1. Choose an educational topic related to the nursing profession that you are interested in enhancing your nursing education/knowledge. 2. Find a peer reviewed journal article, textbook, video or reliable internet source that encompasses your learning goal.

Factors affecting nurses’ decision in getting flu vaccine

Order Description

Here are the guidelines for the paper:

1. Choose an educational topic related to the nursing profession that you are interested in enhancing your nursing education/knowledge.

2. Find a peer reviewed journal article, textbook, video or reliable internet source that encompasses your learning goal.

3. Provide the reason you choose the topic.

4. Did you agree or disagree with the author(s) of the article/source? Explain your answer.

5. Identify the effect the learning will have on your professional practice.

6. Reflect upon how the knowledge you gained may influence your thinking and behavior in practice.

7. List 2-3 possible implications to nursing practice.

8. Provide a reference for your chosen article in APA formatting style.

9. Assignment should be typed and double spaced.

For the references please use 2 internet sources and the remaining 2 could be an article or a book. Please use references from year 2009-2014 only.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Discuss two (2) benefits and two (2) limitations of the selected approach. Describe two (2) ways by which this approach will improve patient outcomes in the perinatal setting.

Improving Obstetric Patient Outcomes
Order Description
Maternal morbidity and mortality is a national health problem. Preventing complications of pregnancy is included in the 2020 National Health Goals. The purpose of this written assignment is to describe how evidenced based findings can improve patient outcomes related to obstetrical care.
Tanya Kim, 36, G4 P4, was in labor for 36 hours when she had a cesarean birth for a failed induction of labor. She delivered a 9 pound 8 ounce male infant. Tanya’s labor was induced with oxytocin at 41 weeks gestation and continuous epidural was placed during active labor. The epidural was discontinued after delivery. She has iron deficiency anemia but otherwise an unremarkable medical history. She has no known allergies. Her obstetrical history includes 1 spontaneous abortion 6 years ago, vaginal delivery of twins 4 years ago, one singleton vaginal delivery 2 years ago and the cesarean birth today. Tanya plans to breastfeed her infant.
Two hours post-delivery the RN assesses the following:
Vital signs: BP 90/62, pulse 88, Respirations 22, temperature 98.6°F
Skin color: pink
Fundus: boggy, firms with fundal massage, midline and at umbilicus.
Lochia: Heavy rubra with nickel-sized clots
Pain: Uterine cramping rates pain 4 out of 10 on verbal pain scale
Intravenous fluids: 3000 mL Lactated Ringers with 20 units of Pitocin in each bag.
Urinary output: 200 mL since delivery (urinary catheter in place)
Patient comments: “I’m really tired. I have been up for the last two nights.”
One hour later the patient puts her light on and makes the following comment:
“I’m really bleeding a lot!” The RN comes in the room and notes increased vaginal bleeding. The patient is pale, diaphoretic, and the uterine fundus is boggy. The fundus does not firm with massage.
Using APA format, write a 2-3 page paper (excludes cover and reference page) that addresses the following:
Identify at least one (1) risk factor from the patient’s obstetrical history associated with the primary problem. Describe why this piece of obstetrical history places the patient at risk for the identified problem.
Early identification of emergencies in the obstetric setting is essential to save lives. Four (4) approaches are identified in the literature that can be utilized to positively impact patient outcomes: simulations, drills, protocols, vital sign alerts. Select one of these approaches and address the following:
Discuss two (2) benefits and two (2) limitations of the selected approach.
Describe two (2) ways by which this approach will improve patient outcomes in the perinatal setting.
A minimum of two (2) current professional references must be provided. Only one (1) textbook that is no more than one (1) edition old may be used.
Current references include professional publications that reflect nursing care provided within the United States. Current nursing professional references must be current (five [5] years or less). Reliable internet sources such as those offered by government agencies, academic institutions or nationally recognized professional organizations may also be used. Examples of unacceptable internet sources include but are not limited to: Wikipedia, medicinenet.com, allnurses.com, and any nursing blog site.
Compose your work using a word processor (or other software as appropriate) and save it frequently to your computer. Use a 12 font size, double space your work and use APA format for citations, references, and overall format.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Q1. Since most developers are not clinicians, and most clinicians are not developers, what measures are necessary to ensure the development of an effective health information system? Q2. Why is the continuous improvement of clinical information systems a high priority to healthcare organizations?

I need each question answered in a clear and organized paragraph no more than 200 words for each question.
Q1. Since most developers are not clinicians, and most clinicians are not developers, what measures are necessary to ensure the development of an effective health information system?

Q2. Why is the continuous improvement of clinical information systems a high priority to healthcare organizations?

Q3. Do the benefits of outsourcing outweigh the risks? Order the highly ranked outsourced services from riskiest to least risky and explain your rationale for the decision.

Q4. What would be the functions of the roles of the individuals in the steering committee, such as medical, nursing, financial management, human resources management, facilities management, clinical support services staff? Why is it important to have all these areas represented on the steering committee?

Q5. What is the importance of data warehouses/clinical data repositories?

Q6. Discuss the impacts of a breach to healthcare information systems, especially the financial and privacy impacts.

Q7. Discuss the differences between HIPAA and the Privacy Act of 1974.

Q8. What concepts are important to information security policies and procedures? What effect does HIPAA have on healthcare organizations’ policies and procedures? Are there any other laws that may affect them?

Q9. Identify how the use of a patient ID bracelet containing a bar-code representation of the patient’s ID and a bar-code scanner has led to improved quality of care in a hospital.

Q10. Name and describe principal physical network topologies.

Q11. What are the benefits of using a thin client for Internet connection?

Q12. Describe IM/IT service delivery processes and how they are interrelated.

Q13. What are the primary uses of an individual’s personal health record?

Q14. How are transaction processing systems employed in financial information systems?

Q15. What are the typical elements of a medical practice management system?

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Write a four to five page paper addressing how your chosen work-related issue/problem from the week two discussion is addressed by your state Board of Nursing (BON) and other professional nursing organizations. Use the following guidelines and evaluation criteria.

Workplace Related Legal and Ethical Issues

Order Description

Week 5 Assignment: Workplace Related Legal and Ethical Issues
Due Day 7 of Week 5
Write a four to five page paper addressing how your chosen work-related issue/problem from the week two discussion is addressed by your state Board of Nursing (BON) and other professional nursing organizations. Use the following guidelines and evaluation criteria.
Include level-one APA headings in your paper using the section headings below. Use a minimum of five references from the professional nursing literature in the assigned course readings and other references in the Walden Library. In addition, you may use one or two professional web sites if relevant to your topic.
Begin this paper with a brief paragraph that provides an overview of the assignment and its purpose. The heading for this paragraph is the same as the title of the paper. This should be no more than two to three sentences. The last sentence in this paragraph is a sentence that begins “The purpose of this paper is to. . . . The introductory paragraph is worth 20 points.
Workplace Issue – 40 points
Describe your chosen workplace issue from the week two discussion board (such as mandatory staffing ratios, mandatory overtime, or risks in the workplace) Provide a background to the issue and discuss why it is important to address.
The BON and Workplace Issue – 60 points
Explain your state’s Board of Nursing (BON) approach to your work-related issue in the BON’s Nurse Practice Act and the efficacy of the BON’s approach in the context of your workplace issue/problem. For example, how does your state BON’s approach to threats of patient abandonment apply to the issue of mandatory overtime?

The American Nurses Association and Your Workplace Issue – 60 points
Describe two American Nurses Association (ANA) sources from the ANA publication that address your work-related issue and the efficacy of the ANA’s approach in the context of your work environment. Resources are provided in the Week 5 Resources areas of the course,
Summary – 20 points
End the paper with a one-paragraph summary of the main points of the paper.
Format/Style
Proofread the paper and correct any typos, grammar, spelling, punctuation, syntax, or APA format errors before submitting your pape. Up to 30 points can be deducted from the grade for this assignment for these types of errors, or for not using at least the minimum number of required professional literature references.
Total points for assignment = 200 points.
When completed, save the assignment as APP5+last name+your first initial.doc. For example, Sally Ride’s Week 5 Application Assignment would be named “APP5RideS.doc.” Submit this assignment in the “Assignment Turnitin Week 5” area of the course. Click the View/Complete link. Follow instructions once the Turnitin submission site opens.

References
List your five different references here. Be sure that they are current (five years or less) and
formatted per APA Style.

Huston, C. J. (2014). Professional issues in nursing: Challenges and opportunities (3rd ed). New
York: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.

Mason, D. J, Leavitt, J. K., & Chaffee, M. W. (2014). Policy and politics in nursing and health care (6th ed). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Saunders.

Currently 3 writers are viewing this order
Request order
Request deadline extension till
Choose your reason
Date
11/11/2015

Time
16

10

© 2005–2015 “EssayWriters.net” Privacy policy
info@essaywriters.net
ChatLive Chat

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Statement of the Phenomenon of Interest a. What is the phenomenon of interest and is it clearly stated for the reader? b. What is the justification for using a qualitative method? c. What are the philosophic underpinnings of the research method?

Postoperative pain management experiences among school-aged children: a qualitative study

Order Description
Statement of the Phenomenon of Interest
a. What is the phenomenon of interest and is it clearly stated for the reader?
b. What is the justification for using a qualitative method?
c. What are the philosophic underpinnings of the research method?

Purpose
a. What is the purpose of the study?
b. What is the projected significance of the work to nursing?

Methodology
a. Is the method used to collect data compatible with the purpose of the research?
b. Is the method adequate to address the phenomenon of interest?
c. If a particular approach is used to guide the inquiry, does the researcher complete the study according to the processes described?

Sampling
a. What type of sampling is used? Is it appropriate given the particular method?
b. Are the informants who were chosen appropriate to inform the research?

Data Collection
a. Is data collection focused on human experience?
b. Does the researcher describe data collection strategies (i.e., interview, observation, field notes)
c. Is the protection of human participants addressed?
d. Is saturation of the data described?
e. What are the procedures for collecting data?

Data Analysis
a. What strategies are used to analyze data?
b. Has the researcher remained true to the data?
c. Does the reader follow the steps described for data analysis?
d. Does the researcher address the credibility, auditability, and fittingness of the data?

Findings
a. Are the findings presented within a context?
b. Is the reader able to apprehend the essence of the experience from the report of the findings?
c. Are the researcher’s conceptualizations true to the data?
d. Does the researcher place the report in the context of what is already known about the phenomenon? Was the existing literature on the topic related to the findings?

Conclusions, Implications, and Recommendations
a. Do the conclusions, implications, and recommendations give the reader a context in which to use the findings?
b. How do the conclusions reflect the study findings?
c. What are the recommendations for future study? Do they reflect the findings?
d. How has the researcher made specific the significance of the study to nursing theory, research, or practice?
Criterion
Introduction-5

Problem/Purpose-5

Literature Review- 8

Framework/Theoretical Perspective-11

Research Objectives, Questions, or Hypotheses-2

Definition of Variables-11

Attribute/Demographic Variables-3

Research Design-5

Sample/Setting-10

Measurement Methods & Instruments-10

Data Collection-5

Statistical Analyses- 10

Interpretation of Findings-10
Study Limitations:
Generalization of Findings:
Implications of Findings:
Suggestions for Further Studies

Format- 5
APA references, writing style, sentence structure, spelling, punctuation.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

1. Provide an introduction to your policy-priority issue. 2. Articulate key points under each of the Formulating a Healthcare Policy Ungraded Worksheet #1 sections, using the headings in your paper.

REQUIREMENTS
Assignment Criteria for Presentation:
1. Provide an introduction to your policy-priority issue.
2. Articulate key points under each of the Formulating a Healthcare Policy Ungraded Worksheet #1 sections, using the headings in your paper.
3. Provide a critique of empirical evidence that supports your chosen policy issue and analysis.
4. Demonstrate the importance and impact of the chosen policy issue to nursing.
5. Provide concluding statements summarizing the content.
6. The paper will be a minimum of 4 pages and a maximum of five pages in length, in APA format 6th edition, excluding the title and reference page.
PREPARING THE PAPER
After completing Formulating a Health Care Policy Ungraded Worksheet #1, address all areas on the worksheet in the body of a scholarly paper. Include a minimum of five (5) classic or current references published within the past 5 years.
Category Points % Description
Introduction and Conclusion 35 20 Introduction clearly introduces your policy priority issue.Concluding statements summarizing content.
Key Points 40 23 Identification of all key points of your policy-priority issue (review sections of Healthcare Policy Ungraded Worksheet) are clearly analyzed and fully articulated.
Empirical Evidence 40 23 Provide a critique of empirical evidence that supports your chosen policy issue and analysis.
Impact and Importance to Nursing 35 20 Demonstrate the importance and impact of the chosen policy issue to nursing.
APA Format 10 6 Text, title page, and references are consistent with APA format.
Writing Quality 15 8 Rules of grammar, word usage, sentence, and paragraph format and punctuation.
Total 175 100
A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

After viewing the home visit, write an essay of 500-750-words in which you do the following: 1.Identify, prioritize, and describe at least four problems. 2.Provide substantiating evidence (assessment data) for each problem identified. 3.Identify and describe at least four medical and/or nursing interventions.

Sallie Mae
Order Description
This is a CLC assignment.

As a group, observe the simulated “Home Visit With Sallie Mae Fisher” video (http://lc.gcumedia.com/zwebassets/courseMaterialPages/nrs410v_vp01Alt.php).

Refer to “Sallie Mae Fisher’s Health History and Discharge Orders” for specifics related to the case study used to inform the assignment.

Using “Home Visit With Sallie Mae Fisher” and “Sallie Mae Fisher’s Health History and Discharge Orders,” complete the following components of this assignment:

Essay Portion

After viewing the home visit, write an essay of 500-750-words in which you do the following:
1.Identify, prioritize, and describe at least four problems.
2.Provide substantiating evidence (assessment data) for each problem identified.
3.Identify and describe at least four medical and/or nursing interventions.
4.Discuss your rationale for the interventions identified.

Prepare this step of the assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

Scripted Dialogue Portion

Utilizing the information learned from the home visit, health histories, and discharge orders, write a scripted dialogue in which you provide Sallie Mae with education that describes her problems and the interventions identified to improve her condition. Consider Sallie Mae’s physiological, psychosocial, educational, and spiritual needs when developing your dialogue.

Your dialogue should resemble a script. The following is an example of a few sentences from a scripted dialogue:

Nurse: “Good morning, Salle Mae, my name is ______ and I will be your nurse today. I understand you are experiencing problems with ________.”

APA format is not required for this part of the assignment, but solid academic writing is expected.

Refer to “Home Visit With Sallie Mae Fisher Grading Criteria.”
portion (overall) is the rationale for the interventions.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

What might your write about? You may choose to write about any aspect of your practice which: ? You feel your intervention made a difference in a client outcome

How to detect Sepsis?

Paper details:

Reflective writing is one way of citing evidence of practice and learning in practice. Reflective writing involves thinking about and reviewing events to try and make sense of them, using acquired nursing knowledge and understanding.

Reflective journaling also provides insight into context and emotions and addresses the matching of intellect, decision-making and problem solving appropriate for a complex and dynamic situation.

A key component of this assignment will be your reflection on specific incidents occurring during your practicum experience. The reflective journal is more than a description of what you have seen and the tasks you have performed. This journal is a chance for you to comment on your actions and experiences in your practicum placement and to explore your feelings about the same. Include how these could/should impact your personal and professional development.

As a novice nurse, you will be required to plan, implement and evaluate your own performance; the reflective journal gives you the scope to begin to develop these skills while completing your practicum.

The reflective journal is a learning tool that can be used to look at your experiences and help you to do the following:

a) Review and reflect upon your development, and how you have grown on both an individual and professional level

b) Organize your thoughts

c) Demonstrate practical application of the underpinnings of knowledge; link theory with clinical practice and vice versa

d) Demonstrate practical competence

e) Decide what new learning you need; provide evidence to show where, when and how practice outcomes/standards of proficiencies have been achieved

Suggestions for developing your reflective journal entry:

1. What might your write about?

You may choose to write about any aspect of your practice which:

? You feel your intervention made a difference in a client outcome

? You feel went unusually well

? You feel did not go as planned

? You think captures the essence of your nursing practice

? You feel was particularly demanding

2. What might you include in your writings?

The focus should be on your nursing practice

? What was going on (the context of the situation)?

o Shift, time of day, resources, clinical scenario

? What happened?

o Detailed description of situation/incident/experience

? Why this incident is important to you?

? What were your concerns at the time?

o What were you thinking and feeling during and after the experience?

o What influenced your decision making?

o What, if anything, was the most demanding aspect of this experience?

o What was unexpected?

3. Reflect upon what you learned from the experience.

You may choose to write about the following:

? A reflection or evaluation of the situation showing the competencies and expertise you used (skilled communication, teaching, leadership). Support these with current evidence-based practice literature.

? What actions did you take? Include not just what you did, but more importantly the rationale for your actions. Support these with current evidence-based practice literature

? What new knowledge or insights were gained? How would you make recommendations for change in practice?

? Provide references to show evidence based practice (see guidelines below)

? Did you learn anything? If so what?

? Have you considered another way to manage your nursing practice as it relates to this experience? Has your nursing practice changed in any way?

Guidelines

1. Utilizing the above as suggestions for contextual writing; complete two (2) journal entries over the course of NUR 4180 (See AAG for assignment due dates).

2. Journal entries should exceed no more than two (2) pages in length (not including reference page).

3. Journal entries should include a minimum of one (1) citation from a peer-reviewed, evidence based journal. The inclusion of evidence based practice is an integral part of learning, critical thinking and growth.

4. APA requirement: Reference page only

5. See attached rubric for grading.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Create a proposal for your Design for Change Capstone Project. Open the template in Doc Sharing. You will include the information from Milestone #1, your PICO question, and evidence appraisal, as you compose this proposal. Your plan is to convince your management team of a nursing problem you have uncovered and you feel is significant enough to change the way something is currently practiced.

Capstone Project Milestone #2:
Design for ChangeProposal Guidelines
PURPOSE
You are to create a Design for Changeproposal inclusive of your PICO and evidence appraisal information from your Capstone Project Milestone #1. Your plan is to convince your management team of a nursing problem you have uncovered and you feel is significant enough to change the way something is currently practiced. In the event you are not currently working as a nurse, please use a hypothetical clinical situation you experienced in nursing school, or nursing education issue you identified in your nursing program.
COURSE OUTCOMES
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes.
CO1:Applies the theories and principles of nursing and related disciplines to individuals, families, aggregates, and communities from entry to the healthcare system through long-term planning. (PO #1)
CO2:Proposes leadership and collaboration strategies for use with consumers and other healthcare providers in managing care and/or delegating responsibilities for health promotion, illness prevention, health restoration and maintenance, and rehabilitative activities. (PO #2)
DUE DATE
Milestone #2 consists of the proposal for your Design for Change Capstone Project. Submit this Milestone to the Dropbox by the end of Week 4.
POINTS
Milestone #2 is worth 225 points.
DIRECTIONS
1. Create a proposal for your Design for Change Capstone Project. Open the template in Doc Sharing. You will include the information from Milestone #1, your PICO question, and evidence appraisal, as you compose this proposal. Your plan is to convince your management team of a nursing problem you have uncovered and you feel is significant enough to change the way something is currently practiced.
2. The format for this proposal will be a paper following the Publication manual of APA 6th edition.
3. The paper is to be four- to six-pages excluding the Title page and Reference page.
4. As you organize your information and evidence, include the following topics.
a. Introduction:Write an introduction but do not use “Introduction” as a heading in accordance with the rules put forth in the Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (2010, p. 63). Introduce the reader to the plan with evidence-based problem identification and solution.
b. Change Plan:Write an overview using the John Hopkins Nursing EBP Model and Guidelines (2012)
i. Practice Question
ii. Evidence
iii. Translation
c. Summary
5. Citations and Referencesmust be included to support the information within each topic area. Refer to the APA manual, Chapter 7, for examples of proper reference format.In-text citations are to be noted for all information contained in your paper that is not your original idea or thought. Ask yourself, “How do I know this?” and then cite the source. Scholarly sources are expected, which means using peer-reviewed journals and credible websites.
6. Tables and Figures may be added as appropriate to the project. They should be embedded within the body of the paper (see your APA manual for how to format and cite). Creating tables and figures offers visual aids to the reader and enhances understanding of your literature review and design for change.
GRADING CRITERIA: DESIGN FOR CHANGE CAPSTONE PROJECT
Category Points % Description
Introduction 25 11% Introduction to the plan is nursing focused, with evidence-based problem identification and potential solutions clearly identified.
Change Plan; Practice Question (Steps 1–5) 50 22% Activities to achieve the first steps of change are fully described in detail and are based on the first five steps of the John Hopkins EBP Process; Practice Question.
Change Plan; Evidence (Steps 6–10) 50 22% Activities to achieve steps six through tenof the John Hopkins EBP Process are fully described in detail; Evidence.
Change Plan; Translation
(Steps 11–18) 50 22% Activities to achieve the final steps of change are fully described in detail and are based on steps11 through 18of the John Hopkins EBP Process; Practice Question.
Summary 25 11% Clear, solid summary summarizing the key points and steps of the change plan is included; ways to maintain the change plan are described.
APA Format 25 11% Minimal errors.
Total 225 points 100%

GRADING RUBRIC: CAPSTONE PROJECT MILESTONE #2
Assignment Criteria Outstanding or Highest Level of Performance
A (92–100%) Very Good or High Level of Performance
B (84–91%) Competent or Satisfactory Level of Performance
C (76–83%) Poor, Failing or Unsatisfactory Level of Performance
F (0–75%) Total
Introduction
25 points Introduction to the plan is nursing focused, with evidence-based problem identification and potential solutions clearly identified.
23–25 points Introduction to the plan is nursing focused, with evidence to support the problem and potential solution identified but convincing areas are missing.
21–22 points Introduction to the plan is provided; however, evidence to support the problem and potential solution is not convincing.
19–20 points Introduction lacks evidence to support need for change and/or potential solution is not realistic.
0–18 points /25
Change Plan Practice Question
(Steps 1–5)
50 points Activities to achieve the first five steps of change are fully described in detail and are based on the first section of the John Hopkins EBP Process:
*Practice question is identified.
*Scope of the problem discussed (including supportive statistics).
*Stakeholders identified.
*Team is identified.
46–50 points Activities to achieve the first five steps of change are fully described, not in detail but are based on the first section of the John Hopkins EBP Process:
*Practice question is identified.
*Scope of the problem discussed (including supportive statistics).
*Stakeholders identified.
*Team is identified.
42–45 points Activities to achieve the first five steps of change are vague. The first section of the John Hopkins EBP Processis not clearly identified.
*Practice question is identified.
*Scope of the problem does not contain statistics to support the problem.
*Stakeholders are identified but not appropriate or missing key members.
*Team members are identified but not appropriate or missing key members.
38–41 points Activities to address and support change are not specifically addressed. Portions of the first five steps are missing or absent.
0–37 points /50
Change Plan Evidence
(Steps 6–10)
50 points Activities to achieve steps six through tenof change are fully described in detail and are based on the first section of the John Hopkins EBP Process: Evidence is identified.
*At least four reliable sources are used, three of which are peer-reviewed.
*Summary of evidence is thorough and detailed.
*Strength of evidence is discussed.
*Recommendation for change is based on evidence and is thorough.
46–50 points Activities to achieve steps six through ten of change are vague and are based on the first section of the John Hopkins EBP Process: Evidence is identified.
*At least four reliable sources are used, three of which are peer-reviewed.
*Summary of evidence is vague.
*Strength of evidence is discussed.
*Recommendation for change is based on evidence but connection is vague.
42–45 points Activities to achieve steps six through ten of change are vague and are based on the first section of the John Hopkins EBP Process: Evidence is identified.
*At least four reliable sources are used but less than three are peer-reviewed. *Summary of evidence is vague.
*Strength of evidence is not discussed.
*Recommendation for change is present but not weak connection to the evidence.
38–41 points Activities to achieve steps six through ten of change may be missing or absent.
*Less than fourreliable sources are used.
*Summary of evidence is not present or missing important elements.
*Strength of evidence is missing.
*Recommendation for change lacks support from evidence.
0–37 points /50
Change Plan Translation
(Steps 11–18)
50 points Activities to achieve the last steps of change are fully described in detail and are based on the last steps of the John Hopkins EBP Process:
Translation. *Action plan is well-developed with specific timeline in place to include all elements of the plan.
*Measurable outcomes and way to report results are discussed in detail.
*Plan for implementation is thoroughly discussed.
*Ways to communicate findings (internally and externally) are discussed.
46–50 points Activities to achieve the last steps of change are described and are based on the last steps of the John Hopkins EBP Process:
Translation.
*Action plan is developed with specific timeline in but some elements of the timeline are missing.
*Outcomes are present but not measurable. Ways to report results are discussed in detail.
*Plan for implementation is discussed.
*Communication of findings is present but does not address both internal and external ways.
42–45 points Activities to achieve the last steps of change are vague.
*Action plan is developed but timeline is missing.
*Outcomes are vague and not measurable. Ways to report results are discussed but not in detail.
*Plan for implementation is vague.
*Communication of findings is missing.
38–41 points Activities to achieve the last steps of change are vague or missing.
*Action plan is not well-developed or missing.
*Outcomes are vague or not present.Ways to report results are discussed but not in detail.
*Plan for implementation is not present.
*Communication of findings is missing.
0–37 points /50
Summary
25 points Clear, solid summary of the key points and the change plan are included; ways to maintain the change plan are described.
23–25 points A clear summary of the key points and part of the change plan are provided; ways to maintain the change plan are mentioned, but not in detail.
21–22 points A summary is present but is vague; parts of the change plan are highlighted; ways to maintain the change plan are not clear.
19–20 points A summary is difficult to determine or absent. Key points of the change plan are not recapped or are absent.
0–18 points /25
APA formatting, scholarly writing
25 points APA format sixth edition: third person, grammar, sentence structure, punctuation, and spelling; sources correctly cited and referenced; title page, headers, and page numbers. No errors to one error.
23–25 points Two to three errors.
21–22 points Four to five errors.
19–20 points Multiple errors
0–18 points /25
Total Points /225

Reference:

Dearholt, S. L., & Dang, D. (2012).Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence Based Practice: Model and Guidelines (2nd ed.).Indianapolis, IN: Sigma Theta Tau International.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"