you are using to answer this question. Remember, research is always a good   thing as it shows effort.

 

 

What does this   artifact mean to you? Please explain.

To explore this, consider these additional questions:

How has it inspired or moved you? Has this artifact helped   make your life or the life of others better? How does it connect to your life   or to the educational journey you are starting along with your classmates?

  • Select an artifact, something that is important to you or resonates with you in some way. Make certain you have a way to share the artifact electronically. You can save the website/link to the artifact if you found it online or take a photo or scan the artifact.
  • Use the Artifact Analysis Worksheet to evaluate your artifact.
  • Use the Academic Writing Expectations (AWE) Checklist to guide your writing for each question on the workshe

Humans are art making creatures. From the evocative hunting depictions of our ancient ancestors to modern dance, humans have reacted to their environment by painting, singing, dancing, writing, and recording the things they encounter. In this week’s assignment, you will be asked to select an artifact to analyze. Make sure that you choose something that really resonates with you, but also make sure that you would not mind sharing it with the members of the class. Understand that this is an academic workspace, and select an image, poem, or song that you would be comfortable sending to the entire class. You are free to select any object that is shareable electronically with your classmates.

Photo credit: Microsoft Corporation. (Producer). MP900309017 [photo of brushes and art supplies]. Retrieved February 6, 2014 from http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/images/results.aspx?qu=art&ex=1%20-%20ai:MP900309017|#ai:MP900309017

Evaluating a work of art requires some distance from the piece. You will be asked to analyze the artifact that you select and to describe why the piece was selected. Please choose something that you would not mind others critiquing. For example, if you select a painting that your sister painted, you might not want to have someone write that they didn’t like the subject or style. Make sure that you are comfortable with the piece being viewed and analyzed by other members of the class.

In this Assignment you will identify and analyze an artifact of your choice. The resources used in the Week 2 Notes and Readings are just a few of the options for types of media you might select as meaningful to you.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

For this assignment, you are being asked to share your artifact with your classmates. Please consider this as you select your artifact by choosing something you are comfortable sharing and avoiding potentially offensive material. 

You chose monalisa. Answer the question .

Artifact Analysis Worksheet

An artifact is something made by a human.

It can be a form of art or a form of self-expression that has meaning to you. It can be anything that a human conceived of as art and deliberately crafted.

For this assignment, you are being asked to share your artifact with your classmates. Please consider this as you select your artifact by choosing something you are comfortable sharing and avoiding potentially offensive material.

In the Learning Resources area, there is also a document on “reading” images and text. It includes many questions which can guide deeper analysis of your artifact.

 

Share your artifact   or a link to your artifact in the space below. 

Include a   description of the artifact and include research on the background of the   artifact. For example, information about the artist involved.

*** Make sure to   cite your sources by including a list of any outsides sources of information   you are using to answer this question. Remember, research is always a good   thing as it shows effort.

 

 

What does this   artifact mean to you? Please explain.

To explore this, consider these additional questions:

How has it inspired or moved you? Has this artifact helped   make your life or the life of others better? How does it connect to your life   or to the educational journey you are starting along with your classmates?

 

 

Many people have artifacts displayed in their home; for   example, a certain painting on their wall. In a way, we’ll be creating a   virtual gallery of artifacts by sharing our choices as a class in the Class   DocSharing area.

How does your   artifact fit into our class gallery? How do you think your artifact communicates your life perspective to   the class? How do you think others   will interpret your choice of artifact?

 

 

Discuss in your own   words, how technology has changed human art making and human art sharing. How do you, or could you, use technology in   making your own art? 

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

What practical steps could be taken to build a relationship with a follower of this worldview who might be a co-worker, neighbor, etc.?

Based on the content of the course (Readings, Presentations, Discussion Board Forum 1, and Assignments) choose 1 of the following worldviews (Secular Humanism, Buddhism, Hinduism, or Islam) and answer the following questions (250–500 words). These questions must be answered in separate paragraphs.

  1. What practical steps could be taken to build a relationship with a follower of this worldview who might be a co-worker, neighbor, etc.?
  2. What barriers/hindrances would exist with presenting the Christian gospel to a person from this worldview? Scripture, course content, and/or research must be included and cited properly in your response this question.
  3. What personal challenges might you have with presenting the gospel?
 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

– Assume nothing of the audience. It is the responsibility of you, the writer, to clearly and effectively communicate to your reader(s).  This rule presupposes that you, the writer, understand that the reader does not know whereof you write (or speak).  It is crucial, therefore, that you start by working to make sure your audience is not confused or led astray by any assumptions of knowledge on their part. You are the communicator with the message — they are the audience waiting to receive that message.

Students,
Here are the instructions for Personality Paper 2.  Please use your time wisely to plan, write, and proof your  papers.

Instructions:
Pick a composer from 1910 – Present and write a paper.
Length:
Five-page paper with well-developed paragraphs plus a cover page, abstract and reference page.

Format:
Double-Spaced

APA – http://www.citationmachine.net/apa/cite-a-book

Font:

Times New Roman 12 point

Composers:

http://digitaldreamdoor.com/pages/best-classic-comp2.html
References:

Three scholarly references are required.

1.      Scholarly Articles/Journals

2.      Documentary

3.      Reference Books from Library

If you have questions about your references, please read the following article.

http://pegasus.cc.ucf.edu/~janzb/courses/scholarly1.htm

This paper should be in standard essay form and should contain the following. Please  remember to spell check your work!  Plagiarized papers will not be accepted.

Cover Page – Page 1

Abstract – Page 2

Body – Pages 3-7

· Introduction

· Body 1 – About the composer (Birth, Death, Place of Birth, Mother, Father, Musical time period {Medieval, Renaissance, Baroque, Classical} etc.)

· Body 2 – About the Culture and time (How does culture and time play a role in the composer’s compositions?)

· Body 3 – Compositions and work experience (Who did the composer compose for? {String Quartet, Orchestra, Chorale, Piano, Organ}, etc.)

· Body 4 – Listening – Using Chapters two and three, pick one of the works from the aforementioned composer and evaluate the  composition. (Dynamics {Loud or Soft}, Articulation {Staccato, Legato, or Accents}, Tempo {Fast or Slow}, Key {Major or Minor}, Instrumentation {Brass, Percussion, Strings, Woodwinds}, Self-Reflection {Did you like it? Why or Why not?}

· Conclusion

Reference Page – Page 8

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Tips for Writing an Essay

Introduction:

Rule 1 — Assume nothing of the audience. It is the responsibility of you, the writer, to clearly and effectively communicate to your reader(s).  This rule presupposes that you, the writer, understand that the reader does not know whereof you write (or speak).  It is crucial, therefore, that you start by working to make sure your audience is not confused or led astray by any assumptions of knowledge on their part. You are the communicator with the message — they are the audience waiting to receive that message.

Rule 2 — You have 20 seconds to get the reader’s attention. It doesn’t matter if you’re selling soap, that initial opening has to provoke the audience to continue reading with interest. There are six (6) strategies to do this:

1.      Start with a broad general statement of your topic and narrow this down to your thesis statement;

2.      Start with an idea or situation that is the opposite of the one you plan to actually develop;

3.      Explain the importance of your topic to the audience;

4.      Use an incident or brief story (anecdote);

5.      Ask one or more questions (but remember that questions deserve to be answered sooner or later); and/or

6.      Use a quotation (something familiar to the targeted audience).  Then, you present the Thesis Statement (i.e., the main idea of the entire essay). There are four (4) errors to avoid here:

· Make no announcements;

· Do not make it too broad;

· Do not make it too narrow or specific; and

· Do not make it too vague.  Further, the Thesis Statement calls for a Plan of Development — at least four ways by which you will develop the thesis.

Body:

Consists of four (4) supporting paragraphs that follow the thesis.

Primary Support Paragraph (1st level of support)

a. The Topic Sentence for  this paragraph comes from the 1st pattern of development in your thesis statement.

b. The Primary Support Sentence expands upon the controlling idea found in the Topic Sentence;

c. The Secondary Support Sentence provides additional detail to the primary support sentence;

d. The Tertiary Support Sentence provides the third level of support to the topic sentence with additional examples, a quote or illustration; and

e. The Concluding Sentence which will restate the main idea in the topic sentence and provide a transitional phrase for the following paragraph.

The Secondary Support Paragraph provides the next level of support to the Thesis Statement. It is developed just as the Primary Support Paragraph except that the Topic Sentence is built upon the second pattern of development.  The Tertiary Support Paragraph of the essay provides the third level of support to the thesis statement and is developed like the Primary and Secondary Paragraphs except that the main idea for the Topic Sentence of this paragraph  comes from the third (3rd) pattern of development.  The fourth paragraph is on listening.

Conclusion:

This leads your reader to the Conclusion of the Essay. I always say to the student writer that this is just as important  as one’s opening, that you want to finish the essay strong. To do so, one has at least eight (8) different strategies to select from. The good writer, in fact, having mastered the opening and closing strategies, will be able to use a combination of opening  and closing strategies when writing. When you can do this, then the writing no longer is stiff and mechanical. This final section deals with those closing essay strategies in writing.

End with a summary and leave the reader with a final thought; Include a thought-provoking question or series of questions; End with a prediction (statement of what may happen in the future) or recommendation (suggestion as to what should be done about the situation or problem described in the essay); A final quotation (Remember that quotes may come from popular songs, poems, speeches like Dr. King’s “I Have A Dream” or Rev. Jessie Jackson’s “I Am Somebody”) A final anecdote that reinforces the main point of the essay; A call for the reader(s) to take action; A summary of what has been presented, highlighting the major points you’ve attempted to  develop; and/or Presentation of proof for the proposition you have argued to your reader(s).

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Robert Jervis argues that great powers today have entered an era of  enduring peace in their relations with one another.  Why does he find  typical realist, liberal, and constructivist accounts lacking?  What is  his “synthetic interactive explanation” for the peace?

MLA
550 WORDS
2 SOURCES

These are the question that you need to answer in the rea
Robert Jervis, “The Era of Leading Power Peace”
1. Robert Jervis argues that great powers today have entered an era of  enduring peace in their relations with one another.  Why does he find  typical realist, liberal, and constructivist accounts lacking?  What is  his “synthetic interactive explanation” for the peace?
2. Jervis argues that a security community now exists among great powers  of the world, rendering war amongst each other almost unthinkable.   Briefly outline his argument for the existence of this security  community.  Do you agree with his assessment about the likelihood of war  amongst the great powers today?  Explain your answer.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

The Mind/Body problem involves the following two positions: Substance Dualism and Materialism. In your own words, provide a concise formulation of the Descartes’ Substance Dualism. In your own words, provide a concise formulation of Materialism. In particular, explain the distinction between Reductive Materialism and Eliminative materialism. In light of the criticisms offered of both Substance Dualism and Materialism, which account is more plausible? Explain why. (70 marks.)

Assignment 5

INSTRUCTIONS: This assignment consists of two short essay questions. The main intent of these questions is to ensure that you have a sound grasp of the fundamentals of the material presented in this unit. To that end, there is a 3 to 4 page (1000 words) limit for this question. I’m not so concerned with whether you agree with a particular author or not. The quality of your answer is based on your exposition of the competing positions, your comparative analysis of those positions and, lastly, your argument in support of the position you defend.

As with all the assignments in this course, these questions are not designed to be a “research” questions. There is no requirement to get material from external sources such as websites like Wikipedia. In fact, doing so can count against you. The point of your essays is to formulate the course material and develop your critical response. You can do this by working with the course material and developing your own ideas about the issue. The essay is simply your opportunity to set that out in paper.

So, the material you need to successfully complete this assignment can be found in the online course materials available through the course website. There may also be some reading material that is part of the hard copy course readings package. You can find this information on the course materials section of the course website.

Questions: (The total possible mark for this assignment is 100 marks.)

1. The Mind/Body problem involves the following two positions: Substance Dualism and Materialism. In your own words, provide a concise formulation of the Descartes’ Substance Dualism. In your own words, provide a concise formulation of Materialism. In particular, explain the distinction between Reductive Materialism and Eliminative materialism. In light of the criticisms offered of both Substance Dualism and Materialism, which account is more plausible? Explain why. (70 marks.)

2. The philosophical problem of personal identity involves two positions offered by John Locke and David Hume. Explain these competing accounts as they are provided by the authors included in our course readings. Which account offers the most plausible response to the problem? Explain why. (30 marks.)

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

1) Write a survey on the theme of the “Messianic Secret” in the Gospel of Mark.  Use quotes from the primary source (i.e., the Gospel of Mark) and secondary sources  (i.e., modern scholarship) to (a) describe the nature/character of the “Messianic Secret”; 

RLS 202 – Introduction to the New Testament

Due Date – March 1, 2016

5-7pages, 6 resources.

1) Write a survey on the theme of the “Messianic Secret” in the Gospel of Mark.

Use quotes from the primary source (i.e., the Gospel of Mark) and secondary sources

(i.e., modern scholarship) to (a) describe the nature/character of the “Messianic Secret”;

(b) discuss the question of Jesus’ identity (i.e., who is Jesus according to Mark, the

disciples, and the other characters?); and, most importantly, (c) offer an explanation as to

what it is that Mark is trying to accomplish by portraying Jesus in this manner.

OR

2) Write a survey on the so-called “Synoptic Problem.” This paper should attempt

to (a) explain the “problem”; (b) provide examples from the synoptic gospels that

reinforce your descriptions of the problem; and (c) outline/explain the dominant theory

that has been forwarded by scholars in order to account for the complex relationship

between the synoptic gospels (i.e., the Markan priority theory). This paper should also

include a discussion on the document known as Quelle or Q.

OR

3) Write a survey on the subject of Jesus’ identity in the Gospel of Matthew. This

paper should shed light on (a) the different ways in which Matthew emphasizes Jesus’

identity as a Jew (i.e., How does the genealogy in Chapter One emphasize this point?

etc); (b) how it is that Jesus’ identity supports the theology of Matthew (i.e., What does it

mean to be the Jewish messiah? How does the person of Jesus fulfill scripture? etc); and

(3) the ways in which Jesus functions as a new Moses.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Write a brief explanation of the relationship between ethics and professional responsibility.  Then, explain whether you agree or disagree with the way that Claude  Ferguson chose to balance his objective, subjective, and ethical  responsibilities as a public administrator given the personal and  professional risks.  Finally, offer an alternate strategy that Claude Ferguson could have  taken and explain why it might help him to balance responsibilities and  ethics. 

APA
2 SOURCES
275 WORDS

By its very nature, the role of public administrator means carrying a  fair share of responsibility. In both government and nonprofit  organizations, administrators may be responsible for budgets, staff, and  project outcomes, for example. As a public administrator, how might you  balance the objective and subjective aspects of responsibility with  both your organization’s ethical standards and your own? In order to  discover this balance, you will begin by examining the fundamental  relationship between ethics and professional responsibility.
In the reading you will review a case study: “When a Career Public  Servant Sues the Agency He Loves: Claude Ferguson, the Forest Service,  and Off-Road Vehicles in the Hoosier National Forest” (O’Leary, 2009)  and consider how a public administrator might balance the objective,  subjective, and ethical responsibilities within a governmental agency or  nonprofit organization.
Write a brief explanation of the relationship between ethics and professional responsibility.
Then, explain whether you agree or disagree with the way that Claude  Ferguson chose to balance his objective, subjective, and ethical  responsibilities as a public administrator given the personal and  professional risks.
Finally, offer an alternate strategy that Claude Ferguson could have  taken and explain why it might help him to balance responsibilities and  ethics.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

For this assignment, you will create a differential diagnosis for the patient in your chosen case. This assignment continues the work you started in the Weeks One and Two discussion forums and the Week Three assignment. Be sure to follow the instructions in Chapter 1: Differential Diagnosis Step by Step when creating your differential diagnosis. Your assignment must include the following: · Recommend a diagnosis based on the patient’s symptoms, presenting problems, and history. (discuss the symptoms, problems, history)

Making a Differential Diagnosis

Prior to beginning work on this assignment, please read Chapter 1: Differential Diagnosis Step by Step in DSM-5: Handbook of Differential Diagnosis and review the same case study you used to write your Weeks One and Two discussion forums and Week Three Assignment.

Use your case study already chosen.
For this assignment, you will create a differential diagnosis for the patient in your chosen case. This assignment continues the work you started in the Weeks One and Two discussion forums and the Week Three assignment. Be sure to follow the instructions in Chapter 1: Differential Diagnosis Step by Step when creating your differential diagnosis. Your assignment must include the following:

· Recommend a diagnosis based on the patient’s symptoms, presenting problems, and history. (discuss the symptoms, problems, history)

· Assess the validity of your diagnosis using a sociocultural perspective. (discuss social and/or cultural aspects)

· Compare at least one evidence-based and one non-evidence-based treatment option for the diagnosis. Research a minimum of two peer-reviewed sources to support your choices.  (Include two articles from the library here- required)

· Propose and provide an explanation for a minimum of two historical perspectives and two theoretical orientations that are inappropriate alternates for the conceptualizations in this case. (USE TWO DIFFERENT THEORIES HERE AND DISCUSS HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVES USING SOURCES)

****INCLUDE THE TEXT INFO

The Making a Differential Diagnosis assignment

· Must be three to five double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in.

· Must include a separate title page with the following:

o Title of paper

o Student’s name

o Course name and number

o Instructor’s name

o Date submitted

  • attachment

    PSY645DB1.doc
  • attachment

    psy645duecasestudy.doc
  • attachment

    Week3Assisgnmentps
 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"