Begin the review by defining the objective of the paper. Introduce the reader to your focal question. What is this question intended to address? You may state your “question” in the form of a problem if you like. Describe the topic for your literature review and why you chose this topic. Explain why you think it is important. It is also useful to tell the reader how the review is organized in your introduction section, before you the transition into the body of the review.

/in /by

Literature Review Paper — Schizophrenia

The purpose of this assignment is to provide you with the opportunity to select a topic in the particular area in which you have an occupational or research interest, and to complete a literature review of the topic, using a minimum of ten scholarly references. This will allow you to demonstrate mastery of the program outcomes for the B.A. psychology program at Argosy University. A helpful Web site for organizing and writing a literature review is www.wisc.edu/writing/Handbook/ReviewofLiterature.html.

You may also want to review the following documents that are available in the Doc Sharing area of the course:

  • A sample literature review,
  • a PowerPoint document illustrating how to set up your word processor for APA style
  • a “Guide for Writing a Literature Review”

Based on your review of the most recent, relevant research findings on your chosen topic, submit a final version of your literature review paper, integrating feedback received from your instructor. Be sure to include a research/focal question, synthesis of the literature you reviewed, well-established conclusions, and points of discussion and/or future research.

  • Begin the review by defining the objective of the paper. Introduce the reader to your focal question. What is this question intended to address? You may state your “question” in the form of a problem if you like. Describe the topic for your literature review and why you chose this topic. Explain why you think it is important. It is also useful to tell the reader how the review is organized in your introduction section, before you the transition into the body of the review.
  • Organize your literature review paper by themes/theories/concepts, rather than article by article. If there is one major theme you want to highlight, state the theme. If there are three major themes or streams of thought on the topic, briefly name them—and then organize the balance of your literature review around those three streams. Think of themes, theories, concepts, lines of thought, and ideas as organizing strategies for your literature review. Your creativity in this assignment is not the content or findings but the clarity with which you organize the review and create a context for understanding the focal question.
  • When you are done introducing the first line of thought, create a new paragraph to discuss studies which present another line of thought or opposing view.
  • Your literature review should hit the high points of each article. You should not discuss a single article, one by one, like a grocery list. Zero in on the main theme or finding and then move on to the next theme. Remember, this is a synthesis, an integration of all the things you have learned. You are creating a discussion on paper, which in turn gives the reader a context for understanding where the scholarship has been, where it is currently, and where it likely will be heading next. Provide enough details to help the reader understand the significance of the studies you cite without “rebuilding Rome.” Be sure to evaluate the studies and offer critical comments on any shortcomings you’ve observed or that have been reported by the authors.
  • Discuss the main findings and their implications. Given the results of your literature review, what is/are the prevailing argument(s)? What research question could you ask in order to further develop this area of study and contribute to the existing body of knowledge? Complete your review by drawing conclusions about your body of research and identifying gaps in the research which still remain to be explored, maybe even by you! Make an argument as to why your research question is important and relevant to the current work being done on your topic.

Requirements

Apply current APA standards for editorial style, expression of ideas, and formatting of the text, headings, citations, and references. Remember to use your own words to describe and evaluate the articles. Avoid quoting the material and also cite works when you are discussing someone else’s ideas. Your paper should be double-spaced and in 12 point, Times New Roman font with normal one-inch margins, written in APA style, and free of typographical and grammatical errors. It should include a title page with a running head, an abstract and a reference page. The body of the paper should be no less than 4-5 pages in length.

 

Assignment 2 Grading Criteria
Maximum Points
Description of the focal question or problem is clear and thorough.

Explanation of the relevance of the topic to the field of psychology is clear.
36
Analysis of themes, theories, or concepts is clear and complete.

Discussion of articles clearly relates to those themes, theories, or concepts (instead of discussing each article individually).
40
Choice of articles is appropriate, both in quality and quantity: they directly address the thesis.

Their evaluation is based on their relation to themes, theories, or concepts.

Evaluation includes discussion of the methodology, and a discussion of any obvious shortcomings.
40
Provides well-supported conclusions.

Suggestions for future research are appropriate and discuss how future research will contribute to the field.
40
Introduction has a clear opening, provides background information, and states the topic.

The paper is organized around an arguable, clearly stated thesis statement.

Transitions are appropriate and help the flow of ideas.

Conclusion summarizes main argument and has a clear ending.
12
Writing follows conventions of spelling and grammar throughout.  Errors are infrequent and do not interfere with readability or comprehension.
12
Using APA format, accurately paraphrased, quoted, and cited in many spots throughout when appropriate or called for. Errors present are somewhat minor.
16
Writing remains in third person throughout writing.

Word choice is accurate, clear and appropriate for the audience.
4
Total:
200
 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Explain the type of discrimination and harassment (you must include both) that took place in your case study scenario. What were the key indicators that this behavior was a violation of workplace policy?

/in /by

Identify a situation that could be considered an example of discrimination and harassment in the workplace.  This can be something that you have experienced or seen in person, or something that you create.

Formulate a short 4- to 6-sentence case study scenario that describes this incident.

Conduct a 700- to 1,050-word analysis of the case study, and include the following in your analysis:

  • Explain the type of discrimination and harassment (you must include both) that took place in your case study scenario.   What were the key indicators that this behavior was a violation of workplace policy?
  • Summarize how to conduct a proper investigation of these claims.
  • Determine which employment laws were violated in your case study scenario.  How were the laws violated?  What change(s) would you make to minimize future occurrences of these violations?

Cite all sources according to APA formatting guidelines.

Create correctly formatted APA references and a title page, and include a minimum of three references.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Identify a specific problem often faced in your field of study or everyday life. Research your problem and assess your data / research. Examples of such problems could be: Business Developing a new product that is superior to competitor’s brands; or Establishing a price for a new product using the law of supply and demand;

/in /by

Assignment 1: Applications of the Scientific Method

Due Week 4 and worth 160 points

The scientific method is useful in problem solving and decision-making in a wide variety of fields. In this assignment, you will demonstrate how to use the scientific method to make decisions and solve problems in your field of study or everyday life.

Identify a specific problem often faced in your field of study or everyday life. Research your problem and assess your data / research. Examples of such problems could be:

  1. Business
    1. Developing a new product that is superior to competitor’s brands; or
    2. Establishing a price for a new product using the law of supply and demand;
  2. Information Systems and Technology
    1. The use of personal electronic devices for work purpose, or
    2. Determining in the most cost-effective computer for your business;
  3. Criminal Justice
    1. The reliability of eyewitness testimony, or
    2. Determining what evidence reveals to you about a crime;
  4. Everyday Life
    1. Selecting a particular brand of detergent, or
    2. Determining the most cost-efficient transportation / route for your commute.

Write a three to five (3-5) page paper in which you:

  1. Explain the scientific method and describe the overall manner in which you would apply it in your field of study or everyday life.
  2. Propose one (1) testable hypothesis to explain / solve the problem you have selected. State the expected outcomes of your actions and include criteria for determining whether or not these actions would succeed. Note: Your hypothesis should be stated very precisely.
  3. Describe the main actions that you intend to put into place to test the hypothesis that you proposed in Question 2. Describe the way in which you would evaluate the success of your program. Include the results that you would deem as a success and the results that would be considered a failure.
  4. Discuss the wisdom behind the strategy you would use to test the hypothesis from Question 3, and describe the additional steps you might take, depending on the results of your test. Note: These additional steps might be to revise your original hypothesis (if the results were unsatisfactory) or to propose new hypotheses. The goal is to continuously improve your understanding of the factors influencing your outcomes, to be able to achieve greater results over time.
  5. Use at least two (2) quality resources / references in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and personal blogs do not qualify as quality resources.

Your report must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Determine whether or not you agree with the position that civil commitment violates Britney Spears’ civil liberties. Provide a rationale to support your position.

/in /by
  1. Determine whether or not you agree with the position that civil commitment violates Britney Spears’ civil liberties. Provide a rationale to support your position.
  2. Explain the distinction between civil commitment and criminal commitment.
  3. Next, support or criticize the premise that civil commitment was the proper course of action in the case of Britney Spears.
  4. Argue for or against the theory that a short term (i.e. 72 hour) commitment provides enough time for a doctor to make a reasonable determination about the scope of the mental health problems of a patient. Provide a rationale to support your response.
  5. The court ordered forensic assessments regarding Britney Spears’ parenting capacity as well as her guardianship. Discuss the manner in which you believe these two (2) assessments served the purposes of protecting the patient, protecting her children, and protecting the public. Provide a rationale to support your response.
 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

. Review the juvenile crime statistics between three cities or states inthree different parts of the country (e.g., Boston, Chicago, and Seattle) for acrime or criminal justice issue. Incorporate a graphic display to present yourfindings. Be sure to include at least three demographic items, such as gender,ethnicity, race, education, or socio-economic status, in your analysis. Ensureyou standardize your data (i.e., 1:1000; 1:10,000; or 1: 100,000) andincorporate the scale in a key for each chart.

/in /by

Focus of the Final Paper

When looking at the relationship between social justice and juvenilejustice, there are two over arching concepts when addressing juveniledelinquency – treatment and punishment. These two concepts have driven a cycleof changes in the juvenile justice system over the years. Your task is tosupport your premise that your state or city should either implement aphilosophy of treatment orpunishment for juvenile offendersfor a specific crime or criminal justice issue identified in your paper.
a. Explain the differences between the treatment and punishment concepts.Build the case for which one you believe has the stronger position based onyour research and the crime or criminal justice issue you selected to study.

b. Review the juvenile crime statistics between three cities or states inthree different parts of the country (e.g., Boston, Chicago, and Seattle) for acrime or criminal justice issue. Incorporate a graphic display to present yourfindings. Be sure to include at least three demographic items, such as gender,ethnicity, race, education, or socio-economic status, in your analysis. Ensureyou standardize your data (i.e., 1:1000; 1:10,000; or 1: 100,000) andincorporate the scale in a key for each chart.

c. Identify the prevailing thought in the city or state: Is it treatment orpunishment? Analyze the differences in the recidivism rates between the citiesor states you have selected? Is recidivism the best indicator of success orfailure or should we use a different indicator?

d. In chapters 2 and 3 of the text, our author addresses biological,psychological and sociological theories to help explain juvenile delinquency.Evaluate which of these theories would best support your thesis.

e. Support which juvenile justice intervention strategy would be effectiveto counter the crime or criminal justice issue based on your research?

f. Conclude with a summary of which concept (treatment or punishment) bestsupports the over arching concept of social justice?
The paper must be ten to twelve pages in length and formatted according toAPA style. You must use at least six scholarly resources (at least four ofwhich must be found in the Ashford Online Library) other than the textbook tosupport your claims. Cite your sources within the text of your paper and on thereference page. For information regarding APA, including samples and tutorials,visit the Ashford Writing Center, located within the Learning Resources tab onthe left navigation toolbar, in your online course.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

1. Describe the activity; how is it tied to the activities in your selected process? 2. Describe the objectives of the activity; how will it improve the deficiencies in your selected process?

/in /by

Unit 6 Assignment: Innovation, RASCI Models and Performance Management

In this Assignment, you are going to evaluate a specific business process based on

criteria detailed below. If you have already selected a business process, continue

using that and skip to the next paragraph. If you have not yet selected the

business process you will use for these Assignments, then begin by selecting

one. Email your instructor and clearly describe the objective of this process, the

participants, and the strategic significance for the company. The business process

you select must have a clear beginning and an end, with identifiable, specific steps.

Your instructor will confirm that the process you selected is suitable or will ask you

to select another one.

For this Assignment, write a paper that answers the following questions (use the

subheadings/numbered questions below to organize your paper):

Part 1: Innovation Activities

There are many different activities for creating solutions identified in the

Understand phase. The effectiveness of these activities depends on many factors,

including the organizational makeup and the circumstances of the process.

Describe an innovation activity to generate improvement ideas that you think will

work best for your selected organization. Include the following details:

1. Describe the activity; how is it tied to the activities in your selected process?

2. Describe the objectives of the activity; how will it improve the deficiencies in

your selected process?

3. Who should be participating, and why?

Part 2: RASCI Model

In any process, it is important to have a clear definition of who is responsible for

the activity and to whom they are accountable, in addition to identifying those that

may be in support positions. Following the RASCI model described on p. 362,

create a table similar to 18.2 that defines these roles for your selected process.

Begin by describing at least 4 steps in your selected process. Be specific about

who does what in each step. Then fill out the table to denote the roles. In addition

to including the table, describe each role briefly.

Part 3: Performance Management

Unit 6 Assignment

As you explored in the Discussion Board, the performance measures play a large

role in determining the actions of the employees involved in the process. Identify

three performance management metrics you will use to promote effective behavior

from those involved in your selected process. Clearly explain:

1. How the metric will be assessed,

2. What the expected targets would be, and

3. How the metrics fit the process objectives.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Consider the steps in civil litigation and ADR, and assess the factors that Pete and the ATV manufacturer will consider when deciding whether they should settle this lawsuit. If you were Pete’s lawyer, what resolution would you advise? Be sure to consider the primary forms of ADR and all ADR factors described in the lesson. Finally, research and select at least one case from an outside source to support your resolution to the ATV case. Your answer should be a minimum of 500 words. Cite any direct quotes or paraphrased material from these sources.

/in /by

Case Analysis

In light of your understanding of the civil and alternative dispute resolution (ADR) process, consider the following scenario:

Pete was seriously injured when the four-wheeled all-terrain vehicle (ATV) he was driving through the trails behind his house rolled over. As a result of his injuries, Pete is unable to work and has incurred $75,000 in medical bills. Pete has

filed a lawsuit against the ATV manufacturer to receive compensation for the financial harm resulting from his injuries. Pete claims that the manufacturer defectively designed the ATV, causing it to have a tendency to roll over on rough terrain.

The ATV manufacturer claims that the ATV is not defectively designed and that the rollover was caused by Pete driving at an excessive rate of speed around a corner.

Consider the steps in civil litigation and ADR, and assess the factors that Pete and the ATV manufacturer will consider when deciding whether they should settle this lawsuit. If you were Pete’s lawyer, what resolution would you advise? Be sure to consider the primary forms of ADR and all ADR factors described in the lesson. Finally, research and select at least one case from an outside source to support your resolution to the ATV case. Your answer should be a minimum of 500 words. Cite any direct quotes or paraphrased material from these sources.

Use APA format to properly reference your information.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

What are the primary audiences for written communication? What types of media (such as email, instant messages, memos, etc.) would be most suited to the audiences you have identified?

/in /by

Choose a specific workplace environment that requires regular written communication. It might be a workplace you have experience with, or it might be a workplace you hope to enter when you have earned your degree.

Write a 350- to 700-word essay answering the following questions about your chosen workplace:

  • What are the primary audiences for written communication?
  • What types of media (such as email, instant messages, memos, etc.) would be most suited to the audiences you have identified?
  • What kind of tone would be most appropriate for this workplace?

Support your answers by citing your assigned course materials.

Format your assignment according to appropriate course-level APA guidelines.

Submit your assignment to the Assignment Files tab.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Write an 800-1,000 word essay on your personal worldview. Briefly discuss the various possible meanings of the term “spirituality,” and your understanding of the concepts of pluralism, scientism, and postmodernism. Primarily, address the following seven basic worldview questions: What is prime reality? What is the nature of the world around you?

/in /by

Write an 800-1,000 word essay on your personal worldview. Briefly discuss the various possible meanings of the term “spirituality,” and your understanding of the concepts of pluralism, scientism, and postmodernism. Primarily, address the following seven basic worldview questions:

  1. What is prime reality?
  2. What is the nature of the world around you?
  3. What is a human being?
  4. What happens to a person at death?
  5. Why is it possible to know anything at all?
  6. How do people know what is right or wrong?
  7. What is the meaning of human history?

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center

PLEASE REVIEW THE RUBRIC BELOW BEFORE POSTING HOMEWORK FOR SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION.

Warning

You do not have permissions to perform this activity

Assignment

Week 1 | Worldview Foundations of Spirituality an…

Current All

Save Link

Assignment Personal Worldview Inventory
View Rubri

Details:

Write an 800-1,000 word essay on your personal worldview. Briefly discuss the various possible meanings of the term “spirituality,” and your understanding of the concepts of pluralism, scientism, and postmodernism. Primarily, address the following seven basic worldview questions:

  1. What is prime reality?
  2. What is the nature of the world around you?
  3. What is a human being?
  4. What happens to a person at death?
  5. Why is it possible to know anything at all?
  6. How do people know what is right or wrong?
  7. What is the meaning of human history?

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the “Submit” button under “Final Submission” is clicked.

New Attempt
Title Attached Documents Turnitin Report Similarity Index Final Submission
Click ‘New Attempt’ to start assignment or attach documents

Error Details

Apply Rubrics

Personal Worldview Inventory 
1

Unsatisfactory

0.00%
2

Less than Satisfactory

65.00%
3

Satisfactory

75.00%
4

Good

85.00%
5

Excellent

100.00%
70.0 %Content
25.0 % Comprehension of Pertinent Terms The concept of spirituality is not analyzed clearly, and no distinctions are made among possible meanings of the term. Only one meaning for the term spirituality is assumed. There is no discussion or discernible grasp of the concepts of pluralism, scientism, and postmodernism. There is surface coverage of the concept of spirituality, with some distinctions, but demonstrating poor or unclear grasp of these distinctions. There is a poor grasp and application of scientism and postmodernism to the concept of spirituality. At least two senses of spirituality are distinguished, though the grasp of that distinction may be shallow. Grasp of scientism and postmodernism is limited to its definition, with some demonstration that its full application and significance is grasped, even if minimally. At least two senses of spirituality, including from the text, are distinguished. Description of how spirituality is broadly defined in the context of scientism and postmodernism is provided and sufficiently demonstrates a grasp of the meaning of these concepts. Several possible definitions of the term spirituality, including from the text, are clearly articulated and distinguished. Description of how spirituality is broadly defined in the context of scientism and postmodernism is provided and clearly demonstrates a grasp of the meaning of these concepts.
45.0 % Personal Worldview Analysis The analysis does not answer all seven questions and there is no discussion of the interconnection of the questions and their implications. The analysis answers all seven questions but with minimal thought and any attempt at interconnection of the questions has little to no relevance. The analysis answers all seven questions thoughtfully and in a detailed manner. The analysis hints at the interconnection of the questions and their implications. The analysis answers all seven questions thoughtfully and in a detailed manner. The analysis recognizes the interconnection of the questions and their implications. The analysis answers all seven questions thoughtfully and in a detailed manner. The analysis thoroughly explains the interconnection of the questions and their implications.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
7.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
8.0 % Argument Logic and Construction Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
10.0 %Format
5.0 % Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
5.0 % Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
100 % Total Weightage
 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"