Describe your reasons for selecting occupational therapy as a profession. –**For this I might include how I have worked at a pre-school for 6 years with children ages 6 months to 5 years. I have several hours of trainings for child development along with obtaining a Child Development Associates.I am very..familiar with developmental stages of children I work very good with children, I am patient, caring, compassionate, sociable, easy to talk to. etc..

/in /by

Topic: Letter of Application for Occupational Therapy Assistant Program

Order Description
The letter should be in correct business format and addressed to:
Arkansas State University
College of Nursing and Health Professions
Program Director, OTA Application
Occupational Therapy Department
PO Box 910
State University, AR 72467

The letter of application should include the following information:
1. Describe your reasons for selecting occupational therapy as a profession.
–**For this I might include how I have worked at a pre-school for 6 years with children ages 6 months to 5 years. I have several hours of trainings for child development along with obtaining a Child Development Associates.I am very..familiar with developmental stages of children I work very good with children, I am patient, caring, compassionate, sociable, easy to talk to. etc..
2. Describe your personal traits, attributes, and strengths that will make you a successful occupational therapy assistant student.
—**I love helping children with developmental delays or just making a difference in all children’s life’s. Work well with children, very patient and kind. Being so familiar with developmental stages makes me a good candidate for this program because I find it easy to come up with activities that will improve the weaknesses that the child is having while also making the activity fun and giving the feeling of desire to want to do these projects to assist the child for the betterment of his or her future.
3. Describe any life or work experiences that have (1) helped you decide to be an occupational therapy assistant; (2) helped you to develop skills that you can use to be a successful occupational therapy assistant; and (3) helped you to be a dedicated occupational therapy assistant.
–**(1) Maybe here it could be discussed that I observed an occupational therapist assistant and really enjoyed the experience and also did a few activities with these children that had developmental delays and saw that it would be a great opportunity for me to be able to not only express the skills and knowledge I have with children but do something I love every day and have an impact on the entire outlook of children.
(2) —**Skills that have helped me would be working at the preschool for so long, getting my child dev. associates, making lesson plans, planning activities with large groups of children and small groups, I also have several hours of college courses that are for specifically teaching and early childhood that I did very well in.
(3) When I have observed the OTA and did so many interesting activities that engaged the children while helping them in several ways and I do this type of planning and process with my class daily when I am the teacher assistant. I am a very dedicated worker when it comes to children and always wanting to further any way that I can expand the ways they can develop in the most hands on ways because I myself am an auditory, visual learner also. I love to do transitions with my class, this is one thing that teachers struggle with. When the class gets crazy, they don’t know how to get it back, but I do this with no problem.
4. Why is A-State your school of choice?
–**Maybe discuss how the location is great for me, it is not far from where I live, or how Arkansas State University is a great school with credible professionals and while attending the technical branch of ASU ( ASU – Newport)..I received a lot of care by the admissions office and my advisors which was nice because normally with so many students other students can tend to get overlooked, but I never had a problem with this.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Review the Universal Health Coverage Statement (https://www.who.int/universal_health_coverage/en/) from the WHO. Then, review one or two of the reports from meetings held in 2013 which is available on their website. In these documents, they discuss the relationship between policy and Universal Health Coverage. 1. Explain what they mean by this and reflect upon whether or not this is the same definition used in the United States.

/in /by
Category: Uncategorized

Nurse Practitioner

Discussion Questions 1 & 2.

Order Description
Instruction: Answer each discussion question on one page and title them. Please follow the guide to find the correct report for each discussion question and answer all the numbered questions within each page efficiently.

(My field of study is Nurse Practitioner)

Discussion Question 1 (answer each question on one page)

Review the Universal Health Coverage Statement (https://www.who.int/universal_health_coverage/en/) from the WHO. Then, review one or two of the reports from meetings held in 2013 which is available on their website. In these documents, they discuss the relationship between policy and Universal Health Coverage.
1. Explain what they mean by this and reflect upon whether or not this is the same definition used in the United States.
2. Do all of us view this concept in the same way?
3. If not, how do we differ?
4. As you review these materials, reflect upon the visibility of the role of health care providers in this development process.

Discussion Question 2 (I selected Patient-centered care competence) another page.

This week we talked about the core competencies for health profession’s education and looked at nursing informatics and how that area has been guided by development within the profession. Consider the remaining competencies: provide patient-centered care, work in interdisciplinary teams, employ evidence-based practice, and apply quality improvement.

1. Select one of these competencies and describe changes which nursing has made to achieve the competency.
2. Find and use a peer-reviewed publications which describe the programs of (Patient-centered care) and their development or outcome.

Please find an article about nursing practitioner patient centered care.
Thanks.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Prepare a critical analysis of a quantitative study focusing on protection of human participants, data collection, data management and analysis, problem statement, and interpretation of findings. The quantitative research article can be from your previous literature review or a new peer-reviewed article. Each study analysis will be 1,000-1,250 words and submitted in one document. As with the assignments in Topics 1-3, this should connect to your identified practice problem of interest.

/in /by
Category: Uncategorized

Research critique part 2(Quantitative review)

Order Description
Save Link
Assignment Benchmark – Research Critique Part 2
View Rubric
Due Date: Mar 27, 2016 23:59:59 Max Points: 150

Details:
Prepare a critical analysis of a quantitative study focusing on protection of human participants, data collection, data management and analysis, problem statement, and interpretation of findings. The quantitative research article can be from your previous literature review or a new peer-reviewed article.
Each study analysis will be 1,000-1,250 words and submitted in one document. As with the assignments in Topics 1-3, this should connect to your identified practice problem of interest.
Refer to the resource entitled “Research Critique Part 2.” Questions under each heading should be addressed as a narrative, in the structure of a formal paper. You are also required to include an Introduction and Conclusion.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.
Submit the assignment along with an electronic version of the article used for the analysis. If an electronic version is not available, submit a clean unmarked copy of the article.
NRS433V.v10R.ResearchCritiquePart2Guidelines_student.docx

Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the “Submit” button under “Final Submission” is clicked.
New Attempt
Title Attached Documents Turnitin Report Similarity Index Final Submission
Click ‘New Attempt’ to start assignment or attach documents
Research Critique, Part 2
To write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of the research study conducted, and respond to each of the action items listed under the headings below. Successful completion of this assignment requires that you provide a rationale, include examples, or reference content from the study in your response.

CRITICAL APPRAISAL GUIDELINES: QUANTITATIVE STUDY
Introduction
• Develop a topic sentence in which you will define the purpose of the Research Critique, Part 2
• Formulate a thesis statement which briefly provides a broad indication of your point of view in composing this assignment.
• Include a summary outline to describe the organization and main topics you will include in the body paragraphs of the assignments (see below sections).
Protection of Human Participants
• Identify the benefits and risks of participation addressed by the authors. Were there benefits or risks the authors do not identify?
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects or participants?
• Did it seem that the subjects participated voluntarily in the study?
• Was institutional review board approval obtained from the agency in which the study was conducted?

Data Collection
• Are the major variables (independent and dependent variables) identified and defined? What were these variables?
• How were data collected in this study?
• What rationale did the author provide for using this data collection method?
• Identify the time period for data collection of the study.
• Describe the sequence of data collection events for a participant.

Data Management and Analysis
• Describe the data management and analysis methods used in the study.
• Did the author discuss how the rigor of the process was assured? For example, does the author describe maintaining a paper trail of critical decisions that were made during the analysis of the data? Was statistical software used to ensure accuracy of the analysis?
• What measures were used to minimize the effects of researcher bias (their experiences and perspectives)? For example, did two researchers independently analyze the data and compare their analyses?

Findings / Interpretation of Findings: Implications for Practice and Future Research
• What is the researcher’s interpretation of findings?
• Are the findings valid or an accurate reflection of reality? Do you have confidence in the findings?
• What limitations of the study were identified by researchers?
• Was there a coherent logic to the presentation of findings?
• What implications do the findings have for nursing practice? For example, can the study findings be applied to general nursing practice, to a specific population, to a specific area of nursing?
• What suggestions are made for further studies?

Conclusion
• Emphasize the importance and congruity of the thesis statement
• Provide a logical wrap-up to bring the appraisal to completion and to leave a lasting impression and take-away points useful in nursing practice.
• Incorporate a critical appraisal and a brief analysis of the utility and applicability of the findings to nursing practice.
• Integrate a summary of the knowledge learned.

Reference
Burns, N., & Grove, S. (2011). Understanding Nursing Research (5th ed.). Elsevier. ISBN-13: 9781437707502
Save Link
Assignment Benchmark – Research Critique Part 2
View Rubric
Due Date: Mar 27, 2016 23:59:59 Max Points: 150

Details:
Prepare a critical analysis of a quantitative study focusing on protection of human participants, data collection, data management and analysis, problem statement, and interpretation of findings. The quantitative research article can be from your previous literature review or a new peer-reviewed article.
Each study analysis will be 1,000-1,250 words and submitted in one document. As with the assignments in Topics 1-3, this should connect to your identified practice problem of interest.
Refer to the resource entitled “Research Critique Part 2.” Questions under each heading should be addressed as a narrative, in the structure of a formal paper. You are also required to include an Introduction and Conclusion.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.
Submit the assignment along with an electronic version of the article used for the analysis. If an electronic version is not available, submit a clean unmarked copy of the article.
NRS433V.v10R.ResearchCritiquePart2Guidelines_student.docx

Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the “Submit” button under “Final Submission” is clicked.
New Attempt
Title Attached Documents Turnitin Report Similarity Index Final Submission
Click ‘New Attempt’ to start assignment or attach documents

Apply Rubrics
Benchmark – Research Critique Part 2
1
Unsatisfactory 0%-71%
71.00% 2
Less Than Satisfactory 72%-75%
75.00% 3
Satisfactory 76%-79%
79.00% 4
Good 80-89%
89.00% 5
Excellent 90% – 100%
100.00%
80.0 %Content
2.0 % Introduction No introduction provided Introduction is incomplete, missing relevant information. Introduction is informative and provides reader with relevant information. Introduction is well-organized with a clear and pertinent thesis statement. Introduction is well-organized, fully incorporates the structure of the critique, and piques the interest of the reader to learn more.
10.0 % Protection of Human Participants Does not critique protection of human participants Some of the study tools are critiqued. Ethical issues are not addressed for quantitative design. The study tools are critiqued. Ethical issues are discussed for quantitative design. The study tools are critiqued using research terminology. Ethical issues are addressed for quantitative design. The study tools are thorough, clear, and accurately critiqued using research terminology. Ethical issues are addressed for quantitative design.
10.0 % Data Collection Does not critique data collection methods. Data collection methods are critiqued, but not to the full extent or including ethical issues. Data collection methods and potential biases are reviewed. Ethical issues are described. Interview and/or data collection processes are presented. Data collection methods are critiqued and potential biases are reviewed. Ethical issues are described. Interview and/or data collection processes are critiqued. Data collection methods are fully critiqued, and potential biases are addressed. Potential ethical issues, interview and/or data collection processes are critiqued.
10.0 % Problem Statement No problem statement is provided. The critique of the problem statement is provided, but is missing criteria as indicated in the writing guidelines. The critique of the problem statement meets all criteria of writing guidelines. The critique of the problem statement meets all criteria of writing guidelines in a detailed and comprehensive manner. The critique of the problem statement meets all criteria of writing guidelines in a detailed and comprehensive manner while demonstrating deeper understanding by incorporating prior learning or thoughtful reflection.
15.0 % Data Analysis (Quantitative) Data Management Does not critique data analysis or management. Data analysis is described. Significance and nonsignificance are explained; generalization and implications to nursing practice are not fully addressed. Conclusions are vague. Data analysis is described and linked to research questions. Results are explained, and implications to nursing practice are reviewed. Conclusions are presented. Data analysis is critiqued and tied to research questions. Results are explained, generalization and implications to nursing practice are reviewed. Conclusions are tied back to purpose of study. Data analysis is accurately critiqued and linked to research questions. Significance and nonsignificance are explained; generalization and implications to nursing practice reviewed. Conclusions are tied back to purpose of study and literature review.
15.0 % Quality of Study (Quantitative) Discussion Quality of study and discussion are not critiqued. Quality of study and discussion, including strengths and weaknesses, is not fully discussed. Strengths and weaknesses of the study are addressed and include discussion of clinical implications of findings. Strengths and weaknesses of the study are addressed and include discussion of clinical implications of findings. Credibility of study is addressed. Strengths and weaknesses of the study are fully summarized from critique, with discussion of clinical implications of findings. Credibility of study is addressed.
15.0 % Implications for Practice and Future Research. Implications for the nursing practice and future research are not addressed Implications for the nursing practice and future research are mentioned but not fully addressed Implications for the nursing practice and future research are addressed and explained. Implications for the nursing practice and future research are addressed and explained with specific suggestions mentioned. Implications for the nursing practice and future research are addressed and explained in detail, including specific suggestions.
3.0 % Conclusion Conclusion does not summarize a critical appraisal and applicability of findings. Conclusion is vague and does not discuss importance to nursing. Conclusion summarizes utility of the research and importance to nursing practice. Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal and the importance of the findings to nursing practice. Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal, knowledge learned, and the importance of the findings to nursing practice.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
5.0 % Paragraph Development and Transitions Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed. Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident. Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose. There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless.
5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
5.0 %Format
2.0 % Paper Format Appropriate template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
3.0 % Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment) No reference page is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and GCU style is usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
100 % Total Weightage

Save Link
Assignment Benchmark – Research Critique Part 2
View Rubric
Due Date: Mar 27, 2016 23:59:59 Max Points: 150

Details:
Prepare a critical analysis of a quantitative study focusing on protection of human participants, data collection, data management and analysis, problem statement, and interpretation of findings. The quantitative research article can be from your previous literature review or a new peer-reviewed article.
Each study analysis will be 1,000-1,250 words and submitted in one document. As with the assignments in Topics 1-3, this should connect to your identified practice problem of interest.
Refer to the resource entitled “Research Critique Part 2.” Questions under each heading should be addressed as a narrative, in the structure of a formal paper. You are also required to include an Introduction and Conclusion.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.
Submit the assignment along with an electronic version of the article used for the analysis. If an electronic version is not available, submit a clean unmarked copy of the article.
NRS433V.v10R.ResearchCritiquePart2Guidelines_student.docx

Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the “Submit” button under “Final Submission” is clicked.
New Attempt
Title Attached Documents Turnitin Report Similarity Index Final Submission
Click ‘New Attempt’ to start assignment or attach documents
Research Critique, Part 2
To write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of the research study conducted, and respond to each of the action items listed under the headings below. Successful completion of this assignment requires that you provide a rationale, include examples, or reference content from the study in your response.

CRITICAL APPRAISAL GUIDELINES: QUANTITATIVE STUDY
Introduction
• Develop a topic sentence in which you will define the purpose of the Research Critique, Part 2
• Formulate a thesis statement which briefly provides a broad indication of your point of view in composing this assignment.
• Include a summary outline to describe the organization and main topics you will include in the body paragraphs of the assignments (see below sections).
Protection of Human Participants
• Identify the benefits and risks of participation addressed by the authors. Were there benefits or risks the authors do not identify?
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects or participants?
• Did it seem that the subjects participated voluntarily in the study?
• Was institutional review board approval obtained from the agency in which the study was conducted?

Data Collection
• Are the major variables (independent and dependent variables) identified and defined? What were these variables?
• How were data collected in this study?
• What rationale did the author provide for using this data collection method?
• Identify the time period for data collection of the study.
• Describe the sequence of data collection events for a participant.

Data Management and Analysis
• Describe the data management and analysis methods used in the study.
• Did the author discuss how the rigor of the process was assured? For example, does the author describe maintaining a paper trail of critical decisions that were made during the analysis of the data? Was statistical software used to ensure accuracy of the analysis?
• What measures were used to minimize the effects of researcher bias (their experiences and perspectives)? For example, did two researchers independently analyze the data and compare their analyses?

Findings / Interpretation of Findings: Implications for Practice and Future Research
• What is the researcher’s interpretation of findings?
• Are the findings valid or an accurate reflection of reality? Do you have confidence in the findings?
• What limitations of the study were identified by researchers?
• Was there a coherent logic to the presentation of findings?
• What implications do the findings have for nursing practice? For example, can the study findings be applied to general nursing practice, to a specific population, to a specific area of nursing?
• What suggestions are made for further studies?

Conclusion
• Emphasize the importance and congruity of the thesis statement
• Provide a logical wrap-up to bring the appraisal to completion and to leave a lasting impression and take-away points useful in nursing practice.
• Incorporate a critical appraisal and a brief analysis of the utility and applicability of the findings to nursing practice.
• Integrate a summary of the knowledge learned.

Reference
Burns, N., & Grove, S. (2011). Understanding Nursing Research (5th ed.). Elsevier. ISBN-13: 9781437707502
Save Link
Assignment Benchmark – Research Critique Part 2
View Rubric
Due Date: Mar 27, 2016 23:59:59 Max Points: 150

Details:
Prepare a critical analysis of a quantitative study focusing on protection of human participants, data collection, data management and analysis, problem statement, and interpretation of findings. The quantitative research article can be from your previous literature review or a new peer-reviewed article.
Each study analysis will be 1,000-1,250 words and submitted in one document. As with the assignments in Topics 1-3, this should connect to your identified practice problem of interest.
Refer to the resource entitled “Research Critique Part 2.” Questions under each heading should be addressed as a narrative, in the structure of a formal paper. You are also required to include an Introduction and Conclusion.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.
Submit the assignment along with an electronic version of the article used for the analysis. If an electronic version is not available, submit a clean unmarked copy of the article.
NRS433V.v10R.ResearchCritiquePart2Guidelines_student.docx

Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the “Submit” button under “Final Submission” is clicked.
New Attempt
Title Attached Documents Turnitin Report Similarity Index Final Submission
Click ‘New Attempt’ to start assignment or attach documents

Apply Rubrics
Benchmark – Research Critique Part 2
1
Unsatisfactory 0%-71%
71.00% 2
Less Than Satisfactory 72%-75%
75.00% 3
Satisfactory 76%-79%
79.00% 4
Good 80-89%
89.00% 5
Excellent 90% – 100%
100.00%
80.0 %Content
2.0 % Introduction No introduction provided Introduction is incomplete, missing relevant information. Introduction is informative and provides reader with relevant information. Introduction is well-organized with a clear and pertinent thesis statement. Introduction is well-organized, fully incorporates the structure of the critique, and piques the interest of the reader to learn more.
10.0 % Protection of Human Participants Does not critique protection of human participants Some of the study tools are critiqued. Ethical issues are not addressed for quantitative design. The study tools are critiqued. Ethical issues are discussed for quantitative design. The study tools are critiqued using research terminology. Ethical issues are addressed for quantitative design. The study tools are thorough, clear, and accurately critiqued using research terminology. Ethical issues are addressed for quantitative design.
10.0 % Data Collection Does not critique data collection methods. Data collection methods are critiqued, but not to the full extent or including ethical issues. Data collection methods and potential biases are reviewed. Ethical issues are described. Interview and/or data collection processes are presented. Data collection methods are critiqued and potential biases are reviewed. Ethical issues are described. Interview and/or data collection processes are critiqued. Data collection methods are fully critiqued, and potential biases are addressed. Potential ethical issues, interview and/or data collection processes are critiqued.
10.0 % Problem Statement No problem statement is provided. The critique of the problem statement is provided, but is missing criteria as indicated in the writing guidelines. The critique of the problem statement meets all criteria of writing guidelines. The critique of the problem statement meets all criteria of writing guidelines in a detailed and comprehensive manner. The critique of the problem statement meets all criteria of writing guidelines in a detailed and comprehensive manner while demonstrating deeper understanding by incorporating prior learning or thoughtful reflection.
15.0 % Data Analysis (Quantitative) Data Management Does not critique data analysis or management. Data analysis is described. Significance and nonsignificance are explained; generalization and implications to nursing practice are not fully addressed. Conclusions are vague. Data analysis is described and linked to research questions. Results are explained, and implications to nursing practice are reviewed. Conclusions are presented. Data analysis is critiqued and tied to research questions. Results are explained, generalization and implications to nursing practice are reviewed. Conclusions are tied back to purpose of study. Data analysis is accurately critiqued and linked to research questions. Significance and nonsignificance are explained; generalization and implications to nursing practice reviewed. Conclusions are tied back to purpose of study and literature review.
15.0 % Quality of Study (Quantitative) Discussion Quality of study and discussion are not critiqued. Quality of study and discussion, including strengths and weaknesses, is not fully discussed. Strengths and weaknesses of the study are addressed and include discussion of clinical implications of findings. Strengths and weaknesses of the study are addressed and include discussion of clinical implications of findings. Credibility of study is addressed. Strengths and weaknesses of the study are fully summarized from critique, with discussion of clinical implications of findings. Credibility of study is addressed.
15.0 % Implications for Practice and Future Research. Implications for the nursing practice and future research are not addressed Implications for the nursing practice and future research are mentioned but not fully addressed Implications for the nursing practice and future research are addressed and explained. Implications for the nursing practice and future research are addressed and explained with specific suggestions mentioned. Implications for the nursing practice and future research are addressed and explained in detail, including specific suggestions.
3.0 % Conclusion Conclusion does not summarize a critical appraisal and applicability of findings. Conclusion is vague and does not discuss importance to nursing. Conclusion summarizes utility of the research and importance to nursing practice. Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal and the importance of the findings to nursing practice. Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal, knowledge learned, and the importance of the findings to nursing practice.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
5.0 % Paragraph Development and Transitions Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed. Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident. Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose. There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless.
5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
5.0 %Format
2.0 % Paper Format Appropriate template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
3.0 % Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment) No reference page is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and GCU style is usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
100 % Total Weightage

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

1. In about two or three paragraphs, include information about the name of the aggregate, its geographical location and size, its population, and a brief history. 2. Explain, giving at least two reasons, why you selected this particular aggregate for your Capstone project.

/in /by

Analyze and describe the strengths and weaknesses of the aggregate and the community

You will be required to select an aggregate (population) You may choose your community, county, city, or another group or organization; e.g. a senior citizen’s center, a school or a particular grade level in a school, a faith based group, a support group, or a group from your local public health department.
Familiarize yourself with Mobilize, Assess, Plan, Implement, Track (MAP-IT) EXAMPLE: https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/implement/leadPoisoning
1. In about two or three paragraphs, include information about the name of the aggregate, its geographical location and size, its population, and a brief history.
2. Explain, giving at least two reasons, why you selected this particular aggregate for your Capstone project.
3. research and describe the demographics and statistics of your aggregate. Include information about the basic vital statistics of the aggregate such as the crude birth rate, infant mortality rate, life expectancy, the leading causes of death, and any other relevant statistical information related to the health of the aggregate. In addition, explain how the local clinic meets, supports, and advocates for evidence-based practice (EBP). As a part of this assignment, you will need to create a questionnaire and interview at least one healthcare provider who is familiar with your selected aggregate.
4.PHASE III Analyze and describe the strengths and weaknesses of the aggregate and the community where the aggregate resides.
5. PHASE IV-For Phase 4 of your project, you will select a family in your aggregate and complete a risk assessment in the field using the information from chapter 18 “Community as Client: Assessment and Analysis” and “Appendix E Friedman Family Assessment Model (Short Form)” as a guide. Describe how the family, environment, home, and risk assessments were conducted, using your course textbook as a reference. Describe the results of the assessments, drawing conclusions about the health risks to the aggregate as you see them.
6. PHASE 5- develop a care plan should propose a nursing diagnosis for the aggregate and include strategies to tackle the major health risks identified during the risk assessment.List of disasters that might affect your aggregate (take into consideration the geographical location of the aggregate, past history, etc.)Strategies for handling at least two disasters from the list
Recommendation for a disaster supplies kit
7. The evaluation component of the Capstone project, you are expected to discuss how you would evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions.
Some questions you should seek answers to are:
Would I be able to implement the interventions? If not, what barriers exist?
What visible signs of success (for example, reduced health issues) would I look for? What is your projected effectiveness?

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

1. Review the needs, challenges or problems you identified in your Case Study from last week’s assignment. For each need, challenge or problem identified, provide a desired outcome. Include a supporting rationale for each desired outcome. Outcomes should be stated as SMART goals (specific, measurable, action-oriented, realistic, and time-limited).

/in /by

SMART goals

1. Review the needs, challenges or problems you identified in your Case Study from last week’s assignment. For each need, challenge or problem identified, provide a desired outcome. Include a supporting rationale for each desired outcome. Outcomes should be stated as SMART goals (specific, measurable, action-oriented, realistic, and time-limited).

2. List at least one holistic nursing intervention you will use to achieve the outcome for each of the nursing diagnoses listed on your plan. Provide supporting rationale for each chosen intervention. The rationale should include what the intervention will provide for the patient, what level of the person it will address, and how it will assist the patient in achieving the desired outcome.

3. Define the evaluation criteria to track the effect of each of the interventions on the patient’s health and healing process.

Grading Criteria Maximum Points
Provided a desired outcome (SMART goal) for each need, challenge or problem identified, and included a supporting rationale for each desired outcome — (24 Points).

Listed at least one holistic nursing intervention for each of need, challenge, or problem identified, and provided supporting rationale for each intervention — (28 Points)

Defined the evaluation criteria to track the effect of each of the interventions on the patient’s health and healing process — (28 Points)

Writing components:
• Organization (8 points)
• Usage and Mechanics (8 points)
• APA (4 points)

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Analyze and critically appraise evidence-based literature to support the solution to the identified problem. A minimum of six peer-reviewed articles must be identified. These can be the same articles from the previous selected literature review or a mixture of new and previous articles. This may also include guidelines from the National Guideline Clearinghouse, Joanna Briggs Institute, or a review from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Review.

/in /by
Category: Uncategorized

Details:
This is a Collaborative Learning Community (CLC) assignment.

Choose a nursing problem from your current practice setting, and identify a possible solution to that problem.

Conduct a search of the literature related to this problem.

Analyze and critically appraise evidence-based literature to support the solution to the identified problem. A minimum of six peer-reviewed articles must be identified. These can be the same articles from the previous selected literature review or a mixture of new and previous articles. This may also include guidelines from the National Guideline Clearinghouse, Joanna Briggs Institute, or a review from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Review.

Include the following components into the presentation:

Present the nursing practice problem with the PICOT question.
Discuss your appraisal of the literature that addresses the problem.
Present the proposed practice changes from an integration of the findings.
While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

CLC – Evidence-Based Practice Presentation

Second part
The PICOT statement will provide a framework for your capstone project (the project students must complete during their final course in the RN-BSN program of study).

Review the PICOT article “Evidence-Based Practice, Step by Step: Asking the Clinical Question: A Key Step in Evidence-Based Practice” along with the “Chapter 18: Using Research in Evidence-Based Nursing Practice” PowerPoint resource.

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://gateway.ovid.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00000446-201003000-00028&D=ovft&PDF=y

The first step of the EBP process is to develop a question from the practice problem you drafted in Topic 1. Start with the patient and identify the clinical problems or issues that arise from clinical care. Consider the research and writing you completed in Topics 1-4.

Following the PICOT format, write a PICOT statement in an area of interest to you, which is applicable to your proposed capstone project.

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

NRS433V.R.UsingResearchEvidenceBasedNursingPractice_student.pptx

1
Unsatisfactory 0-71%
71.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory 72-75%
75.00%
3
Satisfactory 76-79%
79.00%
4
Good 80-89%
89.00%
5
Excellent 90-100%
100.00%
80.0 %Content

10.0 %Identifies a nursing practice problem
Does not clearly describe a nursing issue.
Describes a nursing issue but lacks reliable sources.
Describes a nursing issue with a few reliable sources.
Articulates a nursing issue; uses supporting information from reliable sources.
Clearly articulates a relevant issue to nursing practice. Supports issue with current research.
35.0 %Critically appraises research to address the problem
Does not critically appraise research for a nursing practice issue.
Appraises research but missed key components of the design/methods that would support a solution.
Appraises three research studies supporting a solution to a nursing practice issue.
Appraises components of four to five research articles supporting a solution to a nursing practice issue.
Thoroughly, critically appraises key components of six research articles that support a solution to nursing practice issue.
35.0 %Proposes an evidence-based practice change
The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information; includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.
The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.
The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.
The solution is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting unity, coherence, and cohesiveness; includes persuasive information from reliable sources.
The solution is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

5.0 %Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)
Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of ‘primer prose’ indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.
Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.
Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.
The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.
The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
5.0 %Evaluating and Documenting Sources (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, references page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style)
Contains no title slide, no references section, and no correctly-cited references within the body of the presentation.
Title slide is incomplete or inaccurate. References section includes sources, but many citation errors. Citations are included within the body of the presentation but many errors are present.
Title slide has minor errors. References section includes sources, but they are not consistently cited correctly. Citations are included within the body of the presentation but some errors are present.
Title slide is complete. References section includes correctly cited sources with minimal errors. Correct citations are included within the body of the presentation.
Title slide is complete. References section includes correctly cited sources. Correct citations are included within the body of the presentation.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
5.0 %Format

5.0 %Layout
The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.
The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.
The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.
The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point- size varies appropriately for headings and text.
The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.
100 %Total Weightage

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Discuss Madeleine Leininger’s Cultural care model with particular reference to the three (3) Professional modes of action or decisions, in cultural approaches to nursing care for people from your above chosen culture.

/in /by

Order Description
1) Research a culture. Lebanese Arabic. That has relevance to nursing practice and present a report that has the following
a) Cultural patterns.
b) Communication.
c) Health beliefs and practices.
And

2) Discuss Madeleine Leininger’s Cultural care model with particular reference to the three (3) Professional modes of action or decisions, in cultural approaches to nursing care for people from your above chosen culture.

Its a report not a essay. It is not religious based but cultural based.

you may need more references. I can send some journal articles. Discard what you don’t need.

– A comprehensive level of insight and knowledge of the cultural communication patterns and health beliefs and practices of the selected culture.

– Leininger’s cultural care model is discussed at an exemplary level.
Deep and thorough insight in the application of all the modes of action in the delivery of culturally sensitive practice.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Summarize direction of your paper, don’t repeat Abstract but add more detail related to the background and significance of the problem for related patient population and/or APN role perspective (eg. mortality rate or prevalence epidemiology in the US). Include why the topic is important to the APN, patient, healthcare, economics, family genetics, etc)

/in /by
Topic: Schizophrenia

Order Description
Purpose: To incorporate theory and other evidenced based practice evidence using a patient experience (case study). This assignment is designed to help you identify a patient issue or advanced nursing practice problem using a case study to communicate in writing the application of valid evidence (research and theory) to clinical practice to improve patient outcomes. You will be completing a literature review, critiquing research articles to develop an evidence table for your paper, evaluating available evidence that can be applied to your advanced nursing practice, gaps in research and implementing evidence into your anticipated role after graduation. Although you will be doing all of these activities to write your paper, you summarize in your paper your findings, not about all the details related to the activities you completed to write your paper.

Body of paper: Length is required to be between 10 and 12 pages double spaced (not including title, abstract, appendix and reference pages). Any additional pages added to the body of the paper, after page 12 will not be included in the grading process using the rubric below. The paper should be in APA 6th edition format, except the title page (use the sample posted on Blackboard).Use Times New Roman and 12 point font. (100 points)

Elements must include but are not limited to:
o (10 points) APA Format and Grammar (Don’t forget about the graduate writing center through RAGE/GROWL)
¬ Abstract: Get the reader’s attention. May use etiology, epidemiology, etc. to stress the importance of the topic in 200 words or less. See the APA manual for description of abstract content
¬ Reference (In text and reference page), see APA manual for order of paper, proper citation and plagiarism information

o (10 points) Introduction
¬ Summarize direction of your paper, don’t repeat Abstract but add more detail related to the background and significance of the problem for related patient population and/or APN role perspective (eg. mortality rate or prevalence epidemiology in the US). Include why the topic is important to the APN, patient, healthcare, economics, family genetics, etc)
¬ Include your PICOT question/statement: Write in a sentence format. Label each letter with parentheses after each section Problem or/Population (P), Intervention (I), Comparison (C), Outcome (O), Time (T). Case Study up to four short sentences Giving a clear example of the population- who would be affected by this problem? Be Specific to the most common gender, age group, may include diagnosis, intervention, comparison (specific or class of medications) — depending on topic and PICOT, and time frame.

o (25 Points) Review of medical topic
¬ Case Study (Concise): List all the significant history, cc, etc.- not all the normal information unless significant for the case to rule out differential diagnoses (The case study should be one to two paragraphs in length). This is different than what you would document in a patient chart. This is a summary of a clear example of the population- who would be affected by this problem? Be Specific to the most common gender, age group, may include diagnosis, intervention, comparison (specific or class of medications) — depending on topic and PICOT, and time frame.

o (35 Points) Review of Literature and Research
Current research review (<5 years old)
¬ Include a Practice guideline for your topic or a Systematic Review and a minimum of 2 peer reviewed articles to answer your PICOT statement/question. All should be referenced and (concise) summarized. You will complete a critical analysis to decide if the findings were significant but all the details from the critical analysis (use the tools from your Melnyk textbook) will not be included in your paper. Only use the most relevant evidence and statistical tests with values related to your case study and PICOT question in your paper and evidence table.
¬ Evidence Table minimum elements that should be present include: author, year, study design, number of subjects, methodology, significant findings or pertinent insignificant findings with associated statistical tests and their values
¬ Discuss research gaps and their limitations or barriers to applying evidence to Advanced Practice Nursing and/ or gaps in practice, if the evidence is available but not being applied in practice

o (10 Points) Relevance and Implications for APN
Describe the relevance for your practice as an APN in reference to your case study support your evidence-based decision making processes with the practice guideline and other research listed in your evidence table to develop a patient centered treatment plan. (Use the NP core competencies and practice guidelines to help you).
¬ Discuss whether you would incorporate new research published (from your evidence table to answer your PICOT question) after the practice guideline to your treatment plan for this patient, or not and why.
¬ Evidence-based treatment plan for the patient in your case study (Use your practice guideline and any significant research to develop your brief plan. Suggested significant (concise) applicable elements that may be included are: psychosocial, cultural, genetic/genomics, assessment, co-morbidities, differential diagnoses, pharmacological, holistic approaches such as alternative medicine treatments (including CAM) treatments, interprofessional collaboration.
¬ Application of Theory or conceptual model –List the name of the theorist or authors if you use a conceptual framework model. Apply the concepts to the patient in your case study. In order to receive full credit you must demonstrate your understanding of how to apply the theory or conceptual model specifically to the patient in the case study you developed in an APN role

o (10 Points) Summary/Conclusion- Case and Implications
¬ Application of best evidence to improve patient outcomes using research, theory in an Advanced Nursing Practice role (make sure it is within your scope of practice or be clear what your role would be related to the PICOT statement and Case Study). Don’t repeat the abstract or all the details in the body of your paper but summarize the most important points in your paper that you want the reader to remember about the patient, evidence available , gaps in research, theory and your role as the APN to answer your PICOT question. Use in text referencing to support your summary with evidence (research and theory) for the most significant variables related to your PICOT question and case study including supporting statistical test and values using your APA manual.

APPROVED PICO: IN ADULT PATIENTS WITH SCHIZOPHRENIA (P) HOW DOES COMBINATION DRUG THERAPY (I) COMPARE TO COMBINATION DRUG THERAPY AND ACUPUNCTURE (C) AFFECT PATIENTS INSOMINIA AND ANXIETY (O) WITHIN 3-6 MONTHS.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Describe the relevance for your practice as an APN in reference to your case study support your evidence-based decision making processes with the practice guideline and other research listed in your evidence table to develop a patient centered treatment plan. (Use the NP core competencies and practice guidelines to help you).

/in /by
Topic: Schizophrenia

Order Description
Purpose: To incorporate theory and other evidenced based practice evidence using a patient experience (case study). This assignment is designed to help you identify a patient issue or advanced nursing practice problem using a case study to communicate in writing the application of valid evidence (research and theory) to clinical practice to improve patient outcomes. You will be completing a literature review, critiquing research articles to develop an evidence table for your paper, evaluating available evidence that can be applied to your advanced nursing practice, gaps in research and implementing evidence into your anticipated role after graduation. Although you will be doing all of these activities to write your paper, you summarize in your paper your findings, not about all the details related to the activities you completed to write your paper.

Body of paper: Length is required to be between 10 and 12 pages double spaced (not including title, abstract, appendix and reference pages). Any additional pages added to the body of the paper, after page 12 will not be included in the grading process using the rubric below. The paper should be in APA 6th edition format, except the title page (use the sample posted on Blackboard).Use Times New Roman and 12 point font. (100 points)

Elements must include but are not limited to:
o (10 points) APA Format and Grammar (Don’t forget about the graduate writing center through RAGE/GROWL)
¬ Abstract: Get the reader’s attention. May use etiology, epidemiology, etc. to stress the importance of the topic in 200 words or less. See the APA manual for description of abstract content
¬ Reference (In text and reference page), see APA manual for order of paper, proper citation and plagiarism information

o (10 points) Introduction
¬ Summarize direction of your paper, don’t repeat Abstract but add more detail related to the background and significance of the problem for related patient population and/or APN role perspective (eg. mortality rate or prevalence epidemiology in the US). Include why the topic is important to the APN, patient, healthcare, economics, family genetics, etc)
¬ Include your PICOT question/statement: Write in a sentence format. Label each letter with parentheses after each section Problem or/Population (P), Intervention (I), Comparison (C), Outcome (O), Time (T). Case Study up to four short sentences Giving a clear example of the population- who would be affected by this problem? Be Specific to the most common gender, age group, may include diagnosis, intervention, comparison (specific or class of medications) — depending on topic and PICOT, and time frame.

o (25 Points) Review of medical topic
¬ Case Study (Concise): List all the significant history, cc, etc.- not all the normal information unless significant for the case to rule out differential diagnoses (The case study should be one to two paragraphs in length). This is different than what you would document in a patient chart. This is a summary of a clear example of the population- who would be affected by this problem? Be Specific to the most common gender, age group, may include diagnosis, intervention, comparison (specific or class of medications) — depending on topic and PICOT, and time frame.

o (35 Points) Review of Literature and Research
Current research review (<5 years old)
¬ Include a Practice guideline for your topic or a Systematic Review and a minimum of 2 peer reviewed articles to answer your PICOT statement/question. All should be referenced and (concise) summarized. You will complete a critical analysis to decide if the findings were significant but all the details from the critical analysis (use the tools from your Melnyk textbook) will not be included in your paper. Only use the most relevant evidence and statistical tests with values related to your case study and PICOT question in your paper and evidence table.
¬ Evidence Table minimum elements that should be present include: author, year, study design, number of subjects, methodology, significant findings or pertinent insignificant findings with associated statistical tests and their values
¬ Discuss research gaps and their limitations or barriers to applying evidence to Advanced Practice Nursing and/ or gaps in practice, if the evidence is available but not being applied in practice

o (10 Points) Relevance and Implications for APN
Describe the relevance for your practice as an APN in reference to your case study support your evidence-based decision making processes with the practice guideline and other research listed in your evidence table to develop a patient centered treatment plan. (Use the NP core competencies and practice guidelines to help you).
¬ Discuss whether you would incorporate new research published (from your evidence table to answer your PICOT question) after the practice guideline to your treatment plan for this patient, or not and why.
¬ Evidence-based treatment plan for the patient in your case study (Use your practice guideline and any significant research to develop your brief plan. Suggested significant (concise) applicable elements that may be included are: psychosocial, cultural, genetic/genomics, assessment, co-morbidities, differential diagnoses, pharmacological, holistic approaches such as alternative medicine treatments (including CAM) treatments, interprofessional collaboration.
¬ Application of Theory or conceptual model –List the name of the theorist or authors if you use a conceptual framework model. Apply the concepts to the patient in your case study. In order to receive full credit you must demonstrate your understanding of how to apply the theory or conceptual model specifically to the patient in the case study you developed in an APN role

o (10 Points) Summary/Conclusion- Case and Implications
¬ Application of best evidence to improve patient outcomes using research, theory in an Advanced Nursing Practice role (make sure it is within your scope of practice or be clear what your role would be related to the PICOT statement and Case Study). Don’t repeat the abstract or all the details in the body of your paper but summarize the most important points in your paper that you want the reader to remember about the patient, evidence available , gaps in research, theory and your role as the APN to answer your PICOT question. Use in text referencing to support your summary with evidence (research and theory) for the most significant variables related to your PICOT question and case study including supporting statistical test and values using your APA manual.

APPROVED PICO: IN ADULT PATIENTS WITH SCHIZOPHRENIA (P) HOW DOES COMBINATION DRUG THERAPY (I) COMPARE TO COMBINATION DRUG THERAPY AND ACUPUNCTURE (C) AFFECT PATIENTS INSOMINIA AND ANXIETY (O) WITHIN 3-6 MONTHS.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"