Power point presentation

Paper details:
Prepare a PowerPoint Presentation on any chapter within your book, Handbook of Informatics, 5th edition. Use other resources as well as your book. Must contain at least 5 sources of references. Summary should reflect all key points covered in the text. A 12 slide presentation is expected. A works cited slide should end your presentation. Use APA format for ppt. Use of graphics, web tools, embedded hyperlinks, etc. expected. writer you can also mention these three items they are: 1. List ways computer technology may be used to support and enhance nursing education in clinical and academic settings.

2. List advantages and disadvantages of web based instruction.

3. Explain mobile learning technologies applicable to nursing education.

writer apply principles of learning to a selected chapter. writer will utilize technology to convey comprehension of key points of the literature as it relates to topics summarize in selected chapter. writer will expand learning through the use of additional sources of evidence to support key findings. THE NAME OF THE TEXTBOOK IS: Hebda, T., & Czar, P. (2013). Handbook of Informatics for Nurses & Professionals , 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
ISBN: 10-0-13-257495-0 and 13:978-0-13-257495-2
WRITER YOU SHOULD DO ONLY ONE CHAPTER IN THE BOOK
make summary of the bottom of each slide

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Research and Article Critique

This written assignment:

You will write in sentences/paragraphs as you answer each question. APA format, e.g., margins, font, and referencing, is expected, and a cover page is required. However, do not include headings – so there will be no Introduction or Conclusion sections either. Copy the questions below onto the page following the cover page and then provide your answer immediately beneath each question. Do not include the information about allocation of marks. To help you with format, please see the document called ‘Common APA Problem Areas for Use re Research F-15’ on Moodle under ‘APA’ in the ‘Getting Started’ section.

Required text.

LoBiondo-Wood, G., Haber, J., Cameron, C., & Singh, M. D. (Eds.). (2013). Nursing research in Canada: Methods, critical appraisal, and utilization (3rd ed.). Toronto, ON: Elsevier Canada.

A. Using your course text, please answer the following questions. You must provide the appropriate reference for each answer, i.e., the author(s), year, and page number(s). The full reference for each chapter you use must also be in the reference list. Do not use direct quotes from your text book. You need to put the answers into your own words to show that you understand, rather than that you can simply copy and paste.

1. Define each of research, evidence-based practice, and evidence-informed practice. Explain the main difference between the research and the evidence-informed practice processes. (2.5 marks – 0.5 mark each for correct definitions; 0.5 mark for correctly explaining; 0.5 mark for correct APA referencing in answer and in reference list).

2. Define each of non-directional, directional, and null hypotheses. Explain what non-directional and directional have in common that is different from null. (2.5 marks – 0.5 mark each for correct definitions; 0.5 for correctly explaining; 0.5 mark for correct APA referencing in answer and in reference list).

3. Describe 2 ways in which you as a newly graduated nurse will be expected to use your research-related competencies. (1.5 marks – 0.5 mark each for correct descriptions; 0.5 mark for correct APA referencing in answer and in reference list).

4. Define each of critical thinking and critical reading. Identify and describe 1 strategy that you plan to use for each of the 4 stages of the critical reading process. (3.5 marks – 0.5 mark each for correct definitions; 0.5 mark for each correct strategy; 0.5 mark for correct APA referencing in answer and in reference list).

B. Using the qualitative article indicated in the Course Outline, please answer the following questions. Include the reference for the article in the reference list, but do not repeatedly provide the reference within the text of your assignment. Instead, indicate before you answer questions 5-8 that all answers will be about the article (reference appropriately) and so you will not repeat the reference within the questions. You must, however, provide the section and associated page number (or numbers as appropriate) for every question that indicates they are required. For example, if writing something about the Abstract then you might note (Abstract, p. 2419). The section and page number(s) show that you know which part of an article to critique for a specific area, therefore they are very important. Direct quotes from the article may be appropriate, e.g., the purpose, and they are acceptable in this part of your assignment only.

Use ONLY the ratings of WEAK, FAIR, GOOD, or STRONG (or combination such as good-strong) in all questions where ratings are required. Please see the document called ‘Notes re identifying strengths-weaknesses’ on Moodle in the Course ‘Information re Assignment’ section.

PART B Article.

Holtslander, L., Kornder, N., Letourneau, L., Turner, H., & Paterson, B. (2012). Identifying the needs of parents and service providers of adolescents with Type 1 diabetes to aid in the creation of an online support intervention. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 21, 2419-2428. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04182.x

5. Rate the title and provide 2 specific points of rationale for your rating. (1 mark – 0.25 mark for correct rating + supporting general statement; 0.25 mark for each correct specific point for rationale; 0.25 mark for correct section and page number).

6. What style of abstract was provided? Rate the abstract and provide 2 specific points of rationale for your rating. (1 mark – 0.25 mark for correct style; 0.25 mark for correct rating + supporting general statement; 0.25 mark for each correct specific point for rationale).

7. Was the phenomenon of interest clearly identified (yes/no)? Rate the clarity of the phenomenon of interest and provide 2 specific points of rationale for your rating. (1.25 mark – 0.25 mark for correct yes/no answer; 0.25 mark for correct rating + supporting general statement; 0.25 mark for each correct specific point for rationale; 0.25 mark for correct section and page number).

8. What was the purpose of this study? Rate the purpose and provide 3 specific points of rationale for your rating. (1.75 mark – 0.5 mark for correct purpose; 0.25 mark for correct rating + supporting general statement; 0.25 mark for each correct specific point for rationale; 0.25 mark for correct section and page number).

Critiquing Published Studies:

Consider each aspect of a published research study and critique for strengths and weaknesses. You can also use a combination of terms when you find that an aspect is not quite good enough for a rating, e.g., Good-Strong, or Weak-Fair. Provide rationale from the article to support your judgment of scientific merit. Note that it’s possible for one person to rate differently from another person – there is some objectivity but also some subjectivity in such ratings. The important point is that you have sufficient supporting evidence (from the article itself) for your judgment. I suggest you expand this table as you move through the course.

Strong Good Fair Weak

Qualitative or
Quantitative: QL/QT

Title

Abstract

Research Problem or Phenomenon of Interest: QL/QT

Purpose

Research Question

Hypothesis

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Application: Planned Change in a Department or Unit

Order Description

Week 4 Assignment

Increase text size
Decrease text size
Print Page

Application: Planned Change in a Department or Unit

Health care organizations are continuously immersed in change from the emergence of new policies, to promote quality care and improve patient safety to keeping pace with the rapid growth in knowledge and best practices. Establishing a solid framework for planning and implementing change is a wise move, as it provides a foundation for the extensive coordination that will be needed to successfully facilitate the change.

For this Assignment, you propose a change at the department or unit level and develop a plan for guiding the change effort.

To prepare:
•Review Chapter 8 in the course text. Focus on Kurt Lewin’s change theory, and contrast it with other classic change models and strategies.
•Reflect on problems, inefficiencies, and critical issues within a specific department, unit, or area in your organization or one with which you are familiar. Select one issue as a focal point for this assignment, and consider a change that could be made to address the issue.
•Think about how the change would align with the organization’s mission, vision, and values as well as relevant professional standards.
•Using one of the change models or strategies discussed in Chapter 8, begin formulating a plan for implementing the change within the department/unit. Outline the steps that you and/or others should follow to facilitate the change effort. Align these steps to the change model or strategy you selected.
•Determine who should be involved in initiating and managing the change. Consider the skills and characteristics that are necessary to facilitate this change effort.

To complete:

Write a 3- to 5-page paper (page count does not include title and reference page) that addresses the following:
•Identify a problem, inefficiency, or issue within a specific department/unit.
•Describe a specific, realistic change that could be made to address the issue.
•Summarize how the change would align with the organization’s mission, vision, and values as well as relevant professional standards.
•Identify a change model or strategy to guide your planning for implementing the change. Provide a rationale for your selection.
•Outline the steps that you and/or others would follow to facilitate the change. Align these steps to your selected change model or strategy.
•Explain who would be involved in initiating and managing this change. Describe the skills and characteristics that would be necessary to facilitate the change effort.

REQUIRED RESOURCES:
Note: To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus.

Readings
•Marquis, B. L., & Huston, C. J. (2015). Leadership roles and management functions in nursing: Theory and application (8th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins. ?Review Chapter 7, “Strategic and Operational Planning”
?Chapter 8, “Planned Change”

This chapter explores methods for facilitating change and the theoretical underpinnings of implementing effective change

•McAlearney, A., Terris, D., Hardacre, J., Spurgeon, P. Brown, C., Baumgart, A., Nyström, M. (2014). Organizational coherence in health care organizations: Conceptual guidance to facilitate quality improvement and organizational change. Quality Management in Health Care, 23(4), 254-267 doi: 10.1097/QMH.0b013e31828bc37d

An international group of investigators explored the issues of organizational culture and Quality Improvement (QI) in different health care contexts and settings. The aim of the research was to examine if a core set of organizational cultural attributes are associated with successful QI systems.
•Mitchell, G. (2013). Selecting the best theory to implement planned change. Nursing Management – UK, 20(1), 32-37. doi: 10.7748/nm2013.04.20.1.32.e1013

Abstract: Planned change in nursing practice is necessary for a wide range of reasons, but it can be challenging to implement. Understanding and using a change theory framework can help managers or other change agents to increase the likelihood of success. This article considers three change theories and discusses how one in particular can be used in practice.
•Shirey, M. R. (2013). Lewin’s Theory of Planned Change as a strategic resource. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 43(2), 69-72. doi:10.1097/NNA.0b013e31827f20a9

Abstract: This department [manuscript] highlights change management strategies that may be successful in strategically planning and executing organizational change initiatives. With the goal of presenting practical approaches helpful to nurse leaders advancing organizational change, content includes evidence-based projects, tools, and resources that mobilize and sustain organizational change initiatives. In this article, the author explores the use of the Lewin’s Theory of Planned Change as a strategic resource to mobilize the people side of change. An overview of the theory is provided along with a discussion of its strengths, limitations, and targeted application.

Media

•Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2012g). Organizational dynamics: Planned change and project planning. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 9 minutes.

In this week’s media presentation, experts discuss how today’s health care organizations can capitalize on the strengths of nurse leaders to plan for and navigate change effectively.

Accessible player –Downloads–Download Video w/CCDownload AudioDownload Transcript

Optional Resources
•Marquis, B. L., & Huston, C. J. (2015). Leadership roles and management functions in nursing: Theory and application (8th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins. ?Chapter 9, “Time Management”

•Batras, D., Duff, C., & Smith, B. J. (2014). Organizational change theory: implications for health promotion practice. Health Promotion International, Retrieved from MEDLINE with Full Text, EBSCOhost

RESOURCES CANNOT BE MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD IMPLEMENTATION

Order Description

****Ohio university Athens
Go to current student. My portal

Log in with username hm538113
password helex123
click on blackboard
Go to Modules
Click on Module 5

MODULE 5: ASSESSMENT 15: WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT – ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD IMPLEMENTATION

and read instructions

For this assignment, you will consider your own facility’s implementation of its electronic health record, if you have one. If not, you should contact a large health system in your area and talk to their IT department, or you may select one of your clinical sites and contact that IT department. Answer the following questions:
1. State the EHR mandate. Who started it? When? 2. What are the goals of the mandate? 3. How does the Affordable Care Act tie in to the mandate? 4. Describe your facility’s plan. If you have already implemented a system, what steps were taken? Make sure you use the HealthIT.gov website—be clear! 5. Describe “meaningful use”. 6. Explain the possible threats to patient confidentiality and the ramifications of HIPAA violations.
This paper should be 3-5 pages long and should be written using APA formatting and citations.
Please continue to use the principles of setting up an APA paper from week 1 and 2 including introduction and conclusion.
The headings for this paper was as follows:
Description of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) ? State the EHR mandate. Who started it? When? ? What are the goals and objectives of the mandate? (See lecture) ? How does the Affordable Care Act tie in to the mandate and Obama Administration tie into the mandate?
Student’s facility’s Plan ? Describe your facility’s plan. Describe each of the six steps listed on the healthit.gov website and how your facility has addressed these steps or how are they progressing towards meeting these steps. (See lecture for steps)
Discussion of Meaningful Use ? Describe “meaningful use”. ? Describes your facility’s status in attaining it, reasons why or why not, what needs to be done.
EHRs and Patient Confidentiality ? Definition of HIPAA laws by describing possible threats to patient confidentiality ? What is being done by your facility to prevent HIPAA violations?
Note: It is HIPAA and not HIPPA
You may use the articles in the readings as a resource for this assignment and you need at least two references for this paper.

NRSE 4510: RUBRIC – ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD IMPLEMENTATION Module 5: Assessment 15
Last updated: 07/13/2015 © 2015 School of Nursing – Ohio University Page 1 of 3
Criteria
Levels of Achievement Accomplished Proficient Needs Improvement
Not Acceptable
Introduction 3 to 3 points Clearly states the purpose of the paper; Provides a comprehensive overview; Engages the reader; organized and easy to follow
2 to 2 points Overview is provided, but key ideas are missing; Does not engage the reader; somewhat disorganized
1 to 1 points No purpose statement; No overview of topics; reader is distracted
0 to 0 points Does not provide an overview of the paper or is absent
Key Requirement 1— Description of the EHR mandate
6-7 points Demonstrates evidence of research includes the following: Who initiated the mandate and when, what are the goals and objectives, and how does the Affordable Care Act and the Obama Administration tie into the mandate. Writing is clear and shows critical thinking.
4-5 points Includes a description of the mandate, including goals and objectives and how the ACA ties in. Writing is disorganized and does not evidence of critical thinking.
2-3 points Includes a general summary of the mandate but at least 1-2 topics are missing; writing is disorganized and distracting to the reader.
0-1 points Summary of the mandate is poorly written; at least 3 topics are missing. No evidence of critical thinking.
Key Requirement 2— Student’s facility’s plan
6-7 points Writing shows evidence of research. Includes a description of each of the six steps as listed on the healthit.com website; includes a clear description of the student’s facility’s progress. Evidence of critical thinking.
4-5 points Student includes a list of the six steps, difficult to determine where the facility is in the process of implementation; writing is disorganized.
2-3 points Writing is vague and difficult to follow the writer’s train of thought.
0-1 points No description of the six steps of implementation, no description of the student’s own facility’s progress or description is weak, not detailed. No evidence of critical thinking.
NRSE 4510: RUBRIC – ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD IMPLEMENTATION Module 5: Assessment 15
Last updated: 07/13/2015 © 2015 School of Nursing – Ohio University Page 2 of 3
Key Requirement 3— Discussion of Meaningful Use
5-6 points Student defines meaningful use; describes facility’s status in attaining it, reasons why or why not, what else needs to be done? Shows evidence of critical thinking.
3-4 points Vague discussion of meaningful use, attempts to define whether or not facility has reached it; no discussion as to the next steps.
1-2 points No definition of meaningful use but attempts to describe facility’s current status in attaining it.
0 points Student does not discuss meaningful use or the facility’s status. No evidence of critical thinking.
Key Requirement 4— EHRs and Patient Confidentiality
5-6 points Includes clear definition of HIPAA laws; thorough discussion of possible threats to patient confidentiality, and what is being done by that student’s facility to prevent HIPAA violations. Shows critical thinking and application to own practice, using examples.
3-4 points Discusses threats to patient confidentiality but no mention of HIPAA laws. Does mention preventive actions by facility but not in depth.
1-2 points Briefly mentions patient confidentiality and EHRs but without detail. No analysis of facility’s actions to prevent HIPAA violations in relation to EHRs.
0 points Does not discuss confidentiality in any detail, does not discuss HIPAA, and does not discuss facility’s actions to prevent HIPAA violations. No evidence of critical thinking.
Conclusion 3 points Summarizes paper and reflects on what the reader has learned from the paper; contains a call to action based on paper contents; demonstrates persuasive thought and is well organized
2 points Summarizes the paper content but does not contain a call to action; somewhat disorganized
1 points Merely summarizes the introduction or contains new ideas not present in the paper contents; disorganized to the point of distraction
0 points Simply restates the introduction or is absent
APA Citation and References
3 points Citations are appropriate; Formatted correctly; References page
2 points Citations are appropriate and formatted correctly; Reference page is
1 points Citations are made but not formatted correctly; references are
0 points No citations are used or not APA formatted; reference page is missing
NRSE 4510: RUBRIC – ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD IMPLEMENTATION Module 5: Assessment 15
Last updated: 07/13/2015 © 2015 School of Nursing – Ohio University Page 3 of 3
is complete and correctly formatted; at least 2 professional references provide
formatted correctly; missing 1 professional reference
not professional or is not formatted correctly
Professionally written, no abbreviations , no spelling/grammar errors
0 to 5 points One point deducted for each error up to five points.
0 to 0 points 0 to 0 points 0 to

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"