Psychology homework help

Week 2 – Assignment

Case Analysis – Integrating Theoretical Orientations

Prior to beginning this assignment, read the PSY650 Week Two Treatment Plan ,Preview the document Case 16: Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Gorenstein and Comer (2014), and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorders in Hamblin and Gross (2012).

Assess the evidence-based practices implemented in this case study by addressing the following issues:

Explain the connection between each theoretical orientation used by Dr. Remoc and the four interventions utilized in the case.

Consider Dr. Remoc’s utilization of two theoretical frameworks to guide her treatment plan. Assess the efficacy of integrating two orientations based on the information presented in the case study. Describe some potential problems with prescribing medication as the only treatment option for children with ADHD.

Identify tasks and positive reinforcements that might be included in Billy’s token economy chart given the behavior issues described in the case. (There are articles in the recommended resources that may assist you in this portion of the assignment.)

Evaluate the effectiveness of the four treatment interventions implemented by Dr. Remoc and support your statements with information from the case and two to three peer-reviewed articles from the Ashford University Library.

Recommend three additional treatment interventions that would be appropriate in this case. Use information from the Hamblin and Gross “Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorders” chapter to help support your recommendations. Justify your selections with information from the case.

The Case Analysis

Must be 4 to 5 double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..

Must include a separate title page with the following:

Title of paper

Student’s name

Course name and number

Instructor’s name

Date submitted

Must use at least two peer-reviewed sources from the Ashford University Library.

Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

Carefully review the Grading Rubric (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Psychology homework help

Read “Different Accounts of the Death of Aztec King Motecuhzoma (Montezuma)

Excerpts from the “Account of Alva Ixtlilxochiltl” (1519) 1966. “The Account of Alva Ixtlilxochitl.” The Broken Spears. Edited and Translated by Miguel León-Portilla. Boston: Beacon Press. Bernal Díaz. 1956. “Account of Moctezuma’s Death.” The Bernal Díaz Chronicles. Edited by Albert Idell. Garden City, NY: Doubleday and Company.

Following the treaty with the Tlaxcalans, the Spaniards marched to the Aztec capital of Tenochtitlán (present site of Mexico City) where they captured the Aztec emperor Montezuma. Subsequently, a battle took place between Cortéz’s men and the Aztecs, forcing the conquistador and his men to flee the city. During the flight and ensuing battle, Montezuma was killed. His death marked a point of no return for Spaniards and Aztecs alike, though there is considerable debate over who exactly killed Montezuma. That the Aztecs and Spaniards each tried to vilify and hold accountable the other is not surprising. Excerpts from two versions — one Aztec and one Spanish — of what happened, though, demonstrate more than just finger-pointing and the inability to determine exactly what happened. They demonstrate the divisions and tensions that the Aztecs experienced even at the heart of their own empire. Moreover, they suggest that the Spaniards, in assuming Montezuma had no cause to be accountable to his people, might have allowed their own assumptions about kingship in Europe to mislead them.

Excerpts from the “Account of Alva Ixtlilxochitl”

Cortes turned in the direction of Tenochtitlan and entered the city of Tezcoco. He was received only by a group of knights, because the legitimate sons of King Nezahualpilli had been hidden by their servants, and the other lords were being held by the Aztecs as hostages. He entered Tenochtitlan with his army of Spaniards and allies on the day of St. John the Baptist, without being molested in any way.

The Mexicans gave them everything they needed, but when they saw that Cortes had no intention of leaving the city or of freeing their leaders, they rallied their warriors and attacked the Spaniards. This attack began on the day after Cortes entered the city and lasted for seven days.

On the third day, Motecuhzoma climbed onto the rooftop and tried to admonish his people, but they cursed him and shouted that he was a coward and a traitor to his country. They even threatened him with their weapons. It is said that an Indian killed him with a stone from his sling, but the palace servants declared that the Spaniards put him to death by stabbing him in the abdomen with their swords.

On the seventh day, the Spaniards abandoned the city along with the Tlaxcaltecas, the Huexotzincas and their other allies. They fled down the causeway that leads out to Tlacopan. But before they left, they murdered King Cacama of Tezcoco, his three sisters and two of his brothers.

There are several accounts by Indians who took part in the fighting that ensued. They tell how their warriors killed a great many of the Spaniards and their allies, and how the army took refuge on a mountain near Tlacopan and then marched to Tlaxcala.

Account of Montezuma’s Death in Bernal Díaz’s True Story of the Conquest of Mexico

Here Cortés showed himself to be every inch a man, as he always was. Oh, what a fight! What a battle we had! It was something to see us dripping blood and covered with wounds, and others killed, but it pleased Our Lord that we should make our way to the place where we had kept the image of Our Lady. We did not find it, and it seems, as we learned later, Montezuma had become devoted to her and had ordered her to be cared for. We set fire to their idols and burned a good part of the room, with great help from the Tlaxcalans.

After this was done, while we were making our way back down, the priests that were in the temple and the three or four thousand Indians made us tumble six or even ten steps. There were other squadrons in the breastworks and recesses of the great cu, discharging so many javelins and arrows that we could not face one group or another, so we decided to return to our quarters, our towers destroyed and everybody wounded, with sixteen dead and the Indians continually pressing us. However clearly I try to tell about this battle, I can never explain it to anyone who wasn’t there. We captured two of their principal priests and Cortés ordered us to take good care of them.

Many times I have seen paintings of this battle among the Mexicans and Tlaxcalans, showing how we went up the great temple, for they look upon it as a very heroic feat.

… The night was spent in treating wounds and burying the dead, preparing to fight the next day, strengthening the walls they had torn down, and consulting as to how we could fight without sustaining so many casualties, but we found no solution at all. I want to tell about the curses that the followers of Narváez threw at Cortés, and how they damned him and the country and even Diego Velázquez for sending them there, when they had been peacefully settled in their homes in Cuba.

To return to our story. We decided to ask for peace so that we could leave Mexico. With dawn came many more squadrons of warriors, and when Cortés saw them, he decided to have Montezuma speak to them from a rooftop and tell them to stop the fighting and that we wished to leave his city. They say that he answered, very upset, “What more does Malinche want from me? I do not want to live, or listen to him, because of the fate he has forced on me.” He would not come, and it was said too that he said that he did not want to see or hear Cortés, or listen to any more of his promises and lies.

The Mercedarian father and Cristóbal de Olid went to him, and showed him great reverence and spoke most affectionately, but Montezuma said, “I do not believe that I can do anything to end this war, for they have already elevated another lord and have decided not to let you leave here alive.”

Nevertheless Montezuma stationed himself behind a battlement on a roof top with many of our soldiers to guard him and began to speak to the Mexicans in very affectionate terms, asking them to stop the war and telling them that we would leave Mexico. Many Mexican chiefs and captains, recognizing him, ordered their men to be quiet, and not to shoot stones or arrows. Four of them reached a place where they were able to talk to Montezuma, and they said, crying as they talked, “Oh, Lord, our great lord, how greatly we are afflicted by your misfortune, and that of your sons and relations! We have to let you know that we have already raised one of your kinsmen to be our lord.”

They said that he was named Coadlavaca, lord of Iztapalapa. They also said that the war would have to go on to the end, for they had promised their idols not to stop until all of us were killed, and they prayed every day that he would be kept free and safe from our power. As everything would come out as they desired, they would not fail to hold him in higher regard as their lord than before, and they asked him to pardon them.

They had hardly finished this speech when there was such a shower of stones and javelins that Montezuma was hit by three stones, one on the head, another on the arm, and the third on the leg, for our men who were shielding him neglected to do so for a moment, because they saw that the attack had stopped while he was speaking with his chiefs.

They begged him to be doctored and to eat something, speaking very kindly to him, but he wouldn’t, and when we least expected it they came to say that he was dead.

Cortés wept for him, and all of our captains and soldiers. There were men among us who cried as though he had been our father, and it is not surprising, considering how good he was. It was said that he had ruled for seventeen years and that he was the best king Mexico had ever had.

… I have already told about the sorrow we felt when we saw that Montezuma was dead. We even thought badly about the Mercedarian father, who was always with him, for not having persuaded him to turn Christian. He gave as an excuse that he didn’t think Montezuma would die from those wounds, but he did say that he should have ordered something given to stupefy him.

Finally Cortés directed that a priest and a chief among those we had imprisoned should be freed so that they could go and tell Coadlavaca and his captains that the great Montezuma was dead and that they had seen him die from the wounds his own people had caused him.

Essay question and outline: Write a Brief Essay Response examining how both the Aztecs and the Spanish portrayed Motecuhzoma’s death to their own advantage. Use evidence from the Document to support your points. (The Document is already an Excerpt, so please read the entire Document.)

Write a Brief Essay Response examining how both the Aztecs and the Spanish portrayed Motecuhzoma’s death to their own advantage. Use evidence from the Document to support your points. (The Document is already an Excerpt, so please read the entire Document.)

A Brief Essay Response should consist of at least 8 sentences, following this format:

A topic sentence that answers the essay question generally.

A sentence that makes your first point or gives your first answer.

A sentence that further supports, illustrates, or discusses the first point or first answer

A sentence that makes your second point or gives your second answer.

A sentence that further supports, illustrates, or discusses the second point or second answer.

A sentence that makes your third point or gives your third answer.

A sentence that further supports, illustrates, or discusses the third point or third answer.

A concluding sentence that relates what your Sentence 2 thru Sentence 7 have to do with the Topic Sentence 1.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Psychology homework help

2 page Case study due in 6 hours

PSYCH 105: Introductory Psychology

Due October 29th, 2018,

20 pts (10% of your course grade)

The Case Study Assignment

THE PURPOSE:

Knowledge:

After completing this assignment, you will understand:

1) How casual explanations of behavior made by the average person compare to those made by psychologists.

2) How psychological principles can be used to explain human behavior.

Skills:

After completing this assignment, you will be able to:

1) Adopt the mindset of a psychologist and form specific, functional connections between the course material

(i.e., the science of human behavior) and your own personal experience.

2) Use the information you have learned in this course (i.e., psychological terminology, principles, concepts,

and/or theories) to explain behavior you observe in the real world.

YOUR TASK:

You will need to recruit a friend or acquaintance to assist you with this assignment. This individual should be a person who has no formal training in psychology (i.e., has not taken a psychology course or received some other form of training on the topic). Ideally, this person will have the opportunity to make a behavioral observation along with you. That way, you are both witnessing the behavior in real time, under the same conditions and circumstances. Be sure to explain this assignment to your friend ahead of time and get permission to use her/his input in your write-up (see below).

Over the next few days, your task is to pay attention to your behavior and the behavior of others around you. You are looking for situations and interactions that you and a friend can collectively observe and then discuss, interpret, and analyze together. Your friend will provide the perspective of the “casual observer” (i.e., the average person). You will provide the perspective of the “social scientist” and use the information you have learned in this course (i.e., psychological terminology, principles, concepts, and/or theories) to explain what you have witnessed. For these reasons, you should focus on observations you can link to any of the topics covered in the course thus far in the semester.

Your behavior observation will be referred to as your “case study.” Once you and your friend have completed the observation, you will construct a “case study write-up” that includes the following information:

1) Date of the behavioral observation (i.e., case study).

2) Location of the case study.

3) Brief Case Description. This description should include any and all details needed to provide a complete

description of the event/observation for someone who did not witness it first-hand. Avoid specific personal identifying details, such as names, to protect the privacy of the people you observe but be sure to provide a comprehensive description of the event itself and the behavior of the persons involved.

4) Casual Explanation. This explanation will be provided by your friend/acquaintance. Ask your friend to

describe what she/he observed and to provide an explanation for, or interpretation of, the behavior. How does the “average person” view the behavior(s) observed? What explanation does she/he give for those behaviors?

5) Psychological Application. This application will be provided by you (the social scientist). In doing so, you will

seek to analyze/explain/interpret the behavior(s) you observed using what you have learned in this course. You will provide functional connections between your observations and relevant course material (i.e., a specific psychological concept, principle, or theory). Be sure to discuss your case study using appropriate psychological terminology. You must also incorporate information from ONE academic source into your analysis (this CANNOT be your textbook). Be sure to cite that source both in text and in a Reference list at the end of your assignment using APA editorial style. You should avoid internet sources, with the exception of electronic versions of articles from peer-reviewed journals.

6) Compare/Contrast. Compare and contrast the explanations provided by your friend (the casual observer) and

you (the social scientist). Were the explanations similar or different? In what ways? Did you focus on different aspects of behavior when trying to explain it? If you focus on different factors/variables when trying to explain the behavior? What did you learn from this exercise about casual, everyday explanations of behavior and those provided by the scientific study of behavior?

7) Reference list. Provide a complete reference entry for any source cited in your psychological application

discussion. The APA tutorial from Assignment 1 covers citation and APA format for journal article references. You are encouraged to use the APA resources posted in Blackboard for help with APA format.

THE CRITERIA:

Review the grading criteria for this assignment on the attached grading rubric (see page 3) to understand what you need to address in your case study to earn points on this assignment.

Your Completed Assignment MUST Include:

1) ONE behavioral observation of events in your own life.

2) A 2-3 page write-up (12 point Times New Roman font, double-spaced and 1 inch margins) in which

you summarize and then compare/contrast the two perspectives/explanations specified in this assignment (i.e., a causal/everyday explanation [provided by a third party] and the explanation based on scientific investigation).

3) Full in-text and Reference list citation for the research sources used to complete the assignment (in APA editorial

format).

4) A copy of the grading rubric (found at the end of this assignment). Be sure to complete and sign the academic

integrity statement before submitting your assignment.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION FOR THE ASSIGNMENT:

Chances are you have made a lot of casual observations of human behavior in your lifetime. You have probably also speculated about the causes of many of those behaviors (i.e., asked yourself “why did so-and-so behave that way?”). Psychologists are also keen observers of human behavior. However, in contrast to the average person, psychologists are interested in determining the causes of behavior using the scientific method and using what they learn to explain other instances of similar behavior. When we say psychology is an “applied” science, we are highlighting how psychologists use scientific inquiry to understand behavior and then apply what they have learned to solve problems in the real world.

This assignment will teach you how to adopt the mindset of a psychologist and form specific, functional connections between the course material (i.e., the science of human behavior) and your own personal experience.

REMEMBER: Your write-up should consist of complete, understandable sentences with proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Clearly label your work following the example given above. Carefully proof-read your paper before submitting it to avoid losing points.

PRINT THIS PAGE and staple it to your assignment for use during grading.

The grading rubric below will be used to evaluate this assignment. Addressing each element of the rubric well will ensure that you have included all critical aspects of the assignment.

Academic Integrity: Any student caught plagiarizing this assignment will receive an F for the assignment and will be formally reported to the Office of Student Conduct. To reinforce academic integrity, insert your name in the statement below and provide your signature prior to submission.

“I, ______________________________________________, verify that this assignment is my original work.”

Your Signature: _______________________________________________________________

THE GRADING RUBRIC

MECHANICS & STYLE (25% = 5 points)

1) Are there 3 or more errors in spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation? If so, -2 pts

2) Are sentences logically related to one another? If not … -1 pt

3) Is the paper’s overall organization consistent and logical? If not . . . -2 pts

APA FORMAT (20% = 4 points)

1) Are the in-text citations in APA Format?

Only 1-2 errors -1 pt

3 or more errors -2 pts

2) Are the references on Reference page in APA format?

Only 1-2 errors -1 pt

3 or more errors -2 pts

NOTE: Failure to include citations for references in your assignment is considered plagiarism so

please be sure to cite all resources you use.

CONTENT (60% = 11 points)

1) Does the write up include a detailed description of an event involving the behavior of

one or more individuals under “real world” conditions” Does the description provide

sufficient details of all behaviors observed (including verbal and nonverbal) so that

someone who has not witnessed it would still have a clear understanding of what had

occurred? ____/3 pts

2) Does the write-up provide a critical analysis that compares and contrasts two

potential explanations or interpretations of the behavior, including:

a) one everyday, casual explanation provided by a third party [i.e., a friend]

and ____/4 pts

b) another explanation that uses a psychological principle/theory/concept to

explain the behavior(s)? ____/4 pts

Was the assignment late? _________

(2 pt deduction per/day including the due date if assignment was submitted after class)

NOTE: Assignments submitted more than 3 days past their deadline will not be accepted.

FINAL GRADE (Mechanics/Style + Format + Content minus any late deductions): _______/20 points

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Nursing 6300

Week 2: Discussion: Evolving Roles in Learning

Post your ideas on the roles of learners and educators in your practice setting. Note: In describing personal examples, do not use actual names. Your post should address the following:

First paragraph

Describe a teaching/learning situation in which you participated, either as a learner or as a teacher, in your nursing practice. Analyze the experience to determine the degree to which power for making major educational decisions was shared among the instructor and the learner or learners.

Second paragraph

What assumptions, in your view, were being made about the roles of the instructor and learner in this situation? Provide a rationale for your views.

Third paragraph

State whether you think this educational encounter was more learner-centered or teacher-centered, and explain why you think so.

Fourth paragraph

Reflecting on other examples of teaching/learning in your nursing practice, provide twoillustrations of how the roles of learners—whether they are nurses or patients—would change if learner-centered principles were incorporated to a greater extent. Similarly, describe two ways in which the roles of educators would change.

Fifth paragraph

What benefits and challenges would arise as a result of these changes in the balance of power between learner and educator?

Sixth paragraph

Cite one concise argument you could give to colleagues for why learner-centered education would be beneficial in your work setting.

Seventh paragraph

Summarize discussion

 

Reading Resources (see attached chapters)

• Course Text: Developing Learner-Centered Teaching: A Practical Guide for FacultyChapter 5—“The Role of the Instructor”

  How can educators become less “teacher-centered” in their educational approaches? This chapter defines how the role of the teacher must change in order to facilitate learner-centered teaching.

  Chapter 6—“The Responsibility for Learning”

  After reviewing characteristics of college students today and traditional methods for promoting learning, this chapter identifies the actions required of students to make learner-centered education successful. Included are suggestions for encouraging students to accept increasing responsibility for their learning.

  Chapter 8—“The Balance of Power”

  This chapter describes the ways that power can be redistributed in educational settings to encourage greater learner responsibility and, in turn, more effective learning.

• Course Text: National League for Nursing’s Certification Governance Committee. (2005). The scope of practice for academic nurse educators. National League for Nursing: New York, NY.The role of academic nursing education in advancing professional nursing is discussed in this document. Also, the document provides the National League for Nursing’s (NLN) hallmarks of excellence in nursing and their core competencies of nurse educators.
• Article: Diekelmann, N., & Lampe, S. (2004). Student-centered pedagogies: Co-creating compelling experiences using the new pedagogies. Journal of Nursing Education, 43(6), 245–247. (CINAHL Plus with Full Text)This article recounts the experience of a nurse educator who gradually transformed her teaching by being less focused on “covering content” and more attuned to allowing learning experiences to be co-created by her students.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"